Current Events > CE what is your reaction time?

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/20995e03.jpg
i wanna see someone get sub 200

Tried a few times. Got 448 and it guessed my age correctly at 37. Most tried were between 300-400

Best try was 295, which I held down the button and released when I saw it.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f9adb056.jpg

tried 10 times or so, got numbers ranging from 270 to 330

Tried a few times and got around 350 ms (25 year old). Best was 298 ms, 18 year old. (I'm 35)

Goddamn 184. That didnt take long lol

IYKYK

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/5/7/AAAHH2AACAVZ.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/eb5396b8.jpg

I consistently get between 300 and 350. Lowest was 305 and it said 19 years old. I turn 48 in 2 months. I think the 40+ years of video games probably helps me vs most people my age.

Just for info, if you're doing this on a touchscreen you're gonna get much worse scores than if you use a microswitched mouse.

Give it a go - you'll probably save at least 100 ms on a computer Vs a phone

DarkDoc posted...

Just for info, if you're doing this on a touchscreen you're gonna get much worse scores than if you use a microswitched mouse.

Give it a go - you'll probably save at least 100 ms on a computer Vs a phone

Interesting. I was using a touchscreen on my tablet and I was pretty satisfied with my times for my age.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lA3S03sbjYc

Also, shoulda posted as a poll. Like this

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/722788-ultra-street-fighter-iv/69811366

Best I got was 321. Yeah I would imagine input lag affects the results.

360 milliseconds, but I'm on my phone. It's definitely faster with a mouse

I just did it 10 times in a row on a phone. My age came out between 32-38 every time. I'm 46.

Leaning close to the monitor helps.

Verdekal posted...

Leaning close to the monitor helps.

Yes less time for the light to travel to your eyes.

My best was 29 year old at 386. Got that twice and 34 once which is closer to my age.

After the first time (where I was getting used to what I was looking for), I was getting between 300 and 320 on most runs. The game thought I was around 20 (I'm 32).

Also, doing it in the morning will get you much better results than late at night.

Keep doing it at 3-hour intervals, you'll notice you don't get the same result twice.

That's one bad test.

https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

VeggetaX posted...

IYKYK

unknown command: cl_righthand 0

GunmaN1905 posted...

https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

Oh neat. That was the test I was thinking of but couldn't remember it(I also forgot I had it bookmarked <_<).

Error 403 Forbidden

258 second try

didnt know what to expect

GunmaN1905 posted...

https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

That was the one discussed in the thread I linked to back in reply 13.

Dunno if it's just the nature of the test (ie less distractions), or the way it's programmed, but the results are very different between the two.

150-199 is my range. It doesn't like me.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/7c32b154.jpg

Like, it's clear everybody on this board is getting a few years below their actual age, so tonight I tried this on my parents.

My dad (79) managed to get 48 and 50.

My mum (79) did it three times and got between 28 and 35...

Really think they need to recalibrate.

Yeah, my reaction is slow. This is why I can't play online shooters.

it kept saying i was either 18 or not human, and i'm 38.

and also after some beers. i think it was on here that i saw someone showing off some nice black and tans, so i'm having that.

I think this test sucks. I used on source and 245 ms on average.
https://www.arealme.com/reaction-test/en/#google_vignette
With that site before I was getting like 500 ms.

Yeah, on human benchmark the global average after millions of votes is about 250 ms. Granted, it's a slightly different test, but the site linked here seems to be giving 450 ms as an average result.

Plus of course, I've yet to hear from anybody who didn't get 5-10 years younger than they actually are.

Worst

Very very old person

1769ms

(My touch screen didnt register.)

Best

Not human

no no idea on time as my finger hit twice starting another try.