Current Events > Warren finally wakes up and attacks Sanders for having volunteers attack her

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
CruelBuffalo 01/13/20 10:13:55 PM #102:	https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1216881311874502663 lmfao how people follow this clown I have no idea <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932892588] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1216881311874502663 lmfao how people follow this clown I have no idea </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 01/13/20 11:05:16 PM #103:	Balrog0 posted... Oh my goodness has a literal he said she said ever happened like this in presidential politics before? I legit can't see this doing anything but tarnishing both of them Seems like a bad angle to attack the candidate primary voters consistently rate as the "most honest" from. CruelBuffalo posted... https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1216881311874502663 lmfao how people follow this clown I have no idea And then there's this. Not a good look when your own campaign staff starts telling people, "Oh yeah, Liz is always exaggerating things, what a cad!" <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:932894835] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote><quote>Balrog0 posted... </cite>Oh my goodness has a literal he said she said ever happened like this in presidential politics before? I legit can't see this doing anything but tarnishing both of them</quote>Seems like a bad angle to attack the candidate primary voters consistently rate as the "most honest" from. CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1216881311874502663 lmfao how people follow this clown I have no idea</quote>And then there's this. Not a good look when your own campaign staff starts telling people, "Oh yeah, Liz is always exaggerating things, what a cad!" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 01/13/20 11:06:32 PM #104:	Somebody give Tulsi attention https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1216925563400654849 --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:932894905] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Somebody give Tulsi attention https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1216925563400654849</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/13/20 11:19:30 PM #105:	Antifar posted... Somebody give Tulsi attention https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1216925563400654849 strong notice me senpaii vibes <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932895454] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote>Somebody give Tulsi attention https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1216925563400654849</quote> strong notice me senpaii vibes </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 12:02:14 AM #106:	https://twitter.com/amyklobuchar/status/1216797252292923393 i thought she was just gonna have a snarky comment at the debate. Didnt think shed jump the gun <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932897123] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/amyklobuchar/status/1216797252292923393 i thought she was just gonna have a snarky comment at the debate. Didnt think shed jump the gun </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dat_Cracka_Jax 01/14/20 6:43:06 AM #107:	Odds that this doesn't get mentioned at all at the debate? --- http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/8131/flame201010170949481638.jpg http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/5517/cateyes.gif Rams: 7-9 <cite>Dat_Cracka_Jax posted [p:932904940] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Odds that this doesn't get mentioned at all at the debate? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 10:01:59 AM #108:	https://twitter.com/mspackyetti/status/1217079443941941248 a very good thread people on CE need to read <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932909624] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/mspackyetti/status/1217079443941941248 a very good thread people on CE need to read </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 01/14/20 10:11:20 AM #109:	CruelBuffalo posted... https://twitter.com/mspackyetti/status/1217079443941941248 a very good thread people on CE need to read I don't think it's a very good thread, imo it seems like a warren supporter trying to support her candidate edit - I don't actually know that this person is supporting warren for president, but the combination of the unity rhetoric + pointedly attacking a specific candidate without turning any fire on your own just seems pretty obvious to me --- But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:932909982] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/mspackyetti/status/1217079443941941248 a very good thread people on CE need to read</quote> I don't think it's a very good thread, imo it seems like a warren supporter trying to support her candidate edit - I don't actually know that this person is supporting warren for president, but the combination of the unity rhetoric + pointedly attacking a specific candidate without turning any fire on your own just seems pretty obvious to me </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#110	Post #110 was unavailable or deleted.
