Current Events > YouTuber Gabi DeMartino sold child porn video of herself for $3

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Solar_Crimson 12/02/20 3:40:48 PM #51:	She is an idiot. Charging for an otherwise-innocent family video on a platform known for its sex workers while using a suggestive caption, she should have known of the blowback she would receive from it. --- I often wonder if we are growing as a people... or in fact, regressing. <cite>Solar_Crimson posted [p:947846113] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>She is an idiot. Charging for an otherwise-innocent family video on a platform known for its sex workers while using a suggestive caption, she should have known of the blowback she would receive from it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumpo 12/02/20 3:42:47 PM #52:	Throw the book at her <cite>Trumpo posted [p:947846175] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Throw the book at her </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Musourenka 12/02/20 3:46:05 PM #53:	How many people are going to get in trouble for looking at that? As in a separate investigation team sees a paid transfer of this but doesn't have the context of this story? This is so messed up on her part. --- Shooing away pigeons crapping on debate tables is not a violation of the pigeons' free speech. <cite>Musourenka posted [p:947846286] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>How many people are going to get in trouble for looking at that? As in a separate investigation team sees a paid transfer of this but doesn't have the context of this story? This is so messed up on her part. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MachineJaipur 12/02/20 3:48:53 PM #54:	Musourenka posted... How many people are going to get in trouble for looking at that? Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so. <cite>MachineJaipur posted [p:947846387] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Musourenka posted... </cite> <quote>How many people are going to get in trouble for looking at that?</quote>Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 12/02/20 3:50:34 PM #55:	Play dumb games, win stupid prizes. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:947846443] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Play dumb games, win stupid prizes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 12/02/20 4:30:35 PM #56:	MachineJaipur posted... Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so. Indeed The context in which she put it out is sketch af, but it does not sound like CP --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg https://imgur.com/8kjZU <cite>eston posted [p:947847784] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>MachineJaipur posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so.</quote>Indeed The context in which she put it out is sketch af, but it does not sound like CP </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CProtectionSvce 12/02/20 4:36:32 PM #57:	Yeah I don't think this is legally child porn but the situation and context is extremely not ok and she deserves the backlash for it. --- To protect children, the elderly, and people with disabilities from abuse, neglect, and exploitation <cite>CProtectionSvce posted [p:947847967] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Yeah I don't think this is legally child porn but the situation and context is extremely not ok and she deserves the backlash for it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
epik_fail1 12/02/20 5:13:09 PM #58:	Wtf? She baits people into comitting a crime they have no clue they are doing. Wtf is wrong with her? --- Dragaux for smash! <cite>epik_fail1 posted [p:947849250] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Wtf? She baits people into comitting a crime they have no clue they are doing. Wtf is wrong with her?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crazyman93 12/02/20 5:18:53 PM #59:	MachineJaipur posted... Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so. When you sell videos of said naked children, you've become a child pornographer. Period. --- let's lubricate friction material! ~nickels, Cars & Trucks <cite>Crazyman93 posted [p:947849469] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>MachineJaipur posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so.</quote>When you sell videos of said naked children, you've become a child pornographer. Period. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CProtectionSvce 12/02/20 5:24:00 PM #60:	Crazyman93 posted... When you sell videos of said naked children, you've become a child pornographer. Period. It's a bit more complicated than that. --- To protect children, the elderly, and people with disabilities from abuse, neglect, and exploitation <cite>CProtectionSvce posted [p:947849660] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Crazyman93 posted... </cite> <quote>When you sell videos of said naked children, you've become a child pornographer. Period.