Last Topic: 11:54:11am, 10/28/2023
Last Post: 10:41:05am, 04/02/2024
There we are, yes, this can be an excellent debate. We should always have an answer that is the most optimal. Imagine a live debate that goes on when the question is posed but answered by a logician, Oh the logic of this post is fallacious, and so and so and you are a terrible human being if I can call you human. These things may seem efficient and save time, but it isnt the most optimal because there isnt no answer to the original question and only seeks to waste time with no progress and only serves to slow things down. We are all not robots that are objective and logical we have our biases and emotions. For example, objectively, we should try to right the wrongs with every group, but not everybody will get equal treatment. Thats what makes us human and we should admit that.
---
Using ML to predict financial/gambling markets with 100% certainty based on retraining past data should be humbling for geared Automatons of the past.