Current Events > What Are The BEST Ways To ANGER Someone in a Debate?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Whether it's an IRL or internet debate

what are some of the best ways to anger or frustrate someone in a debate?

shoot their dog

Be right

Lots of ways. Red Herring, Strawman, Gaslighting, Attacking the Messenger, twisting facts, etc.

It depends on how little wherewithal you have.

"You only say that because you're...."

come to the debate nude

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/0/4/AAcI8BAAEGVI.jpg

Tickle them during their opening argument.

TMOG posted...

Be right

yeah, thats true haha

Sleep with their mother on stage during the debate.

Every rebuttal is just an airhorn.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/1/1/AAEhCpAAEGVP.jpg

Do and say everything you normally would but have the tip of your dick coming out of your pants, then use your fingers to manuever your foreskin in a way that it looks like it is actually your penis talking. Like you are doing a ventriloquist act and your own penis is your puppet. It can be hard to make like hard consonsants look realistic through foreskin lips but if you practice enough it will look aight.

Note: does not work if circumcised

Probably just mentioning something they have a personal connection to. I posted a statistic about crime rates for teachers by the actual FBI conducted in 2018 in a thread about teachers and got suspended. I expect the mod or the person who reported me either was a teacher or had a friend/family member that was an educator.

Jennywentnorth8 posted...

Note: does not work if circumcised

You'll just have to glue googly eyes on the head and wiggle it around.

Jump_Fangirl posted...

Probably just mentioning something they have a personal connection to. I posted a statistic about crime rates for teachers by the actual FBI conducted in 2018 in a thread about teachers and got suspended. I expect the mod or the person who reported me either was a teacher or had a friend/family member that was an educator.

This post is missing a fair bit of context lol

TMOG posted...

This post is missing a fair bit of context lol

I don't want to get banned again.

Jump_Fangirl posted...

I don't want to get banned again.

You can probably safely go into more context on what the topic was about beyond "it was about teachers" and why the FBI crime data was relevant to it

If irl just repeat everything they say

Say so many things that arent quite true or are dramatically exaggerated in such rapid succession that they cant form a response to it all in time

and end it with a funny remark that relieves tension and gets the room on your side

I get angry when people drag it off topic and assume my intentions or experiences. But, I also catch myself doing that too. The only difference is I don't dig my feet in. As soon as someone says "Nope, you got it wrong. That's not me", I accept their word. As to where others mught double down and accuse you of lying while having zero insight on anything about you.

https://youtu.be/XpXkkwUWg-Q

Oh no no no Jump Fangirl I don't play the PM game, you can post it in public where everyone can see

After an excessive amount of back and forth, I just tell them they're right and to enjoy the rest of the day.

99.9% of the time it makes them angrier than continuing the argument.

Keep poking them.

TMOG posted...

Oh no no no Jump Fangirl I don't play the PM game, you can post it in public where everyone can see

There was a teacher who unexpectedly killed himself and people were asking why. I posted a study by the FBI Crime Prevention unit that 10% of all students are "victimized" by their teachers. I was told I was posting inappropriate content. I'm trying to avoid terms that may lead to an auto ban.

TMOG posted...

So what exactly made your link about teachers diddling their students relevant to this teacher's suicide?

Because there are greater than average odds as he worked as a principal as well that he had at least been involved in covering up something by a teacher. The article went on to show how the average offending teacher would go on to work at an average of three schools.

Nah I think my point was made well enough that I don't need to follow up lol

Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

AlephZero posted...

Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like its a peach of cake.

Accuse them of being racist

respond to everything they say with "you're begging the question"

"I'll pray for you sweetie"

Fart. Insist it was them.

Ok boomer

Say they aren't listening