</quote> It's a bit more complicated than that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 12/02/20 5:43:35 PM #61:	The X Dawg posted... I will say though, this is kind of a weird place we are at now with society and laws. Is it technically child porn? Yes. 100%. By the law, downloading or viewing this video is illegal. Could also help to flame the fires of creation and distribution of child porn in general. But I can understand her perspective of where if it is a video of yourself, why you would have no issue sharing it with other people. It's you as a child being silly. You are comfortable showing a 'funny' video like that to others. It's why when families get together, they share and laugh at photos/home-videos of each other as babies or kids doing silly stuff naked. But that said of course, you need to know the laws and not fucking do it. It kinda falls in a bizarre gray area. I haven't seen the video, but from context I'm assuming that the video wasn't originally taken for sale and was a home movie of some kind where the parents took it because they thought she was being funny or something. At the same time, it wasn't being sold for explicitly pornographic reasons (well, the "joke" in the sale was that people thought they were buying a video of the adult YTuber nude). Likewise, not all nude photography and artwork of children is considered pornographic (otherwise entire museums would be arrested). So the standard for child pornography isn't just that it's a nude photo of a child being sold. However, I'm not sure if that's specifically a defense pertaining to art or a general exemption regarding child pornography. Regardless, it's one of those things where a person really doesn't want to test how the law works by doing what she did. And even if she doesn't get in any legal trouble, I imagine YT and other sites might suspend her over the backlash. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:947850357] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>The X Dawg posted... </cite> <quote>I will say though, this is kind of a weird place we are at now with society and laws. Is it technically child porn? Yes. 100%. By the law, downloading or viewing this video is illegal. Could also help to flame the fires of creation and distribution of child porn in general. But I can understand her perspective of where if it is a video of yourself, why you would have no issue sharing it with other people. It's you as a child being silly. You are comfortable showing a 'funny' video like that to others. It's why when families get together, they share and laugh at photos/home-videos of each other as babies or kids doing silly stuff naked. But that said of course, you need to know the laws and not fucking do it.</quote> It kinda falls in a bizarre gray area. I haven't seen the video, but from context I'm assuming that the video wasn't originally taken for sale and was a home movie of some kind where the parents took it because they thought she was being funny or something. At the same time, it wasn't being sold for explicitly pornographic reasons (well, the "joke" in the sale was that people thought they were buying a video of the adult YTuber nude). Likewise, not all nude photography and artwork of children is considered pornographic (otherwise entire museums would be arrested). So the standard for child pornography isn't just that it's a nude photo of a child being sold. However, I'm not sure if that's specifically a defense pertaining to art or a general exemption regarding child pornography. Regardless, it's one of those things where a person really doesn't want to test how the law works by doing what she did. And even if she doesn't get in any legal trouble, I imagine YT and other sites might suspend her over the backlash. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hi C 12/02/20 5:49:03 PM #62:	Should of charged $300. Resetera would jump at that shit in a second. --- I5-8400 \| ASRock Z370M-ITX \| GSKILL 16GB \| ASUS GTX 960 <cite>Hi C posted [p:947850562] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Should of charged $300. Resetera would jump at that shit in a second. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
garan 12/02/20 6:01:58 PM #63:	CalypsoDoom posted... Jesus, what a shitty person This-- hope they throw the book at her regardless of her intentions. <cite>garan posted [p:947851063] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>CalypsoDoom posted...</cite> <quote>Jesus, what a shitty person</quote> This-- hope they throw the book at her regardless of her intentions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoBowser 12/02/20 6:04:35 PM #64:	this girl just cannot keep herself out of trouble. was rooting for her before --- I'm feeling myself, I'm feeling myself, I'm feeling my feeling my' <cite>NeoBowser posted [p:947851156] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>this girl just cannot keep herself out of trouble. was rooting for her before </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 12/02/20 6:07:53 PM #65:	Zeus posted... It kinda falls in a bizarre gray area. I haven't seen the video, but from context I'm assuming that the video wasn't originally taken for sale and was a home movie of some kind where the parents took it because they thought she was being funny or something. At the same time, it wasn't being sold for explicitly pornographic reasons (well, the "joke" in the sale was that people thought they were buying a video of the adult YTuber nude). Likewise, not all nude photography and artwork of children is considered pornographic (otherwise entire museums would be arrested). So the standard for child pornography isn't just that it's a nude photo of a child being sold. However, I'm not sure if that's specifically a defense pertaining to art or a general exemption regarding child pornography. Regardless, it's one of those things where a person really doesn't want to test how the law works by doing what she did. And even if she doesn't get in any legal trouble, I imagine YT and other sites might suspend her over the backlash. AFAIK, Production companies are still making movies with naked kids, so yeah its not cp just because a movie has naked kids in it. Or maybe people want everyone involved in movies like Tomboy to be put in prison. --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:947851262] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>It kinda falls in a bizarre gray area. I haven't seen the video, but from context I'm assuming that the video wasn't originally taken for sale and was a home movie of some kind where the parents took it because they thought she was being funny or something. At the same time, it wasn't being sold for explicitly pornographic reasons (well, the "joke" in the sale was that people thought they were buying a video of the adult YTuber nude). Likewise, not all nude photography and artwork of children is considered pornographic (otherwise entire museums would be arrested). So the standard for child pornography isn't just that it's a nude photo of a child being sold. However, I'm not sure if that's specifically a defense pertaining to art or a general exemption regarding child pornography. Regardless, it's one of those things where a person really doesn't want to test how the law works by doing what she did. And even if she doesn't get in any legal trouble, I imagine YT and other sites might suspend her over the backlash.