Current Events > Not getting $2,000 to protect Section 230 is stupid

Topic List	Page List: 1
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:40:56 PM #1:	Trump wants to get rid of 230 Biden wants to get rid of 230 Republicans want to get rid of 230 Democrats want to get rid of 230 Magically when it involves 2 grand for us, does the internet media scream and cry that you have to protect them. That protecting trolls and bots is important. Fuck Twitter and Facebook. They will live, they will just get better software. Google will probably make a fortune off what ever automod bot they make after. Section 230 is doomed, we should just take the money now. Instead of losing 230 later, and getting nothing. <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948972970] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Trump wants to get rid of 230 Biden wants to get rid of 230 Republicans want to get rid of 230 Democrats want to get rid of 230 Magically when it involves 2 grand for us, does the internet media scream and cry that you have to protect them. That protecting trolls and bots is important. Fuck Twitter and Facebook. They will live, they will just get better software. Google will probably make a fortune off what ever automod bot they make after. Section 230 is doomed, we should just take the money now. Instead of losing 230 later, and getting nothing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_SilverX 12/31/20 9:41:39 PM #2:	BBQ, beer and freedom is all we need. --- Rather a Zoom Thanksgiving than an ICU Christmas. don't compare games to feces -- if you've an opinion worth mentioning, do so civilly <cite>Dark_SilverX posted [p:948972994] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>BBQ, beer and freedom is all we need. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeadBankerDream 12/31/20 9:41:46 PM #3:	OnlyTheTruth posted... Biden wants to get rid of 230 Wat. --- "That thick shaft that causes women to shudder!" <cite>DeadBankerDream posted [p:948972996] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>OnlyTheTruth posted...</cite> <quote>Biden wants to get rid of 230 </quote> Wat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shadowplay 12/31/20 9:42:10 PM #4:	I'd gladly give up $2000 if it meant that the internet would not go further down the toilet than it already has. --- I make a topic in Final Fantasy 12 to ask if Tifa! They said no Tifa. Hardness gone!-gandob <cite>Shadowplay posted [p:948973012] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>I'd gladly give up $2000 if it meant that the internet would not go further down the toilet than it already has. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:43:18 PM #5:	@DeadBankerDream Wat. https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2020/1/17/21070403 /joe-biden-president-election-section-230-communications-decency-act-revoke <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973039] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>@DeadBankerDream <quote>Wat.</quote>https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2020/1/17/21070403 /joe-biden-president-election-section-230-communications-decency-act-revoke </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 12/31/20 9:43:18 PM #6:	Citation needed --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. <cite>Irony posted [p:948973040] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Citation needed </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:43:44 PM #7:	Irony posted... Citation needed I can provide links for all of them. Who you want? <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973053] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Irony posted... </cite> <quote>Citation needed</quote>I can provide links for all of them. Who you want? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Graycap 12/31/20 9:43:49 PM #8:	Forums like this wouldn't be able to exist without 230. Everything would be either ResetEra or 4chan. OnlyTheTruth posted... Trump wants to get rid of 230 Biden wants to get rid of 230 Republicans want to get rid of 230 Democrats want to get rid of 230 The bolded is wrong. Removing 230 isn't popular among Democrats. --- Say it on your main. <cite>Graycap posted [p:948973056] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Forums like this wouldn't be able to exist without 230. Everything would be either ResetEra or 4chan. OnlyTheTruth posted...</cite> <quote>Trump wants to get rid of 230 Biden wants to get rid of 230 Republicans want to get rid of 230 Democrats want to get rid of 230</quote> The bolded is wrong. Removing 230 isn't popular among Democrats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarcyWarcy 12/31/20 9:46:52 PM #9:	DeadBankerDream posted... Wat. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/17/opinion/joe-biden-nytimes-interview.html Charlie Warzel: Sure. Mr. Vice President, in October, your campaign sent a letter to Facebook regarding an ad that falsely claimed that you blackmailed Ukrainian officials to not investigate your son. Im curious, did that experience, dealing with Facebook and their power, did that change the way that you see the power of tech platforms right now? No, Ive never been a fan of Facebook, as you probably know. Ive never been a big Zuckerberg fan. I think hes a real problem. I think CW: Can you elaborate? No, I can. He knows better. And you know, from my perspective, Ive been in the view that not only should we be worrying about the concentration of power, we should be worried about the lack of privacy and them being exempt, which youre not exempt. [The Times] cant write something you know to be false and be exempt from being sued. But he can. The idea that its a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms. CW: Thats a pretty foundational law of the modern internet. Thats right. Exactly right. And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. Im sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. Its irresponsible. Its totally irresponsible. <cite>MarcyWarcy posted [p:948973140] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted... </cite> <quote>Wat.