Current Events > Anal sex in Canada

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-159.html

159 (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Marginal note:Exception

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between

(a) husband and wife, or

(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,

both of whom consent to the act.

Marginal note:Idem

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),

(a) an act shall be deemed not to have been engaged in in private if it is engaged in in a public place or if more than two persons take part or are present; and

(b) a person shall be deemed not to consent to an act

(i) if the consent is extorted by force, threats or fear of bodily harm or is obtained by false and fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act, or

(ii) if the court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person could not have consented to the act by reason of mental disability.

Seems complicated.
---

How is that complicated? That's actually pretty straight-forward as far as laws go.
---

You can have anal in private, but no anal threesomes in private.
---

i applied for my anal sex license but the licensing office is backed up and they're taking forever to approve them
---

AlephZero posted...

backed up

Heh
---

Do Canadian pronounce "butt stuff" as "boot stoof"
---

frozenshock posted...

fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act

This wording struck me as funny.
---

So some sex acts are banned there in 2018? I think it was outlawed in the US till the early 2000s.
---

So it's okay to have anal sex in Canada, but if someone watches then it's a crime
---

SquirrelyDan posted...

frozenshock posted...

fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act

This wording struck me as funny.

I'm not sure how you can word that better though
---

SquirrelyDan posted...

frozenshock posted...

fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act

This wording struck me as funny.

It means the "oops, wrong hole" defense is inadmissable in Canadian court
---

Canadian anal is better than American. I guess cause its colder.
---

Cheater87 posted...

So some sex acts are banned there in 2018? I think it was outlawed in the US till the early 2000s.

No, it's legal. That section of the criminal code is unconstitutional, but they didn't bother to actually remove it from the text of the law.

Last I checked, the criminal code still says that abortion is a crime.
---

Umm, am I reading this right? Getting spitroasted in Canada is illegal and punishable with prison?
---

eston posted...

SquirrelyDan posted...

frozenshock posted...

fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act

This wording struck me as funny.

It means the "oops, wrong hole" defense is inadmissable in Canadian court

I got it, but seeing it in legalese tickled my funny bone.
---

(I can't believe I'm typing this out on this website)

I don't think that's what it's referring to, I think it's actually like promising you'll take it slow and doing their best to make them comfortable and then...not.
---

Or saying you're just gonna stick the tip in and then not
---

Ivynn posted...

Do Canadian pronounce "butt stuff" as "boot stoof"

lollllll
---

The way it's worded it sounds like by default it's a crime with normal conditions making it an exception which is weird and you'd think it'd be the other way around (by default not a crime except under abnormal conditions)
---