Current Events > Trump has to win in 2020

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Smashingpmkns 05/30/19 5:03:05 PM #51:	Lol he probably wont go to jail ever but the last years of his life are going to be filled with lawsuits and court appearances regardless. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:922577400] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Lol he probably wont go to jail ever but the last years of his life are going to be filled with lawsuits and court appearances regardless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 05/30/19 5:07:16 PM #52:	coinstarcad posted... Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed) He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation Yes. Like I said Zikten posted... CNN yesterday had on a guy who has correctly predicted every president since like Reagan. and he says Trump will be relected unless the Democrats try to impeach and then they might have a chance Zikten posted... https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/28/politics/allan-lichtman-donald-trump-2020/index.html do you have a problem with CNN? <cite>Zikten posted [p:922577590] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>coinstarcad posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed)</quote> He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation</quote> Yes. Like I said <cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>CNN yesterday had on a guy who has correctly predicted every president since like Reagan. and he says Trump will be relected unless the Democrats try to impeach and then they might have a chance</quote> <cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/28/politics/allan-lichtman-donald-trump-2020/index.html do you have a problem with CNN?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 05/30/19 5:08:54 PM #53:	creativerealms posted... DifferentialEquation posted... Antifar posted... tremain07 posted... Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine. They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won. I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior. It's times like this when I am reminded that you are just a well crafted troll/poe. Where is this supposedly large swath of Americans that believe in fringe crap like pizzagate and held it against Hillary? If you ask people why they didn't vote for Hillary, you're probably going to hear the same few answers over and over again... that they vote Republican, that they thought she was crooked, or that they only wanted Bernie. I know a lot of very anti-Hillary people, and not one believes in that pizzagate crap or thinks Hillary is creepy around kids. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:922577672] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tremain07 posted...</cite> <quote>Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine.</quote> They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won.</quote> I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior.</quote> It's times like this when I am reminded that you are just a well crafted troll/poe.</quote> Where is this supposedly large swath of Americans that believe in fringe crap like pizzagate and held it against Hillary? If you ask people why they didn't vote for Hillary, you're probably going to hear the same few answers over and over again... that they vote Republican, that they thought she was crooked, or that they only wanted Bernie. I know a lot of very anti-Hillary people, and not one believes in that pizzagate crap or thinks Hillary is creepy around kids.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 05/30/19 5:22:51 PM #54:	DifferentialEquation posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... DifferentialEquation posted... Antifar posted... tremain07 posted... Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine. They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won. I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior. No, they just said she was part of a pedo pizza ring. That was a weird conspiracy that was perpetuated in the the fringes of the internet. Average Americans didn't know it existed and wouldn't have taken it seriously. Most things like what you described don't become mainstream enough to get episodes of crime drama television programs dedicated to them. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:922578245] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tremain07 posted...</cite> <quote>Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine.</quote> They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won.</quote> I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior.</quote> No, they just said she was part of a pedo pizza ring.</quote> That was a weird conspiracy that was perpetuated in the the fringes of the internet. Average Americans didn't know it existed and wouldn't have taken it seriously.</quote> Most things like what you described don't become mainstream enough to get episodes of crime drama television programs dedicated to them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 05/30/19 5:30:56 PM #55:	DifferentialEquation posted... creativerealms posted... DifferentialEquation posted... Antifar posted... tremain07 posted... Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine. They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won. I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior. It's times like this when I am reminded that you are just a well crafted troll/poe. Where is this supposedly large swath of Americans that believe in fringe crap like pizzagate and held it against Hillary? If you ask people why they didn't vote for Hillary, you're probably going to hear the same few answers over and over again... that they vote Republican, that they thought she was crooked, or that they only wanted Bernie. I know a lot of very anti-Hillary people, and not one believes in that pizzagate crap or thinks Hillary is creepy around kids. That was random. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:922578543] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tremain07 posted...</cite> <quote>Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine.</quote> They called Hillary all of those and she still almost won.</quote> I don't recall anyone calling Hillary a serial rapist. Whatever other problems she may have, I don't know anyone that considers her a creep or untrustworthy around children. That's going to hurt Biden a lot. No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior.</quote> It's times like this when I am reminded that you are just a well crafted troll/poe.</quote> Where is this supposedly large swath of Americans that believe in fringe crap like pizzagate and held it against Hillary? If you ask people why they didn't vote for Hillary, you're probably going to hear the same few answers over and over again... that they vote Republican, that they thought she was crooked, or that they only wanted Bernie. I know a lot of very anti-Hillary people, and not one believes in that pizzagate crap or thinks Hillary is creepy around kids.</quote> That was random.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 05/30/19 5:43:39 PM #56:	tremain07 posted... Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the millennial whose a complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine. Funny how all of those descriptors fit Trump perfectly, aside from Sanders and millennial --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:922578999] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>tremain07 posted...</cite> <quote>Let's see, there's Biden the serial rapist, Sanders the communist socialist, Warren, the corporate stooge and Buttigieg the millennial whose a complete fraud. Yeah, Trump's gonna be just fine.</quote> Funny how all of those descriptors fit Trump perfectly, aside from Sanders and millennial</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
