Current Events > Did any impeachment witnesses offer proof that Trump committed a crime?

Topic List	Page List: 1
karlpilkington4 12/05/19 3:41:52 PM #1:	Presumptions, opinions and hearsay are not facts or evidence, which is all that I've heard. Ambassador Sondland was suppose to be a key witness for the democrats to prove a quid pro quo was committed by Trump. His exchange during the impeachment inquiry - Asked outright, No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations. Yes or no?, he answered, Yes. The followup: So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations. Sondlands answer: *Other than my own presumption.* *When he (Sondland) directly asked Trump what he sought from Ukraine, the president responded: I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.* https://nypost.com/2019/11/20/sondlands-bombshell-turns-out-to-be-merely-his-presumption/ Now this is just one example. We have the outline of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian President, which didn't show any corruption. We have the Ukrainian President saying their was no Quid Pro Quo either. We have Trump saying that the funds were held to make sure Ukraine was not corrupted at the time, and to make sure Russia was not involved. We also have the testimony of Kurt Volker (Special Representative for Ukraine) - He said that when he helped facilitate contact between Giuliani and a senior Ukrainian official, he was not aware that anyone considered a "linkage" between U.S. military aid and the investigations Trump sought. https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/kurt-volker-public-impeachment-hearing-071566 My question is, where is the evidence? Where is the proof that President Trump did something impeachable? Thank you. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:931151195] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote> Presumptions, opinions and hearsay are not facts or evidence, which is all that I've heard. Ambassador Sondland was suppose to be a key witness for the democrats to prove a quid pro quo was committed by Trump. His exchange during the impeachment inquiry - Asked outright, No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations. Yes or no?, he answered, Yes. The followup: So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations. Sondlands answer: Other than my own presumption. When he (Sondland) directly asked Trump what he sought from Ukraine, the president responded: I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing. https://nypost.com/2019/11/20/sondlands-bombshell-turns-out-to-be-merely-his-presumption/ Now this is just one example. We have the outline of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian President, which didn't show any corruption. We have the Ukrainian President saying their was no Quid Pro Quo either. We have Trump saying that the funds were held to make sure Ukraine was not corrupted at the time, and to make sure Russia was not involved. We also have the testimony of Kurt Volker (Special Representative for Ukraine) - He said that when he helped facilitate contact between Giuliani and a senior Ukrainian official, he was not aware that anyone considered a "linkage" between U.S. military aid and the investigations Trump sought. https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/kurt-volker-public-impeachment-hearing-071566 My question is, where is the evidence? Where is the proof that President Trump did something impeachable? Thank you. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 12/05/19 3:49:24 PM #2:	Nobody respond to the Trumper --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:931151499] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote>Nobody respond to the Trumper </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Musourenka 12/05/19 3:50:51 PM #3:	Yes, hearsay can be evidence. Also, the moment that aid was held for "I need you to do a favor", a hold that legally has to go through Congress first, that is solicitation of bribery. Period. Criminal. Impeachable. Also, the blocking of a dozen Executive branch witnesses from responding to House subpoenas is obstruction of Congress. Period. Impeachable. --- Shooing away pigeons crapping on debate tables is not a violation of the pigeons' free speech. <cite>Musourenka posted [p:931151563] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote>Yes, hearsay can be evidence. Also, the moment that aid was held for "I need you to do a favor", a hold that legally has to go through Congress first, that is solicitation of bribery. Period. Criminal. Impeachable. Also, the blocking of a dozen Executive branch witnesses from responding to House subpoenas is obstruction of Congress. Period. Impeachable. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Musourenka 12/05/19 3:51:15 PM #4:	iPhone_7 posted... Nobody respond to the Trumper Crap. Sorry. --- Shooing away pigeons crapping on debate tables is not a violation of the pigeons' free speech. <cite>Musourenka posted [p:931151583] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote>iPhone_7 posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody respond to the Trumper</quote>Crap. Sorry. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThanksUglyGod 12/05/19 3:51:26 PM #5:	Lamest TED Talk ever <cite>ThanksUglyGod posted [p:931151592] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote>Lamest TED Talk ever </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
davyheinz 12/05/19 4:00:18 PM #6:	Nice melty --- Currently playing: Psychonauts, BioShock In limbo: Strider, Jet Force Gemini <cite>davyheinz posted [p:931151954] in Did any im... [t:78229294]...</cite> <quote>Nice melty </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Did any impeachment witnesses offer proof that Trump committed a crime? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Did any impeachment witnesses offer proof that Trump committed a crime?