Current Events > Should the bodies of the Texas children be release to the public?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Some are saying that they should be released, so that the world understands the true horror of these mass shootings. Do you agree?

What the fuck are you talking about

Should be up to the parents.

Or just let the families have their privacy. No one wants to see that

This is fucking weird.

No, it will change zero minds and is just a grotesque idea.

For what? Is this some consipiracy theory bullshit like Sandy Hook and Alex Jones? I really hope it's not, but I'm struggling to find a reason why any decent human being would "demand" to see the bodies of some shot up school children.

The fuck is wrong with you TC? This topic needs closing.

What would it change?

If it motivates politicians to push for stronger gun control, yeah, maybe.
If you think the sight will cause even a single person to let go of their firearms, you're wasting your time.

I think folks are going with the Emmett Till approach, as macabre as it seems.

Bodies, or pictures of them?

spikethedevil posted...

The fuck is wrong with you TC? This topic needs closing.

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I never said I wanted the bodies released. I read a news article, which talked about how others were talking about how the pictures of the slain bodies should be shown the public, because it would bring awareness. Never once did I say I wanted to see the bodies. What's wrong with you? @spikethedevil

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I'm picturing something like how Emmitt Till's mother chose to release photos of his body to the public.

thronedfire2 posted...

Bodies, or pictures of them?

I meant that some people were saying, that pictures should be released. What did people think I was saying?

I highly doubt you would get ANY of the families to agree to that.

Even wanting pictures of dead kids released is fucked up.

This is some topic

spikethedevil posted...

Even wanting pictures of dead kids released is fucked up.

Yes I agree. Which is why I wasnt saying that I would want to see pictures. I was saying that some have been saying that releasing pics to the public (such as the republicans, etc), would accelerate change.

u have a disturbing fetish

It wouldn't even change the opinions of the ghouls in Congress and all you've done is horrified a general public that largely wants some sort of action on guns anyway.

There is no good reason to do something that awful.

It should be up to the parents.

Emmett Till's mother deciding to release photos of his body to the press is what sparked the civil rights movement.

prisonerd posted...

u have a disturbing fetish

I....think you misunderstood the topic. Re-read.

jstewart01 posted...

I meant that some people were saying, that pictures should be released. What did people think I was saying?

well the titles says the bodies not pictures

like you wanted to have the bodies donated to science

man, shut up

With the parents' consent, yes

Then just fucking blast them in ads against every single politician who votes against any form of bill to address this shit

thronedfire2 posted...

well the titles says the bodies not pictures

like you wanted to have the bodies donated to science

What the f***?

BigSLM1993 posted...

I think folks are going with the Emmett Till approach, as macabre as it seems.

A_Good_Boy posted...

I'm picturing something like how Emmitt Till's mother chose to release photos of his body to the public.

I can understand that and if the parents are willing to do that I see no problem. Why not? America needs to see what lack of action results in. Hell according to the conservatives there's no difference in an aborted fetus and a slain 8 year old. What would be the difference between the aftermath of an abortion and the aftermath of these murders then?

Emmitt Till

I dont think so, tim. We already know how messed up it is.

jstewart01 posted...

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I never said I wanted the bodies released. I read a news article, which talked about how others were talking about how the pictures of the slain bodies should be shown the public, because it would bring awareness. Never once did I say I wanted to see the bodies. What's wrong with you? @spikethedevil

The way you worded the original post sounds like you're talking about the bodies themselves, not just photos thereof. It wasn't until your later posts clarifying it that I realised you meant photos.

The pro-life crowd loves to show dead fetuses, so I don't see why not. Stick a trigger warning on it and show us the brutal reality of the world all the time.

Bump

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Not to mention which group would be more likely to get their rocks off from that in the first place...

No, absolutely not. Nothing about the appearances of the bodies of the victims should be released because it involves minors who were horrifically murdered as there are a lot of sick and / or crazy bastards out there who enjoy seeing children hurt, especially minority children, and they will mock them and will make ignorant political statements online just to rile people up and hurt their families and friends.

i learned very much in one governor who wants to have AR to hunt foxes so the chickens would survive at the expense of children.

Here, when you buy cigarettes or tobacco theres a picture of what smoking can do to you on the carton

Maybe they should do something similar with gun stores.

The_Creep_2020 posted...

Maybe they should do something similar with gun stores.

no amount of drilling that information into a republican's skull will get the point across.

The_Creep_2020 posted...

Here, when you buy cigarettes or tobacco theres a picture of what smoking can do to you on the carton

Maybe they should do something similar with gun stores.

When you use a gun you generally aren't the one who ends up riddled with holes. :/