Current Events > No one wants women in their 40s and 50s

(+) Yeah! (+)

Sackgurl posted...

one of the things that has stood out to me as a common experience among my single female friends is that the main place they're meeting men is dating sites

but if they were meeting men through common interests instead, they could meet unavailable men with no single male friends!

Tell them to go, talk to people, get hobbies or go to the club.

Online dating is a train wreck.

lolife67 posted...

Most people who believe stuff like this tend to also be perpetually single.

Facts, andrew tate is single

Jx1010 posted...

Facts, andrew tate is single

Thats like saying Leonardo DiCaprio is single.

It is technically true, but practically speaking, ehh, not so much.

Lost_All_Senses posted...

Which is fair. But why reject when someone is giving you more insight on the person and then drag the conversation back to something a person didn't even say they disagree with. That's just refusing to advance a conversation into something deeper. I was just adding context to her character. Tbf, he also mentioned she could be a grifter or what not. So, he's actually taking in the nee information while still acting like we're at some disagreement >_>. I don't think Cuttin is dumb or lacking common sense or anything. Im just not sure why it would be assume I can't do that whole actually knowing more about the person as well and their intentions. You would think that would be a plus of insight instead of something to argue against

I guess for me, topics like this I interpret differently.

I interpret the point of this topic as Listen to this quote, and discuss.

So when a few of posts are this:

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


CommonStar posted...

This lady sucks. She got some internalized misogyny. Tries to be a pick me.

Flockaveli posted...

Stop posting this ugly THOT

Lost_All_Senses posted...

Ah. CE has found their woman against women to justify their shallow ways. I knew it was only time until you guys stumbled upon her.

I get annoyed. Because none of these posts are productive. None of these posts address the point made. None of these posts add any context to anything. Because even if all of these opinions or claims are true, the topic of discussion is not be refuted.

I think youre a great poster, but I dont even know your stance on what she said. I can infer it since you said shallow people flock to her, but you havent contributed to the discussion I thought this topic is about.

Its especially irksome because good posters like Gladius reveal stuff like this:

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



So I cant even trust that yall are being objective in your analysis. So I personally dont think the person giving the message will ever be relevant in a topic like this.

You get me?

These women are needed by millions of homeless cats, think of how miserable the poor animals will be if not for these woman being themselves.

Animals need good homes, and no one can deny that cats are living well when these older ladies take many of them in.

cuttin_in_farm posted...

I get annoyed. Because none of these posts are productive. None of these posts address the point made. None of these posts add any context to anything. Because even if all of these opinions or claims are true, the topic of discussion is not be refuted.

I think youre a great poster, but I dont even know your stance on what she said. I can infer it since you said shallow people flock to her, but you havent contributed to the discussion I thought this topic is about.

Fair enough. I guess I didn't have to generalize CE. You're right, that doesn't add anything. It was just something I had in the back of my mind when I first seen her talked about and knew she'd eventually pop up here. When she popped up here being praised, it felt like it spoke for CE to me in the moment.

Jx1010 posted...

Facts, andrew tate is single

Andrew Tate doesnt believe in marriage, instead he has a huge vast amount of women who basically sleep with him, I guess hoping he will some reason change his mind?

So yeah Andrew Tate is the kind of guy who can say anything he wants to a womans face and then will still sleep with him, he owns a yacht after all.

40 year old woman are great. I dated one some years ago. Most of them have their shit together by that age.

SpiritSephiroth posted...

"Its a good thing I got personality" lmao

From my experience the girls who say this have personalities of a plank >_>

The level of conceitedness in a person saying that

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Been watching some of her videos the past few days. Did you see her video where she was like "if you've slept with other men you're no longer pure"

I was rofling on the floor laughing at that point

Noumas posted...

Did you see her video where she was like "if you've slept with other men you're no longer pure"

I was rofling on the floor laughing at that point

I dont get it. In the context of traditional expectations, which those guests were probably discussing, shes not wrong.

This topic serves as a routine reminder to make a daily run on Bumble.

AlephZero posted...

women finally find out what it's like to be an average man and they fall into a deep depression lol

Oh hohoho you think it's just the average ones and below who have a hard time do you?

CommonStar posted...

This lady sucks. She got some internalized misogyny. Tries to be a pick me.

pick me's are dope, nothing worse than cookie cutter generic people with no worldview

Vampire_Chicken posted...

It's reflected in a patently nonsensical statement like "No one wants women in their 40s and 50s".

You being able to find a man, or 10 men, or 10,000 who will date women that old doesn't actually make it untrue, though. It's a generalization that's obviously pretty accurate. There's a reason the fear exists in the first place, remember. See post 21

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Most definitely not true, the most common would be dating in school, first and foremost. For a lot of people that's their ONLY experience.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

This doesn't show what you think it does. That user was talking about dating experience, not couples who are currently together and how they met.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

That doesn't follow at all. Most people who are in a relationship have prior dating experience.

Some older women are hawt.

dj1200 posted...

Some older women are hawt.

Have you seen Candyman (the original and the recent reboot)?

The woman who plays the Candyman's mom is in both of them but they were filmed like 30 years apart. Literally looks almost exactly the same in both films. I was blown away, my first thought was "how'd they find someone who looks so much like the first one's actress?" lol

Elizabeth Hurley is still looking pretty good too, as is MIA

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Why are you making this about highschool? I never said highschool.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

...you do know people go to elementary and middle school before high school right

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

That's a pretty desperate grasp even from you tbf, let's not move goalposts around to suit our argument please.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

You probably don't remember what you had for dinner three nights ago, this argument is just dumb. It can be extended to anything past your current relationship, those certainly aren't remembered as well as what you did with your s/o yesterday. Weak sauce

Also I'd like to point out two problems with your guys' argument

1. The data here has a problem with recency bias in the way you're using it. Couples who are currently together (what this data shows) will of course have mostly met via the current most popular avenue, that's why this data isn't useful for your argument. Those couples that are still together of course met more recently than they met with their previous partners so the most trendy way of getting together is obviously going to be overrepresented here.
2. It doesn't even show what you're claiming, only 39% of them met through online according to that data. That leaves most people having met not online, so most peoples' dating experience is literally not from online based on this info. lol

Why do Noumas topics always last a week or longer

MedeaLysistrata posted...

Why do Noumas topics always last a week or longer

He always necro bumps his own topic.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

This really doesn't mean anything though, lives aren't measured in time, but in moments. Being generous to you and assuming someone only has opportunity & desire to date for 5 years out of their school career (8th-12th grades, no college), that's 5 years of a LOT of interactions with other people for most kids. A lot of people here (ironically this applies even moreso to online daters) can go MONTHS not having as many interactions with other people as they had in a week of school. It's important to remember the difference in interaction density. Personally, I often go a good month not talking to anyone outside of family at length, that was just not a thing in school at all

Haejin posted...

Shit thats so fucked. But something theyre also forgetting is its not just looks but men arent going to go for a women who will have a more difficult time baring children.

Not every man or woman wants to have children or deal with them. Rightfully so, given that having children ruins your freedom and you have to completely change how you live, and not everybody finds appeal in that. So lots of people don't care about "baring children" at all. This is 2022. Also, asexual people and gay/bi/lesbian people exist.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Data that doesn't actually show what you're claiming, lol.
I like this gimmick though, the pigeon playing chess style of argumentation where you shit all over the place and then strut around as if you won, kek I kinda want to keep this going just to see more of that.

I like how the pew research you posted also doesn't in any way prove your claim that most dating experience comes from online dating, lmao why do you keep throwing out irrelevant data points?
Also you never addressed my point that whatshisface's data literally shows most dating experience is not from online dating

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

It does not.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

No I want you to address the fact that his study shows literally less than 40% of couples met online. Further stressing your point's solidity, that's only current couples. Online dating is relatively new, past experience for most people will be an even lower number than that the further back you go since it's more popular now than ever. No matter how you slice it, online dating isn't more ubiquitous than offline.

kek

Oubliettes posted...

kek

jej, even.

In case it hasnt been mentioned already, we can include Instagram to the mix of online dating platforms.

Its virtual flesh market, for better or worse.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Yeah if you count anything involving meeting someone online as online "dating" I'd believe that the majority of people with dating experience have some with online dating. I was thinking more along the lines of actual dating sites but if social media counts as well then I'd believe it. Anyway I agree online dating sucks but then so does all dating

Here in Japan, women over 25 have the nickname "Christmas Cake".

Because no one wants a Christmas cake after the 25th.

Also decided to watch the video. Why tf is everyone jumping on this woman? She seemed sensible to me. Hell, that's all common knowledge in this country. Is it not the same in the USA, or is there just a bunch of denial going around?