garlic powder 05/31/19 9:34:57 AM #57:	coinstarcad posted... Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed) He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation I still can't quite figure out what they'd impeach him for. The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice. It doesn't mean he's innocent of those crimes, but it does mean there is zero evidence as of this moment. This is why our justice system is predicated on the notion of "guilty" or "not guilty" and not "innocent" and "guilty". Campaign finance felonies would be, at worst, a fine for Trump. I'm not sure what abuse of power you're referring to, but he's allowed to do certain things under executive privilege. Not sure what you're referring to with the Emoluments clause, but if it's about that bank thing back in 1994, as far as I understand it (and I'm not an expert by any means in property or anything like that) but the bank itself collaborated with funds from Russia; not Trump. As far as obstruction goes, as my understanding, he DID NOT fire Mueller. Talking about firing Mueller isn't a crime. Do we really wanna open pandora's box with going after thought crimes? --- What, this isn't Resident Evil? Dying means nothing. It's simply a minor setback, if that.-radioraheem <cite>garlic powder posted [p:922604400] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>coinstarcad posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed)</quote> He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation</quote> I still can't quite figure out what they'd impeach him for. The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice. It doesn't mean he's innocent of those crimes, but it does mean there is zero evidence as of this moment. This is why our justice system is predicated on the notion of "guilty" or "not guilty" and not "innocent" and "guilty". Campaign finance felonies would be, at worst, a fine for Trump. I'm not sure what abuse of power you're referring to, but he's allowed to do certain things under executive privilege. Not sure what you're referring to with the Emoluments clause, but if it's about that bank thing back in 1994, as far as I understand it (and I'm not an expert by any means in property or anything like that) but the bank itself collaborated with funds from Russia; not Trump. As far as obstruction goes, as my understanding, he DID NOT fire Mueller. Talking about firing Mueller isn't a crime. Do we really wanna open pandora's box with going after thought crimes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sackgurl 05/31/19 9:43:37 AM #58:	garlic powder posted... The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice. this is a lie --- LittleBigPlanet is like merging dress-up with a real game. <cite>Sackgurl posted [p:922604614] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>garlic powder posted...</cite> <quote>The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice.</quote> this is a lie</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
teepan95 05/31/19 9:47:07 AM #59:	DifferentialEquation posted... No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior. I love you --- I use Gameraven and you should too. http://error1355.com/ce/teepan95.html <cite>teepan95 posted [p:922604708] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>No one in this country will vote for someone who engages in inappropriate touching or behavior.</quote> I love you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 05/31/19 10:10:04 AM #60:	garlic powder posted... coinstarcad posted... Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed) He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation I still can't quite figure out what they'd impeach him for. The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice. It doesn't mean he's innocent of those crimes, but it does mean there is zero evidence as of this moment. This is why our justice system is predicated on the notion of "guilty" or "not guilty" and not "innocent" and "guilty". Campaign finance felonies would be, at worst, a fine for Trump. I'm not sure what abuse of power you're referring to, but he's allowed to do certain things under executive privilege. Not sure what you're referring to with the Emoluments clause, but if it's about that bank thing back in 1994, as far as I understand it (and I'm not an expert by any means in property or anything like that) but the bank itself collaborated with funds from Russia; not Trump. As far as obstruction goes, as my understanding, he DID NOT fire Mueller. Talking about firing Mueller isn't a crime. Do we really wanna open pandora's box with going after thought crimes? Ordering people to break the law =/= thought crime --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922605466] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>garlic powder posted...</cite> <quote><cite>coinstarcad posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Trump has to win in 2020 (or else he's screwed)</quote> He WILL win in 2020 unless democrats take responsibility. By that I mean do their duty to go for an impeachment inquiry regardless of the Senate. It still leads to public exposure which will mess with his chances in 2020 just by virtue of being a scandal. Remember Bill Clinton's scandal just for brushing Monica's teeth? It's a more serious case against Donald. Obstruction of justice Collusion with Russians 2 campaign finance felonies Abuse of power and undermining separation of powers Emoluments clause violation</quote> I still can't quite figure out what they'd impeach him for. The Mueller report stated there was no evidence of any collusion or obstruction of justice. It doesn't mean he's innocent of those crimes, but it does mean there is zero evidence as of this moment. This is why our justice system is predicated on the notion of "guilty" or "not guilty" and not "innocent" and "guilty". Campaign finance felonies would be, at worst, a fine for Trump. I'm not sure what abuse of power you're referring to, but he's allowed to do certain things under executive privilege. Not sure what you're referring to with the Emoluments clause, but if it's about that bank thing back in 1994, as far as I understand it (and I'm not an expert by any means in property or anything like that) but the bank itself collaborated with funds from Russia; not Trump. As far as obstruction goes, as my understanding, he DID NOT fire Mueller. Talking about firing Mueller isn't a crime. Do we really wanna open pandora's box with going after thought crimes?