Current Events > The massive new Ghostbusters Ultimate Collection omits 2016

Topic List	Page List: 1
Hayame Zero 12/27/21 4:44:06 PM #1:	https://www.amazon.com/Ghostbusters-II-Afterlife-Gift-Blu-ray/dp/B09LGK58M5 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/8/6/AABfkMAACvuq.jpg --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame Zero posted [p:961257803] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>https://www.amazon.com/Ghostbusters-II-Afterlife-Gift-Blu-ray/dp/B09LGK58M5 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/8/6/AABfkMAACvuq.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Karate_II 12/27/21 4:44:53 PM #2:	Why would it include the trash remake? --- Currently Playing: Dead by Daylight,Friday the 13th and Forza Horizon 5 <cite>Mr_Karate_II posted [p:961257817] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Why would it include the trash remake? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 12/27/21 4:46:18 PM #3:	Never bought the rights to Filmation's Ghost Busters, huh? <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:961257845] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Never bought the rights to Filmation's Ghost Busters, huh? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
__aCEr__ 12/27/21 4:46:29 PM #4:	The people who are going to shell out the money for something like that don't want that movie, anyway. --- See you next Wednesday. <cite>__aCEr__ posted [p:961257852] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>The people who are going to shell out the money for something like that don't want that movie, anyway. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Norman_Smiley 12/27/21 4:47:07 PM #5:	what % of buyers of this would want the 2016? I'm guessing <5% --- http://i.imgur.com/BVBQC.jpg The big wiggle equals ratings. <cite>Norman_Smiley posted [p:961257870] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>what % of buyers of this would want the 2016? I'm guessing <5% </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 12/27/21 4:47:15 PM #6:	I love Ghostbusters, but they never should've made more than the first one. <cite>Esrac posted [p:961257874] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>I love Ghostbusters, but they never should've made more than the first one. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaiganeer 12/27/21 4:47:57 PM #7:	wow, i guess they hate women then <cite>Kaiganeer posted [p:961257895] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>wow, i guess they hate women then </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dakimakura 12/27/21 4:49:11 PM #8:	wow women really are oppressed i am so sorry for my gender --- The greatest Warcraft hero ever my queen the black lady Sylvanas Windrunner: https://i.imgur.com/J9Vhyjv.png <cite>Dakimakura posted [p:961257926] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>wow women really are oppressed i am so sorry for my gender </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 12/27/21 4:51:48 PM #9:	2016 wasn't a Ghostbusters movie. That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs. And it wasn't even good fanfiction. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:961257995] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>2016 wasn't a Ghostbusters movie. That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs. And it wasn't even good fanfiction. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 12/27/21 4:55:58 PM #10:	They lost $70 million on the 2016 movie. I'm not surprised they didn't include it lol --- PSN - NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:961258085] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>They lost $70 million on the 2016 movie. I'm not surprised they didn't include it lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
refmon 12/27/21 4:59:37 PM #11:	Gobstoppers12 posted... That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs. --- If you read this signature, then that meant that I had control of what you read for 5 SECONDS!! <cite>refmon posted [p:961258171] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame Zero 12/27/21 5:02:03 PM #12:	NoxObscuras posted... They lost $70 million on the 2016 movie. I'm not surprised they didn't include it lol That's pretty much their fault too since it grossed $230 million in theaters, and still didn't turn a profit. The marketing budget was insane, and the director was expecting it to make at least $500 million. Having a Ghostbusters movie have the budget of a Marvel film - even if it included the original cast - is a profoundly stupid idea --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame Zero posted [p:961258224] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>NoxObscuras posted... </cite> <quote>They lost $70 million on the 2016 movie. I'm not surprised they didn't include it lol</quote>That's pretty much their fault too since it grossed $230 million in theaters, and still didn't turn a profit. The marketing budget was insane, and the director was expecting it to make at least $500 million. Having a Ghostbusters movie have the budget of a Marvel film - even if it included the original cast - is a profoundly stupid idea </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeadBankerDream 12/27/21 5:05:17 PM #13:	The main character in the new Ghostbusters movie killed Bill Murray through negligence because she was so insecure about people not beliving her when she says ghosts are real and in the process releases the only ghost they catch in the entire film. And the movie just keeps going as if it didn't happen. --- "That thick shaft that causes women to shudder!" <cite>DeadBankerDream posted [p:961258290] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>The main character in the new Ghostbusters movie killed Bill Murray through negligence because she was so insecure about people not beliving her when she says ghosts are real and in the process releases the only ghost they catch in the entire film. And the movie just keeps going as if it didn't happen. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IShall_Run_Amok 12/27/21 5:07:23 PM #14:	Half ass pandering, big surprise. --- Everything you love was always woke, and its less woke than it used to be, and that's why its not as good anymore, because its less woke. <cite>IShall_Run_Amok posted [p:961258340] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Half ass pandering, big surprise. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 12/27/21 5:10:37 PM #15:	Gobstoppers12 posted... 