Current Events > Noraneko_Vel is WARNED

(+) Yeah! (+)

Probably shouldn't double down on dumb shit.

Finally, should have happened way earlier

I forgot what he did, but I remember seeing his post yesterday and knowing he was going in time out soon.

i don't trust anyone with neko in their name

Umbreon posted...

I forgot what he did, but I remember seeing his post yesterday and knowing he was going in time out soon.

Had a melty in a topic about AI: Somnium Files having a pro-LGBT line in it.

viewmaster_pi posted...

i don't trust anyone with neko in their name

I've seen some decentish users with it. This guy's just a bad apple.

Oh yeah, that dumb shit.

"She was clearly intimidated into saying something positive about LGBT people!"

Even though the cutscene suggested no such thing. And she didn't look scared. Or sound scared. Nor would have any reason to feel threatened at all.

People still debate Mizuki's line from years back? lol I wish the game at least got more exposure off that as it needs more attention. Surprised it got a sequel on the way.

Boy, I sure do wonder why users that are against LGBT stuff tend to be the people that get suspended/banned the most on a regular basis. Who knows!?

My fellow Kokomi lover got warned!?

Aitz posted...

My fellow Kokomi lover got warned!?

And it never had a meaning in the end coz the warning status allows people to continue posting with minimal restrictions and the moderation team stopped doing the meaningless alt witch hunts.

It was pretty surprising how agressive the group mentality on this board is, violently rejecting and torching people for having different opinions and attempting discussion.

But hey, if the people on this board enjoy effectively talking to themselves, because disagreeing is offensive, I'll let them be. I just prefered considering the perspectives of both sides (culprit/victim, right/wrong etc) before judging who is evil, or if there is evil at all.

If liking music games and having a dance video in my signature makes me evil here, I'll just interact with people who are more open-minded in other places instead.

Kitt posted...

Boy, I sure do wonder why users that are against LGBT stuff tend to be the people that get suspended/banned the most on a regular basis. Who knows!?

Users here claim the mods don't do anything against transpobia tho

Sexypwnstar posted...

Users here claim the mods don't do anything against transpobia tho

I'm not even against LBGT at all, though. I love Mizuki and I love the game.
But yeah, voice any questionable opinions about this topic here at all and it's immediately harshest possible moderation from clean moderation history.

V_exe1 posted...

And it never had a meaning in the end coz the warning status allows people to continue posting with minimal restrictions and the moderation team stopped doing the meaningless alt witch hunts.

It was pretty surprising how agressive the group mentality on this board is, violently rejecting and torching people for having different opinions and attempting discussion.

But hey, if the people on this board enjoy effectively talking to themselves, because disagreeing is offensive, I'll let them be. I just prefered considering the perspectives of both sides (culprit/victim, right/wrong etc) before judging who is evil, or if there is evil at all.

If liking music games and having a dance video in my signature makes me evil here, I'll just interact with people who are more open-minded in other places instead.

Nah mate, as someone who likes the same stuff you do, you were being incredibly obnoxious, embarrassing yourself and proving bad stereotypes right. You were the one doubling down and attacking other people's character just because people corrected you. You should've immediately stepped away while you were ahead. No offense (although, a person like you who claims to not be oversensitive shouldn't take offense right) but do you have some sort of condition that prevents self-awareness?

Also, your alt https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/community/39_Miku got banned.

You don't get warned/suspended for a "difference of opinion". You do however get that for breaking the ToU.

Umbreon posted...

You don't get warned/suspended for a "difference of opinion". You do however get that for breaking the ToU.

If you think that is the truth, then it must be true.
*shrug*
I really don't care anymore though, it was discussed enough.

02fran posted...

You were the one doubling down and attacking other people's character

So saying negative things about a fictional game character I like is forbidden here.
Got it.

By the way, how do I tell which character belongs to other people here?

02fran posted...

do you have some sort of condition that prevents self-awareness

Then, are you self-aware?

Again, if you're comfortable intentionally misgendering a fictional character then you're probably comfortable intentionally misgendering a real person.

Possibly under the excuse of 'It doesn't matter if they don't know about it.'

Also you got pretty insulting with the users who kept asking you to stop doing what you did. So, you know.

I don't believe it was intentional misgendering. But the moderators made their point, so I literally can't discuss that anymore and I won't.

I'll just stick to discussing stuff I like instead here.

You were corrected, and you kept fighting it.

Intentional.

I was asking people to tell me if the character dislikes my choice or if the character asked to be called a specific one.

That got completely ignored, even after being brought up again and again.

So yeah, this discussion has no meaning anymore. I stopped caring.

V_exe1 posted...

So saying negative things about a fictional game character I like is forbidden here.
Got it.

By the way, how do I tell which character belongs to other people here?

Saying blatantly false things about a fictional game character (and using talking points of bigots to do so) is childish and obnoxious. How can you not see that? The character was never referred to as "he" by the game itself so there's no reason to use it other than because of a personal agenda. I mean, sure you have the "right" to do it because they're fictional but imagine someone insisting Mario and Luigi are into gay incest because they personally like it. Just because they're fictional doesn't mean doing it doesn't look obnoxious and stupid to others (and potentially offensive for this site). It looks like a 10 year old making up whatever they want.

02fran posted...

Saying blatantly false things about a fictional game character

I was never told it was false. People never answered my request if the character disliked it.
When I am told I was false and to shut up and accept it, I prefer to question why it is so. If it is childish to enquire, I am fine being childish.
But that conversation got forcefully shut down, so it is over now.

Oh right.

Didn't you also lie about the context of the cutscene and said the pro-LGBT line was only said because the character who said it was "intimidated"? Despite there being zero evidence to support that.

