Current Events > james cameron spent millions on whining about ppl nitpicking titanic

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/FB_BMB/status/1603887591098814464?s=20&t=iK2A2csTFm91b6m0EH7koQ

this is just sad and pathetic

Cameron is going senile

He should have paid mythbusters to do it, then it would have been cool

Octans posted...

He should have paid mythbusters to do it, then it would have been cool

they did do it

and they busted it proving a door can support both

Octans posted...

He should have paid mythbusters to do it, then it would have been cool

Didnt they do it?

Of course the poverty stricken old timey guy knew all the scientific research.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPDxtclZzVU

Nitpicking refers to the picking of lice eggs from our hair. Just an FYI.

Aridi posted...

Nitpicking refers to the picking of lice eggs from our hair. Just an FYI.

That's an accurate description of watching the movie Titanic.

lol

roju posted...

Rose barely survived. The door would submerge both her and Jack just enough to kill freeze them both.

the mythbusters debunked this

It looks to me like he found a way to produce new content about a massively successful movie he made over 25 years ago that will also probably earn him money in itself

AceMos posted...

the mythbusters debunked this

Not really. Too people who have the time, skill, and modern knowledge of the titanic to think of a third solution that involves going against what would seem like common knowledge and risking your life jacket isn't really the same as two people actively freezing to death while trying to think of a solution in 1912. >.>

I get that it is more than likely that they could have both survived if they did, but it doesn't seem like either of them would have actuallyrisked trying that.

itachi15243 posted...

Not really. Too people who have the time, skill, and modern knowledge of the titanic to think of a third solution that involves going against what would seem like common knowledge and risking your life jacket isn't really the same as two people actively freezing to death while trying to think of a solution in 1912. >.>

I get that it is more than likely that they could have both survived if they did, but it doesn't seem like either of them would have actuallyrisked trying that.

or james cameron only cared about his cheap emotional manipulation ending

and he is salty ppl have been proving it wrong for 25 years so he is paying ppl to prove him right (which means the data cant even be trusted as these ppl where payed to get this conclusion)

You know... this new "mature" James Cameron could probably make a decent Edmund Fitzgerald film

AceMos posted...

or james cameron only cared about his cheap emotional manipulation ending

and he is salty ppl have been proving it wrong for 25 years so he is paying ppl to prove him right (which means the data cant even be trusted as these ppl where payed to get this conclusion)

He sounding like Dream.

itachi15243 posted...

Not really. Too people who have the time, skill, and modern knowledge of the titanic to think of a third solution that involves going against what would seem like common knowledge and risking your life jacket isn't really the same as two people actively freezing to death while trying to think of a solution in 1912. >.>

I get that it is more than likely that they could have both survived if they did, but it doesn't seem like either of them would have actuallyrisked trying that.

No, they did debunk it.
The myth wasn't "Why did the characters choose to do this?". The myth was them both dying if they were both using the door. A thing that Cameron himself said.
He didn't try to explain it away using history, character justifications and the like as you are doing, he just said "nope, both dead".

Questionmarktarius posted...

You know... this new "mature" James Cameron could probably make a decent Edmund Fitzgerald film

How would he incorporate a door raft?

DeadBankerDream posted...

How would he incorporate a door raft?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/5/6/AAEhCpAAD_34.jpg

This is like the most perfect definition of triggered I could ever think of. They should just replace whatever existing definition there is in the dictionary with this Twitter post

Questionmarktarius posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/5/6/AAEhCpAAD_34.jpg

I didn't realize the wreck was salvaged.

AceMos posted...

or james cameron only cared about his cheap emotional manipulation ending

and he is salty ppl have been proving it wrong for 25 years so he is paying ppl to prove him right (which means the data cant even be trusted as these ppl where payed to get this conclusion)

TheSavageDragon posted...

No, they did debunk it.
The myth wasn't "Why did the characters choose to do this?". The myth was them both dying if they were both using the door. A thing that Cameron himself said.
He didn't try to explain it away using history, character justifications and the like as you are doing, he just said "nope, both dead".

I know, just pointing out the obvious on this one. I wouldn't be surprised if he either went with the explanation I gave, subtly altered the dimensions of the door, or otherwise tried to walk back his claims just to say that he won.

I wouldn't expect much from this.

DeadBankerDream posted...

I didn't realize the wreck was salvaged.

That's a lifeboat.

bump

Why do you hate James Cameron so much lmao

Didn't Mythbusters do their experiment in warm water?

What i dont get is, why didnt jack look for another piece of floating debris to get on?

There was plenty of shit scattered around them.

Flauros posted...

What i dont get is, why didnt jack look for another piece of floating debris to get on?

There was plenty of shit scattered around them.

because james wanted his emotional manipulation ending

Flauros posted...

What i dont get is, why didnt jack look for another piece of floating debris to get on?

There was plenty of shit scattered around them.

Protecting Rose was his main concern.

ForsakenHermit posted...

Protecting Rose was his main concern.

Fuck that thot.

AceMos posted...

because james wanted his emotional manipulation ending

Lame.

One thing Titanic shouldn't have done is reveal Old Rose's full name early on. It reveals that best case scenario she and Jaxk weren't a thing by the 1920's.

Heh, even if he was on the door there's no guarantee he would have lived.

ForsakenHermit posted...

One thing Titanic shouldn't have done is reveal Old Rose's full name early on. It reveals that best case scenario she and Jaxk weren't a thing by the 1920's.

I feel like its kind of silly to complain about being able to guess the ending of a movie about the Titanic.

DeadBankerDream posted...

I feel like its kind of silly to complain about being able to guess the ending of a movie about the Titanic.

The ship going down? Yeah everyone knows that's gonna happen.

The fates of certain characters? That's fair game as they're the reason we get invested in the story in the first place.

Jack had to die, he was poor!