Current Events > Is it fair for girls to reject guys if they have no car?

(+) Yeah! (+)

nt

Im a woman and was rejected prior to having a car, so fair next if men can do it
---

You can reject anyone for anything you want

A grown ass man? Yes.

Kensaimage posted...

You can reject anyone for anything you want

---

So I got to be 6'4 and have a car? Forever alone here I come.

As a carless man, I mean I guess. It's my choice not to drive so I guess it's their choice if that's okay.

---

"Fair" has nothing to do with it. There are no protected classes in romance.

---

If the person doesn't need a car cause they can walk, bike or take transit to work I'm cool with it. If they can't afford a car then that also makes sense. If they live a life spending like crazy and are bust then it's an issue.
---

_Matchabuu_ posted...

Im a woman and was rejected prior to having a car, so fair next if men can do it

That's a shitty reason to reject someone
---

It probably sounds like shallow reason to reject someone at first, but the impracticality of not having a car will eventually set in and breed annoyance and resentment. So at least be honest and lay it out there as an issue, see where the discussion goes.
---

If the person constantly needs rides everywhere it can be an issue. My ex wife didn't have a car until roughly a year prior to us breaking up. It never bothered me. She worked a walking distance. Now her and her new man share a car.
---

This is the reason I haven't had my cars hood repainted since the clear coat started peeling. Keeps me away from money grabbers and show outs.

Edit: If a man should have his own ride due to money/circumstances then that should be a top priority though to work on. I can understand someone saying "but he isn't even trying". I get it.
---

Hexenherz posted...

_Matchabuu_ posted...

Im a woman and was rejected prior to having a car, so fair next if men can do it

That's a shitty reason to reject someone

Oh I know but Im just saying that both sides do it and if its somehow ok for one its okay for both, or not at all.
---

_Matchabuu_ posted...

Hexenherz posted...

_Matchabuu_ posted...

Im a woman and was rejected prior to having a car, so fair next if men can do it

That's a shitty reason to reject someone

Oh I know but Im just saying that both sides do it and if its somehow ok for one its okay for both, or not at all.

Well keep in mind that both sides doing it doesn't make it right. Both sides cheat, and most people don't think that's "ok".

While you're free to date(or not date) who you want, doing the same shitty thing someone else did to you doesn't even the odds. It just means that another person was being shitty.

That being said, I don't think not dating someone who doesn't have reliable transportation is a poor reason itself.
---

PsychicHippo posted...

It probably sounds like shallow reason to reject someone at first, but the impracticality of not having a car will eventually set in and breed annoyance and resentment. So at least be honest and lay it out there as an issue, see where the discussion goes.

Yup.

It's not shallow because in our society it's almost imperative to survival. Especially if you live in the country and your job is 20-50+ miles away. Females look for security in a man, which is not being shallow it's an intelligently designed instinct so the offspring have maximum chance of survival. Just like how we mostly go for good looks on a female...it's not being shallow, it's just the desire to spread the very best genetics possible.

Kensaimage posted...

You can reject anyone for anything you want

Not if they're transgender

---