Current Events > No matter what side you fall on, can we all agree the runoff is stoopud

Topic List	Page List: 1
SauI_Goodman 11/14/22 1:55:45 PM #1:	Agree? Yes No Agree? - Results (25 votes) Yes 48% (12 votes) 12 No 52% (13 votes) 13 Lol georgia --- Italian, French, German. <cite>SauI_Goodman posted [p:969423852] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote> Agree? Yes No Vote View Results Agree? - Results (25 votes) Yes 48% (12 votes) 12 No 52% (13 votes) 13 Show Voting Form function poll_vote() { var vote_option = $("input[name='poll_vote']:checked").val(); if(!vote_option) return; $.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: '/ajax/forum_poll_vote', data: { option: vote_option, board: '400', topic: '80233368', message: '0', key: 'e065826f' }, success: function(response) { if(response.error) { alert(response.error); } else { $("#poll_vote").hide(); $("#poll_results").html(response.html).show(); } } }); } function view_results_legacy() { $("#poll_vote").hide(); $("#poll_results").show(); } function hide_results_legacy() { $("#poll_results").hide(); $("#poll_vote").show(); } Lol georgia </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SauI_Goodman 11/14/22 2:01:43 PM #2:	Are you 3 people republicans lol hoping for a victory. I speak as a non partisan. --- Italian, French, German. <cite>SauI_Goodman posted [p:969423997] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>Are you 3 people republicans lol hoping for a victory. I speak as a non partisan.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FL81 11/17/22 12:20:32 AM #3:	No, it's a better system than just giving it to whoever gets the most votes in the first round although, ranked choice voting would be ideal --- Thanks to Proofpyros for the sig images https://i.imgur.com/Nv4Pi1v.jpg https://i.imgur.com/N43HJYv.jpg <cite>FL81 posted [p:969484191] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>No, it's a better system than just giving it to whoever gets the most votes in the first roundalthough, ranked choice voting would be ideal</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 11/17/22 12:25:12 AM #4:	FL81 posted... No, it's a better system than just giving it to whoever gets the most votes in the first round although, ranked choice voting would be ideal This, absolutely. --- I'm Queen of Tomorrow baby! Remember: heat from fire, fire from heat! She/her <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:969484253] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>FL81 posted... </cite><quote>No, it's a better system than just giving it to whoever gets the most votes in the first roundalthough, ranked choice voting would be ideal</quote>This, absolutely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 11/17/22 12:27:14 AM #5:	I see nothing particularly wrong with mandating that a winner has to get over 50% of the vote. Truth be told, Im more a fan of jungle primary systems that toss everyone into one pool and then the two top vote-getters go head-to-head in the general. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:969484276] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>I see nothing particularly wrong with mandating that a winner has to get over 50% of the vote.Truth be told, Im more a fan of jungle primary systems that toss everyone into one pool and then the two top vote-getters go head-to-head in the general.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fin_Dawg_004 11/17/22 12:33:27 AM #6:	https://time.com/6232641/georgia-runoffs-racist-history-warnock-walker/ Georgias runoff system began in 1963 when state representative Denmark Grooveran avid segregationistproposed adding a second round of voting to ensure that at least half of all constituents backed a candidate. Groovers proposal came a few years after he lost his previous election bid in 1958, which he blamed on Negro bloc voting, or that theoretically, if Black voters put up a united front and voted consistently, it would further their political interests. Groover thought that a runoff would decrease the likelihood of an African-American being elected because it would rally white voters around a white candidate. --- Ruthkanda Forever <cite>Fin_Dawg_004 posted [p:969484366] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>https://time.com/6232641/georgia-runoffs-racist-history-warnock-walker/Georgias runoff system began in 1963 when state representative Denmark Grooveran avid segregationistproposed adding a second round of voting to ensure that at least half of all constituents backed a candidate.Groovers proposal came a few years after he lost his previous election bid in 1958, which he blamed on Negro bloc voting, or that theoretically, if Black voters put up a united front and voted consistently, it would further their political interests. Groover thought that a runoff would decrease the likelihood of an African-American being elected because it would rally white voters around a white candidate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GGuirao13 11/17/22 3:28:24 AM #7:	Agreed. Elections should be decided by a simple, mathematical result. --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>GGuirao13 posted [p:969486151] in No matter ... [t:80233368]...</cite> <quote>Agreed. Elections should be decided by a simple, mathematical result.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > No matter what side you fall on, can we all agree the runoff is stoopud (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > No matter what side you fall on, can we all agree the runoff is stoopud