Current Events > Breaking: King Charles Has Cancer.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Mechu 02/05/24 4:40:20 PM #51:	Holy shit. --- Constant isolation and distress. <cite>Mechu posted [p:978672272] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Holy shit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 02/05/24 5:14:26 PM #52:	5. Mary I (5 years, 121 days) Queen Mary I was the only surviving child of Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. A devout Catholic, Mary was kept from her mother after her parents marriage was annulled and was forced to serve in her half-sisters household as a lady-in-waiting. Mary came to the throne after her brother, King Edward VI, died in 1553 and left his throne to Lady Jane Grey. Marys supporters overturned the young Lady Jane Grey in less than two weeks. Mary worked to return England to Catholicism, a move which earned her the moniker Bloody Mary that persists to this day. Mary died in 1558, childless, from what historians now think was ovarian cancer. 4. James II (3 years, 309 days) King James II was the last Catholic King of England. The younger son of King Charles I, he lived most of his formative years in exile in France, and returned to England with the restoration of the monarch in 1660. His brother, King Charles II, did not have any legitimate children, so James inherited the throne. His reign was marked by a push for religious tolerance, especially for Catholics. James was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and his elder daughter, Queen Mary II, and her husband, King William III, were chosen to be co-monarchs. 3. Richard III (2 years, 57 days) King Richard III remains one of the most divisive monarchs in England history to this day. The younger brother of King Edward IV, he played a significant role in his brothers reign. After his brother died and his nephews disappeared from the Tower of London, Richard claimed the throne. He was defeated by Henry Tudors forces at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, and was the last Yorkist King and the final person in the Plantagenet line. His body was found under a Leicester car park in 2012, and was reburied in Greyfriars Church in Leicester. 2. Edward V (78 days) King Edward V, also known as the elder of the Princes in the Tower, was the son of King Edward IV. Edward was never crowned, and was a pawn in the power struggles won by his uncle, who became King Richard III. Edward, and his younger brother, Richard, were taken into the Tower of London by their uncle who said he was protecting them. However, just 78 days after the death of his father, the young Edward was deposed. Soon afterwards, he was seen in the Tower for the final time. The mystery of what happened to the Princes in the Tower has never been solved. 1. Lady Jane Grey (9 days) Lady Jane Grey, also known as the Nine Days Queen, holds the record for the shortest reign in English history. King Henry VIIIs son, King Edward VI, decided to name the Protestant Lady Jane Grey as his successor upon his death at the age of 15. Descended through Edwards aunt, Princess Mary and Charles Brandon, Jane was given a Humanist education. She married Lord Guildford Dudley in 1553. Edward drafted a will that altered the line of succession, bypassing his Catholic half-sister, Mary. Although Mary had forces behind her, the Privy Council proclaimed Jane Queen of England and Ireland on 10 July 1553, but by 19 July, they had switched their allegiance to Mary Tudor. Jane was charged with high treason and convicted. Jane was beheaded at the Tower of London on 12 February 1554, and is buried in the Church of St. Peter Ad Vincula at the Tower. --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:978672963] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote><quote>5. Mary I (5 years, 121 days)Queen Mary I was the only surviving child of Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. A devout Catholic, Mary was kept from her mother after her parents marriage was annulled and was forced to serve in her half-sisters household as a lady-in-waiting. Mary came to the throne after her brother, King Edward VI, died in 1553 and left his throne to Lady Jane Grey. Marys supporters overturned the young Lady Jane Grey in less than two weeks. Mary worked to return England to Catholicism, a move which earned her the moniker Bloody Mary that persists to this day. Mary died in 1558, childless, from what historians now think was ovarian cancer. 4. James II (3 years, 309 days) King James II was the last Catholic King of England. The younger son of King Charles I, he lived most of his formative years in exile in France, and returned to England with the restoration of the monarch in 1660. His brother, King Charles II, did not have any legitimate children, so James inherited the throne. His reign was marked by a push for religious tolerance, especially for Catholics. James was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and his elder daughter, Queen Mary II, and her husband, King William III, were chosen to be co-monarchs. 3. Richard III (2 years, 57 days) King Richard III remains one of the most divisive monarchs in England history to this day. The younger brother of King Edward IV, he played a significant role in his brothers reign. After his brother died and his nephews disappeared from the Tower of London, Richard claimed the throne. He was defeated by Henry Tudors forces at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, and was the last Yorkist King and the final person in the Plantagenet line. His body was found under a Leicester car park in 2012, and was reburied in Greyfriars Church in Leicester. 