</quote> Ordering people to break the law =/= thought crime</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BandofMedz 05/31/19 10:13:33 AM #61:	if he wins he will go to jail in 2024 <cite>BandofMedz posted [p:922605588] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>if he wins he will go to jail in 2024</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 05/31/19 10:21:11 AM #62:	BandofMedz posted... if he wins he will go to jail in 2024 The statute of limitations on obstruction of justice will have expired by then --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922605856] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>BandofMedz posted...</cite> <quote>if he wins he will go to jail in 2024</quote> The statute of limitations on obstruction of justice will have expired by then</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 05/31/19 10:30:10 AM #63:	BandofMedz posted... if he wins he will go to jail in 2024 but if he loses he goes to jail in 2020 --- "Even if that's not the case, I would prefer this bill fail, since I'd rather see a Democrat get this win instead" - Doom_Art <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:922606210] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>BandofMedz posted...</cite> <quote>if he wins he will go to jail in 2024</quote> but if he loses he goes to jail in 2020</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Koinzo 05/31/19 10:31:59 AM #64:	TheGreatGeno326 posted... CommonStar posted... I have a really bad feeling that the Dems are gonna drop the ball again. I don't get why people keep saying this, as if 2018 didn't happen and democrats didn't sweep the house. Because this is how the real world works: People will always drop the ball so it's expected that Trump will win again because the Democrats will fuck up. --- Mare Ditat, Rosa Decorat. The one who woke up to the Real World brings Truth to the Unfortunate. <cite>Koinzo posted [p:922606264] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheGreatGeno326 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CommonStar posted...</cite> <quote>I have a really bad feeling that the Dems are gonna drop the ball again.</quote> I don't get why people keep saying this, as if 2018 didn't happen and democrats didn't sweep the house.</quote> Because this is how the real world works: People will always drop the ball so it's expected that Trump will win again because the Democrats will fuck up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/31/19 10:37:34 AM #65:	Its a case of... elect him again, and in 4 years we will no longer have to worry about him, or get him out of office and jail him. 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922606424] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Its a case of... elect him again, and in 4 years we will no longer have to worry about him, or get him out of office and jail him. 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 05/31/19 11:17:46 AM #66:	Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922607922] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 05/31/19 11:25:44 AM #67:	Ivany2008 posted... elect him again, and in 4 years we will no longer have to worry about him, He would be an ex president. Write a book. Go on commercials and stuff. Like obama, bush, clinton etc did. --- "Even if that's not the case, I would prefer this bill fail, since I'd rather see a Democrat get this win instead" - Doom_Art <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:922608200] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>elect him again, and in 4 years we will no longer have to worry about him, </quote> He would be an ex president. Write a book. Go on commercials and stuff. Like obama, bush, clinton etc did.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
unclekoolaid73 05/31/19 11:29:32 AM #68:	Trump has nothing to worry about come 2020. --- https://imgur.com/NilNCvi <cite>unclekoolaid73 posted [p:922608323] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Trump has nothing to worry about come 2020.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/31/19 5:48:37 PM #69:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922623168] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Heineken14 05/31/19 5:50:36 PM #70:	darkphoenix181 posted... If he does not, he very likely may go to jail. This is even MORE reason to vote against this lying piece of shit. --- Rage is a hell of an anesthetic. <cite>Heineken14 posted [p:922623252] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If he does not, he very likely may go to jail. </quote> This is even MORE reason to vote against this lying piece of shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 06/01/19 9:10:53 AM #71:	Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922645870] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cheater87 06/01/19 9:16:22 AM #72:	Depends if the DNC get another candidate people don't want and force it on them. --- Doom, the game with unlimited ways to play. <cite>Cheater87 posted [p:922645986] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Depends if the DNC get another candidate people don't want and force it on them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
friendbuddypal 06/01/19 9:26:59 AM #73:	Trump will win in 2020, he will never be impeached, and he won't be indicted on anything after his presidency. --- CIA: You're a big guy. Bane: For you. <cite>friendbuddypal posted [p:922646232] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Trump will win in 2020, he will never be impeached, and he won't be indicted on anything after his presidency.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 06/01/19 9:37:25 AM #74:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922646482] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about</quote> Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 06/01/19 9:40:06 AM #75:	Ivany2008 posted... As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. There is less than 0 chance of any of those people running --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:922646535] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. </quote> There is less than 0 chance of any of those people running</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 06/01/19 10:00:34 AM #76:	Antifar posted... Ivany2008 posted... As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. There is less than 0 chance of any of those people running Just have to wait and see. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922647042] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. </quote> There is less than 0 chance of any of those people running</quote> Just have to wait and see.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 06/01/19 12:08:45 PM #77:	Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost. 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922650595] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about</quote> Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost.</quote> 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#78	Post #78 was unavailable or deleted.
