Current Events > How much of a bottleneck would there be with a Ryzen 5 2400G paired with a GTX..

(+) Yeah! (+)

1660 Ti?
---

Do any PC gaming experts here know how much of a bottleneck a Ryzen 5 2400G paired with a GTX 1660 TI would be?
---

no bottleneck imo
---

Did you ask on the PC board?
---

shokan_warrior posted...

no bottleneck imo

I don't know about that because the R5 2400G is a low end CPU and the GTX 1660 TI is kind of a mid-range GPU, so i was wondering if it would have any affect on the performance.
---

If you are looking at 1080p 30fps gaming, you won't have a problem.
---

@008Zulu The CPU holds the 1660 TI back that much? The 1660 TI should be able to easily handle 1080p 60FPS in the majority of games just fine, even with max or near max settings.
---

i was checking some benchmarks and i saw that the 2400g is only about 10fps or so lower than the 2600 with the same gpu

the 2600 is a competent cpu and the 2400g is a solid quad core even if best used with only its integrated graphics

the difference between the two isn't that great is just that the 2600 overclocks better and has more cores

they're from the same generation with some minor architecture differences but i dont think the performance difference isn't that massive so any bottlenecks should be minor

iirc the 1660 ti should be maybe a 1070 or 1070 ti which isn't bottlenecked by a 2600 so it MIGHT get bottlenecked by a 2400g but i dont think it would be a big one
---

shokan_warrior posted...

i was checking some benchmarks and i saw that the 2400g is only about 10fps or so lower than the 2600 with the same gpu

the 2600 is a competent cpu and the 2400g is a solid quad core even if best used with only its integrated graphics

the difference between the two isn't that great is just that the 2600 overclocks better and has more cores

they're from the same generation with some minor architecture differences but i dont think the performance difference isn't that massive so any bottlenecks should be minor

iirc the 1660 ti should be maybe a 1070 or 1070 ti which isn't bottlenecked by a 2600 so it MIGHT get bottlenecked by a 2400g but i dont think it would be a big one

The 1660 TI is supposed to be the equivalent of a 1070 or a little better in some games, so its around the same performance level or a little higher than the 1070.
---

leebul posted...

shokan_warrior posted...

i was checking some benchmarks and i saw that the 2400g is only about 10fps or so lower than the 2600 with the same gpu

the 2600 is a competent cpu and the 2400g is a solid quad core even if best used with only its integrated graphics

the difference between the two isn't that great is just that the 2600 overclocks better and has more cores

they're from the same generation with some minor architecture differences but i dont think the performance difference isn't that massive so any bottlenecks should be minor

iirc the 1660 ti should be maybe a 1070 or 1070 ti which isn't bottlenecked by a 2600 so it MIGHT get bottlenecked by a 2400g but i dont think it would be a big one

The 1660 TI is supposed to be the equivalent of a 1070 or a little better in some games, so its around the same performance level or a little higher than the 1070.

the 2600 has no problem with the 1070 so the 2400g SHOULD be fine but since it IS a weaker cpu it MIGHT bottleneck but i wouldn't worry too much

since the ryzen 2000 are am4 you SHOULD be able to upgrade to a 2700x later if you feel you need it
---

leebul posted...

@008Zulu The CPU holds the 1660 TI back that much? The 1660 TI should be able to easily handle 1080p 60FPS in the majority of games just fine, even with max or near max settings.

The bottlenecking won't be obvious for the most part, at most it'll probably no more intrusive than a fraction of a second load delay when cell transitioning in an open world map. Or moving the camera around too fast.
---