If the left wants to continually advertise hatred towards whites, they cant be mad when whites begin to hate them back.
They don't. Stop trying to make yourself the victim because racism isn't acceptable.
Your assumption that people who disagree with sentiments like whites are awful are racist is where the issue lies. Being against generalizations from both sides is how we solve issues. But it looks like some would rather assume power than equality.
No one has the sentiment that "whites are awful". You just want to play the victim.
Just because you dont socialize doesnt mean others havent experienced something.
No one has experienced this, because it doesn't happen. Pretending it does so you can play a victim online, because people don't like the racist thing you said is not the same as what you want to claim is happening.
Lmao youre so sure of your prejudice. Telling. ---
I love catching people in the act. That's why I whip open doors.
If the left wants to continually advertise hatred towards whites, they cant be mad when whites begin to hate them back.
They don't. Stop trying to make yourself the victim because racism isn't acceptable.
Your assumption that people who disagree with sentiments like whites are awful are racist is where the issue lies. Being against generalizations from both sides is how we solve issues. But it looks like some would rather assume power than equality.
No one has the sentiment that "whites are awful". You just want to play the victim.
Just because you dont socialize doesnt mean others havent experienced something.
No one has experienced this, because it doesn't happen. Pretending it does so you can play a victim online, because people don't like the racist thing you said is not the same as what you want to claim is happening.
Lmao youre so sure of your prejudice. Telling.
How terrible. The prejudice of not liking racism. ---
Pretending it does so you can play a victim online
If an institution identifies a student who put up IOTBW fliers and then ends their enrollment for that reason I'd say they're actual victims. Of racist oppression. ---
Pretending it does so you can play a victim online
If an institution identifies a student who put up IOTBW fliers and then ends their enrollment for that reason I'd say they're actual victims. Of racist oppression.
No surprise you don't actually know what racist oppression is if you think losing enrollment to a school for putting a white nationalist posters is racist oppression. ---
No surprise you don't actually know what racist oppression is if you think losing enrollment to a school for putting a white nationalist posters is racist oppression.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda. ---
Pretending it does so you can play a victim online
If an institution identifies a student who put up IOTBW fliers and then ends their enrollment for that reason I'd say they're actual victims. Of racist oppression.
No surprise you don't actually know what racist oppression is if you think losing enrollment to a school for putting a white nationalist posters is racist oppression.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda? ---
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda?
Those who use that kind of rhetoric tend to fall on the alt-right spectrum, so yes. ---
"If you want to move fast, practice slowly...if you want to move like lightning, practice in stillness."
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda?
Those who use that kind of rhetoric tend to fall on the alt-right spectrum, so yes.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda?
Those who use that kind of rhetoric tend to fall on the alt-right spectrum, so yes.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
This
Don't you get it? If a white person can't do shitty things without consequences, that's oppression! ---
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda?
Those who use that kind of rhetoric tend to fall on the alt-right spectrum, so yes.
What if this a hoax and a non white put up the signs?
Seeing as how hoaxes like this are few and far between, with legitimate instances of anti black white supremacists (particularly in school) being FAR more prevalent, it being a hoax is unlikely
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Saying it is ok to be white is white supremacist propaganda?
Those who use that kind of rhetoric tend to fall on the alt-right spectrum, so yes.
What about BLM, is that totally cool though?
Eh, theres a slight but significant difference in those slogans.
Now, if posters went up saying its okay to be black, that would be a worthy equivalent.
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
Aaaaand we are back to square one.
So with that being said, when the left hates on whites, you cant be mad that whites begin to hate back.
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
Pretty sure it exists because some snowflake racist kids from an internet forum wanted to cause outrage from the most literally innocuous statement they could think of. Success to the 4chan kids once again. ---
Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say 'Golly gee, I can't do that" Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
Its been perpetuated because of that, but it exists because chaos trolls were looking for a chuckle.
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
Aaaaand we are back to square one.
So with that being said, when the left hates on whites, you cant be mad that whites begin to hate back.
Sure you can, because the circumstances are entirely different. One group, to this day, economically, socially, medically and through a draconian law enforcement and criminal justice system, oppresses the other, thus, garnering hatred towards them in the macro sense
That oppressed groups brings awareness to these issues through solidarity, pride and yes, anger agaisnt their oppressors and are hated for it.
