Current Events > Did you like Wonder Woman more or WW84?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Smallville 09/10/23 6:31:46 PM #1:	which? - Results (30 votes) wonder woman 76.67% (23 votes) 23 ww84 0% (0 votes) 0 saw both disliked both 10% (3 votes) 3 never seen 13.33% (4 votes) 4 ww84 did kinda bad box office right? there may not ever be another wonder woman movie? Not sure which movie did bigger box office --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:975983284] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote> which? - Results (30 votes) wonder woman 76.67% (23 votes) 23 ww84 0% (0 votes) 0 saw both disliked both 10% (3 votes) 3 never seen 13.33% (4 votes) 4 Show Voting Form ww84 did kinda bad box office right? there may not ever be another wonder woman movie? Not sure which movie did bigger box office </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Compsognathus 09/10/23 6:32:21 PM #2:	Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit. --- 1 line break(s), 160 characters allowed <cite>Compsognathus posted [p:975983294] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Popo 09/10/23 6:32:58 PM #3:	WW was solid. One of the better DCEU movies. WW84 was awful and sorta had casual rape as part of the storyline. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran <cite>The_Popo posted [p:975983307] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was solid. One of the better DCEU movies. WW84 was awful and sorta had casual rape as part of the storyline. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Euripides 09/10/23 6:33:40 PM #4:	WW was garbage, and when people said 84 was worse, I didn't bother --- people who car cars a whip are so cringe <cite>Euripides posted [p:975983320] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was garbage, and when people said 84 was worse, I didn't bother </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 09/10/23 6:35:19 PM #5:	WW was pretty middle of the road. Never saw 1984 as I had given up on the DCEU by then but only heard bad things about it. --- Let's all please just get along. <cite>lilORANG posted [p:975983340] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was pretty middle of the road. Never saw 1984 as I had given up on the DCEU by then but only heard bad things about it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Glob 09/10/23 6:41:48 PM #6:	Wonder Woman wasnt a great film but 84 was bloody awful. <cite>Glob posted [p:975983477] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Wonder Woman wasnt a great film but 84 was bloody awful.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 09/10/23 6:43:03 PM #7:	WW84 was so bad that my wife and one of my daughters who absolutely loved the first movie stopped caring about this iteration of the character as a result. My other daughter, my sons, and I merely disliked it. So WW. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:975983505] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW84 was so bad that my wife and one of my daughters who absolutely loved the first movie stopped caring about this iteration of the character as a result. My other daughter, my sons, and I merely disliked it.So WW. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nemu 09/10/23 6:44:38 PM #8:	WW was fine, something on par with the average Marvel film. 84 was like three different versions of a movie smashed together in post-production to form the shitshow that we got. I enjoyed most of the scenes with the evil guy, but the rest was just a mess. <cite>Nemu posted [p:975983533] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was fine, something on par with the average Marvel film. 84 was like three different versions of a movie smashed together in post-production to form the shitshow that we got. I enjoyed most of the scenes with the evil guy, but the rest was just a mess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryven 09/10/23 6:44:48 PM #9:	WW obviously, which IMO was really good. I actually didn't mind '84, but definitely was a step down. --- 'We're not gonna make it, are we? People i mean.' 'It's in your nature to destroy yourselves.' <cite>Ryven posted [p:975983537] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW obviously, which IMO was really good.I actually didn't mind '84, but definitely was a step down. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeesMcGees 09/10/23 6:48:14 PM #10:	WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. The choice was to use that was a dumb and bad 80s movie homage that has no real world parallel (other than maybe dissociative identity disorder), because its functionally possession. The first WW was an above average/good superhero movie. Id almost say it was great, but the DBZ fight at the end was stupid. <cite>VeesMcGees posted [p:975983604] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. The choice was to use that was a dumb and bad 80s movie homage that has no real world parallel (other than maybe dissociative identity disorder), because its functionally possession.The first WW was an above average/good superhero movie. Id almost say it was great, but the DBZ fight at the end was stupid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smallville 09/10/23 6:52:34 PM #11:	didn't ww84 outgross the 1st one though? Still, a lot of people didn't like it, i don't think a 3rd one will ever be made --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:975983699] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>didn't ww84 outgross the 1st one though? Still, a lot of people didn't like it, i don't think a 3rd one will ever be made </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nemu 09/10/23 6:56:24 PM #12:	VeesMcGees posted... WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Nah, it's definitely raping the guy. The fact that he wasn't conscious of it changes nothing. <cite>Nemu posted [p:975983775] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take.