Current Events > Does it hurt the Beatles' legacy that they never toured their best material?

Topic List	Page List: 1
lilORANG 12/18/21 2:38:21 PM #1:	What were those dudes even doing? ~~other than drugs~~ --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:961023838] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>What were those dudes even doing? other than drugs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/18/21 2:41:08 PM #2:	I actually think it's pretty awesome that they were so prolific and well-known despite their short existence and lack of touring. I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but they made some great music and were incredibly talented. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:961023902] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>I actually think it's pretty awesome that they were so prolific and well-known despite their short existence and lack of touring. I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but they made some great music and were incredibly talented. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shotgunnova 12/18/21 2:42:38 PM #3:	They had a ticket to ride...but didn't care. --- Take me down from the ridge where the summer ends And watch the city spread out just like a jet's flame <cite>Shotgunnova posted [p:961023934] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>They had a ticket to ride...but didn't care. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KiwiTerraRizing 12/18/21 2:45:29 PM #4:	Its why it irks me when Paul (or anyone) says the Beatles were better than the Stones. To be a great band you have to tour. The Beatles were a studio band. --- Trucking Legend Don Schneider! <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:961024001] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>Its why it irks me when Paul (or anyone) says the Beatles were better than the Stones. To be a great band you have to tour. The Beatles were a studio band. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 12/18/21 2:48:12 PM #5:	Beatles concerts sucked though, people were so excited they essentially just screamed through the entire set. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:961024072] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>Beatles concerts sucked though, people were so excited they essentially just screamed through the entire set. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Derwood 12/18/21 2:48:54 PM #6:	KiwiTerraRizing posted... Its why it irks me when Paul (or anyone) says the Beatles were better than the Stones. To be a great band you have to tour. The Beatles were a studio band. That certainly is an opinion <cite>Derwood posted [p:961024091] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>KiwiTerraRizing posted... </cite> <quote>Its why it irks me when Paul (or anyone) says the Beatles were better than the Stones. To be a great band you have to tour. The Beatles were a studio band.</quote> That certainly is an opinion </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RedLuigi 12/18/21 3:26:28 PM #7:	Nah, its even more legendary because they didnt --- It's-a-me! Green Mario! <cite>RedLuigi posted [p:961024964] in Does it hu... [t:79816319]...</cite> <quote>Nah, its even more legendary because they didnt </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1