</quote>AFAIK, Production companies are still making movies with naked kids, so yeah its not cp just because a movie has naked kids in it. Or maybe people want everyone involved in movies like Tomboy to be put in prison. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grischnak 12/02/20 6:08:50 PM #66:	Ehh. Maybe I'm too soft hearted but I don't think she should go to prison on a child porn charge for this. That's really brutal. Meme aside, it was a dumb prank from a dumb young person that wasn't really peddling child porn. Intent does matter. <cite>Grischnak posted [p:947851307] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Ehh. Maybe I'm too soft hearted but I don't think she should go to prison on a child porn charge for this. That's really brutal. Meme aside, it was a dumb prank from a dumb young person that wasn't really peddling child porn. Intent does matter. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 12/02/20 6:09:41 PM #67:	MachineJaipur posted... Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so. This completely ignores the context. Don't do that. --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:947851326] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>MachineJaipur posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody because it isn't actually pornographic in nature from the sounds of it. Naked children =/= CP, nor should it be considered so.</quote>This completely ignores the context. Don't do that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SolidShadow3 12/02/20 6:10:54 PM #68:	Some places that develop photos won't give you back photos of kids in the bathtub these days because it can be considered child porn; the definition is blurry. With that said, She should get her ass beat by the legal system. --- By Odin's beard! <cite>SolidShadow3 posted [p:947851369] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>Some places that develop photos won't give you back photos of kids in the bathtub these days because it can be considered child porn; the definition is blurry. With that said, She should get her ass beat by the legal system. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoBowser 12/02/20 6:13:58 PM #69:	prison is too much but she should just be banned from the subscription site and take all that heat --- I'm feeling myself, I'm feeling myself, I'm feeling my feeling my' <cite>NeoBowser posted [p:947851468] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>prison is too much but she should just be banned from the subscription site and take all that heat </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CProtectionSvce 12/02/20 6:22:10 PM #71:	SolidShadow3 posted... Some places that develop photos won't give you back photos of kids in the bathtub these days because it can be considered child porn; the definition is blurry. With that said, She should get her ass beat by the legal system. If it was actual child porn it would be reported to the authorities. Sounds more like a personal business thing. --- To protect children, the elderly, and people with disabilities from abuse, neglect, and exploitation <cite>CProtectionSvce posted [p:947851769] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>SolidShadow3 posted... </cite> <quote>Some places that develop photos won't give you back photos of kids in the bathtub these days because it can be considered child porn; the definition is blurry. With that said, She should get her ass beat by the legal system.</quote> If it was actual child porn it would be reported to the authorities. Sounds more like a personal business thing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
omega cookie 12/02/20 6:24:06 PM #72:	She charged money to disseminate video of a naked child. She should serve time, as a example to others if nothing else. --- FFRK: BRKB - Eiko - Guardian Mog <cite>omega cookie posted [p:947851829] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>She charged money to disseminate video of a naked child. She should serve time, as a example to others if nothing else. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
epik_fail1 12/02/20 6:28:39 PM #73:	The only reason she should not go to prison is because it was herself, but she needs to pay fines and have her account banned. --- Dragaux for smash! <cite>epik_fail1 posted [p:947852005] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>The only reason she should not go to prison is because it was herself, but she needs to pay fines and have her account banned.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
im not 13 12/04/20 6:44:12 AM #75:	She uses the word triggered unironically Throw the book at her --- http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m510t9eNw71r2yd8o.jpg <cite>im not 13 posted [p:947906657] in YouTuber G... [t:79148354]...</cite> <quote>She uses the word triggered unironically Throw the book at her </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > YouTuber Gabi DeMartino sold child porn video of herself for $3 (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > YouTuber Gabi DeMartino sold child porn video of herself for $3