</quote>Nah, it's definitely raping the guy. The fact that he wasn't conscious of it changes nothing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FolkenRawr 09/10/23 6:57:57 PM #13:	Compsognathus posted... Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit. --- Cookin like a chef, I'm a 5 Star Michelin <cite>FolkenRawr posted [p:975983805] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Compsognathus posted... </cite><quote>Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Astro1446 09/10/23 6:59:38 PM #14:	WW was a good movie. WW84 was like The Room. Awful, but I got a good amount of enjoyment laughing at how bad it was. --- Impossible is just a word people use to make themselves feel better when they quit. <cite>Astro1446 posted [p:975983834] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was a good movie.WW84 was like The Room. Awful, but I got a good amount of enjoyment laughing at how bad it was. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Compsognathus 09/10/23 7:06:59 PM #15:	VeesMcGees posted... WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. The choice was to use that was a dumb and bad 80s movie homage that has no real world parallel (other than maybe dissociative identity disorder), because its functionally possession. The first WW was an above average/good superhero movie. Id almost say it was great, but the DBZ fight at the end was stupid. If you extend this logic then you can argue that having sex with a passed out person isn't rape as they weren't conscious for it. --- 1 line break(s), 160 characters allowed <cite>Compsognathus posted [p:975983975] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. The choice was to use that was a dumb and bad 80s movie homage that has no real world parallel (other than maybe dissociative identity disorder), because its functionally possession.The first WW was an above average/good superhero movie. Id almost say it was great, but the DBZ fight at the end was stupid.</quote>If you extend this logic then you can argue that having sex with a passed out person isn't rape as they weren't conscious for it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 09/10/23 7:07:36 PM #16:	VeesMcGees posted... WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. ... so she fucked an unconscious dude and that isn't rape? No man, it was bad and even in the theater if felt awkward as fuck. Especially as it was easily fixable as there was no reason whatsoever for Pine to possess someone else other than for her to be confused for ten seconds and a weird hallmark christmas movie ending scene for ten seconds. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:975983995] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting.</quote>... so she fucked an unconscious dude and that isn't rape?No man, it was bad and even in the theater if felt awkward as fuck. Especially as it was easily fixable as there was no reason whatsoever for Pine to possess someone else other than for her to be confused for ten seconds and a weird hallmark christmas movie ending scene for ten seconds. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PMarth2002 09/10/23 7:07:39 PM #17:	I only watched the first one. --- When money talks for the very last time, and nobody walks a step behind When there's only one race, and that's mankind, then we shall be free <cite>PMarth2002 posted [p:975983996] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>I only watched the first one. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 09/10/23 7:08:04 PM #18:	VeesMcGees posted... WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting. It's still problematic because ultimately, anything that happens to his body still affects him. Consciousness does not matter. --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:975984005] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>WW84 sucks, but the rape thing is really a bad take. Its concerned about the body and not the consciousness that was consenting.</quote>It's still problematic because ultimately, anything that happens to his body still affects him. Consciousness does not matter. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CassandraCroft 09/10/23 7:43:27 PM #19:	Euripides posted... WW was garbage, and when people said 84 was worse, I didn't bother ^that^ WW was complete and utter horse shit but that is what you should expect when you have the grotesque Gal Gadot stinking up the place. I cheered when I heard that there would be no more WW movies after WW 84 bombed hard. It means no more Gadot disgracing the name Wonder Woman. --- All your base are belong to us. Been gaming since 1979. Xbox Live Account Sophitia99 <cite>CassandraCroft posted [p:975984697] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Euripides posted... </cite><quote>WW was garbage, and when people said 84 was worse, I didn't bother</quote>^that^WW was complete and utter horse shit but that is what you should expect when you have the grotesque Gal Gadot stinking up the place.I cheered when I heard that there would be no more WW movies after WW 84 bombed hard. It means no more Gadot disgracing the name Wonder Woman. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rexcrk 09/10/23 8:43:13 PM #20:	CassandraCroft posted... ^that^ WW was complete and utter horse shit but that is what you should expect when you have the grotesque Gal Gadot stinking up the place. I cheered when I heard that there would be no more WW movies after WW 84 bombed hard. It means no more Gadot disgracing the name Wonder Woman. Tag checks out --- I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you.. have elected.. the way of.. PAIN <cite>rexcrk posted [p:975985616] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>CassandraCroft posted... </cite><quote>^that^WW was complete and utter horse shit but that is what you should expect when you have the grotesque Gal Gadot stinking up the place.I cheered when I heard that there would be no more WW movies after WW 84 bombed hard. It means no more Gadot disgracing the name Wonder Woman.</quote>Tag checks out </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 09/10/23 8:44:31 PM #21:	WW was bad WW84 was a trashfire --- See profile pic <cite>Irony posted [p:975985632] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was badWW84 was a trashfire </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeesMcGees 09/11/23 11:17:40 AM #22:	K181 posted... ... so she fucked an unconscious dude and that isn't rape? No man, it was bad and even in the theater if felt awkward as fuck. Especially as it was easily fixable as there was no reason whatsoever for Pine to possess someone else other than for her to be confused for ten seconds and a weird hallmark christmas movie ending scene for ten seconds. Steve Trevors consciousness was in the body. Steve Trevor consented. Steve Trevor has free will to do what he desires. The decision to include that element in the movie was stupid- I dont disagree there. I just think trying to push it as rape was a gimmick to further stigmatize a bad movie. Does anyone complain any other time anything akin to possession happens in movies? <cite>VeesMcGees posted [p:975994640] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>K181 posted... </cite><quote>... so she fucked an unconscious dude and that isn't rape?No man, it was bad and even in the theater if felt awkward as fuck. Especially as it was easily fixable as there was no reason whatsoever for Pine to possess someone else other than for her to be confused for ten seconds and a weird hallmark christmas movie ending scene for ten seconds.</quote>Steve Trevors consciousness was in the body. Steve Trevor consented. Steve Trevor has free will to do what he desires. The decision to include that element in the movie was stupid- I dont disagree there. I just think trying to push it as rape was a gimmick to further stigmatize a bad movie. Does anyone complain any other time anything akin to possession happens in movies?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 09/11/23 11:21:10 AM #23:	Dislike both. WW1 is overrated AF. It's not better than mid rank MCU movie. --- You have the right to remain silent. Anything you posted will be misquoted, then be used against you. http://error1355.com/ce/Ricemills.html <cite>Ricemills posted [p:975994696] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Dislike both.WW1 is overrated AF. It's not better than mid rank MCU movie. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 09/11/23 11:22:10 AM #24:	VeesMcGees posted... Steve Trevors consciousness was in the body. Steve Trevor consented. Steve Trevor has free will to do what he desires. The decision to include that element in the movie was stupid- I dont disagree there. I just think trying to push it as rape was a gimmick to further stigmatize a bad movie. Does anyone complain any other time anything akin to possession happens in movies? It's still rape dude. It's HIS body and somebody he didn't consent to had sex with HIS body. It doesn't matter what consciousness is in there if the owner of the body didn't agree to anything. And other movies that feature bodily possession usually treat it as a bad thing, so that doesn't help your point --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:975994716] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>Steve Trevors consciousness was in the body. Steve Trevor consented. Steve Trevor has free will to do what he desires. The decision to include that element in the movie was stupid- I dont disagree there. I just think trying to push it as rape was a gimmick to further stigmatize a bad movie. Does anyone complain any other time anything akin to possession happens in movies?</quote>It's still rape dude. It's HIS body and somebody he didn't consent to had sex with HIS body. It doesn't matter what consciousness is in there if the owner of the body didn't agree to anything.And other movies that feature bodily possession usually treat it as a bad thing, so that doesn't help your point </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Proto_Spark 09/11/23 11:24:29 AM #25:	I don't think WW84 is nearly as terrible as people make it out to be, but its still like, meh at best. The original WW is just like, actually pretty good on its own. <cite>Proto_Spark posted [p:975994754] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>I don't think WW84 is nearly as terrible as people make it out to be, but its still like, meh at best.The original WW is just like, actually pretty good on its own.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Destroyer53 09/11/23 11:25:51 AM #26:	First has some problems but was overall good. 84 was just had. <cite>Destroyer53 posted [p:975994778] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>First has some problems but was overall good. 84 was just had.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gray_Areas 09/11/23 11:29:53 AM #27:	I really liked Wonder Woman, but I felt like it kind of sidelined its own message/theme at the end by having the war actually end when Ares was defeated. Wonder Woman 1984 was just bad. I am usually very easy to please, but there are so things I disliked about that movie even while in the middle of watching it that I just don't ever have the desire to see it again. And on top of it being a pretty bad movie, it's made worse by the fact that it is supposed to be part of a shared universe. 