Current Events > Woman brought newborn baby to Trump rally with no mask

Topic List	Page List: 1
ThisGuyAreSick 06/21/20 2:31:48 AM #1:	https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/20/woman-brings-newborn-three-week-old-baby-trump-tulsa-rally-covid/ Well, I'm pretty sure that poor kid's being taken away by child services this week. Fuck these shitbags. --- sigless <cite>ThisGuyAreSick posted [p:941005659] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/20/woman-brings-newborn-three-week-old-baby-trump-tulsa-rally-covid/ Well, I'm pretty sure that poor kid's being taken away by child services this week. Fuck these shitbags.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Accolon 06/21/20 2:33:26 AM #2:	Newborns aren't supposed to wear masks --- https://imgur.com/XAMp8 <cite>Accolon posted [p:941005701] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Newborns aren't supposed to wear masks </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 06/21/20 2:33:41 AM #3:	Doubt it. But how did they allow her in in the first place? --- formerly evening formerly guide https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:941005710] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Doubt it. But how did they allow her in in the first place? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VigorouslySwish 06/21/20 2:34:27 AM #4:	eh, newborns are essentially immune --- it stinks and i hate it <cite>VigorouslySwish posted [p:941005734] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>eh, newborns are essentially immune </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThisGuyAreSick 06/21/20 2:35:03 AM #5:	VigorouslySwish posted... eh, newborns are essentially immune Wat? They literally have no immune system --- sigless <cite>ThisGuyAreSick posted [p:941005749] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>VigorouslySwish posted...</cite> <quote>eh, newborns are essentially immune </quote> Wat? They literally have no immune system</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 06/21/20 2:37:05 AM #6:	Hopefully she gets reported to CPS --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. <cite>Irony posted [p:941005822] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Hopefully she gets reported to CPS </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 06/21/20 2:38:37 AM #7:	Guide posted... Doubt it. But how did they allow her in in the first place? Because she signed the legal waiver --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:941005862] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Guide posted... </cite> <quote>Doubt it. But how did they allow her in in the first place?</quote>Because she signed the legal waiver </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 06/21/20 2:39:19 AM #8:	VigorouslySwish posted... eh, newborns are essentially immune No. A wide age range of children are safer than most, but infants are at higher risk, having an incomplete immune system. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-in-babies-and-children/art-20484405 Although rare, children under age 1 (infants) are at higher risk of severe illness with COVID-19. This is likely due to their immature immune systems and smaller airways, which make them more likely to develop breathing issues with respiratory virus infections. A study of more than 2,100 children with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in China between late December and early February showed that just under 11% of infants had severe or critical illness. In comparison, rates of severe or critical illness were about 7% for children ages 1 to 5, 4% for those 6 to 10, 4% for those 11 to 15 and 3% for those 16 and older. The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. Is this worth it for a rally? --- formerly evening formerly guide https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:941005883] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>VigorouslySwish posted... </cite> <quote>eh, newborns are essentially immune</quote> No. A wide age range of children are safer than most, but infants are at higher risk, having an incomplete immune system. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-in-babies-and-children/art-20484405 <quote>Although rare, children under age 1 (infants) are at higher risk of severe illness with COVID-19. This is likely due to their immature immune systems and smaller airways, which make them more likely to develop breathing issues with respiratory virus infections. A study of more than 2,100 children with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in China between late December and early February showed that just under 11% of infants had severe or critical illness. In comparison, rates of severe or critical illness were about 7% for children ages 1 to 5, 4% for those 6 to 10, 4% for those 11 to 15 and 3% for those 16 and older.</quote> The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. Is this worth it for a rally? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 06/21/20 2:39:22 AM #9:	ThisGuyAreSick posted... I'm pretty sure that poor kid's being taken away by child services Shut the fuck up. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:941005886] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>ThisGuyAreSick posted... </cite> <quote>I'm pretty sure that poor kid's being taken away by child services</quote>Shut the fuck up. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 06/21/20 2:40:05 AM #10:	The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. Is this worth it for a rally, @Gobstoppers12 ? If you had a kid, would 10% be a risk you'd take for this event? --- formerly evening formerly guide https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:941005910] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. Is this worth it for a rally, @Gobstoppers12 ? If you had a kid, would 10% be a risk you'd take for this event? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Perascamin 06/21/20 2:40:45 AM #11:	Gobstoppers12 posted... Shut the fuck up. It's literally negligence --- I've grown. <cite>Perascamin posted [p:941005930] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>Shut the fuck up.