2. Edward V (78 days)King Edward V, also known as the elder of the Princes in the Tower, was the son of King Edward IV. Edward was never crowned, and was a pawn in the power struggles won by his uncle, who became King Richard III. Edward, and his younger brother, Richard, were taken into the Tower of London by their uncle who said he was protecting them. However, just 78 days after the death of his father, the young Edward was deposed. Soon afterwards, he was seen in the Tower for the final time. The mystery of what happened to the Princes in the Tower has never been solved. 1. Lady Jane Grey (9 days)Lady Jane Grey, also known as the Nine Days Queen, holds the record for the shortest reign in English history. King Henry VIIIs son, King Edward VI, decided to name the Protestant Lady Jane Grey as his successor upon his death at the age of 15. Descended through Edwards aunt, Princess Mary and Charles Brandon, Jane was given a Humanist education. She married Lord Guildford Dudley in 1553. Edward drafted a will that altered the line of succession, bypassing his Catholic half-sister, Mary. Although Mary had forces behind her, the Privy Council proclaimed Jane Queen of England and Ireland on 10 July 1553, but by 19 July, they had switched their allegiance to Mary Tudor. Jane was charged with high treason and convicted. Jane was beheaded at the Tower of London on 12 February 1554, and is buried in the Church of St. Peter Ad Vincula at the Tower.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 02/05/24 5:21:03 PM #53:	damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded --- Not to say that I'm in love with you but who's to say that I'm not? <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:978673104] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 02/05/24 5:28:56 PM #54:	Damn_Underscore posted... damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded she was only like 15 lol --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:978673274] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite><quote>damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded</quote>she was only like 15 lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/05/24 5:29:07 PM #55:	Damn_Underscore posted... damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded Late Tuder/Elizabethan period was mental in terms shit like that. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978673276] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite><quote>damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded</quote>Late Tuder/Elizabethan period was mental in terms shit like that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ai123 02/05/24 5:52:37 PM #56:	Damn_Underscore posted... damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded She would probably have been spared, but her father got involved in a rebellion. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'. <cite>ai123 posted [p:978673690] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite><quote>damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded</quote>She would probably have been spared, but her father got involved in a rebellion. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/05/24 5:54:50 PM #57:	Jane Grey was killed for the actions of Henry 8. So fucked up <cite>Zikten posted [p:978673733] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Jane Grey was killed for the actions of Henry 8. So fucked up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 02/05/24 5:55:31 PM #58:	No deets? Kind, stage? --- Getting high and playing video games is the best! I swear to ducking God! <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:978673743] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>No deets? Kind, stage? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ironman2009 02/05/24 5:55:34 PM #59:	Oi bruv get the lad a tea and crumpet --- THRILLHO <cite>ironman2009 posted [p:978673745] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Oi bruv get the lad a tea and crumpet </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/05/24 5:56:30 PM #60:	mustachedmystic posted... No deets? Kind, stage? They would never reveal that. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978673763] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted... </cite><quote>No deets? Kind, stage?</quote>They would never reveal that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 02/05/24 5:58:05 PM #61:	spikethedevil posted... They would never reveal that. Even if he has stage 4 pancreatic Cancer and isnt expected to make it 6 months? --- Getting high and playing video games is the best! I swear to ducking God! <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:978673789] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>spikethedevil posted... </cite><quote>They would never reveal that.</quote>Even if he has stage 4 pancreatic Cancer and isnt expected to make it 6 months? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 02/05/24 6:00:41 PM #62:	Zikten posted... Jane Grey was killed for the actions of Henry 8. So fucked up That's medieval life for you. Or early modern period? The point is life before 1850 sucked. Ok, maybe before 1900. Oh right, the world wars.... Just be glad you were born today --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:978673832] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite><quote>Jane Grey was killed for the actions of Henry 8. So fucked up</quote>That's medieval life for you.Or early modern period?The point is life before 1850 sucked.Ok, maybe before 1900.Oh right, the world wars....Just be glad you were born today </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ai123 02/05/24 6:01:16 PM #63:	mustachedmystic posted... Even if he has stage 4 pancreatic Cancer and isnt expected to make it 6 months? They would never reveal that kind of personal medical detail. They would just say something like 'the King is gravely ill' when it became necessary. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'. <cite>ai123 posted [p:978673846] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted... </cite><quote>Even if he has stage 4 pancreatic Cancer and isnt expected to make it 6 months?</quote>They would never reveal that kind of personal medical detail.They would just say something like 'the King is gravely ill' when it became necessary. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Background_Guy 02/05/24 6:01:28 PM #64:	Damn_Underscore posted... damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded Well they don't call her Nice Mary <cite>Background_Guy posted [p:978673850] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite><quote>damn Jane Grey literally committed the crime of being Queen and got beheaded</quote>Well they don't call her Nice Mary</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/05/24 6:10:06 PM #65:	Ivynn posted... That's medieval life for you. Or early modern period? The point is life before 1850 sucked. Ok, maybe before 1900. Oh right, the world wars.... Just be glad you were born today Late medieval to early modern --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978673988] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Ivynn posted... </cite><quote>That's medieval life for you.Or early modern period?The point is life before 1850 sucked.Ok, maybe before 1900.Oh right, the world wars....Just be glad you were born today</quote>Late medieval to early modern </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 02/05/24 6:49:35 PM #66:	ai123 posted... They would never reveal that kind of personal medical detail. They would just say something like 'the King is gravely ill' when it became necessary. Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public. --- Getting high and playing video games is the best! I swear to ducking God! <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:978674753] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>ai123 posted... </cite><quote>They would never reveal that kind of personal medical detail.They would just say something like 'the King is gravely ill' when it became necessary.</quote>Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pokeweeb30 02/05/24 6:51:33 PM #67:	Its absurd that the monarchy is still a thing in the 21st century. --- Formerly known as maro_man aka lugi_lad. <cite>pokeweeb30 posted [p:978674793] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Its absurd that the monarchy is still a thing in the 21st century. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/05/24 7:40:21 PM #68:	mustachedmystic posted... Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public. They really dont. The BBC announced the Queens death hours after it happened and hid it very badly before the announcement. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978675761] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted... </cite><quote>Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public.</quote>They really dont. The BBC announced the Queens death hours after it happened and hid it very badly before the announcement. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 02/06/24 3:08:25 AM #69:	pokeweeb30 posted... Its absurd that the monarchy is still a thing in the 21st century. Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:978681979] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>pokeweeb30 posted... </cite><quote>Its absurd that the monarchy is still a thing in the 21st century.</quote>Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ai123 02/06/24 3:12:50 AM #70:	mustachedmystic posted... Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public. I think it's incredibly personal. There's no reason the details would be made public. Like I said, if he was dying, they would indicate that. But there's no need to be specific just because some (not all) famous people do. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'. <cite>ai123 posted [p:978681998] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted... </cite><quote>Dat really isnt that all dat personal. I know he isnt like an ordinary celebrity, but when a famous person has cancer those details are usually made public. Also, I would think if The King is dying, the government would want to prepare da public.</quote>I think it's incredibly personal. There's no reason the details would be made public.Like I said, if he was dying, they would indicate that. But there's no need to be specific just because some (not all) famous people do. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SHRlKE 02/06/24 3:24:24 AM #71:	solosnake posted... Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different The difference is that with the likes of Trump etc people have a choice. --- Come join us at the Sudoku + Other Pencil Puzzles Community Board. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1572-sudoku-plus-other-pencil-puzzles <cite>SHRlKE posted [p:978682066] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite><quote>Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different</quote>The difference is that with the likes of Trump etc people have a choice. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 02/06/24 3:32:45 AM #72:	SHRlKE posted... The difference is that with the likes of Trump etc people have a choice. Do we? Doesnt really seem that way most of the time. Musk is allowed to do whatever the fuck he wants. He is literally building a mega constellation in the sky that will block out the stars for everyone in the world. Who chose that? --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:978682115] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>SHRlKE posted... </cite><quote>The difference is that with the likes of Trump etc people have a choice.