1984 wasn't that long ago in the DCEU. I think it was even after Bruce Wayne lost his parents, so having a whole climax that involves the entire world having their wishes granted without it ever being mentioned again is really odd, even when the movies are meant to be kind of loosely bound together. <cite>Gray_Areas posted [p:975994851] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>I really liked Wonder Woman, but I felt like it kind of sidelined its own message/theme at the end by having the war actually end when Ares was defeated.Wonder Woman 1984 was just bad. I am usually very easy to please, but there are so things I disliked about that movie even while in the middle of watching it that I just don't ever have the desire to see it again. And on top of it being a pretty bad movie, it's made worse by the fact that it is supposed to be part of a shared universe. 1984 wasn't that long ago in the DCEU. I think it was even after Bruce Wayne lost his parents, so having a whole climax that involves the entire world having their wishes granted without it ever being mentioned again is really odd, even when the movies are meant to be kind of loosely bound together.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
invertedlegdrop 09/11/23 12:08:41 PM #28:	WW was a decent superhero, nothing great but just fine WW84 was just terrible, what the ** was Patty Jenkins thinking... They were gonna a 3rd but WB passed and Jenkins was gonna do a Rouge Squadron movie but Disney canceled it after SW crashed and burned... --- Political correctness is the fascism of the 90s-Roger Ebert I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic *** hatreds-George Carlin <cite>invertedlegdrop posted [p:975995525] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>WW was a decent superhero, nothing great but just fineWW84 was just terrible, what the ** was Patty Jenkins thinking...They were gonna a 3rd but WB passed and Jenkins was gonna do a Rouge Squadron movie but Disney canceled it after SW crashed and burned... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeesMcGees 09/11/23 1:21:32 PM #29:	RchHomieQuanChi posted... It's still rape dude. It's HIS body and somebody he didn't consent to had sex with HIS body. It doesn't matter what consciousness is in there if the owner of the body didn't agree to anything. And other movies that feature bodily possession usually treat it as a bad thing, so that doesn't help your point If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body. <cite>VeesMcGees posted [p:975997011] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>RchHomieQuanChi posted... </cite><quote>It's still rape dude. It's HIS body and somebody he didn't consent to had sex with HIS body. It doesn't matter what consciousness is in there if the owner of the body didn't agree to anything.And other movies that feature bodily possession usually treat it as a bad thing, so that doesn't help your point</quote>If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tom_Joad 09/11/23 1:23:00 PM #30:	Compsognathus posted... Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit. This. Within the first 5 minutes of WW84, I knew the movie would not be good. (The mall scene was jaw-droppingly bad.) --- "History shows again and again that nature points out the folly of man. Go go Godzilla!" Godzilla - Blue Oyster Cult <cite>Tom_Joad posted [p:975997035] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Compsognathus posted... </cite><quote>Wonder Woman was a good movie. WW84 was fucking horseshit.</quote>This.Within the first 5 minutes of WW84, I knew the movie would not be good.(The mall scene was jaw-droppingly bad.) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bsp77 09/11/23 1:25:55 PM #31:	Smallville posted... didn't ww84 outgross the 1st one though? What? lol, no. Like why would you even think that? It came out in the height of the pandemic (Dec 2020) and was day-and-date on HBO Max, so it didn't make hardly any money. Only made $170 million worldwide vs $823 million for the first. --- Currently playing: Armored Core VI <cite>bsp77 posted [p:975997096] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Smallville posted... </cite><quote>didn't ww84 outgross the 1st one though?</quote>What? lol, no. Like why would you even think that? It came out in the height of the pandemic (Dec 2020) and was day-and-date on HBO Max, so it didn't make hardly any money. Only made $170 million worldwide vs $823 million for the first. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nemu 09/11/23 1:44:17 PM #32:	VeesMcGees posted... If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body. If someones body is used without their consent, they were raped. In the case of the movie, both are rapists. In the case of a scenario where the other partner doesnt know about the body swap, the person in the body is the rapist. You seem to be going by nobody was hurt logic, so instead imagine if the body was put through absolute debauchery of all kind. Then imagine if that was your body. Would you feel violated or not care? <cite>Nemu posted [p:975997489] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body.</quote>If someones body is used without their consent, they were raped. In the case of the movie, both are rapists. In the case of a scenario where the other partner doesnt know about the body swap, the person in the body is the rapist. You seem to be going by nobody was hurt logic, so instead imagine if the body was put through absolute debauchery of all kind. Then imagine if that was your body. Would you feel violated or not care?