Current Events > C/D: White women have more privilege than white men.

(+) Yeah! (+)

C, because men still have to be the breadwinner. Women can start a business, be a stay at home mom, or do anything else they want. They have options men dont.

---

D.

---

Societally in grandstanding terms, sure. In everyday real life, it boils down to a more subjective thing.

---

D

---

Orlando_Jordan posted...

C, because men still have to be the breadwinner. Women can start a business, be a stay at home mom, or do anything else they want. They have options men dont.

Did you forget to put on your thinking cap when you typed this out?

---

depends on how hot they are

---

SquantoZ posted...

Did you forget to put on your thinking cap when you typed this out?

No, I just used logic to arrive at the logical conclusion.

---

C but not because of those stupid reasons.

---

Just think, TC. Think about why it's more likely for men to be the breadwinner.

---

C

Xavier_On_High posted...

Just think, TC. Think about why it's more likely for men to be the breadwinner.

Because they literally have to be. Otherwise, theyll die alone, and with no friends.

---

Xavier_On_High posted...

Just think, TC. Think about why it's more likely for men to be the breadwinner.

Orlando_Jordan posted...

Because they literally have to be. Otherwise, theyll die alone, and with no friends.

think again TC, you didnt get it yet.

Woman have an inherent advantage over men in that they have boobs.
---

Duncanwii posted...

Woman have an inherent advantage over men in that they have boobs.

Duncan gets it.

---

the "hot woman" privilege is bullshit. she could make money on OF, big deal.

guys can make that OF money if they do gay stuff.

Xavier_On_High posted...

Just think, TC. Think about why it's more likely for men to be the breadwinner.

It's not because women aren't being given more opportunities, what with them more likely to go to college, more scholarships towards them, graduate from college, and more likely to be hired out of college for the same credentials as a man and even outearn men if they don't have a kid in their first 10 yrs of their career...

No, there is no "barrier" stopping women from outearning men, and if anything, we massively incentivize more women to go into STEM and they actively choose not to.

Why? Because STEM is boring and the classes are hard and probably 90% of the reason people go into it is because they want the money. I have about a dozen software engineer friends...none of them can tell me wholeheartedly they "love" it, and most would admit they only did it for the money. So why would men prioritize higher paying fields that are boring? Because men are JUDGED in the dating market based on what they do for a living, and Freud was a very clever man, because sex and future relationship status is a very large motivator for both men and women. Dozens of studies show that women only want to date up and across socio-economically while guys typically date across and down.

And it's mostly agreed upon WOMEN are the gender that primarily decides the rules of dating dynamics with guys needing to adjust to their preferences. So women's own standards prioritize high earning men, making getting a high paying job in a boring field you don't give a damn about a much higher priority, while men prioritize no such thing in women. If anything, most women who make more money than men don't want to date them anyways, so it's not like a guy who works as an Amazon delivery guy stands a snowballs chance in hell at dating a doctor/lawyer anyways.

---

Robot2600 posted...

the "hot woman" privilege is bullshit. she could make money on OF, big deal.

guys can make that OF money if they do gay stuff.

This is a funny post, but still wrong.

Gay men don't simp on OF, it's literally just straight dudes doing it. They are the only ones dumb and desperate enough.

No one else is doing it because they have (free) porn and most can get laid easily enough to not pay $10/month for soft core porn...which given you have hours of free porn at the click of a finger is the saddest shit imaginable.

---

MajesticFerret posted...

It's not because women aren't being given more opportunities, what with them more likely to go to college, more scholarships towards them, graduate from college, and more likely to be hired out of college for the same credentials as a man and even outearn men if they don't have a kid in their first 10 yrs of their career...

No, there is no "barrier" stopping women from outearning men, and if anything, we massively incentivize more women to go into STEM and they actively choose not to.

Why? Because STEM is boring and the classes are hard and probably 90% of the reason people go into it is because they want the money. I have about a dozen software engineer friends...none of them can tell me wholeheartedly they "love" it, and most would admit they only did it for the money. So why would men prioritize higher paying fields that are boring? Because men are JUDGED in the dating market based on what they do for a living, and Freud was a very clever man, because sex and future relationship status is a very large motivator for both men and women. Dozens of studies show that women only want to date up and across socio-economically while guys typically date across and down.

And it's mostly agreed upon WOMEN are the gender that primarily decides the rules of dating dynamics with guys needing to adjust to their preferences. So women's own standards prioritize high earning men, making getting a high paying job in a boring field you don't give a damn about a much higher priority, while men prioritize no such thing in women. If anything, most women who make more money than men don't want to date them anyways, so it's not like a guy who works as an Amazon delivery guy stands a snowballs chance in hell at dating a doctor/lawyer anyways.

Finally, a woke post.

---

Oh look, another incel topic from TC
---

I saw this thing where a man decapitated a woman because she rejected him. I'll gladly stay a man.

---

berlyman101 posted...

depends on how hot they are

---

MajesticFerret posted...

It's not because women aren't being given more opportunities, what with them more likely to go to college, more scholarships towards them, graduate from college, and more likely to be hired out of college for the same credentials as a man and even outearn men if they don't have a kid in their first 10 yrs of their career...

No, there is no "barrier" stopping women from outearning men, and if anything, we massively incentivize more women to go into STEM and they actively choose not to.

Why? Because STEM is boring and the classes are hard and probably 90% of the reason people go into it is because they want the money. I have about a dozen software engineer friends...none of them can tell me wholeheartedly they "love" it, and most would admit they only did it for the money. So why would men prioritize higher paying fields that are boring? Because men are JUDGED in the dating market based on what they do for a living, and Freud was a very clever man, because sex and future relationship status is a very large motivator for both men and women. Dozens of studies show that women only want to date up and across socio-economically while guys typically date across and down.

And it's mostly agreed upon WOMEN are the gender that primarily decides the rules of dating dynamics with guys needing to adjust to their preferences. So women's own standards prioritize high earning men, making getting a high paying job in a boring field you don't give a damn about a much higher priority, while men prioritize no such thing in women. If anything, most women who make more money than men don't want to date them anyways, so it's not like a guy who works as an Amazon delivery guy stands a snowballs chance in hell at dating a doctor/lawyer anyways.

CE, is this a copypasta or is it for real?

---

TC, can you help me define privilege?

---

No.

We still live in a largely patriarchic world.

---

As for the topic itself, it's complicated, but I say men eventually have the bigger advantages in life.

I say eventually, because YOUNG women are FAR more privledged than YOUNG men and it's not even close.

And this is even if you're slightly below average looking for a young woman compared to an even above average looking young man. Society treats young men like shit, openly incentivize them to go to the military because it sees them as cannon fodder, and a lot of the privileges that come with "being a man" do NOT come with being a young man.

People are more likely to listen to you when you speak...when you're an OLDER man. If you speak and you're 20, nobody gives a fuck. If anything, older men in power probably respect the younger women more just because literally no one respects young men.

And a lot of the advantages of being a man, like eventually accumulating money and power, tend to come to fruition once you're a little older.

Meanwhile, I think dating becomes drastically harder as an older woman, I think older women trying to reach the top rings of a company might be more difficult, which is an "old person struggle" as most young people don't have the experience to be going for these positions anyways.

But yeah, there's about a decade where women eclipse men in value (20's). I actually think it's one of the reason most of the women most angered by these dynamics are almost always older women, because a lot of young women get to cash in on all their privileges early while those privileges fizzle out around late 30's to 40's and then some of power shifts and they want it back.

---

C in D