Current Events > Could there have been a second killer in Scream 3? (Scream 1-5 Spoilers)

(+) Yeah! (+)

Supposedly the original script had a second killer and people speculate it was Angelina. There was 2 killers in Scream,Scream 2 and Scream 4 so i wonder why 3 was changed.

There's a good video on YouTube that goes into details about 3 and how there originally was going to be a 2nd killer.

I think it's a possibility because Angelina is never seen getting killed on screen, just dragged off screen when she's supposedly dead and her look is damn near identical to Roman's when he fakes his death.

Plus she's not listed in the booklet for Scream 3 as a victim. Maybe Roman didn't want her being caught and 'killed her" for her to escape.

Thoughts? Also there's going to be 2 killers in Scream 5.

---

It's likely Angelina was a second killer. Either that, or Roman was BUSY. I like the idea of him being a solo killer though.

---

MorbidFaithless posted...

It's likely Angelina was a second killer. Either that, or Roman was BUSY. I like the idea of him being a solo killer though

He'd have to be fucking fast to get around the set like he did when Sidney was attacked and i don't think he's that quick. Plus she disappeared into the set after she met Sidney in the bathroom.

She'd be the perfect killer too, she could move about without calling attention to herself.

---

There's a theory that the entire sequence of Sid attacked on the set is in her mind. We know for sure at least part of it is. But I think it's entirely possible she was slipping that bad, mentally, imo, as to imagine it all.

---

MorbidFaithless posted...

There's a theory that the entire sequence of Sid attacked on the set is in her mind. We know for sure at least part of it is. But I think it's entirely possible she was slipping that bad, mentally, imo, as to imagine it all.

I don't think any of it was in her mind.

---

Watching Scream 3 now

---

Now I'm convinced she's the 2nd killer, she slips away from everyone at the party when they're outside before the house explodes. Why else would she do that?

---

Couldn't there technically be a second killer in any Slasher movie?

There was a second killer in Friday 13th part 4. Guy called Nick. He just never appeared on camera.

---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Couldn't there technically be a second killer in any Slasher movie?

There was a second killer in Friday 13th part 4. Guy called Nick. He just never appeared on camera.

Not really.


---

Mr_Karate_II posted...

Now I'm convinced she's the 2nd killer, she slips away from everyone at the party when they're outside before the house explodes. Why else would she do that?

To be fair, as much as I like the theory, and as much as I do think it's relatively plausible, it's probably more likely that things like this were in there as red herrings.

---

Tom Clark posted...

To be fair, as much as I like the theory, and as much as I do think it's relatively plausible, it's probably more likely that things like this were in there as red herrings.

She was present when Sidney got in the cop car to go to the police station. Roman wasn't anywhere near there when that went down, how would he have known where Sidney was? Maybe just another red herring but the original script had 2 killers but was changed.

---