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dancing_cactuar 09/11/23 1:49:46 PM #33:	Glob posted... Wonder Woman wasnt a great film but 84 was bloody awful. --- Believing that Disney movies are for families is akin to buying into Nazi propaganda- LoyalToTheGame PS5s have liquid metal tech like the T-1000- AceCombatX <cite>dancing_cactuar posted [p:975997597] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Glob posted... </cite><quote>Wonder Woman wasnt a great film but 84 was bloody awful.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeesMcGees 09/11/23 3:51:37 PM #34:	Nemu posted... If someones body is used without their consent, they were raped. In the case of the movie, both are rapists. In the case of a scenario where the other partner doesnt know about the body swap, the person in the body is the rapist. You seem to be going by nobody was hurt logic, so instead imagine if the body was put through absolute debauchery of all kind. Then imagine if that was your body. Would you feel violated or not care? I give agency to the conscious individual, who was Steve Trevor, over the vessel the consciousness subsided in. Steve Trevor was free to engage in whatever acts he would choose to do. Its not no one gets hurt, but it is conscious minds have freedom to make choices for themselves. The man was a bag of flesh and wholly irrelevant since a consciousness was active inside of him. Diana would be at fault for making the wish that was answered in such a manner as possession, but once Steve Trevor was in control, all actions were Steve Trevors to make. Since I dont believe in possessions in the real world, I dont think any real-world parallel fits because the scenario is impossible. <cite>VeesMcGees posted [p:976000017] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Nemu posted... </cite><quote>If someones body is used without their consent, they were raped. In the case of the movie, both are rapists. In the case of a scenario where the other partner doesnt know about the body swap, the person in the body is the rapist. You seem to be going by nobody was hurt logic, so instead imagine if the body was put through absolute debauchery of all kind. Then imagine if that was your body. Would you feel violated or not care?</quote>I give agency to the conscious individual, who was Steve Trevor, over the vessel the consciousness subsided in. Steve Trevor was free to engage in whatever acts he would choose to do. Its not no one gets hurt, but it is conscious minds have freedom to make choices for themselves. The man was a bag of flesh and wholly irrelevant since a consciousness was active inside of him. Diana would be at fault for making the wish that was answered in such a manner as possession, but once Steve Trevor was in control, all actions were Steve Trevors to make. Since I dont believe in possessions in the real world, I dont think any real-world parallel fits because the scenario is impossible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZevLoveDOOM 09/11/23 3:52:48 PM #35:	the first was way better even if the ending was kinda stupid... <cite>ZevLoveDOOM posted [p:976000038] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>the first was way better even if the ending was kinda stupid...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masterpug53 09/11/23 4:06:38 PM #36:	I saw WW and liked it well enough. I skipped WW84. Should be as good an answer as any. --- Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read. <cite>masterpug53 posted [p:976000323] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>I saw WW and liked it well enough. I skipped WW84. Should be as good an answer as any. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Destroyer53 09/11/23 5:24:37 PM #37:	VeesMcGees posted... If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body. That doesn't work. Living in a someone's house while they are away and without their knowledge doesn't change the fact that it is their house. <cite>Destroyer53 posted [p:976001745] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>VeesMcGees posted... </cite><quote>If its Steve Trevors consciousness, then its currently Steve Trevors body.</quote>That doesn't work. Living in a someone's house while they are away and without their knowledge doesn't change the fact that it is their house.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeesMcGees 09/11/23 5:34:55 PM #38:	Destroyer53 posted... That doesn't work. Living in a someone's house while they are away and without their knowledge doesn't change the fact that it is their house. Except that isnt the circumstance. Its the possessing entity is in the body of the one who owned the house. By all practical means, the possessing entity now owns the house. If some magic contest had been drawn beforehand, perhaps this couldve been argued against. The movie never indicates the original bodys owner was even around until the end, making the flesh simply a secondhand object at that point, an item unwittingly put in a donation box. <cite>VeesMcGees posted [p:976001943] in Did you li... [t:80561656]...</cite> <quote>Destroyer53 posted... </cite><quote>That doesn't work. Living in a someone's house while they are away and without their knowledge doesn't change the fact that it is their house.</quote>Except that isnt the circumstance. Its the possessing entity is in the body of the one who owned the house. By all practical means, the possessing entity now owns the house. If some magic contest had been drawn beforehand, perhaps this couldve been argued against. The movie never indicates the original bodys owner was even around until the end, making the flesh simply a secondhand object at that point, an item unwittingly put in a donation box. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Did you like Wonder Woman more or WW84? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Did you like Wonder Woman more or WW84?