Institutions of learning all across the country are taking the position that it's not okay to be white. The ADL is rather influential too, I'd say, and they're taking that position as well.
https://www.wcsu.edu/news/2019/11/01/nov-1-2019-statement-from-wcsu-president-dr-john-b-clark/ President John Clark has launched an investigation that includes police and the FBI, calling the postering "despicable and utterly unacceptable behavior", "sick and outrageous" and "revolting actions" by "sick individuals" who are committing "virulent and hateful attacks" who should be "subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions".
The flyers alone dont appear to be a crime, Citty said. Property would have to be destroyed for vandalism to apply. Officers will investigate whether the persons actions amounted to a hate crime.
How is any of that "Taking the position that it's not okay to be white."? It's just proving that college campuses doesn't like white supremacist propaganda.
Because they strongly disapprove of this simple statement of fact. They disapprove in explicit hateful outrage and intolerance. They project by calling IT racist, when in fact it's racist to disagree with the statement. The logical conclusion, judging by their extreme reactions, is that they don't believe it's okay. They don't even want to allow people to utter those words. They want to punish people for it. ---
of course it is...because it was necessary. The systematic oppression of blacks and other minorities that exists in the legal system is the reason why that came about.
"It's ok to be white" exists because of snowflake racist kids that are mad at minorities for seeking equal rights.
Aaaaand we are back to square one.
So with that being said, when the left hates on whites, you cant be mad that whites begin to hate back.
Sure you can, because the circumstances are entirely different. One group, to this day, economically, socially, medically and through a draconian law enforcement and criminal justice system, oppresses the other, thus, garnering hatred towards them in the macro sense
That oppressed groups brings awareness to these issues through solidarity, pride and yes, anger agaisnt their oppressors and are hated for it.
Not. The. Same.
Jussie Smollett is asking you to hold his beer ---
Imagine if these universities weren't out for blood when students put up IOTBW posters. Imagine if they didn't say one damn thing about it. What if they totally ignored it? Then it would barely get any attention at all. The message wouldn't spread. But nahhh... they hate it SO MUCH grrrr they HAVE to condemn it! ---
If it's okay to put up a campus mural that says "Dismantle Whiteness," it should be fine to remind people that it's okay to be white.
The problem with saying "white supremacy" instead of "whiteness" is that most of us agree white supremacy is a problem, and nobody refers to themselves as a white supremacist.
But there are still problems baked into our world by the white ruling class from centuries ago, and just because we decided 50 years ago that that was wrong doesn't mean those problems have disappeared. Especially when there still is a largely white ruling class that doesn't want to put any real effort into dismantling what started several hundred years ago.
If it's okay to put up a campus mural that says "Dismantle Whiteness," it should be fine to remind people that it's okay to be white.
"If it's ok to advocate dismantling white supremacy and privilege, it should just as OK to affirm support for those concepts"
I mean...OK
So call out white supremacy not a whole race
They did, and socially well adjusted people, both white and black, understood the intent. The "what about black on black crime" crowd was the only group butthurt about it
If it's okay to put up a campus mural that says "Dismantle Whiteness," it should be fine to remind people that it's okay to be white.
"If it's ok to advocate dismantling white supremacy and privilege, it should just as OK to affirm support for those concepts"
I mean...OK
Except it doesn't say that. Someone thought they were being "cute" and specifically put "whiteness."
So you're confirming your willfull ignorance when it comes to BOTH signs. Gotcha.
If you don't know the difference between "white supremacy" and "whiteness," you have no business calling anyone else ignorant. Educate yourself.
Its funny how only one group of people took offense to the sign. Plenty of educated people, both white and black, got the message...I wonder whats unique about that one group of people who were really salty about it
Because they strongly disapprove of this simple statement of fact. They disapprove in explicit hateful outrage and intolerance. They project by calling IT racist, when in fact it's racist to disagree with the statement. The logical conclusion, judging by their extreme reactions, is that they don't believe it's okay. They don't even want to allow people to utter those words. They want to punish people for it.
How is IOTBW any different from 14 words or white pride? ---
