Current Events > So when is the Supreme Court going to define guns as people?

Topic List
Page List: 1
Duncanwii
08/31/19 6:39:13 PM
#1:


I mean Corporations and Money are people now, may as well make it a trifecta.
---
Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :)
... Copied to Clipboard!
AmericaTheBrave
08/31/19 6:39:41 PM
#2:


Would that mean anyone who doesn't like guns is a racist?
---
https://i.imgtc.ws/8tc5P9i.jpg
That's America's ass
... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete
08/31/19 6:42:42 PM
#3:


I don't own any guns so I don't care... but I don't see why they don't consider machetes people. They should. Jonathan, Edwin, Danny and Walter deserve the same rights as me tbh
---
https://talktotransformer.com
The Internet is kind of the whole ****ing Internet.
... Copied to Clipboard!
#4
Post #4 was unavailable or deleted.
Nikra
08/31/19 6:48:07 PM
#5:


Crazy Americans: It's just a matter of time, before not carrying a firearm will be a crime.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii
08/31/19 6:53:11 PM
#6:


Mr Hangman posted...
I don't know where you get the idea that "money is people" but corporations are groups of people, organized a certain way. Obviously for some legal purposes it makes sense to think of that group of people as one virtual person, and for other purposes it does not. This isn't a supreme court "definition", it's just a general tool for interpreting law.

The Supreme Court ruled money has the same freedom of speech protections that people do. Therefore money=people.
---
Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :)
... Copied to Clipboard!
#7
Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
mustachedmystic
08/31/19 7:20:05 PM
#8:


That was Citizens United iirc.
---
Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand. Sampson, Terrordactyl
PSN: DarkHoosier
... Copied to Clipboard!
#9
Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
Paragon21XX
08/31/19 7:41:47 PM
#10:


Duncanwii posted...
Mr Hangman posted...
I don't know where you get the idea that "money is people" but corporations are groups of people, organized a certain way. Obviously for some legal purposes it makes sense to think of that group of people as one virtual person, and for other purposes it does not. This isn't a supreme court "definition", it's just a general tool for interpreting law.

The Supreme Court ruled money has the same freedom of speech protections that people do. Therefore money=people.

No, they ruled money is protected as free speech, and limiting the amount of money one may contribute to political causes is limiting their 1st amendment rights.
Corporations = people
Money = speech
---
Hmm...
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1