V_exe1 posted...

I was asking people to tell me if the character dislikes my choice or if the character asked to be called a specific one.

In other words, you were defending an intentional misgendering.

Umbreon posted...

was only said because the character who said it was "intimidated"

I brought it up on the side, because the game literally mentioned Mizuki was uncomfortable with the character for some reason. Didn't go in my favor it seems. Oh well.

The reason this matters is because its obvious hes using this character as a proxy for how he feels about people irl.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

The reason this matters is because its obvious hes using this character as a proxy for how he feels about people irl.

Why would I do that? You're just putting words in my mouth.
I have nothing against LBGT people. I have no reason to, they're just normal people.

V_exe1 posted...

I was never told it was false. People never answered my request if the character disliked it.
When I am told I was false and to shut up and accept it, I prefer to question why it is so. If it is childish to enquire, I am fine being childish.
But that conversation got forcefully shut down, so it is over now.

I mean, your argument that since they're gender neutral they'd be fine being referred to as "he" is just flat out illogical. It doesn't work like that in real life, and in fiction unless they're actually shown or said to be fine with it in-universe, it's nothing but a made up assumption. It's like saying since Peach still treats Bowser somewhat civilly despite being constantly kidnapped it means she'd be fine with you telling her you want to rape her to justify you saying that.

V_exe1 posted...

I was never told it was false

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80015700/964924997

Also, misgendering? Who the fuck cares, it's a fictional character and he isn't so insecure that he'd care about something so insignificant

You knew you were misgendering.
You didn't care you were misgendering.
You saw it as something "insignificant".

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You guys are the ones creating a topic celebrating a user's ban, you guys immediately show extreme bias with childish posts like "anime sig" or "neko in name".

But hey, this is a text forum, no matter what either of us says, there's no way to tell what the other is thinking, so discussing this is pointless.

Umbreon posted...

You knew you were misgendering.

I was asking if it was, I was disregarding the concept that it's a crime to ignore the rights of fictional characters.

And to begin with, I don't think the character in question would dislike it, but I guess I picked the wrong words in that post

You were told you were misgendering. Multiple times. You said you didn't care.

What's the confusion about exactly?

Guess I'm an asshole for discussing fictional characters I like now.
And here I tried to be respectful towards you.

But yeah, this whole conversation is going nowhere.

V_exe1 posted...

Guess I'm an asshole

Maybe you do have self-awareness after all.

V_exe1 posted...

You guys are the ones creating a topic celebrating a user's ban, you guys immediately show extreme bias with childish posts like "anime sig" or "neko in name".

But hey, this is a text forum, no matter what either of us says, there's no way to tell what the other is thinking, so discussing this is pointless.

I was asking if it was, I was disregarding the concept that it's a crime to ignore the rights of fictional characters.

And to begin with, I don't think the character in question would dislike it, but I guess I picked the wrong words in that post

I think those kinds of comments are dumb and biased (I think an adult swim or sports profile pic would be just as if not more likely) but you're not helping the stereotype with your posts. This is where self-awareness comes in.
And it's not about the rights of fictional characters, it's about what your reasoning is. Even disregarding the fact that the character is never referred to with he, why use he to begin with? Because it's your default? Since you appear to like female characters to the point of having one in your username why not use "she"?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Why would I care if I'm fooling you or not? This is a literal slander topic and I wanted to speak my side of the story. From here people who view the topic can decide on their own if they think it was fair not, but I am not the one calling others "asshole" here, unprovoked.

02fran posted...

This is where self-awareness comes in.

Are you really sure you're self-aware? This is the second time so I'm having doubts now

02fran posted...

Since you appear to like female characters to the point of having one in your username

I like the said fictional character. That's all there is.
I've had people call me "she" because of it, I've had people call me "he", I enjoy both.

Nothing said about you is slander. There is evidence in that very topic itself. Pretending to be oblivious isn't fooling anyone when your own words condem you.

Also slander is spoken. If someone was speaking falsehoods about you on the internet's that's libel.

Nurupoo

V_exe1 posted...

Are you really sure you're self-aware? This is the second time so I'm having doubts now

Yes, I'm aware of how I can appear to others. With the way you're responding it does seem like you aren't.

V_exe1 posted...

I like the said fictional character. That's all there is.
I've had people call me "she" because of it, I've had people call me "he", I enjoy both.

Huh, so maybe this is you projecting yourself onto Mama? You should've said so earlier. That's still an assumption. The game doesn't show that and only has her being referred to as her.

Umbreon posted...

Nothing said about you is slander

If you think so, it must be true.

Rayman2943 posted...

Nurupoo

Haha, I don't remember your name anymore (alt?), but it's interesting someone would somehow know that after so many years.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You are the one flaming me and trying to get a negative response here?

@gunplagirl
This could be an egg that could use some help in cracking though!

Against the evidence is right there. I know. We know.

It's like me 'thinking' water is wet.

V_exe1 posted...

If you think so, it must be true.

Haha, I don't remember your name anymore (alt?), but it's interesting someone would somehow know that after so many years.

2 years worth of glop. Hoshi no samidare. Srxmkii calling you a voyeur. Feeny.

Oh yeah. I know you. Don't have a problem with you though

V_exe1 posted...

This is a literal slander topic

Objectively incorrect.

Slander is spoken.

You aren't good at knowing what words mean.

02fran posted...

Huh, so maybe this is you projecting yourself

I don't self-insert in games at all though. In fact I hate empty personality protagonists in games.

As funny as pretty much every scene with that character is, why would I self-insert? The characters I really like are Date, Mizuki, Aiba, Iris. Pretty much the only one I hated was Ota