Topic List

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

VanananaHeyHey

Topics: 74

Posts: 120
Last Post: 10:36:23am, 09/02/2022
Absolutely opposed.

Support is the right of the child.

Men can already choose to terminate their parental rights. Men and women can already make legal agreements to not have one party involved in the child's life. Men have control over where they deposit their sperm and, if they're that worried, they can just not have one-night stands or wrap it up. Them's the breaks. The vanishingly few women who would trawl nightclubs looking to sap your fluids for financial gain are not worthy of a societal overhaul or new law permitting "financial abortion," a term which flattens and conflates the possible burdens artificially.

Tough shit that women (theoretically if not legally) have control over their own bodies. They also bear the full physical burden of carrying to term or not, so obviously it's not and shouldn't be treated "the same" or have some kind of concocted "equality" that would only benefit men.

---
https://imgur.com/vA0mIdX
Vanai CE's official linguist, War-tor-le and Charizard


Manual Topics: 0
Last Topic:
[none]

Manual Posts: 0
Last Post:
[none]
---