Current Events > Is it true dat circumcision was invented to stop guys from deeding?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Lmao dat failed hard
---

yes

No. It was intended to stop infections from sand build up under the foreskin. This was back before underwear, and general hygiene, were invented.
---

No
---

Can't stop the need to deed

Ain't that right @glitteringfairy
---

No, but cornflakes were.

Seriously.
---

Yes, it was around the time Kellogg also thought boys eating a healthy cereal/oatmeal would as well. It was a strange puritan time back then.
---

American circumcision was. The sand thing is maybe the origin of Jewish version. But the reason almost everyone in America does it is cause of a Christian corn flakes maker wanting to stop deeding

Prestoff posted...

Yes, it was around the time Kellogg also thought boys eating a healthy cereal/oatmeal would as well. It was a strange puritan time back then.

Pretty much everything Kellogg did was dedicated to that one thing. Guy had a serious obsession with making sure that boys didn't touch themselves at night.
---

circumcision does nothing to inhibit masturbation

SSJGrimReaper posted...

Can't stop the need to deed

Ain't that right @glitteringfairy

*chuckles*

Being circumsized has only increased my deeding prowess ten fold. Being an anteater only holds a man back from realizing his true deeding potential
---

Zikten posted...

American circumcision was. The sand thing is maybe the origin of Jewish version. But the reason almost everyone in America does it is cause of a Christian corn flakes maker wanting to stop deeding

I think the Arabic religions first started it, and Judaism picked it up latter.
---

DK9292 posted...

No, but cornflakes were.

Seriously.

Graham crackers too.

I'm still amused that I found out about this while eating a package of Honey-Maid and going through some porn backlog. "Mission failed" never seemed so apt.
---

I wonder who came up with circumcision?

I mean I am happy I am not a guy with an ugly, smelly anteater, but if you think about it its a crazy idea and procedure;

This Guy has this skin over the top of his penis, I bet we could cut that skin and the other skin in the head and shaft arent connected to it and the penis wont end horribly mauled

Spam_n_eggs posted...

I wonder who came up with circumcision?

I mean I am happy I am not a guy with an ugly, smelly anteater, but if you think about it its a crazy idea and procedure;

This Guy has this skin over the top of his penis, I bet we could cut that skin and the other skin in the head and shaft arent connected to it and the penis wont end horribly mauled

Does make one wonder how many failed attempts/approaches it took... though I do remember from many moons ago, roughly 06-08 range some guy who got so drunk or into drugs they used an exacto knife to trim the outer spongy part of the glans(aka the head) off themselves and shared with the internet their handiwork.

I'm sure when they sobered up they realized how great of an awesome idea it was. This is part of why I'm wary of getting too drunk or messed up on drugs. Not that I've ever touched drugs, but ya know...
*Lemme rephrase that, I'll touch drugs but usually only in controlled legal doses. None of that weird industrial cleaner banned stuff that makes one maul their little friend.

I imagine that it was a weirdo who did it on himself and then bragged about how much better it is. Then it turned into a whole thing.
---

008Zulu posted...

No. It was intended to stop infections from sand build up under the foreskin. This was back before underwear, and general hygiene, were invented.

This is demonstrably false nonsense. Holy shit. Do you actually believe this garbage?

smoliske posted...

circumcision does nothing to inhibit masturbation

The ancient rabbis thought it did, and it was the primary reason they wanted to hold on to that old covenant between the Jewish people and their god.

Spam_n_eggs posted...

I wonder who came up with circumcision?

I mean I am happy I am not a guy with an ugly, smelly anteater, but if you think about it its a crazy idea and procedure;

This Guy has this skin over the top of his penis, I bet we could cut that skin and the other skin in the head and shaft arent connected to it and the penis wont end horribly mauled

Making sure to throw out an insult toward uncircumcised folk even when questioning the point of your own circumcision lol
---

It's insane that people with a cut penis throw insults at people with an intact penis.

If someone with an intact penis was upset with it being intact, they could go get a circumcision any time.

smoliske posted...

circumcision does nothing to inhibit masturbation

No but logical thinking wasn't exactly Kellogg's strong suit.
---

CornBarn posted...

008Zulu posted...

No. It was intended to stop infections from sand build up under the foreskin. This was back before underwear, and general hygiene, were invented.

This is demonstrably false nonsense. Holy shit. Do you actually believe this garbage?

where the fuck is your proof to the contrary? do you enjoy talking out of your ass? if you're gonna call someone out on their shit you best back it up jack

smoliske posted...

CornBarn posted...

008Zulu posted...

No. It was intended to stop infections from sand build up under the foreskin. This was back before underwear, and general hygiene, were invented.

This is demonstrably false nonsense. Holy shit. Do you actually believe this garbage?

where the fuck is your proof to the contrary? do you enjoy talking out of your ass? if you're gonna call someone out on their shit you best back it up jack

I posted it afterwards. The ancient rabbis openly said that it was done to stunt sexual desire. And people had robes that would prevent sand from getting into their private areas. Not to mention that with how the foreskin works in an intact penis it's not possible to get sand build up under it unless you're having sex out in the open during a sandstorm.

no sources? all conjecture and speculation

smoliske posted...

no sources? all conjecture and speculation

Easily googled. I'm not going to force feed you. Go google what the earliest rabbis said about the point of circumcision. Go look at how the foreskin works when intact. You're not going to get build up of sand under it unless you're walking around and having sex naked outside during a sandstorm.

the burden of proof is on the accuser, you accused zulu. i aint doing your homework for you

This is not a debate in the court of law or philosophy class. If someone does not know how basic human anatomy or Judaism work, then it's not my problem beyond giving the bare minimum fuck. Maybe if I cared what either of you think I'd put more effort into googling the quotes for you.