2016 wasn't a Ghostbusters movie. That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs. And it wasn't even good fanfiction. The Sonichu of Ghostbusters. <cite>Esrac posted [p:961258408] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>2016 wasn't a Ghostbusters movie. That was fanfiction full of quirky OCs. And it wasn't even good fanfiction.</quote> The Sonichu of Ghostbusters. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 12/27/21 5:10:49 PM #16:	i didnt like the new ghostbusters that much but them reopening the old wound of the 2016 one that people still havent gotten over has been hilarious --- I pray god will curse the writer, as the writer has cursed the world with this beautiful, stupendous creation, terrible in its simplicity, irresistible in truth <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:961258415] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>i didnt like the new ghostbusters that much but them reopening the old wound of the 2016 one that people still havent gotten over has been hilarious </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 12/27/21 5:11:56 PM #17:	It included the three movies within the same narrative universe. 2016 wouldnt fit in there. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:961258439] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>It included the three movies within the same narrative universe. 2016 wouldnt fit in there. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarveI 12/27/21 5:21:02 PM #18:	Bill Murray was in the 2016 one? And the new one just ignores it? --- Make mine Marvel! <cite>MarveI posted [p:961258647] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Bill Murray was in the 2016 one? And the new one just ignores it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 12/27/21 5:26:09 PM #19:	MarveI posted... Bill Murray was in the 2016 one? And the new one just ignores it? It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:961258769] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>MarveI posted... </cite> <quote>Bill Murray was in the 2016 one? And the new one just ignores it?</quote>It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JimmyFraska 12/27/21 5:26:46 PM #20:	I've seen none of these. Is the second one any good? <cite>JimmyFraska posted [p:961258785] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>I've seen none of these. Is the second one any good? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 12/27/21 5:27:40 PM #21:	JimmyFraska posted... I've seen none of these. Is the second one any good? It's... passable, but clearly an uninspired cash-in compared to the wit and creativity of the first one. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:961258804] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>JimmyFraska posted... </cite> <quote>I've seen none of these. Is the second one any good?</quote>It's... passable, but clearly an uninspired cash-in compared to the wit and creativity of the first one. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 12/27/21 5:30:14 PM #22:	It's the Ultimate collection, not the complete collection --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:961258853] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>It's the Ultimate collection, not the complete collection </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JimmyFraska 12/27/21 5:31:55 PM #23:	Gobstoppers12 posted... It's... passable, but clearly an uninspired cash-in compared to the wit and creativity of the first one. Thats kind of the idea i got.... just at a glance, it seems the only worthwhile one is the first film and maybe this new one <cite>JimmyFraska posted [p:961258897] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>It's... passable, but clearly an uninspired cash-in compared to the wit and creativity of the first one.</quote>Thats kind of the idea i got.... just at a glance, it seems the only worthwhile one is the first film and maybe this new one </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LeoRavus 12/27/21 5:32:52 PM #24:	That flop doesn't tie in with the rest. The original cast made cameos as randomass people --- This is where cool people write stuff. <cite>LeoRavus posted [p:961258922] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>That flop doesn't tie in with the rest. The original cast made cameos as randomass people </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RiKuToTheMiGhtY 12/27/21 5:35:18 PM #25:	No one wants the garbage 2016 movie with the 3 good movies. Afterlife proved that the original movies still have plenty of fans while tastefully and respectfully passing the torch to the next generation. Kind of hard to claim you hate women when the new movie has Phoebe, Lucky, and Callie only getting praises from fans and casual viewers. 2016 was a bad movie with bad characters all around. --- doa-plus.com - We Press Forward. . . By Pressing Back. <cite>RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted [p:961258969] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>No one wants the garbage 2016 movie with the 3 good movies. Afterlife proved that the original movies still have plenty of fans while tastefully and respectfully passing the torch to the next generation. Kind of hard to claim you hate women when the new movie has Phoebe, Lucky, and Callie only getting praises from fans and casual viewers. 2016 was a bad movie with bad characters all around. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarveI 12/27/21 5:39:36 PM #26:	Gobstoppers12 posted... It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed. Ah. I guess that makes a bit more sense. --- Make mine Marvel! <cite>MarveI posted [p:961259072] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed.</quote>Ah. I guess that makes a bit more sense. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Raikuro 12/27/21 5:40:24 PM #27:	Doesn't even have The Real Ghostbusters or Extreme Ghostbusters smh <cite>Raikuro posted [p:961259094] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Doesn't even have The Real Ghostbusters or Extreme Ghostbusters smh </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PuppetPalClem 12/27/21 5:42:20 PM #28:	I cant imagine anyone feels that the Chris Hemsworth Ghostbusters ever need be mentioned again. Kate McKinnon just is not funny unless shes got a good writer. --- bonk <cite>PuppetPalClem posted [p:961259129] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>I cant imagine anyone feels that the Chris Hemsworth Ghostbusters ever need be mentioned again. Kate McKinnon just is not funny unless shes got a good writer. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/27/21 5:44:25 PM #29:	That's fine. I would have included it but well that's because I think the hate it gets is overblown. There are far worse sequels and remakes out there. It was just a below average movie. But I understand why it's not being included. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:961259167] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>That's fine. I would have included it but well that's because I think the hate it gets is overblown. There are far worse sequels and remakes out there. It was just a below average movie. But I understand why it's not being included. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HylianFox 12/27/21 5:49:55 PM #30:	Unsugarized_Foo posted... It's the Ultimate collection, not the complete collection touche --- This is my signature until I can think of a better one. <cite>HylianFox posted [p:961259299] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Unsugarized_Foo posted... </cite> <quote>It's the Ultimate collection, not the complete collection</quote> touche </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 12/27/21 6:38:12 PM #31:	RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted... Kind of hard to claim you hate women when the new movie has Phoebe, Lucky, and Callie only getting praises from fans and casual viewers. 2016 was a bad movie with bad characters all around. The complaint has never been "women bad." It has always been "badly written women bad." But because 90% of attempts to fill diversity quotas are clumsily handled and awkwardly conveyed, most instances are disliked by audiences... which leads to this illusion that audiences dislike female leads. Which is fucking silly, because people absolutely love characters like Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Furiosa, Wonder Woman, Gamora, etc. They need good writing. Strong performances. A reason to exist within the story. There are tons of male characters who suck, too, and they suck for the same reason the sucky women suck. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:961260434] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted... </cite> <quote>Kind of hard to claim you hate women when the new movie has Phoebe, Lucky, and Callie only getting praises from fans and casual viewers. 2016 was a bad movie with bad characters all around.</quote>The complaint has never been "women bad." It has always been "badly written women bad." But because 90% of attempts to fill diversity quotas are clumsily handled and awkwardly conveyed, most instances are disliked by audiences... which leads to this illusion that audiences dislike female leads. Which is fucking silly, because people absolutely love characters like Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Furiosa, Wonder Woman, Gamora, etc. They need good writing. Strong performances. A reason to exist within the story. There are tons of male characters who suck, too, and they suck for the same reason the sucky women suck. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IShall_Run_Amok 12/27/21 7:25:54 PM #32:	"Women bad" was definitely one of the popular complaints being lobbed against the movie. People would like to forget that the backlash against Ghostbusters wasn't just the next episode in GamerGate, but the damage has been done and nobody who called "foul" back then is smelling it any different today. Any genuine dislike of the movie was successfully piggy backed off of, and increased, by media illiterates (anyone talking about "diversity quotas") and bad faith actors with an agenda. --- Everything you love was always woke, and its less woke than it used to be, and that's why its not as good anymore, because its less woke. <cite>IShall_Run_Amok posted [p:961261482] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>"Women bad" was definitely one of the popular complaints being lobbed against the movie. People would like to forget that the backlash against Ghostbusters wasn't just the next episode in GamerGate, but the damage has been done and nobody who called "foul" back then is smelling it any different today. Any genuine dislike of the movie was successfully piggy backed off of, and increased, by media illiterates (anyone talking about "diversity quotas") and bad faith actors with an agenda. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/27/21 8:24:18 PM #33:	Afterlife is getting plenty of hate for it being way too much of a rehash of the first movie. More people like it then dislike yes but it still gets a fair share of criticism. I like Afterlife. I like all four Ghostbusters films and yes the remake is the weakest. There are far worse remakes and sequels out there. The hate for the reboot is overblown. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:961262870] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Afterlife is getting plenty of hate for it being way too much of a rehash of the first movie. More people like it then dislike yes but it still gets a fair share of criticism. I like Afterlife. I like all four Ghostbusters films and yes the remake is the weakest. There are far worse remakes and sequels out there. The hate for the reboot is overblown. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
j_coat 12/27/21 8:37:10 PM #34:	No cartoons either. Back to the Future had a collection that included the cartoon. --- Play my free full-length RPG game today! https://jco.itch.io/universal-wars <cite>j_coat posted [p:961263174] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>No cartoons either. Back to the Future had a collection that included the cartoon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HagenEx 12/27/21 8:38:31 PM #35:	Good. --- PWB's #1 Bad Bunny Mark <cite>HagenEx posted [p:961263208] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Good. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 12/27/21 8:40:22 PM #36:	Gobstoppers12 posted... It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed. That's why 2016 doesn't fit in with this collection, regardless of it's reception. --- I'll remain unperturbed by the joy and the madness that I encounter everywhere I turn Slayer_22 picked waifu - https://ibb.co/WD8p1Kz <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:961263269] in The massiv... [t:79828659]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>It wasn't Venkman. He played somebody else. In the 2016 one, the original Ghostbusters never existed.</quote>That's why 2016 doesn't fit in with this collection, regardless of it's reception. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > The massive new Ghostbusters Ultimate Collection omits 2016 (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > The massive new Ghostbusters Ultimate Collection omits 2016