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 10:15:02 AM #111:	Balrog0 posted... I don't think it's a very good thread, imo it seems like a warren supporter trying to support her candidate edit - I don't actually know that this person is supporting warren for president, but the combination of the unity rhetoric + pointedly attacking a specific candidate without turning any fire on your own just seems pretty obvious to me Which specific points in that thread do you disagree with? <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932910131] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Balrog0 posted... </cite> <quote>I don't think it's a very good thread, imo it seems like a warren supporter trying to support her candidate edit - I don't actually know that this person is supporting warren for president, but the combination of the unity rhetoric + pointedly attacking a specific candidate without turning any fire on your own just seems pretty obvious to me</quote> Which specific points in that thread do you disagree with? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 01/14/20 10:19:00 AM #112:	CruelBuffalo posted... Which specific points in that thread do you disagree with? I don't disagree with any of it necessarily, it's just pretty obvious what you're doing when you lead with "stanning candidates is bad" about this specific thing where only two candidates are involved, and then all of your complaints are about one candidate and his supporters. In fact, the whole argument is basically saying you should believe Warren and that calling her a liar is sexist, the opposite of some kind of neutral take --- But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:932910285] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>Which specific points in that thread do you disagree with?</quote> I don't disagree with any of it necessarily, it's just pretty obvious what you're doing when you lead with "stanning candidates is bad" about this specific thing where only two candidates are involved, and then all of your complaints are about one candidate and his supporters. In fact, the whole argument is basically saying you should believe Warren and that calling her a liar is sexist, the opposite of some kind of neutral take </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 10:21:17 AM #113:	Balrog0 posted... I don't disagree with any of it necessarily, it's just pretty obvious what you're doing when you lead with "stanning candidates is bad" about this specific thing where only two candidates are involved, and then all of your complaints are about one candidate and his supporters. In fact, the whole argument is basically saying you should believe Warren and that calling her a liar is sexist, the opposite of some kind of neutral take One of the arguments is not that you should believe warren, its you shouldnt write her off as a liar automatically. Theres a difference. and look at the posts and responses here. You have one anti-bernie gung ho, and you have a lot of anti-Warren immediately writing her off. Which side needs to hear it more? <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932910370] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Balrog0 posted... </cite> <quote>I don't disagree with any of it necessarily, it's just pretty obvious what you're doing when you lead with "stanning candidates is bad" about this specific thing where only two candidates are involved, and then all of your complaints are about one candidate and his supporters. In fact, the whole argument is basically saying you should believe Warren and that calling her a liar is sexist, the opposite of some kind of neutral take</quote> One of the arguments is not that you should believe warren, its you shouldnt write her off as a liar automatically. Theres a difference. and look at the posts and responses here. You have one anti-bernie gung ho, and you have a lot of anti-Warren immediately writing her off. Which side needs to hear it more? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 01/14/20 10:28:20 AM #114:	CruelBuffalo posted... One of the arguments is not that you should believe warren, its you shouldnt write her off as a liar automatically. Theres a difference. Nah, I don't see why you're being this charitable. It's not just "maybe he said it," it's "look we know Bernie has a problem with intersectionality, here's an example of him being retrogressive, and the things you're using as examples of why you don't believe it are bad" Again, maybe that's true, but you could also do this exact same thread substituting in Warren's track record of exaggerations or actual lies, and it's obvious why this person didn't go that route --- But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:932910681] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>One of the arguments is not that you should believe warren, its you shouldnt write her off as a liar automatically. Theres a difference.</quote> Nah, I don't see why you're being this charitable. It's not just "maybe he said it," it's "look we know Bernie has a problem with intersectionality, here's an example of him being retrogressive, and the things you're using as examples of why you don't believe it are bad" Again, maybe that's true, but you could also do this exact same thread substituting in Warren's track record of exaggerations or actual lies, and it's obvious why this person didn't go that route </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 10:30:59 AM #115:	Balrog0 posted... Nah, I don't see why you're being this charitable. It's not just "maybe he said it," it's "look we know Bernie has a problem with intersectionality, here's an example of him being retrogressive, and the things you're using as examples of why you don't believe it are bad" Again, maybe that's true, but you could also do this exact same thread substituting in Warren's track record of exaggerations or actual lies, and it's obvious why this person didn't go that route if most people were Auto believing Warren, then yes the opposite would need to be posted here. People need to challenge themselves here more. I mean look at the amazing posts in this topic. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932910790] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Balrog0 posted... </cite> <quote>Nah, I don't see why you're being this charitable. It's not just "maybe he said it," it's "look we know Bernie has a problem with intersectionality, here's an example of him being retrogressive, and the things you're using as examples of why you don't believe it are bad" Again, maybe that's true, but you could also do this exact same thread substituting in Warren's track record of exaggerations or actual lies, and it's obvious why this person didn't go that route</quote> if most people were Auto believing Warren, then yes the opposite would need to be posted here. People need to challenge themselves here more. I mean look at the amazing posts in this topic. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 01/14/20 10:38:13 AM #116:	https://twitter.com/OsitaNwanevu/status/1217097183201239040 They're going all in on this strategy, I guess. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:932911086] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/OsitaNwanevu/status/1217097183201239040 They're going all in on this strategy, I guess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#117	Post #117 was unavailable or deleted.
