Current Events > Unpopular opinion: The Hobbit trilogy wasn't bad

Topic List	Page List: 1
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:01:10 PM #1:	There. I said it. --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927726161] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>There. I said it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlecSkorpio 09/20/19 10:04:30 PM #2:	CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late --- Christian Bale profited off the Iraq War <cite>AlecSkorpio posted [p:927726315] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:06:07 PM #3:	AlecSkorpio posted... CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late I didn't say it was on par with LOTR Just that it wasn't bad --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927726384] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>AlecSkorpio posted...</cite> <quote>CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late</quote> I didn't say it was on par with LOTR Just that it wasn't bad</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/20/19 10:06:39 PM #4:	It wasn't bad, but it was mediocre and needlessly drawn out. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:927726404] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>It wasn't bad, but it was mediocre and needlessly drawn out. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 09/20/19 10:09:10 PM #5:	While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:927726495] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/20/19 10:09:39 PM #6:	I liked it. I admit it's not as good as LOTR. but it was still good. I enjoyed the movies. <cite>Zikten posted [p:927726513] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>I liked it. I admit it's not as good as LOTR. but it was still good. I enjoyed the movies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarthGoomba 09/20/19 10:09:56 PM #7:	They were decent Only Smaug was boring <cite>MarthGoomba posted [p:927726525] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>They were decent Only Smaug was boring</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/20/19 10:10:19 PM #8:	AvantgardeAClue posted... While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people I haven't read any of the tolkien books. I think most people haven't. you dont need to read them to appreciate the movies I might try to read them someday. but I hear Tolkien's style of writing is hard to get through <cite>Zikten posted [p:927726542] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people</quote> I haven't read any of the tolkien books. I think most people haven't. you dont need to read them to appreciate the movies I might try to read them someday. but I hear Tolkien's style of writing is hard to get through</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:10:25 PM #9:	AvantgardeAClue posted... While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people I read the books after. Loved both. --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927726547] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people</quote> I read the books after. Loved both.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:11:00 PM #10:	The Admiral posted... It wasn't bad, but it was mediocre and needlessly drawn out. That I agree with, it should've been two movies at most. --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927726568] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>It wasn't bad, but it was mediocre and needlessly drawn out. </quote> That I agree with, it should've been two movies at most.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ASithLord7 09/20/19 10:11:17 PM #11:	First two were whatever, third was one of the worst movies ive ever seen --- https://imgur.com/VZeCB RebelElite791 <cite>ASithLord7 posted [p:927726578] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>First two were whatever, third was one of the worst movies ive ever seen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlecSkorpio 09/20/19 10:11:27 PM #12:	Tired-Insomniac posted... AlecSkorpio posted... CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late I didn't say it was on par with LOTR Just that it wasn't bad Yeah my bad I think I think less of it because of the length. Should have been two films tops --- Christian Bale profited off the Iraq War <cite>AlecSkorpio posted [p:927726582] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted...</cite> <quote>AlecSkorpio posted...</cite> <quote>CEs opinion on movies has gotten really turrible as of late</quote> I didn't say it was on par with LOTR Just that it wasn't bad</quote> Yeah my bad I think I think less of it because of the length. Should have been two films tops</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
smoke_break 09/20/19 10:12:42 PM #13:	How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. --- https://imgur.com/WTmIPt8 <cite>smoke_break posted [p:927726622] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/20/19 10:13:13 PM #14:	It got objectively bad. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:927726638] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>It got objectively bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Clutch 09/20/19 10:13:18 PM #15:	Not enough songs. --- "The historian looks backward; eventually he also believes backward" - F.N. <cite>Clutch posted [p:927726640] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Not enough songs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 09/20/19 10:13:36 PM #16:	Zikten posted... AvantgardeAClue posted... While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people I haven't read any of the tolkien books. I think most people haven't. you dont need to read them to appreciate the movies I might try to read them someday. but I hear Tolkien's style of writing is hard to get through Tired-Insomniac posted... AvantgardeAClue posted... While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people I read the books after. Loved both. Gotcha I have audio books of the trilogy + the Hobbit ready to listen when I have time Should I read The Hobbit first or is it a prequel to the trilogy --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:927726650] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people</quote> I haven't read any of the tolkien books. I think most people haven't. you dont need to read them to appreciate the movies I might try to read them someday. but I hear Tolkien's style of writing is hard to get through</quote> Tired-Insomniac posted...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>While we're here, as someone who is completely new to LoTR do I read the book before the movie or vice versa Trying to figure out why the movies had the biggest impact for people</quote> I read the books after. Loved both.</quote> Gotcha I have audio books of the trilogy + the Hobbit ready to listen when I have time Should I read The Hobbit first or is it a prequel to the trilogy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/20/19 10:15:28 PM #17:	Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit <cite>Zikten posted [p:927726714] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#18	Post #18 was unavailable or deleted.