Machete 06/01/19 12:15:19 PM #79:	I want trump to win ~~a trip to prison~~ --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:922650809] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>I want trump to win a trip to prison</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 06/01/19 4:02:33 PM #80:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost. 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running ....Sanders literally had the entire world talking about him. Him being removed from the Democrats was one of the biggest stories to come out of the last election. What world are you living in? Everyone I talked to was actually excited to see what Sanders could do, while also shitting all over Clintons policies. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922658705] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about</quote> Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost.</quote> 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running</quote> ....Sanders literally had the entire world talking about him. Him being removed from the Democrats was one of the biggest stories to come out of the last election. What world are you living in? Everyone I talked to was actually excited to see what Sanders could do, while also shitting all over Clintons policies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 06/01/19 4:32:14 PM #81:	Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Ivany2008 posted... 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent? Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully. Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost. 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running ....Sanders literally had the entire world talking about him. Him being removed from the Democrats was one of the biggest stories to come out of the last election. What world are you living in? Everyone I talked to was actually excited to see what Sanders could do, while also shitting all over Clintons policies. Im living in the real world where he wasnt removed from the Democrats and he got less votes and won less states than Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. These are verifiable facts if you want to look them up rather than assuming youre right. --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922659786] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote> 2020 is going to be an interesting year. Supposedly we have a bunch of celebs going for the presidency, and then you have Bernie... who I think said he is going to run as an independent?</quote> Sanders is running as a Democrat and I think the only celebrity to announce is Marianne Williamson</quote> Sanders doesn't seem to learn. He lost as a Democrat last time, because his own party pushed him out. Had they not done that, they might have actually had a Democrat President for the past 4 years. How will this time be any different? If Hilary decides to run again, its a repeat of last time. As for the celebs, while she may be the only one announced, there are hints that Kanye, The Rock, and even Chris Rock have hinted at running. I wouldn't be against Chris Rock as president, since he would cut out all the bullshit.... hopefully.</quote> Dude just admit you dont know what youre talking about</quote> Admit to what? Everything I said was pretty much true. He ran last time as a democrat while that same party pushed him out in favor of Hilary. Hilary lost. Even if it was because of the weird way you Americans run your voting system, she still lost.</quote> 1. Hillary isnt running again 2. Sanders lost because he was a no-name politician who got less votes than Clinton; hes only so recognizable and a major political force because he chose to run as a Democrat 3. There is a 0% chance of a non-Democrat or Republican getting elected so running as something else is a waste 4. None of those celebrities are running</quote> ....Sanders literally had the entire world talking about him. Him being removed from the Democrats was one of the biggest stories to come out of the last election. What world are you living in? Everyone I talked to was actually excited to see what Sanders could do, while also shitting all over Clintons policies.</quote> Im living in the real world where he wasnt removed from the Democrats and he got less votes and won less states than Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. These are verifiable facts if you want to look them up rather than assuming youre right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 06/01/19 7:22:44 PM #82:	Lets say you are right. Why would he even go back to begin with? Clearly they didn't use him like they used Hilary, and the story of a female president is sure as hell better than an older man with a plan. He could run on his own and get more draw than with the Democrats. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:922665847] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote>Lets say you are right. Why would he even go back to begin with? Clearly they didn't use him like they used Hilary, and the story of a female president is sure as hell better than an older man with a plan. He could run on his own and get more draw than with the Democrats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 06/02/19 12:25:21 AM #83:	Ivany2008 posted... Lets say you are right. Why would he even go back to begin with? Clearly they didn't use him like they used Hilary, and the story of a female president is sure as hell better than an older man with a plan. He could run on his own and get more draw than with the Democrats. No, he couldnt. --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:922676719] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>Lets say you are right. Why would he even go back to begin with? Clearly they didn't use him like they used Hilary, and the story of a female president is sure as hell better than an older man with a plan. He could run on his own and get more draw than with the Democrats.</quote> No, he couldnt.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 06/02/19 12:55:06 PM #84:	metallica846 posted... This is America. Don't catch you slippin now --- "Even if that's not the case, I would prefer this bill fail, since I'd rather see a Democrat get this win instead" - Doom_Art <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:922692239] in Trump has ... [t:77750566]...</cite> <quote><cite>metallica846 posted...</cite> <quote>This is America. </quote> Don't catch you slippin now</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Trump has to win in 2020 (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Trump has to win in 2020