</quote> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/17/opinion/joe-biden-nytimes-interview.html Charlie Warzel: Sure. Mr. Vice President, in October, your campaign sent a letter to Facebook regarding an ad that falsely claimed that you blackmailed Ukrainian officials to not investigate your son. Im curious, did that experience, dealing with Facebook and their power, did that change the way that you see the power of tech platforms right now? No, Ive never been a fan of Facebook, as you probably know. Ive never been a big Zuckerberg fan. I think hes a real problem. I think CW: Can you elaborate? No, I can. He knows better. And you know, from my perspective, Ive been in the view that not only should we be worrying about the concentration of power, we should be worried about the lack of privacy and them being exempt, which youre not exempt. [The Times] cant write something you know to be false and be exempt from being sued. But he can. The idea that its a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms. CW: Thats a pretty foundational law of the modern internet. Thats right. Exactly right. And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. Im sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. Its irresponsible. Its totally irresponsible. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:46:55 PM #10:	@Graycap Forums like this wouldn't be able to exist without 230. Everything would be either ResetEra or 4chan. The bolded is wrong. Removing 230 isn't popular among Democrats. I can get you more links of more democrats wanting to change/kill it. https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/democrats-and-republicans-agree-that-section-230-is-flawed/ <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973144] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>@Graycap <quote>Forums like this wouldn't be able to exist without 230. Everything would be either ResetEra or 4chan. The bolded is wrong. Removing 230 isn't popular among Democrats.</quote>I can get you more links of more democrats wanting to change/kill it. https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/democrats-and-republicans-agree-that-section-230-is-flawed/ </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hop103 12/31/20 9:47:19 PM #11:	DeadBankerDream posted... Wat. Everyone wants to either get rid of it (establishment) or reform it to stop political discrimination (centrists). Getting rid of it would kill off Twitter, but unfortunately would also kill off every comments section in the process in the US. It's not the best solution. --- "In the name of the future moon I shall punish you"-Chibi Moon <cite>Hop103 posted [p:948973155] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted...</cite> <quote> Wat.</quote> Everyone wants to either get rid of it (establishment) or reform it to stop political discrimination (centrists). Getting rid of it would kill off Twitter, but unfortunately would also kill off every comments section in the process in the US. It's not the best solution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:49:36 PM #12:	@Graycap Also fuck Red Ventures (the company that just paid $$$$$$$$ to buy this shity site from CNET) They can pay for googles automod software to. <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973227] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>@Graycap Also fuck Red Ventures (the company that just paid $$$$$$$$ to buy this shity site from CNET) They can pay for googles automod software to. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 12/31/20 9:50:36 PM #13:	Not getting $2000 because shitty politicians want to hold it hostage to force other politicians to destroy the internet is stupid <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:948973256] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Not getting $2000 because shitty politicians want to hold it hostage to force other politicians to destroy the internet is stupid</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Graycap 12/31/20 9:53:58 PM #14:	OnlyTheTruth posted... I can get you more links of more democrats wanting to change/kill it. https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/democrats-and-republicans-agree-that-section-230-is-flawed/ From your own article: Biden told The New York Times editorial board earlier this year, he thinks the whole provision should be eliminated. But aside from Biden, most Democrats in Congress interested in Section 230 reform, believe amendments to the statute should be limited in scope to ensure free speech is protected. They've criticized Trump and the DOJ for their efforts. The only Dems who agree with Trump on revoking 230 are lolBiden and his cronies. Other Democrats are simply looking into reforming the law so that platforms can be held liable for profiting off of false advertisements. --- Say it on your main. <cite>Graycap posted [p:948973348] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>OnlyTheTruth posted...</cite> <quote>I can get you more links of more democrats wanting to change/kill it. https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/democrats-and-republicans-agree-that-section-230-is-flawed/ </quote> From your own article: <quote>Biden told The New York Times editorial board earlier this year, he thinks the whole provision should be eliminated. But aside from Biden, most Democrats in Congress interested in Section 230 reform, believe amendments to the statute should be limited in scope to ensure free speech is protected. They've criticized Trump and the DOJ for their efforts.</quote> The only Dems who agree with Trump on revoking 230 are lolBiden and his cronies. Other Democrats are simply looking into reforming the law so that platforms can be held liable for profiting off of false advertisements.