#118	Post #118 was unavailable or deleted.
Intro2Logic 01/14/20 11:02:17 AM #119:	It seems transparent to me that this three day news cycle (Politico's scoop Sunday, the CNN story yesterday, the Daily Beast today) has come from sources within Warren's camp as part of a broader strategy to label Bernie as "divisive" while the candidate herself says she just wants to focus on the issues. It's also funny to me that this "unity candidate" approach the Warren campaign is going with arrives three weeks after her big swing at Pete didn't quite work out the way they'd planned. I like Warren, she's clearly better than any of the non-Sanders alternatives, but her instincts as a campaigner don't exactly inspire confidence. --- Have you tried thinking rationally? <cite>Intro2Logic posted [p:932912076] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>It seems transparent to me that this three day news cycle (Politico's scoop Sunday, the CNN story yesterday, the Daily Beast today) has come from sources within Warren's camp as part of a broader strategy to label Bernie as "divisive" while the candidate herself says she just wants to focus on the issues. It's also funny to me that this "unity candidate" approach the Warren campaign is going with arrives three weeks after her big swing at Pete didn't quite work out the way they'd planned. I like Warren, she's clearly better than any of the non-Sanders alternatives, but her instincts as a campaigner don't exactly inspire confidence. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Intro2Logic 01/14/20 2:59:36 PM #120:	https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rubycramer/elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-woman-president-deescalation "We assassinated your famous general, but really we're looking for de-escalation" --- Have you tried thinking rationally? <cite>Intro2Logic posted [p:932923151] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rubycramer/elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-woman-president-deescalation "We assassinated your famous general, but really we're looking for de-escalation" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 01/14/20 3:04:54 PM #121:	De-escalating a fight she started. Nice! Real cool! --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:932923411] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>De-escalating a fight she started. Nice! Real cool!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 01/14/20 6:09:05 PM #122:	The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21 --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:932931375] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keith_Valentine 01/14/20 6:41:09 PM #123:	Let these morons tear each other up in their little cat fight. Maybe next Warren will call Sanders a racist, that would be gold. Thats a reflex Democrat move. <cite>Keith_Valentine posted [p:932932819] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Let these morons tear each other up in their little cat fight. Maybe next Warren will call Sanders a racist, that would be gold. Thats a reflex Democrat move. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#124	Post #124 was unavailable or deleted.
#125	Post #125 was unavailable or deleted.
Umbreon 01/14/20 6:58:41 PM #126:	Antifar posted... The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21 Is this person a known troll? Or just a moron? It's so hard to tell these days. --- This is a mobile account, forgive any errors. ~DYL~ 12-18-19: Donald Trump has been impeached. <cite>Umbreon posted [p:932933572] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote>The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21</quote> Is this person a known troll? Or just a moron? It's so hard to tell these days. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 7:12:28 PM #127:	Antifar posted... The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21 i remember him. He was the goober that got wrecked by Mygyn Kylly. Lol. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932934141] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote>The good news is, everybody is being normal about it all https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768?s=21</quote> i remember him. He was the goober that got wrecked by Mygyn Kylly. Lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Iodine 01/14/20 7:15:06 PM #128:	https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786 Hmm I dunno. --- In Belichick we Trust <cite>Iodine posted [p:932934258] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786 Hmm I dunno. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 01/14/20 7:23:22 PM #129:	Umbreon posted... Is this person a known troll? Or just a moron? It's so hard to tell these days. They are a political analyst at ABC News --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:932934607] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Umbreon posted...</cite> <quote> Is this person a known troll? Or just a moron? It's so hard to tell these days. </quote> They are a political analyst at ABC News</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 01/14/20 7:27:43 PM #130:	Iodine posted... https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786 Hmm I dunno. the pivot is gonna be well it wasnt bad anyway rather than addressing the denials beforehand or the behavior of deep state was infiltrating the sanders campaign <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:932934791] in Warren fin... [t:78325127]...</cite> <quote>Iodine posted... </cite> <quote>https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786 Hmm I dunno.</quote> the pivot is gonna be well it wasnt bad anyway rather than addressing the denials beforehand or the behavior of deep state was infiltrating the sanders campaign </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Warren finally wakes up and attacks Sanders for having volunteers attack her (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Warren finally wakes up and attacks Sanders for having volunteers attack her