AvantgardeAClue 09/20/19 10:16:40 PM #19:	Zikten posted... Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:927726753] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit</quote> Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#20	Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
Zikten 09/20/19 10:18:18 PM #21:	not exactly. there is a big time gap between the end of The Hobbit and the start of Lord of the Rings. in both the books and the movies, The Hobbit takes place decades before Lord of the Rings. the main character is a young man in The Hobbit. and in Lord of the Rings he is many many decades older. it's like over 50 years later or more I think. <cite>Zikten posted [p:927726808] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>not exactly. there is a big time gap between the end of The Hobbit and the start of Lord of the Rings. in both the books and the movies, The Hobbit takes place decades before Lord of the Rings. the main character is a young man in The Hobbit. and in Lord of the Rings he is many many decades older. it's like over 50 years later or more I think.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sabin017 09/20/19 10:19:40 PM #22:	They're not bad films, just held to a high standard. --- https://imgur.com/TWsfIIj <cite>sabin017 posted [p:927726851] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>They're not bad films, just held to a high standard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rodu_jr 09/20/19 10:20:58 PM #23:	It had moments, some very good moments, isolated among many not so good moments <cite>rodu_jr posted [p:927726889] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>It had moments, some very good moments, isolated among many not so good moments</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:23:53 PM #24:	Zikten posted... not exactly. there is a big time gap between the end of The Hobbit and the start of Lord of the Rings. in both the books and the movies, The Hobbit takes place decades before Lord of the Rings. the main character is a young man in The Hobbit. and in Lord of the Rings he is many many decades older. it's like over 50 years later or more I think. He's in his 50s in The Hobbit, 111 in LOTR PrideOfLion posted... It's not that long of a book, but there are definitely times when a one or two sentence description could easily be a ~10 minute scene. Not to mention things like Bilbo is knocked unconscious for certain scenes the movies decided to show, or showing what Gandalf was doing off-screen. Could have easily been two though, three was milking it. They took a bunch of stuff from the appendices too, didn't they? --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927727005] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>not exactly. there is a big time gap between the end of The Hobbit and the start of Lord of the Rings. in both the books and the movies, The Hobbit takes place decades before Lord of the Rings. the main character is a young man in The Hobbit. and in Lord of the Rings he is many many decades older. it's like over 50 years later or more I think.</quote> He's in his 50s in The Hobbit, 111 in LOTR PrideOfLion posted...</cite> <quote>It's not that long of a book, but there are definitely times when a one or two sentence description could easily be a ~10 minute scene. Not to mention things like Bilbo is knocked unconscious for certain scenes the movies decided to show, or showing what Gandalf was doing off-screen. Could have easily been two though, three was milking it.</quote> They took a bunch of stuff from the appendices too, didn't they?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/20/19 10:26:40 PM #25:	AvantgardeAClue posted... Zikten posted... Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol IMO it's like the first six Star Wars movies. Watch the original trilogy first. One of the very first scenes of The Hobbit takes place right before the beginning of LOTR and then boom 60 year flashback. Lots of references/foreshadowing that you'd appreciate more having watched LOTR first. --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927727096] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>Hobbit was written first. so I guess start with that, if your going with the books. technically in the book versions. Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit</quote> Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol</quote> IMO it's like the first six Star Wars movies. Watch the original trilogy first. One of the very first scenes of The Hobbit takes place right before the beginning of LOTR and then boom 60 year flashback. Lots of references/foreshadowing that you'd appreciate more having watched LOTR first.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Makeveli_lives 09/20/19 10:27:26 PM #26:	smoke_break posted... How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. It was supposed to be 2 originally and also directed by Del Toro instead of Peter Jackson. Jackson did what he could given the demands but still. Originally he had like 3 years to prep for the original trilogy, for this one he comes on with 6 months to figure out how to work with someone else's vision and casting. It's no wonder it suffered. Studio saw dollar signs in a trilogy so they did it. MarthGoomba posted... They were decent Only Smaug was boring The second one? The second one was easily the best of the 3. The first was good but it was so goddamn long, they really could've cut an hour of footage and lost nothing of worth. 3rd was a waste of time, only 20-30 minutes of what happened needed to be shown to end the story. Dope fight for ~~Legolas~~ though. --- Switch FC: SW-3917-4425-6106 PSN: PiKappaPhi769 <cite>Makeveli_lives posted [p:927727123] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>smoke_break posted...</cite> <quote>How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. </quote> It was supposed to be 2 originally and also directed by Del Toro instead of Peter Jackson. Jackson did what he could given the demands but still. Originally he had like 3 years to prep for the original trilogy, for this one he comes on with 6 months to figure out how to work with someone else's vision and casting. It's no wonder it suffered. Studio saw dollar signs in a trilogy so they did it. MarthGoomba posted...