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 9:55:20 PM #15:	Let me all explain the future after 230 is gone ^_^ -google makes automod software with AI -It automatically flags all potentially offensive and new memes that come out, that is then sent to a live team before a message post -stuff that is safe enough to squeeze your ass cheeks hard enough too prevent sharding, post live Bam new internet has way less trolling, or at least trolling becomes a much more nuanced art with less vulgarity ^_^ <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973388] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Let me all explain the future after 230 is gone ^_^ -google makes automod software with AI -It automatically flags all potentially offensive and new memes that come out, that is then sent to a live team before a message post -stuff that is safe enough to squeeze your ass cheeks hard enough too prevent sharding, post live Bam new internet has way less trolling, or at least trolling becomes a much more nuanced art with less vulgarity ^_^ </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 12/31/20 9:56:47 PM #16:	They all want to get rid of 230 for different reasons so they'll never actually get rid of it because they could never agree on what to replace it with. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/S1m3po4 https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:948973437] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>They all want to get rid of 230 for different reasons so they'll never actually get rid of it because they could never agree on what to replace it with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hop103 12/31/20 9:57:58 PM #17:	OnlyTheTruth posted... Let me all explain the future after 230 is gone ^_^ -google makes automod software with AI -It automatically flags all potentially offensive and new memes that come out, that is then sent to a live team before a message post -stuff that is squeeze your ass cheeks hard enough too prevent sharding, post live Bam new interest has way less trolling, or at least trolling becomes a much more nuanced art with less vulgarity ^_^ There would be no posting or comment sections at all, it's cheaper and easier for companies to remove them entirely and it would end complaints about bad AI once and for all. --- "In the name of the future moon I shall punish you"-Chibi Moon <cite>Hop103 posted [p:948973468] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>OnlyTheTruth posted...</cite> <quote>Let me all explain the future after 230 is gone ^_^ -google makes automod software with AI -It automatically flags all potentially offensive and new memes that come out, that is then sent to a live team before a message post -stuff that is squeeze your ass cheeks hard enough too prevent sharding, post live Bam new interest has way less trolling, or at least trolling becomes a much more nuanced art with less vulgarity ^_^ </quote> There would be no posting or comment sections at all, it's cheaper and easier for companies to remove them entirely and it would end complaints about bad AI once and for all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OnlyTheTruth 12/31/20 10:10:18 PM #18:	Hop103 posted... There would be no posting or comment sections at all, it's cheaper and easier for companies to remove them entirely and it would end complaints about bad AI once and for all. Things will just switch to live and forum stuff will be moderated harder. Companies want money, less protections won't stop that no matter how much you want to believe your billionaire websites need you to protect them. <cite>OnlyTheTruth posted [p:948973778] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>Hop103 posted... </cite> <quote>There would be no posting or comment sections at all, it's cheaper and easier for companies to remove them entirely and it would end complaints about bad AI once and for all.</quote>Things will just switch to live and forum stuff will be moderated harder. Companies want money, less protections won't stop that no matter how much you want to believe your billionaire websites need you to protect them. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reis 12/31/20 10:11:37 PM #19:	so how many shitty topics are you gonna make to troll about this <cite>Reis posted [p:948973808] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>so how many shitty topics are you gonna make to troll about this </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
David1988 12/31/20 10:14:10 PM #20:	I recently found out Biden supported repealing 230, i can only blame myself for voting for him and not knowing basic things like that. --- Each night, when I go to sleep, I die. <cite>David1988 posted [p:948973886] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>I recently found out Biden supported repealing 230, i can only blame myself for voting for him and not knowing basic things like that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightHawKnight 12/31/20 10:15:17 PM #21:	David1988 posted... I recently found out Biden supported repealing 230, i can only blame myself for voting for him and not knowing basic things like that. Who else would you have voted for? Trump? Any other choice than Biden would have risked Trump winning and that would be far worse. --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:948973908] in Not gettin... [t:79211474]...</cite> <quote>David1988 posted... </cite> <quote>I recently found out Biden supported repealing 230, i can only blame myself for voting for him and not knowing basic things like that.</quote> Who else would you have voted for? Trump? Any other choice than Biden would have risked Trump winning and that would be far worse. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Not getting $2,000 to protect Section 230 is stupid (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Not getting $2,000 to protect Section 230 is stupid