</quote>Do we? Doesnt really seem that way most of the time. Musk is allowed to do whatever the fuck he wants. He is literally building a mega constellation in the sky that will block out the stars for everyone in the world. Who chose that? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/06/24 3:34:06 AM #73:	solosnake posted... Do we? Doesnt really seem that way most of the time. In reality, most of America does not have a choice. Presidents are chosen by swing states. And most Americans live in solid red or blue states <cite>Zikten posted [p:978682119] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite><quote>Do we? Doesnt really seem that way most of the time.</quote>In reality, most of America does not have a choice. Presidents are chosen by swing states. And most Americans live in solid red or blue states</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Null_Gain 02/06/24 3:40:06 AM #74:	Are we going to get a King Andrew? --- Series S + Switch "Don't steal, stop being ignorant and respect other peoples beliefs." -perthboy on flying a Nazi flag <cite>Null_Gain posted [p:978682157] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Are we going to get a King Andrew? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/06/24 3:44:37 AM #75:	Null_Gain posted... Are we going to get a King Andrew? No, why would he be king? William is next. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978682189] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Null_Gain posted... </cite><quote>Are we going to get a King Andrew?</quote>No, why would he be king? William is next. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Null_Gain 02/06/24 3:50:19 AM #76:	spikethedevil posted... No, why would he be king? William is next. I'm asking because I don't know --- Series S + Switch "Don't steal, stop being ignorant and respect other peoples beliefs." -perthboy on flying a Nazi flag <cite>Null_Gain posted [p:978682221] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>spikethedevil posted... </cite><quote>No, why would he be king? William is next.</quote>I'm asking because I don't know </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/06/24 4:00:33 AM #77:	Null_Gain posted... I'm asking because I don't know Also the whole going for under age girls thing means he no longer has his royal titles. First born child is always next in line, in this case William. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978682278] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Null_Gain posted... </cite><quote>I'm asking because I don't know</quote>Also the whole going for under age girls thing means he no longer has his royal titles. First born child is always next in line, in this case William. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kingdrake2 02/06/24 4:05:15 AM #78:	Null_Gain posted... Are we going to get a King Andrew? i hope not. he done some bad things (cant be forgiven ever). --- beware of shere khan (fall guys) currently playing: Asdivine Menace (ps4) Kemco game. on the road to trails to azure <cite>kingdrake2 posted [p:978682313] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Null_Gain posted...</cite><quote>Are we going to get a King Andrew?</quote>i hope not. he done some bad things (cant be forgiven ever). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ai123 02/06/24 4:11:01 AM #79:	Null_Gain posted... Are we going to get a King Andrew? Extremely unlikely. William William's kids in birth order Harry Harry's kids in birth order When William's kids have kids, the line of succession is through them. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'. <cite>ai123 posted [p:978682361] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Null_Gain posted... </cite><quote>Are we going to get a King Andrew?</quote>Extremely unlikely.WilliamWilliam's kids in birth orderHarryHarry's kids in birth orderWhen William's kids have kids, the line of succession is through them. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trelve 02/06/24 4:19:00 AM #80:	Null_Gain posted... Are we going to get a King Andrew? No, only if some massive disaster killed William and Harry's family. And even then, Andrew may decide not to take the role and it passes to his eldest daughter, Beatrice. The succession order goes like this: William, Prince of Wales Prince George Princess Charlotte Prince Louis Harry, Duke of Sussex Prince Archie Princess Lilibet Andrew, Duke of York Princess Beatrice Princess Eugenie <cite>Trelve posted [p:978682420] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Null_Gain posted... </cite><quote>Are we going to get a King Andrew?</quote>No, only if some massive disaster killed William and Harry's family. And even then, Andrew may decide not to take the role and it passes to his eldest daughter, Beatrice.The succession order goes like this:William, Prince of WalesPrince GeorgePrincess CharlottePrince LouisHarry, Duke of SussexPrince ArchiePrincess LilibetAndrew, Duke of YorkPrincess BeatricePrincess Eugenie</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Agent_Stroud 02/06/24 4:19:09 AM #81:	Long live the King! Scar --- "We're going to shake things up, Morgan. Like old times." -- Alex Yu, Prey (2017) <cite>Agent_Stroud posted [p:978682421] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Long live the King! Scar </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 02/06/24 4:22:29 AM #82:	I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen. <cite>dioxxys posted [p:978682451] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/06/24 4:44:22 AM #83:	dioxxys posted... I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen. I mean she died last year and hes the king of the entire UK not just England. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978682560] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen.</quote>I mean she died last year and hes the king of the entire UK not just England. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/06/24 4:52:16 AM #84:	dioxxys posted... I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen. How did you miss the news that the Queen died? <cite>Zikten posted [p:978682596] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>I didnt even know England had an old King, I only ever heard about the Queen.</quote>How did you miss the news that the Queen died?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 02/06/24 5:44:03 AM #85:	Zikten posted... How did you miss the news that the Queen died? I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King <cite>dioxxys posted [p:978682842] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite><quote>How did you miss the news that the Queen died?</quote>I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/06/24 5:45:54 AM #86:	dioxxys posted... I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King Hows that rock youre living under? Lol. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978682850] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King</quote>Hows that rock youre living under? Lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 02/06/24 5:55:21 AM #87:	dioxxys posted... I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King Ok, now I am curious, when you heard the Queen died, did it cross your mind dat they would elevate a new Monarch? --- Getting high and playing video games is the best! I swear to ducking God! <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:978682909] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King</quote>Ok, now I am curious, when you heard the Queen died, did it cross your mind dat they would elevate a new Monarch? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 02/06/24 6:07:56 AM #88:	dioxxys posted... I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she did The new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne. <cite>Zikten posted [p:978682985] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>I didnt, just saying only ever heard of the Queen not the King</quote>He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she didThe new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spikethedevil 02/06/24 6:33:15 AM #89:	Zikten posted... He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she did The new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne. The Queen didnt have any real power either. --- A garbage pod!? It's a smegging garbage pod! <cite>spikethedevil posted [p:978683205] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite><quote>He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she didThe new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne.</quote>The Queen didnt have any real power either. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funkydog 02/06/24 6:35:32 AM #90:	spikethedevil posted... The Queen didnt have any real power either. The royals have much more power than people realise and have had laws vetoed and amended to not affect them numerous times. --- Let's make biscuits! <cite>Funkydog posted [p:978683227] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>spikethedevil posted... </cite><quote>The Queen didnt have any real power either.</quote>The royals have much more power than people realise and have had laws vetoed and amended to not affect them numerous times. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
S_A_S 02/06/24 6:36:08 AM #91:	Very sad about the King having cancer. <cite>S_A_S posted [p:978683230] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Very sad about the King having cancer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 02/06/24 9:20:55 AM #92:	spikethedevil posted... Also the whole going for under age girls thing means he no longer has his royal titles. First born child is always next in line, in this case William. This is true now but it was very unlikely that that Elizabeth was Queen, especially for so long. IIRC the King wanted to marry a divorcee or something like that but he had to abdicate the throne to do so. Then the next King in line only had daughters so Elizabeth became Queen when he died. I think they changed the rule to oldest child regardless of gender becomes next in line of succession only recently --- Not to say that I'm in love with you but who's to say that I'm not? <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:978684909] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>spikethedevil posted... </cite><quote>Also the whole going for under age girls thing means he no longer has his royal titles. First born child is always next in line, in this case William.</quote> This is true now but it was very unlikely that that Elizabeth was Queen, especially for so long. IIRC the King wanted to marry a divorcee or something like that but he had to abdicate the throne to do so. Then the next King in line only had daughters so Elizabeth became Queen when he died.I think they changed the rule to oldest child regardless of gender becomes next in line of succession only recently </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Were_Wyrm 02/06/24 9:24:50 AM #93:	obligatory/cringy "fuck cancer" post --- I was a God, Valeria. I found it...beneath me. - Dr. Doom https://i.imgur.com/0EJvC4l.jpg <cite>Were_Wyrm posted [p:978684970] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>obligatory/cringy "fuck cancer" post </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 02/06/24 9:28:07 AM #94:	spikethedevil posted... The Queen didnt have any real power either. No, they do. It's a very fucked weird polite British thing that they essentially just never exercise it. --- Furthermore, The GOP is a Fascist Organization and must be destroyed <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:978685023] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>spikethedevil posted... </cite><quote>The Queen didnt have any real power either.