Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
streamofthesky 02/10/20 9:09:56 PM #1: |
Which recipient of the award disgusts you more?
Vote
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-19/trump-awards-medal-to-controversial-tax-cut-champion-laffer Laffer, 78, who was an aide to President Ronald Reagan, is known for his eponymous curve, which supposes that taxation rates beyond a certain level can prove counterproductive by discouraging work. The argument is frequently cited by Republican lawmakers, including Trump, in support of tax cuts. In 2012, the state of Kansas hired Laffer to advise then-Governor Sam Brownback as he prepared his own tax cut proposal. The economist, who was paid $75,000 according to the Kansas City Star, argued that deep tax cuts would spur growth that would create more jobs and bring in more payroll tax revenue during a series of appearances in Topeka. This dude's an utter fucking sociopath, and his policies have been ruining lives for forty fucking years! Honestly him getting the award is even more atrocious to me than Rush getting it. What do you think? Bonus: clip of Arthur Laffer being COMPLETELY FUCKING WRONG in 2006 about the economy, as proven by the Great Recession. Unsung hero Peter Schiff owned his ass! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYkFYdLTTw8 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
#2 | Post #2 was unavailable or deleted. |
streamofthesky 02/11/20 1:41:35 AM #3: |
Mr Hangman posted...
The Laffer Curve is obviously true, at the extremes.Even if I just take that at face value as true, does anyone w/ the slightest bit of intellect actually think a real world government would operate at an extreme end of "no taxation / all the taxation"? But even the people citing it I don't think are really dumb enough to think that tax rates are actually in a range that you can raise revenue by lowering them. They are just looking for intellectual cover for what they were going to do anyway. And if Laffer didn't give it to them, they'd easily find some other bullshit to slip in its place.Of course they know better. Skeptical on your final argument, though. If there are countless bs justifications for supply side economics, you'd think they'd have tried to employee them by now, rather than fall back on the same failed economic argument repeatedly. If for no other reason than to claim, "look at all these economic theories that back up cutting taxes!" Whether anyone else would step in to fill the gap or not, the fact remains it's Laffer who's gladly taken that mantle all of this time and sold his soul. Fuck him. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Mead 02/11/20 1:46:43 AM #4: |
Leave Lunch Rimjaub alone he cant help the fact that hes a horrid sack of shit
--- Lemonheads ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |