Current Events > I didnt know Ted Nugent was a FNAF fan O_O

(+) Yeah! (+)

He wrote an entire song about one of the animatronics. Not even the main and most well known version of Freddy Fazzbear, but his old, golden form. So Ted must be pretty fluent in the rich FNAF lore. I hope they use this song in the movie. :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Uuk8nP1gs

Remember when Ted Nugent said that if Obama won reelection he'd either be dead or in jail?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


And domestic terrorism

Fuck Ted Nugent

Tyranthraxus posted...

Remember when Ted Nugent said that if Obama won reelection he'd either be dead or in jail?

He also has a habit of starting each of his performances promoting violence against liberals.

In sixth grade I actually got Cat-Scratch Fever and had to have surgery because of it.

Fuck Ted Nugent.

who?

I think a lot of people don't realize how huge FNAF is as a franchise

It's the modern day Goosebumps.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

I think a lot of people don't realize how huge FNAF is as a franchise

It's the modern day Goosebumps.

You think Uncle Ted likes Goosebumps too?

It sucks and so does his music so that tracks

Probably depending on the age of his kids

Nugent sucks.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

Probably depending on the age of his kids

Probably late 50s for his oldest. 30s for the youngest?

lol

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

I think a lot of people don't realize how huge FNAF is as a franchise

It's the modern day Goosebumps.

no it isnt lol.

I4NRulez posted...

no it isnt lol.

It really is

Dozens of successful books. Several successful games
Hollywood movie which is the start of a trilogy (as well as a knock off movie that was successful) read and played by tens of millions of kids and teens worldwide.

And it's child suitable horror and spooky stories.

Other than "Well I;m not a kid anymore so I don't like new thing." how is it not the new generation version of Goosebumps?

literally the only thing good ted nugent has ever been attached to is that old album cover where his guitar is a gun. cat scratch fever is one of the worst songs ever written

Just because a bunch of weirdos spam the internet with FNAF porn doesn't mean it's the next goosebumps

Just because porn exists (BTW, porn exists for everything including Goosebumps) doesn't change :

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

Dozens of successful books. Several successful games
Hollywood movie which is the start of a trilogy (as well as a knock off movie that was successful) read and played by tens of millions of kids and teens worldwide.

And it's child suitable horror and spooky stories.

Other than "Well I;m not a kid anymore so I don't like new thing." how is it not the new generation version of Goosebumps?

Don't take it as a personal slight. You're more than allowed to claim the thing from your childhood was better than the thing today

But it's silly to deny the parallels.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

Well I;m not a kid anymore so I don't like new thing

"New"

FNAF came out in 2014 lol. I wasnt even 25 when i played the first one. FNAF has a dedicated fan base and owes its entire popularity to markiplier.

It had 2 great games in FNAF 1 and 2 and have released duds every step of the way. Their lore is so awfully written that EVERY movie gets stuck in dev hell trying to make sense of it.

i cant speak on the books because i dont care enough about FNAF to read them.

Goosebumps had mostly well-written books and have a lot scarier stuff in them than a few jump scares from FNAF and were a household name.

And you have a weird definition of success because none of the FNAF rip off movies have been successful. I bet the new movie doesnt even get past a direct to red box sequel

and i say that as someone who generally likes the FNAF games

Funny how TC ignored all the posts about how big a piece of shit Nugent is

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Funny how TC ignored all the posts about how big a piece of shit Nugent is

I only care about his opinions on Goosebumps at this point TBH.

Is he a CHUD if he likes Stay Out of the Basement over The Haunted Mask?

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Funny how TC ignored all the posts about how big a piece of shit Nugent is

Well yeah he's also a far right clown that made this topic specifically because he knew how much of a piece of shit Nugent is

How you claim you don't read the books yet Goosebumps is better?

And the Markpiler point is weird. They mutually benefitted each other and the franchise is still ongoing but even if you ignore that and pretend "It only took off due to Markiplier!" ... so what? It took off. What's your point?