</quote>No, they do. It's a very fucked weird polite British thing that they essentially just never exercise it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lobinde 02/06/24 9:29:12 AM #95:	https://www.reddit.com/r/AbolishTheMonarchy/comments/xad97a/get_to_know_king_charles_iii_megathread/ Fantastic guy this Charles. --- Hey gamers, check out my gaming game ratings and game reviews at https://backloggd.com/u/LobbyDob/ <cite>Lobinde posted [p:978685047] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>https://www.reddit.com/r/AbolishTheMonarchy/comments/xad97a/get_to_know_king_charles_iii_megathread/ Fantastic guy this Charles. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 02/07/24 12:09:12 AM #96:	Zikten posted... He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she did The new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne. ohhhh lol I assumed he was king forever and I had never heard of him. Also assumed was husband because how old he is. damn 70 years? Also I thought meghan and harry were the replacements https://youtu.be/lCqvJW1kIv8?si=NRvXpCik1WzBRusm&t=36 <cite>dioxxys posted [p:978700269] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite><quote>He is new. The Queen wasn't married to a king I don't think. Her husband was like a royal version of First Lady or First Man in America. He didn't have power himself. Only she didThe new king is her son. He's very old though because his mother was Queen for fucking forever and was ancient. He waited like 70 years to take the throne.</quote>ohhhhlol I assumed he was king forever and I had never heard of him. Also assumed was husband because how old he is. damn 70 years?Also I thought meghan and harry were the replacementshttps://youtu.be/lCqvJW1kIv8?si=NRvXpCik1WzBRusm&t=36</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#97	Post #97 was unavailable or deleted.
pokeweeb30 02/07/24 6:05:46 AM #98:	solosnake posted... Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different I hate Trump, but I have to admit that he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters. He wasnt randomly chosen to become president, people chose to make him president. Thats democracy. --- Formerly known as maro_man aka lugi_lad. <cite>pokeweeb30 posted [p:978703134] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite><quote>Is it? As a society, we tend to worship people like Trump, Bezos, Musk, ect. Is it really so different? Seems like they are above the laws that you and i have to live by as well. Doesnt really seem so different</quote>I hate Trump, but I have to admit that he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters. He wasnt randomly chosen to become president, people chose to make him president. Thats democracy. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_Arbron 02/07/24 6:09:23 AM #99:	pokeweeb30 posted... he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters. It's easy. He appealed to what was always there (racists) and said they should be "out and proud," so to speak. pokeweeb30 posted... people chose to make him president. Thats democracy. Let's just get this out of the way - not only did he not win the popular vote, but given the GOP's well documented history of voter disenfranchisement, in no sense did any form of "majority" make him president. --- Calling out stupid or reckless decision-making is not "victim blaming." <cite>Dark_Arbron posted [p:978703167] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>pokeweeb30 posted... </cite><quote>he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters.</quote>It's easy. He appealed to what was always there (racists) and said they should be "out and proud," so to speak.pokeweeb30 posted... </cite><quote>people chose to make him president. Thats democracy.</quote>Let's just get this out of the way - not only did he not win the popular vote, but given the GOP's well documented history of voter disenfranchisement, in no sense did any form of "majority" make him president. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Agent_Stroud 02/07/24 1:33:02 PM #100:	pokeweeb30 posted... I hate Trump, but I have to admit that he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters. He wasnt randomly chosen to become president, people chose to make him president. Thats democracy. Kinda like how Palworld wasnt randomly chosen to become one of the most popular indie games on Steam and Xbox, but rather people willingly supported a game that they felt appealed to them, eh? --- "We're going to shake things up, Morgan. Like old times." -- Alex Yu, Prey (2017) <cite>Agent_Stroud posted [p:978708990] in Breaking: ... [t:80688676]...</cite> <quote>pokeweeb30 posted... </cite><quote>I hate Trump, but I have to admit that he (somehow) has amassed tens of millions of supporters. He wasnt randomly chosen to become president, people chose to make him president. Thats democracy.</quote>Kinda like how Palworld wasnt randomly chosen to become one of the most popular indie games on Steam and Xbox, but rather people willingly supported a game that they felt appealed to them, eh? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Breaking: King Charles Has Cancer. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Breaking: King Charles Has Cancer.