Current Events > Why are conservatives considerably more charitable then liberals?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Jesserae posted...

where does politics even play role in on the ground disaster relief.

This grammar has to be intentional lmao

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Pick a singular aspect and an unimportant aspect comparatively to say education and medicine and then exaggerate to the utmost limit. I guess you really are shameless and disgustingly disrespectful to a deceased aboriginal elder.

Selfish liberals seethe at the idea of any conservative doing/giving more than they do, even though selfish liberals that feign concern to appear morally superior don't really do anything for other people on a regular basis. They don't give money or time, they just complain.

Jesserae posted...

That's fantastic, I respect that immensely, but why is it unfortunate to work with conservatives when you both have same goal of helping people?, where does politics even play role in on the ground disaster relief.

Its unfortunate because in order to best help the communities in need we often end up in partnerships with people like preachers who give anti-LGBT sermons or like to be vocal about their feelings on infanticide. I would much prefer it if we could do what we do without having to passively condone people with hateful, bigoted beliefs.

TotAll posted...

Selfish liberals seethe at the idea of any conservative doing/giving more than they do, even though selfish liberals that feign concern to appear morally superior don't really do anything for other people on a regular basis. They don't give money or time, they just complain.

You must be a Trump supporter with comprehension this bad

AmishDoinks420 posted...

This grammar has to be intentional lmao

Grammar and typo mistakes, the cornerstone of the online leftist debate strategy.

Tenlaar posted...

Its unfortunate because in order to best help the communities in need we often end up in partnerships with people like preachers who give anti-LGBT sermons or like to be vocal about their feelings on infanticide. I would much prefer it if we could do what we do without having to passively condone people with hateful, bigoted beliefs.

You don't have to condone it at all, all you have to do is help, in a crisis political belief is irrelevant, you wouldn't ask a man if was a conservative before you saved him from drowning.

Jesserae posted...

Grammar and typo mistakes, the cornerstone of the online leftist debate strategy.

Its a pretty good indication of where someone is mentally, yes. Especially if its the language you were born into.

I can't believe that you guys are actually feeding a troll that's this bad at trolling.
This topic shouldn't have ever made it past the first page.

Turbam posted...

I can't believe that you guys are actually feeding a troll that's this bad at trolling.
This topic shouldn't have ever made it past the first page.

Clearly TC doesn't get enough attention in his normal life, so we're being charitable

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

People can see exactly what I said earlier in the thread and the context, you are only serving to make yourself look like a cruel and dishonest person, you might fool someone who enters at this point but everyone else can see how shamefully you're acting.

Rathinor posted...

You must be a Trump supporter with comprehension this bad

Trump is one of the worst that has happened in recent history.

What exactly did I fail to "comprehend"? Please be very specific.

Watch everyone else as this guy never answers this question.

@Jesserae Trump isn't a real Christian.... use your brain he married a whore. He's been divorced twice and paid plenty of pornstars to sleep with hiim.

My goodness it didn't take long for TC to abandon his impartial facade.

Jesserae posted...

You don't have to condone it at all, all you have to do is help, in a crisis political belief is irrelevant, you wouldn't ask a man if was a conservative before you saved him from drowning.

It never stops being relevant if someone thinks some members of your team shouldnt have the same rights as everyone else and actively push for that goal.

AmishDoinks420 posted...

Its a pretty good indication of where someone is mentally, yes. Especially if its the language you were born into.

It's more indicative of their access to education, this is an incredibly racist statement you've made.

COVxy posted...

Except significant doesn't mean what you're trying to suggest it does, and you cut off the portion of the abstract that directly contradicts what you say.

Like, the overall mean is slightly biased towards conservatives, but it's not strong, and that bias almost entirely depends on structures of organized religion and individual wealth.

So what bullshit have y'all been talking about for 100 posts? The discussion was basically over with this one.

Tenlaar posted...

It never stops being relevant if someone thinks some members of your team shouldnt have the same rights as everyone else and actively push for that goal.

So it's relevant when you are knee deep in water stacking sand bags next to a conservative to save the home of someone who's politics neither of you know, but there you both are helping.

Jabodie posted...

So what bullshit have y'all been talking about for 100 posts? The discussion was basically over with this one.

Except that was incorrect, significant was meant literally, and I shared the numbers later showing the significant difference in charitable acts, it's not a small amount.

Anybody else feel like TC is just a few posts away from using the N-word?

Jesserae posted...

So it's relevant when you are knee deep in water stacking sand bags next to a conservative to save the home of someone who's politics neither of you know, but there you both are helping.

Yes. It not being the most immediate or overwhelming concern doesnt make it no longer relevant.

What posted

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Could you be anymore dishonest?, could you be anymore shameless?.
Your behaviour is incredibly disgusting for someone who claims the moral high ground through their political affiliation.

Jesserae posted...

Could you be anymore dishonest?, could you be anymore shameless?.
Your behaviour is incredibly disgusting for someone who claims the moral high ground through their political affiliation.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/9/6/AACEPOAADOkQ.jpg

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

He said that compassion fatigue, which is a very real thing, led to alcoholism which killed him.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

If I needed it, I'd go to volunteer organisation and I'd statistically speaking most likely be helped by a conservative.

Tenlaar posted...

He said that compassion fatigue, which is a very real thing, led to alcoholism which killed him.

They would have to know what compassion is to understand friend, but thank for wording it better than I did.

They think charity works, and leftists know better. Also conservatives have more money to throw away, since their political ideology is built around thievery, and they can dodge taxes (which are actually useful) by throwing it at charities.

Decided to read through the article in the OP. Some fun excerpts:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/1/7/AAQ6H1AADOkl.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/1/8/AAQ6H1AADOkm.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/1/9/AAQ6H1AADOkn.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/0/AAQ6H1AADOko.jpg
And, of course, the important meta analysis caveat:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/1/AAQ6H1AADOkp.jpg
Sorry if these have already been posted here. I just found them illuminating for the question posed in the topic title.

you shouldn't use a scientific study like a knife,

Jesserae posted...

So not only do conservatives have a better work ethic, they are also more likely to improve the lives of people around them with fruits of their labour.

Imagine being this deluded.