Current Events > Report: Avengers: Kang Dynasty Is Getting a Name Change, and Could Drop Kang

Topic List	Page List: 1
Pikachuchupika 02/22/24 1:04:19 PM #1:	https://gizmodo.com/marvel-avengers-kang-dynasty-name-change-jonathan-major-1851274375 could drop Kang entirely. Ugh. <cite>Pikachuchupika posted [p:978982564] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>https://gizmodo.com/marvel-avengers-kang-dynasty-name-change-jonathan-major-1851274375could drop Kang entirely. Ugh. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BigB0ss13 02/22/24 1:05:11 PM #2:	I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2 <cite>BigB0ss13 posted [p:978982575] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pokedude900 02/22/24 1:06:50 PM #3:	Remember when we just recast characters instead of erasing them from the story? --- https://i.imgur.com/lfI7zGE.jpg https://i.imgur.com/tgLNUuX.jpg Come to the (un)official GameFAQs Touhou board. http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1110- <cite>pokedude900 posted [p:978982610] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Remember when we just recast characters instead of erasing them from the story? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/22/24 1:07:02 PM #4:	BigB0ss13 posted... I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2 And Guardians of the Galaxy 4. <cite>Zikten posted [p:978982615] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>BigB0ss13 posted... </cite><quote>I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2</quote>And Guardians of the Galaxy 4. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaldrenthebold 02/22/24 1:07:53 PM #5:	pokedude900 posted... Remember when we just recast characters instead of erasing them from the story? War Machine remembers --- http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u223/chocolateFRESH/arts/kraid.png - Thanks GP cosmonaut! http://i.imgur.com/TuJWAR8.jpg <cite>Kaldrenthebold posted [p:978982626] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>pokedude900 posted... </cite><quote>Remember when we just recast characters instead of erasing them from the story?</quote>War Machine remembers </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 02/22/24 1:08:56 PM #6:	Man, as if the MCU couldn't get more turbulent. That dude really messed things up, didn't he? --- (He/Him) I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:978982647] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Man, as if the MCU couldn't get more turbulent. That dude really messed things up, didn't he? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 02/22/24 1:10:05 PM #7:	That would be a really stupid decision. They spent all this time building up Kang as the next big bad. Just recast him ffs --- Steam/Xbox/PSN = NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:978982670] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>That would be a really stupid decision. They spent all this time building up Kang as the next big bad. Just recast him ffs </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PerseusRad 02/22/24 1:12:10 PM #8:	To be honest, Im pretty sure people were cold on Kang before the Jonathon Majors stuff. Seeing him get beat by a bunch of ants really hurt his image, even if part of the point is that he didnt have all his technology. Thanos failed before IW, but only through his intermediaries. <cite>PerseusRad posted [p:978982705] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>To be honest, Im pretty sure people were cold on Kang before the Jonathon Majors stuff. Seeing him get beat by a bunch of ants really hurt his image, even if part of the point is that he didnt have all his technology. Thanos failed before IW, but only through his intermediaries.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 02/22/24 1:12:40 PM #9:	"Just recast him" doesn't work because people by and large just don't care about Kang --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:978982713] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>"Just recast him" doesn't work because people by and large just don't care about Kang </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tenlaar 02/22/24 1:14:26 PM #10:	PerseusRad posted... To be honest, Im pretty sure people were cold on Kang before the Jonathon Majors stuff. Seeing him get beat by a bunch of ants really hurt his image, even if part of the point is that he didnt have all his technology. Thanos failed before IW, but only through his intermediaries. The Kang in Quantumania was not the actual Kang threat and that was made clear in the movie. <cite>Tenlaar posted [p:978982753] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>PerseusRad posted... </cite><quote>To be honest, Im pretty sure people were cold on Kang before the Jonathon Majors stuff. Seeing him get beat by a bunch of ants really hurt his image, even if part of the point is that he didnt have all his technology. Thanos failed before IW, but only through his intermediaries.</quote>The Kang in Quantumania was not the actual Kang threat and that was made clear in the movie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 02/22/24 1:15:46 PM #11:	Also that post-credits scene in Quantamania did not help. --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:978982779] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Also that post-credits scene in Quantamania did not help. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PerseusRad 02/22/24 1:16:32 PM #12:	Tenlaar posted... The Kang in Quantumania was not the actual Kang threat and that was made clear in the movie. Sure, but it doesnt stop people from thinking he looked pathetic, even if, again, it was justified. Thanos had mystique, and showed up when he finally got in on the action, Kang lost hard, even if it was only one of many. Im just saying how general audiences take it. <cite>PerseusRad posted [p:978982794] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Tenlaar posted... </cite><quote>The Kang in Quantumania was not the actual Kang threat and that was made clear in the movie.