Current Events > Kentucky has fully banned abortion they went over the governor veto

(+) Yeah! (+)

And yet there are women who will vote against their own best interests and loudly support this rampant fascism that establishes them as inferior to men

That is their best interest. Conservative women aren't victims or tools. They know what they're doing. They know what they want. The reality is that they're every bit as reprehensible as their male counterparts.

And yet there are women who will vote against their own best interests and loudly support this rampant fascism that establishes them as inferior to men

This country is too far gone

It's going to be really sad and frustrating watching it as it dies.

That is their best interest. Conservative women aren't victims or tools. They know what they're doing. They know what they want. The reality is that they're every bit as reprehensible as their male counterparts.

It isnt in their best interest though. Like if theyd never get an abortion, it makes no difference if it is legal or illegal. Banning it is only in the best interest of fetuses, but they cant even comprehend the concept, let alone vote.

And yet there are women who will vote against their own best interests and loudly support this rampant fascism that establishes them as inferior to men

They are tools, though, because the men just put it in writing that women have no freedom or rights.

It isnt in their best interest though. Like if theyd never get an abortion, it makes no difference if it is legal or illegal. Banning it is only in the best interest of fetuses, but they cant even comprehend the concept, let alone vote.

The Sandernistas really picked the worst possible time to throw a hissy fit. We could have had a left-leaning SC had they taken their loss like an adult.

Was your protest vote worth it Sandernistas?

A larger percentage of Bernie voters voted for Hillary in the 2016 general than Hilary voters voted for Obama on 2008. Shut the fuck up weirdo.

What's the ratio for Bernie voters voting for Trump?

6-12% compared to 24% of Hillary voters who switched to Mccain

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/24/did-enough-bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-for-trump-to-cost-clinton-the-election/

6-12% compared to 24% of Hillary voters who switched to Mccain

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/24/did-enough-bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-for-trump-to-cost-clinton-the-election/

A larger percentage of Bernie voters voted for Hillary in the 2016 general than Hilary voters voted for Obama on 2008. Shut the fuck up weirdo.

What's the ratio for Bernie voters voting for Trump?

Almost nothing.

Any Bernie supporters who voted almost certainly voted Hillary.

A much bigger deal more likely is that many Bernie supporters didn't vote at all. In fact there were a lot of Hillary supporters who didn't vote because "she obviously got this lol"

Vote out all Republicans. End that bigoted party forever.

Are people still unironically blaming bernie bros

Only 12% defected and it didnt help that the "moderates" shunned us all the way up to the primary then beg us for our vote

https://i.imgur.com/iiyC4Eol.png?1

This was posted earlier, try to keep up with the rest of the class. When were you shunned exactly? Clinton bent over backwards to try and appease you and you people simply weren't having it.

6 years, 6 fucking years and you people are still spouting this debunked talking point. It's like you lack the mental capacity to understand basic math.

84% of Clinton voters voted for Obama: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/exit.polls/

Only 74.3% of the Sanders voters voted for Clinton: https://i.imgur.com/iiyC4Eo.png

Now then, use your big boy brain for this next question, which number is bigger, 84% or 74.3%? Go

Shut the fuck up weirdo.

"wah wah wah, but if I ignore the figures you actually linked and instead pick the ones most charitable to my argument, the numbers are different!"

The authors analysed the self-reported votes of 1,837 respondents, finding that of the 15% (~275) who reported voting for Clinton in the primary, 25% (~69) claims to then have voted for McCain in the general election.

Sounds damning? Except... it's all bullcrap. See for yourself by adding up the votes for Obama and McCain: 0.76 * 30 + 0.11 * 21 + 0.33* 49 vs 0.19 * 30 + 0.86 * 21 + 0.37 * 49 => 41.28% vs 41.89%. Of course, in our timeline, instead of losing by 0.61%, Obama became president in a 7.1% (52.9 to 45.7) landslide. Further red flags: Studies typically find only 2% of primary voters vote against their own candidate. Yet, in this table only 87% of Obama's primary voters reported voting for him in the general, and for McCain it's even lower, 84%.

So why is this apparently the worst poll since The Literary Digest called the election for President Alfred Landon in 1936? Simple: because it is the unweighted results of a panel survey.
Normally, opinion polls try to produce representative results by getting a certain number of responses from different demographics and modelling the population. If they don't get enough responses, they keep trying until they do. In contrast, with a panel survey, a fixed cohort of panel members are selected at the start and just keeps getting re-interviewed throughout the rest of the year. Inevitably, response rates drop off a cliff. Hence, it is conventional wisdom that panel surveys are good for showing trends of the self-reporting cohort, but useless as an prediction of the absolute numbers. This gets even worse when you try to get a subgroup of a subgroup, as the author were doing in creating this table. All 69 Hillary-McCain voter it found could just be from West Virginia, for all we know.

It makes zero sense to believe that the 25% number is accurate, when we know for fact that nearly every other number on that table is off by double digits.

That's literally what you're doing right now, I started off posting sources because this is such a tired and debunked discussion that I can shut down immediately and then you had to search for hours to find something that would agree with you.

GJ proving you didn't actually look at it, champ.

Also pretty cute how edited out the part about your own numbers still proving more hillary voters switched over to mccain. Not clever, but cute for sure

I've been through this argument hundreds of times and you're not bringing anything new to the table, your source has already been debunked so cry more.

My point was always that Sandernistas were too butthurt to support the nominee. I don't know why you're so laser focused on one aspect of that while ignoring the bigger picture.