Current Events > Dmc5 was fun but I beat it in 9 hours.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Don't really have the urge to replay it either. Maybe bloody palace a bit, but I'll probably hold out until the Vergil DLC for a replay. Dante was a shit load of fun to play as and brought me back to playing dmc3 as a kid. Lots of familiarity in his moveset and got into the groove quickly. Nero is cool, great for staying in the air and juggling until the end of time. But I never got into a groove with him. My combos always balanced around A/S with him and S/SS with Dante.

---

its easily the most fun game in the series but yes, the lack of content sucked

---

higher difficulties rearrange enemy placements and you fight harder enemies earlier, and it's basically NG+

---

ultimate reaver posted...

its easily the most fun game in the series but yes, the lack of content sucked

Again, I loved it. But 90% of the missions were walking through 2-3 spawn areas, getting to a boss, and ending with a thirty second cutscene. That one Dante level where you needed to clear the three blood paths, for example, was one of the few times they shook up and formula and I would have liked to see a lot more of that classic DmC level designing.

I also feel like missions 17-20 could have been one mission, they were literally just an insta boss and cutscene followed by another and another.

---

SSJKirby posted...

higher difficulties rearrange enemy placements and you fight harder enemies earlier, and it's basically NG+

I think I'd rather just bloody palace. If I have to play the V missions again I might cry.

---