</cite> <quote>They were decent Only Smaug was boring</quote> The second one? The second one was easily the best of the 3. The first was good but it was so goddamn long, they really could've cut an hour of footage and lost nothing of worth. 3rd was a waste of time, only 20-30 minutes of what happened needed to be shown to end the story. Dope fight for Legolas though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pfh1001 09/20/19 10:34:44 PM #27:	They sucked. <cite>pfh1001 posted [p:927727368] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>They sucked.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shotgunnova 09/20/19 10:35:38 PM #28:	That new QT3.14 elf they added in was --- Take me down from the ridge where the summer ends And watch the city spread out just like a jet's flame <cite>Shotgunnova posted [p:927727399] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>That new QT3.14 elf they added in was </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rikiaz 09/20/19 10:53:04 PM #29:	I agree. But the issue isnt that they were terrible, its that they should have been much better. --- From the depths, the thing they called Worm King did rise. Nirn itself did scream in the Mages' and Necromancers' war. <cite>Rikiaz posted [p:927727950] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>I agree. But the issue isnt that they were terrible, its that they should have been much better.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
stoltenberg11 09/20/19 11:08:20 PM #30:	It had an indulgent amount of callbacks to the LotR trilogy and that stuff with the poorly CGId white orc was unnecessary too --- You're such a boring characterless entity. Try getting laid once in a while and maybe you'll have friends and find out what a "joke" is. - derrate <cite>stoltenberg11 posted [p:927728425] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>It had an indulgent amount of callbacks to the LotR trilogy and that stuff with the poorly CGId white orc was unnecessary too</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CelestialVoices 09/20/19 11:08:53 PM #31:	i don't think theyre that bad either. i had a pretty good time the last time i watched them, prob the most of any time i saw them before --- ginger ale is lit http://www.last.fm/user/pinkfloydrulez <cite>CelestialVoices posted [p:927728443] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>i don't think theyre that bad either. i had a pretty good time the last time i watched them, prob the most of any time i saw them before</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hanky_Bannister 09/20/19 11:11:13 PM #32:	lame compared to lotr sexy elf kate was cool tho --- "3rd Best Whiskey in Northern Burma" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvjOu4EzjYg <cite>Hanky_Bannister posted [p:927728495] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>lame compared to lotr sexy elf kate was cool tho</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BruceWayneJr 09/20/19 11:12:47 PM #33:	Good soundtracks. And the sequence in the first one where they kill the goblin king and escape from their lair was fun in a cartoony way. That's it. --- Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. <cite>BruceWayneJr posted [p:927728545] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Good soundtracks. And the sequence in the first one where they kill the goblin king and escape from their lair was fun in a cartoony way. That's it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 09/21/19 12:36:06 AM #34:	Well shit Random fun morbid fact I found while watching clips from LOTR on YouTube J.R.R. Tolkien died in 1973 Reverse 1973 and you get 3791 3 7 9 1 Three rings for the Elven Kings under the sky Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone Nine for Mortal Men, doomed to die One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne Maybe it's the four hours of sleep getting to me but that's cool as fuck. --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:927730702] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Well shit Random fun morbid fact I found while watching clips from LOTR on YouTube J.R.R. Tolkien died in 1973 Reverse 1973 and you get 3791 3 7 9 1 <quote>Three rings for the Elven Kings under the sky Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone Nine for Mortal Men, doomed to die One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne</quote> Maybe it's the four hours of sleep getting to me but that's cool as fuck.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/21/19 12:36:58 AM #35:	that's actually pretty interesting. <cite>Zikten posted [p:927730720] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>that's actually pretty interesting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ludwig Von 2 09/21/19 12:54:53 AM #36:	I really liked the first movie. To me that one was on par with LotR. --- My luck works best when things are... random. Mat Cauthon from The Dragon Reborn <cite>Ludwig Von 2 posted [p:927731167] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>I really liked the first movie. To me that one was on par with LotR. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 09/21/19 12:56:47 AM #37:	I only saw the first one and i saw in theaters it was aggressively mediocre --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:927731210] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>I only saw the first one and i saw in theaters it was aggressively mediocre </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
marthsheretoo 09/21/19 1:08:31 AM #38:	The second one has the dubious honor of being one of the only films I had to stop watching because of how bad it was. --- "Even MarthKoopa has jumped on the MarthKoopa hate wagon." -DevsBro <cite>marthsheretoo posted [p:927731480] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>The second one has the dubious honor of being one of the only films I had to stop watching because of how bad it was.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#39	Post #39 was unavailable or deleted.