</quote>It's literally negligence </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThisGuyAreSick 06/21/20 2:43:28 AM #12:	Gobstoppers12 posted... Shut the fuck up. Oh, when you're not bootlicking cops you're defending mothers who put their newborns at risk for deadly diseases. Nice. --- sigless <cite>ThisGuyAreSick posted [p:941006008] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote> Shut the fuck up. </quote> Oh, when you're not bootlicking cops you're defending mothers who put their newborns at risk for deadly diseases. Nice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 06/21/20 2:44:32 AM #13:	Guide posted... The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:941006036] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Guide posted... </cite> <quote>The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this.</quote>I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jmikla 06/21/20 2:46:25 AM #14:	Accolon posted... Newborns aren't supposed to wear masks TC prob hasnt had a baby, can give him/her a break --- So say we all <cite>jmikla posted [p:941006082] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Accolon posted... </cite> <quote>Newborns aren't supposed to wear masks</quote>TC prob hasnt had a baby, can give him/her a break </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThisGuyAreSick 06/21/20 2:48:41 AM #15:	Gobstoppers12 posted... I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? bruh what --- sigless <cite>ThisGuyAreSick posted [p:941006140] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote> I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? </quote> bruh what</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MwarriorHiei 06/21/20 2:51:55 AM #16:	Gobstoppers12 posted... I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? https://i.imgur.com/yedi2Tv.jpg --- https://imgur.com/QkFxs3C <cite>MwarriorHiei posted [p:941006221] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote> I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? </quote> https://i.imgur.com/yedi2Tv.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 06/21/20 2:52:04 AM #17:	ThisGuyAreSick posted... bruh what Guide posted... The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this. I'm just asking for proof of this number. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:941006227] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>ThisGuyAreSick posted... </cite> <quote> bruh what</quote> Guide posted... </cite> <quote>The kid has a 1/10 chance of getting seriously sick for this.</quote>I'm just asking for proof of this number. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThisGuyAreSick 06/21/20 2:57:56 AM #18:	Gobstoppers12 posted... I'm just asking for proof of this number. didnt you do this a few days ago where youre like "i just want proof" when people shove proof in your face and youre like "i want proof tho" weird gimmick --- sigless <cite>ThisGuyAreSick posted [p:941006391] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote> I'm just asking for proof of this number. </quote> didnt you do this a few days ago where youre like "i just want proof" when people shove proof in your face and youre like "i want proof tho" weird gimmick</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 06/21/20 3:03:09 AM #19:	Gobstoppers12 posted... I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick? Guide posted... https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-in-babies-and-children/art-20484405 A study of more than 2,100 children with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in China between late December and early February showed that just under 11% of infants had severe or critical illness. No argument was made about 10% of all rally attendees or 100% of newborns. I specified 10% of newborns, because that's what's in the source provided. If the newborn contracts the disease, it has a 1/10 chance of getting sick. So, fair point; without gauging the odds of infection, I can't say the actual odds of it getting sick, just what happens if it contracts; and I can say that they're certainly not taking any steps to avoid contraction in that image. Also, for funsies, I cannot at all prove whether those parents considering the odds of contraction, but I would be quite comfortable betting a significant amount of money that they aren't. --- formerly evening formerly guide https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:941006523] in Woman brou... [t:78789713]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>I feel like that's not exactly accurate. Proof that not only 10% of all rally attendees will get sick, but that 100% (or 10% if you assume 100% of the rally attendees will contract the disease) of all newborns get seriously sick?</quote> Guide posted... </cite> <quote>https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-in-babies-and-children/art-20484405 A study of more than 2,100 children with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in China between late December and early February showed that just under 11% of infants had severe or critical illness.</quote> No argument was made about 10% of all rally attendees or 100% of newborns. I specified 10% of newborns, because that's what's in the source provided. If the newborn contracts the disease, it has a 1/10 chance of getting sick. So, fair point; without gauging the odds of infection, I can't say the actual odds of it getting sick, just what happens if it contracts; and I can say that they're certainly not taking any steps to avoid contraction in that image. Also, for funsies, I cannot at all prove whether those parents considering the odds of contraction, but I would be quite comfortable betting a significant amount of money that they aren't. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Woman brought newborn baby to Trump rally with no mask (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Woman brought newborn baby to Trump rally with no mask