I don't get why you people seem to think "I prefer the older thing that was around when I was kid, therefor can't compare them!" makes any kind of sense whatsoever.

They're both quirky multi-media childrens horror franchises that are hugely successful.

You're crazy egotistical

Axiom posted...

Well yeah he's also a far right clown that made this topic specifically because he knew how much of a piece of shit Nugent is

Is this topic a far right, dog whistle?

Stranglehold is a great song.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

How you claim you don't read the books yet Goosebumps is better?

Because Goosebumps is a book series and FNAF is a video game franchise?

and RL Stine is one of the greatest authors of all time, especially for kids/teens

and FNAF's lore is god-awful.

I4NRulez posted...

Because Goosebumps is a book series and FNAF is a video game franchise?

Well for a start I don't see why that matters in a vacuum. You can compare things across different mediums and video gaming didn't exist like it does now in 1992.

For another, FNAF has sold over 9 million books. Not a patch on Goosebumps but still, FNAF is a multi-media franchise.

And it's childfriendly quirky horror. So the comparison is ripe.

and RL Stine is one of the greatest authors of all time, especially for kids/teens

and FNAF's lore is god-awful.

Says person who has never read FNAF books and probably hasn't read Goosebumps since he was a child.

Besides it's irrelevant opinion. "I like the stuff I had as a kid more than the new things I didn't grow up and don't understand." is fine, but you're literally claiming they can't be compared. Which is bonkers.

Like saying you can't compare Joker to The King of Comedy because you like the latter more.

It's weird egotism

I4NRulez posted...

and FNAF's lore is god-awful.

but the bite of 83

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

Says person who has never read FNAF books and probably hasn't read Goosebumps since he was a child.

Wrong, I read a goosebump book with my little brother this summer for a summer library reading competition for his school.

And I shouldn't have to read a companion book to judge the lore. Halo has good lore and ive never read any of the halo books which I've heard are good. I judge FNAF by the lore in games because that's its main medium. Same way i wouldn't judge goosebumps any differently if they released a shitty video game.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

"I like the stuff I had as a kid more than the new things I didn't grow up and don't understand."

Its not about liking something more from my childhood. I'm not looking at something with nostalgia glasses. I liked space jam as a kid and when I watch it as an adult I can see its an awful movie objectively. I still love it.

FNAF has awful lore and more bad games than good. Its not the next big teen horror franchise. Yeah, its more succesful than people thought it would be and im glad because the first 2 games are good and it deserves it.

FNAF just has some of the worst storytelling and lore in video games. Its objectively bad. Even when i watch FNAF friendly youtubers play the games they say its bad. The only people i see who say its good are FNAF hardcore fans who will defend it from anything.

FNAF does what every horror franchise does that kills itself.

It gives too much story to it and kills the mystery of the monsters.

I4NRulez posted...
Wrong, I read a goosebump book with my little brother this summer for a summer library reading competition for his school.

And I shouldn't have to read a companion book to judge the lore. Halo has good lore and ive never read any of the halo books which I've heard are good. I judge FNAF by the lore in games because that's its main medium. Same way i wouldn't judge goosebumps any differently if they released a shitty video game.

Its not about liking something more from my childhood. I'm not looking at something with nostalgia glasses. I liked space jam as a kid and when I watch it as an adult I can see its an awful movie objectively. I still love it.

FNAF has awful lore and more bad games than good. Its not the next big teen horror franchise. Yeah, its more succesful than people thought it would be and im glad because the first 2 games are good and it deserves it.

FNAF just has some of the worst storytelling and lore in video games. Its objectively bad. Even when i watch FNAF friendly youtubers play the games they say its bad. The only people i see who say its good are FNAF hardcore fans who will defend it from anything.

Right off the bat, Goosebumps had Lore companion books as well. I had one as a kid and another got released with the movie.