BanjoBoomer 09/21/19 2:15:08 AM #40:	The content that actually follows the book is phenomenal. But that's like, two or three hours, maybe four tops, out of a nine hour runtime. And yeah, I hated the 48fps thing. Why PJ chose to do that on a fucking prequel that should be trying to have visual consistency with LotR, I'll never understand. <cite>BanjoBoomer posted [p:927732968] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>The content that actually follows the book is phenomenal. But that's like, two or three hours, maybe four tops, out of a nine hour runtime. And yeah, I hated the 48fps thing. Why PJ chose to do that on a fucking prequel that should be trying to have visual consistency with LotR, I'll never understand. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Awakened_Link 09/21/19 2:33:05 AM #41:	Really should've been condensed down to one film. They did the book a disservice. --- Add me on Switch! FC: SW-3465-2506-6411 \| Nintendo Network ID: awakened_link37 Formerly known as Coleby <cite>Awakened_Link posted [p:927733300] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Really should've been condensed down to one film. They did the book a disservice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rikiaz 09/21/19 2:56:14 AM #42:	Awakened_Link posted... Really should've been condensed down to one film. They did the book a disservice. I agree. I liked some of Gandalfs story and the tying into the Lord of the Rings parts but they should have been a different movie. --- From the depths, the thing they called Worm King did rise. Nirn itself did scream in the Mages' and Necromancers' war. <cite>Rikiaz posted [p:927733723] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Awakened_Link posted...</cite> <quote>Really should've been condensed down to one film. They did the book a disservice.</quote> I agree. I liked some of Gandalfs story and the tying into the Lord of the Rings parts but they should have been a different movie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ilishe 09/21/19 2:56:48 AM #43:	smoke_break posted... How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. Hm. Well, in the books, the big battle at the end lasts for about one paragraph IIRC. Bilbo gets knocked out by a rock hitting him in the head and wakes up after the battle. Since it's all from his perspective, we see none of the actual fighting. --- ~Phoenix Nine~ ~Victory needs no explanation; defeat allows none.~ <cite>Ilishe posted [p:927733730] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>smoke_break posted...</cite> <quote>How'd they even stretch it out to 3 movies? Granted I haven't read the book but it doesn't seem like a long book. </quote> Hm. Well, in the books, the big battle at the end lasts for about one paragraph IIRC. Bilbo gets knocked out by a rock hitting him in the head and wakes up after the battle. Since it's all from his perspective, we see none of the actual fighting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thrashmetal14 09/21/19 3:13:32 AM #44:	The Hobbit movies piss me off. They're straight up disrespectful to Tolkien <cite>thrashmetal14 posted [p:927734009] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>The Hobbit movies piss me off. They're straight up disrespectful to Tolkien </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shnangyboos 09/21/19 3:22:01 AM #45:	That goddamn barrel river battle was some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen. --- How's my posting? Call http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/182361-human-resource-machine for any comments or concerns. <cite>shnangyboos posted [p:927734144] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>That goddamn barrel river battle was some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InYourWalls1 09/21/19 3:22:17 AM #46:	AvantgardeAClue posted... Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol I would just read the Hobbit first, it's a good read and gives you a solid grounding for when you get into LotR Don't bother with the Hobbit movies though --- The fully enlightened earth radiates disaster triumphant <cite>InYourWalls1 posted [p:927734150] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>Does movie Hobbits lead into LoTR well? Judging from this topic I'm guessing not lol</quote> I would just read the Hobbit first, it's a good read and gives you a solid grounding for when you get into LotR Don't bother with the Hobbit movies though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 09/21/19 3:43:57 AM #47:	Tired-Insomniac posted... They took a bunch of stuff from the appendices too, didn't they? Most of what they took was from their ass --- Stop being so aggressively argumentative for no reason. - UnfairRepresent <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:927734506] in Unpopular ... [t:78029604]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted...</cite> <quote>They took a bunch of stuff from the appendices too, didn't they?</quote> Most of what they took was from their ass</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Unpopular opinion: The Hobbit trilogy wasn't bad (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Unpopular opinion: The Hobbit trilogy wasn't bad