Current Events > Is Mary Popping the oldest movie so far to get a sequel?

Topic List	Page List: 1
RiderofHogs 12/24/18 1:36:11 AM #1:	--- I'll be riding shotgun, underneath the hot sun, Feeling like a someone. <cite>RiderofHogs posted [p:914629517] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 12/24/18 1:37:07 AM #2:	Bambi got a sequel. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:914629548] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>Bambi got a sequel.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrMallard 12/24/18 1:37:52 AM #3:	Phantom_Nook posted... Bambi got a sequel. Just came in to say this, the sequel came out like 50+ years after the first one as well. I'm pretty sure that it's the oldest direct sequel, at least to my knowledge. --- And I always liked that about me, that I know what I'm fighting for - and for this, I'd go to war Now playing: Stardew Valley, FFX, Skyrim <cite>MrMallard posted [p:914629568] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote><cite>Phantom_Nook posted...</cite> <quote>Bambi got a sequel.</quote> Just came in to say this, the sequel came out like 50+ years after the first one as well. I'm pretty sure that it's the oldest direct sequel, at least to my knowledge.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rikasa 12/24/18 1:38:42 AM #4:	ometimes someone decides to bring more money from a standalone success and even recover part of the cast like in Psycho and Wall Street (both close to 23 after the original) and Belle de Jour (39 years). Some try to do new films similar to the original and call it a sequel like War Games and Kindergarden Cop, 25 years after the original. Sometimes a universe that was loved returns in Mad Max, Tron, Blade Runner, and even classics get a new light like The Birds, The Maltese Falcon, The Wicker Man, Easy Rider, all 30 to 40 years. And then Disney came along doing sequels of every animated film that didn't had one. 101 Dalmatians41 years Lady and the Tramp45 years Peter Pan 49 years Cinderella51 years Fantasia59 years (well, this is more like a director's cut) Bambi63.5 years --- you are not alone <cite>rikasa posted [p:914629599] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>ometimes someone decides to bring more money from a standalone success and even recover part of the cast like in Psycho and Wall Street (both close to 23 after the original) and Belle de Jour (39 years). Some try to do new films similar to the original and call it a sequel like War Games and Kindergarden Cop, 25 years after the original. Sometimes a universe that was loved returns in Mad Max, Tron, Blade Runner, and even classics get a new light like The Birds, The Maltese Falcon, The Wicker Man, Easy Rider, all 30 to 40 years. And then Disney came along doing sequels of every animated film that didn't had one. 101 Dalmatians41 years Lady and the Tramp45 years Peter Pan 49 years Cinderella51 years Fantasia59 years (well, this is more like a director's cut) Bambi63.5 years</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gafemage 12/24/18 1:48:15 AM #5:	Oz the Great and Powerful came out in 2013, while the original major film adaption of The Wizard of Oz came out in 1939. That's a 74-year difference, while this is a 54-year difference. Meh... --- https://imgur.com/1EOFcjn https://imgur.com/epjd8zk <cite>Gafemage posted [p:914629864] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>Oz the Great and Powerful came out in 2013, while the original major film adaption of The Wizard of Oz came out in 1939. That's a 74-year difference, while this is a 54-year difference. Meh...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bulletproofvita 12/24/18 2:08:08 AM #6:	Michael Rooker man what a legend. --- Signatures are overrated. <cite>bulletproofvita posted [p:914630459] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>Michael Rooker man what a legend.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#7	Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
codey 12/24/18 2:18:23 AM #8:	JACKBUTTMOMMY posted... Gafemage posted... Oz the Great and Powerful came out in 2013, while the original major film adaption of The Wizard of Oz came out in 1939. That's a 74-year difference, while this is a 54-year difference. Meh... To be technical that was more of a prequel. Wasn't there another sequel in the 80s as well? Or was that just a different adaption? --- *runs out of topic naked* <cite>codey posted [p:914630725] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote><cite>JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gafemage posted...</cite> <quote>Oz the Great and Powerful came out in 2013, while the original major film adaption of The Wizard of Oz came out in 1939. That's a 74-year difference, while this is a 54-year difference. Meh...</quote> To be technical that was more of a prequel.</quote> Wasn't there another sequel in the 80s as well? Or was that just a different adaption?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordDemonWolf 12/24/18 2:38:08 AM #9:	codey posted... Wasn't there another sequel in the 80s as well? Or was that just a different adaption? It was a sequel. Return to Oz. It was a lot darker, and scarier as a kid. I loved it, but few people know about it. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089908/?ref_=nv_sr_1 --- What is life, except/ Excuse for death, or death but/ An escape from life? <cite>LordDemonWolf posted [p:914631171] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote><cite>codey posted...</cite> <quote>Wasn't there another sequel in the 80s as well? Or was that just a different adaption?</quote> It was a sequel. Return to Oz. It was a lot darker, and scarier as a kid. I loved it, but few people know about it. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089908/?ref_=nv_sr_1</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImmatureContent 12/24/18 2:46:31 AM #10:	The Odd Couple sequel came 30 years later and it actually had the same actors. --- NinjaMaster <cite>ImmatureContent posted [p:914631350] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>The Odd Couple sequel came 30 years later and it actually had the same actors.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#11	Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
ledbowman 12/24/18 3:42:53 AM #12:	It's the longest span between a movie and its theatrical sequel - 54 years. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:914632500] in Is Mary Po... [t:77329761]...</cite> <quote>It's the longest span between a movie and its theatrical sequel - 54 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Is Mary Popping the oldest movie so far to get a sequel? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Is Mary Popping the oldest movie so far to get a sequel?