</quote>Sure, but it doesnt stop people from thinking he looked pathetic, even if, again, it was justified. Thanos had mystique, and showed up when he finally got in on the action, Kang lost hard, even if it was only one of many. Im just saying how general audiences take it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClayGuida 02/22/24 1:16:48 PM #13:	NoxObscuras posted... That would be a really stupid decision. They spent all this time building up Kang as the next big bad. Just recast him ffs Lol no they didn't. They spent 2 seasons of TV and a one off film in antman. --- lolAmerica <cite>ClayGuida posted [p:978982799] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>NoxObscuras posted... </cite><quote>That would be a really stupid decision. They spent all this time building up Kang as the next big bad. Just recast him ffs</quote>Lol no they didn't. They spent 2 seasons of TV and a one off film in antman. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 02/22/24 1:16:50 PM #14:	BigB0ss13 posted... I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2 --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7T2OR-O2Vk <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:978982802] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>BigB0ss13 posted... </cite><quote>I don't care about any of this crap just make Shang Chi 2</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/22/24 1:18:08 PM #15:	ClayGuida posted... Lol no they didn't. They spent 2 seasons of TV and a one off film in antman. And most people don't watch the shows. No matter how popular they might be, the overall global audience mostly only watches the movies <cite>Zikten posted [p:978982840] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>ClayGuida posted... </cite><quote>Lol no they didn't. They spent 2 seasons of TV and a one off film in antman.</quote>And most people don't watch the shows. No matter how popular they might be, the overall global audience mostly only watches the movies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dancing_cactuar 02/22/24 1:19:17 PM #16:	Recasting won't help because nobody gives a shit about Kang and people consider him a joke after the supposedly most dangerous variant got beat by hyperintelligent ants and a giant Spy Kids tier CGI head. You're trying to salvage a plotline that's already in the gutter of interest. --- Believing that Disney movies are for families is akin to buying into Nazi propaganda- LoyalToTheGame PS5s have liquid metal tech like the T-1000- AceCombatX <cite>dancing_cactuar posted [p:978982871] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Recasting won't help because nobody gives a shit about Kang and people consider him a joke after the supposedly most dangerous variant got beat by hyperintelligent ants and a giant Spy Kids tier CGI head. You're trying to salvage a plotline that's already in the gutter of interest. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chaos_knight 02/22/24 1:20:10 PM #17:	Kang is a shit tier big bad. Move on to Secret Wars and Dr. Doom. --- Seattle Seahawks Super Bowl XLVIII Champions <cite>chaos_knight posted [p:978982884] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Kang is a shit tier big bad. Move on to Secret Wars and Dr. Doom. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZevLoveDOOM 02/22/24 1:20:41 PM #18:	well i guess Dr. Doom about to become the next big bad baddie of the MCU now... <cite>ZevLoveDOOM posted [p:978982892] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>well i guess Dr. Doom about to become the next big bad baddie of the MCU now...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnsteadyOwl 02/22/24 1:21:00 PM #19:	My only concern with changing course is that they allow enough time to come up with a good story for whoever the new villain is going to be, even if that means pushing the movie back. If what we get is essentially a Kang story that's been hastily reworked to try to make it a Dr. Doom story then it's probably going to suck. --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." <cite>UnsteadyOwl posted [p:978982902] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>My only concern with changing course is that they allow enough time to come up with a good story for whoever the new villain is going to be, even if that means pushing the movie back. If what we get is essentially a Kang story that's been hastily reworked to try to make it a Dr. Doom story then it's probably going to suck. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 02/22/24 1:24:02 PM #20:	Remember when Thanos looked different in every movie? --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:978982947] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Remember when Thanos looked different in every movie? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nemu 02/22/24 1:24:38 PM #21:	They definitely did not introduce or hype the character well at all. Introducing the concept in a TV show and then introducing him in one of the low tier movies was not a great idea. <cite>Nemu posted [p:978982957] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>They definitely did not introduce or hype the character well at all. Introducing the concept in a TV show and then introducing him in one of the low tier movies was not a great idea.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 02/22/24 1:25:44 PM #22:	UnsteadyOwl posted... My only concern with changing course is that they allow enough time to come up with a good story for whoever the new villain is going to be, even if that means pushing the movie back. If what we get is essentially a Kang story that's been hastily reworked to try to make it a Dr. Doom story then it's probably going to suck. They waited too long to put out another Avengers. We don't need every crossover to be Thanos-tier threatening. That's not how the first few phases did things. Make the next Avengers movie villain Dr. Doom so he can act like this next phase's Loki in being the bad guy who occasionally has to work with the good guys, and THEN build up towards who would be threatening enough for Doom to suffer through working with Reed. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:978982974] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>UnsteadyOwl posted... </cite><quote>My only concern with changing course is that they allow enough time to come up with a good story for whoever the new villain is going to be, even if that means pushing the movie back. If what we get is essentially a Kang story that's been hastily reworked to try to make it a Dr. Doom story then it's probably going to suck.</quote>They waited too long to put out another Avengers. We don't need every crossover to be Thanos-tier threatening. That's not how the first few phases did things. Make the next Avengers movie villain Dr. Doom so he can act like this next phase's Loki in being the bad guy who occasionally has to work with the good guys, and THEN build up towards who would be threatening enough for Doom to suffer through working with Reed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero 02/22/24 1:26:56 PM #23:	Zikten posted... And Guardians of the Galaxy 4. Lol ain't no way that's happening --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame_Zero posted [p:978982994] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite><quote>And Guardians of the Galaxy 4.</quote>Lol ain't no way that's happening </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jagr_68 02/22/24 1:27:47 PM #24:	Foppe posted... Remember when Thanos looked different in every movie? Josh Brolin couldn't help those overworked and starving Disney artists from taking 10 years to fully get his giant fucking chin correct. --- New York Rangers [2004-2008] https://media.giphy.com/media/WvQHBYW0q4TuxdAg61/giphy.gif https://psnprofiles.com/Jaromiroquai68 <cite>Jagr_68 posted [p:978983005] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Foppe posted... </cite><quote>Remember when Thanos looked different in every movie?</quote>Josh Brolin couldn't help those overworked and starving Disney artists from taking 10 years to fully get his giant fucking chin correct. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueTigerLion 02/22/24 1:29:10 PM #25:	I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast. --- Hey now. <cite>BlueTigerLion posted [p:978983030] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masterpug53 02/22/24 1:32:52 PM #26:	BlueTigerLion posted... I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast. I'd say it's pretty clear that they simply don't have faith in the ongoing Kang storyline at this point, considering that - like you said - this is an easy-mode recast from a narrative / continuity perspective. --- Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read. <cite>masterpug53 posted [p:978983087] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite><quote>I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast.</quote>I'd say it's pretty clear that they simply don't have faith in the ongoing Kang storyline at this point, considering that - like you said - this is an easy-mode recast from a narrative / continuity perspective. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnsteadyOwl 02/22/24 1:34:18 PM #27:	BlueTigerLion posted... I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast. Maybe they could even bring back Terrence Howard and Edward Norton as variants of Rhodey and Bruce. --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." <cite>UnsteadyOwl posted [p:978983117] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite><quote>I could understand dropping characters in the previous Gen of movies. But with this multiversal stuff seems like it made it even easier to recast anyone. Just say they are a variant and recast.</quote>Maybe they could even bring back Terrence Howard and Edward Norton as variants of Rhodey and Bruce. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClayGuida 02/22/24 1:35:17 PM #28:	I'd skip doom for now, replace Kang with galactus and go from there. They've already introduced the eternals, and the various celestials, eternity, and so on, just throw in galactus and then build towards doom instead of rushing him. --- lolAmerica <cite>ClayGuida posted [p:978983134] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>I'd skip doom for now, replace Kang with galactus and go from there. They've already introduced the eternals, and the various celestials, eternity, and so on, just throw in galactus and then build towards doom instead of rushing him. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pauIie 02/22/24 1:38:14 PM #29:	Ivynn posted... "Just recast him" doesn't work because people by and large just don't care about Kang yeah i only cared about kang because of majors (prior to the abuse coming out. fuck majors). --- http://i.imgur.com/O5APL.jpg http://www.last.fm/user/jaeganja <cite>pauIie posted [p:978983186] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>Ivynn posted... </cite><quote>"Just recast him" doesn't work because people by and large just don't care about Kang</quote>yeah i only cared about kang because of majors (prior to the abuse coming out. fuck majors). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueTigerLion 02/22/24 1:39:14 PM #30:	UnsteadyOwl posted... Maybe they could even bring back Terrence Howard and Edward Norton as variants of Rhodey and Bruce. If Secret Wars doesn't have Human Torch Chris Evans meeting Captain America Chris Evans I will be disappointed. --- Hey now. <cite>BlueTigerLion posted [p:978983209] in Report: Av... [t:80703218]...</cite> <quote>UnsteadyOwl posted... </cite><quote>Maybe they could even bring back Terrence Howard and Edward Norton as variants of Rhodey and Bruce.</quote>If Secret Wars doesn't have Human Torch Chris Evans meeting Captain America Chris Evans I will be disappointed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Report: Avengers: Kang Dynasty Is Getting a Name Change, and Could Drop Kang (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Report: Avengers: Kang Dynasty Is Getting a Name Change, and Could Drop Kang