I like how you cut out the part about you not actually reading a single FNAF book as well as how "I prefer Goosebumps so therefore you can't compare them" doesn't mean anything.

Hell even "Well I watched a video and the guy in the video said the thing was bad" is weird.

Also what does "It's objectively bad" mean?

It's opinion. There's no such thing as an obective opinion. Meanwhile the only non opinion metric is sales and critical reception. Which FNAF does well in.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with prefering the thing you grew up with as a kid, that's natural. You can love Goosebumps and hate FNAF until the cows come home, but why are you claiming that you can't compare a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise with a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise? Solely because you like one more than the other?

FNAF is very much a modern day goosebumps regardless of your opinion on either property. It's just the next generations version of the same thing.

And in 20 years time someone like you is going to be claiming that you can't compare FNAF to Captain Tim's Spooky Town because FNAF is so much better.

idk about goosebumps but fnaf is popular as hell. ive seen plenty of kids in public with freddie shirts and shit

Compsognathus posted...

In sixth grade I actually got Cat-Scratch Fever and had to have surgery because of it.

Fuck Ted Nugent.

A cat bit a square cm out of my leg, took months for all new skin to grow back.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

Right off the bat, Goosebumps had Lore companion books as well. I had one as a kid and another got released with the movie.

I like how you cut out the part about you not actually reading a single FNAF book as well as how "I prefer Goosebumps so therefore you can't compare them" doesn't mean anything.

Hell even "Well I watched a video and the guy in the video said the thing was bad" is weird.

Also what does "It's objectively bad" mean?

It's opinion. There's no such thing as an obective opinion. Meanwhile the only non opinion metric is sales and critical reception. Which FNAF does well in.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with prefering the thing you grew up with as a kid, that's natural. You can love Goosebumps and hate FNAF until the cows come home, but why are you claiming that you can't compare a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise with a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise? Solely because you like one more than the other?

FNAF is very much a modern day goosebumps regardless of your opinion on either property. It's just the next generations version of the same thing.

And in 20 years time someone like you is going to be claiming that you can't compare FNAF to Captain Tim's Spooky Town because FNAF is so much better.

Its not close to Goosebumps though. Goosebumps is the leading seller and i'm pretty such is the biggest selling kids series of books of all time or at least it was in time time.

FNAF is popular sure but its not goosebumps level of successful. Saying FNAF is the next Goosebumps is like saying Klay Thompson is the next Michael Jordan. They are both successful in their field but one is Michael Jordan

it's actually wild that there's paragraphs and paragraphs being typed in an argument about goosebumps vs five nights at freddy's of all things right now. definitely a fresh change of pace, just unexpected is all

I4NRulez posted...

Its not close to Goosebumps though. Goosebumps is the leading seller and i'm pretty such is the biggest selling kids series of books of all time or at least it was in time time.

For sure. Goosebumps is much more successful and likely there will never be anything that will touch it's sales numbers since it's not the 90s anymore and book franchises won't be that big.

In terms of book sales figures it can't be touched by anything except Harry Potter

FNAF is popular sure but its not goosebumps level of successful. Saying FNAF is the next Goosebumps is like saying Klay Thompson is the next Michael Jordan. They are both successful in their field but one is Michael Jordan

People compared Kobe Bryant to Jordan all the time.

viewmaster_pi posted...

it's actually wild that there's paragraphs and paragraphs being typed in an argument about goosebumps vs five nights at freddy's of all things right now. definitely a fresh change of pace, just unexpected is all

It's not even vs.

I'm not stating either franchise is better

The dude is literally saying you're not allowed to compare them because he prefers the one he grew up with. It's bonkers.

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

People compared Kobe Bryant to Jordan all the time.

FNAF isnt even the Kobe Bryant of the genre

Guns_of_Verdun posted...

The dude is literally saying you're not allowed to compare them because he prefers the one he grew up with. It's bonkers.

That's not what im saying at all.

I like the turn this topic took