In a 2-1 ruling Friday, a federal appeals court ruled that Illinois assault weapon ban does not violate the U.S. Constitution, setting up a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Second Amendment to the Constitution recognizes an individual right to keep and bear Arms. Of that there can be no doubt, the majority opinion began, citing a string of recent Supreme Court cases. But as we know from long experience with other fundamental rights, such as the right to free speech, the right peaceably to assemble, the right to vote, and the right to free exercise of religion, even the most important personal freedoms have their limits.
The decision involved three consolidated cases that challenged the states assault weapon ban as well as local ordinances enacted in Cook County, Chicago and Naperville. Both the state law and the Naperville ordinance were passed in response to a mass shooting last year at an Independence Day parade in Highland Park that left seven people dead and dozens more injured and traumatized.
Illinois lawmakers passed the state law during a special lame duck session in January, and Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker signed it within hours of its passage out of the General Assembly.
The new law sparked immediate challenges in both state and federal courts.
The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the law in August against narrow challenges under the state constitution. But the broader legal issues were aired in federal courts, where judges in different districts reached different conclusions.
One judge in the Southern District of Illinois ruled in April that the law violated the Second Amendment of the constitution. But two judges in the Northern District came to the opposite conclusion. Those three cases were then consolidated in the appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Judge Diane Wood wrote the majority opinion, joined in concurrence by Judge Frank Easterbrook, while in a 44-page dissent nearly as long as the opinion itself Judge Michael Brennan wrote the state and municipal governments that enacted the bans failed to meet their burden to show that their bans are part of the history and tradition of firearms regulation.
He also ripped his colleagues remarkable conclusion that personal ownership of assault-style weapons and high-powered magazines is not protected by the Second Amendment. The majority wrote the firearms banned under Illinois law are much more like machine guns and military-grade weaponry than those typically used for self-defense, like handguns.
The AR-15 is a civilian, not military, weapon, Brennan wrote. No army in the world uses a service rifle that is only semiautomatic. Even so, the majority opinion uses a civilian firearms military counterpart to determine whether it is an Arm.
Gun control advocates issued immediate statements praising the decision. This is an important victory in the fight against gun violence, and a victory for all states and municipalities that are fighting to keep their residents safe,
Douglas Letter, chief legal officer for the anti-gun violence group Brady, said in a statement. States and cities should have the right to stop these weapons of war from decimating our communities, and this ruling demonstrates that assault weapon bans are indeed constitutional.
Gov. JB Pritzker praised the courts opinion, saying in a statement the majority recognized the assault weapons ban as a commonsense law and urging Congress to pass an assault weapons ban so Illinois is not an island surrounded by states with weak protections.
Despite constant attacks by the gun lobby that puts ideology over peoples lives, here in Illinois we have stood up and said no more to weapons of war on our streets, Pritzker said. This is a victory for the members of the General Assembly who stood alongside families, students and survivors who worked so hard to make this day a reality.
Fridays opinion comes in the midst of a series of Illinois State Police hearings on the part of the assault weapons ban law that allows gun owners who already possess banned weapons and high-capacity magazines to be able to keep them so long as theyre registered with the state.
Unfortunately, the current SCOTUS probably won' be so understanding of how to integrate modern technology with a document written over 2 centuries ago. We'll see. The case goes there next when the gun lobby appeals.
Absolutely stunning that this got through the 7th circuit. Such a ridiculously conservative court. Clinton appointee and Reagan appointee were dissented by a Trump appointee.