| Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
|---|---|
|
COVxy 09/29/23 4:35:50 PM #1: |
https://twitter.com/PaoloCrosetto/status/1707771226947469471?t=CSWlBhnhHCFp2B9yvS5pag&s=19
It's a tweet thread, you're going to need to click into it to read the content, or read the paper. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
COVxy 09/29/23 5:42:33 PM #2: |
Up
--- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Zanzenburger 09/29/23 5:59:52 PM #3: |
Not a surprise. Academic publishing is a ticking time bomb. Most publications are so hyper-specific to meet trnure requirements that they are useless to all but a handful of people.
--- Congratulations! Your post was deemed response-worthy. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
| #4 | Post #4 was unavailable or deleted. |
|
COVxy 09/29/23 6:33:42 PM #5: |
[LFAQs-redacted-quote]
Being critical of the science publishing industry is the opposite of anti-science. If that's what you are implying. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
kirbyy 09/29/23 7:26:16 PM #6: |
Yeah publishing / scientific research is a hyper-competitive field. I'd be more worried if the quality of research would diminish like the tweet posits, though I can imagine that being pretty hard to measure.
--- Crayons taste like purple. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
COVxy 09/29/23 7:27:48 PM #7: |
kirbyy posted...
Yeah publishing / scientific research is a hyper-competitive field. I'd be more worried if the quality of research would diminish like the tweet posits, though I can imagine that being pretty hard to measure. It's not really possible to do science well at the rates expected of scientists. We need to do work slower. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
| #8 | Post #8 was unavailable or deleted. |
| Topic List |
Page List:
1 |