Current Events > If everyone could stop calling a credible rape victim a liar that'd be great

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
#151	Post #151 was unavailable or deleted.
nemu 09/29/18 9:09:18 PM #152:	shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma? And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists. Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not And you're basing that on nothing but one person's story, not looking at it at all critically because of feelings. You're obviously allowed your opinion either way, but you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Go ahead and say you believe her despite that if you want, but to say she has proven anything is disingenuous. <cite>nemu posted [p:909684488] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma?</quote> And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists.</quote> Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not</quote> And you're basing that on nothing but one person's story, not looking at it at all critically because of feelings. You're obviously allowed your opinion either way, but you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Go ahead and say you believe her despite that if you want, but to say she has proven anything is disingenuous.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:12:26 PM #153:	nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909684653] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:15:24 PM #154:	shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma? And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists. Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not 'Probable' based on what? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909684816] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma?</quote> And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists.</quote> Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not</quote> 'Probable' based on what?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:17:43 PM #155:	Dragonblade01 posted... It's amazing to me how people find this story both absolutely convincing and unequivocally false. The only reasonable position anyone can take after hearing this telling of events is to remain uncertain. Precisely. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909684945] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>It's amazing to me how people find this story both absolutely convincing and unequivocally false. The only reasonable position anyone can take after hearing this telling of events is to remain uncertain.</quote> Precisely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:19:41 PM #156:	darkjedilink posted... shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma? And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists. Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not 'Probable' based on what? Evidence --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685056] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma?</quote> And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists.</quote> Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not</quote> 'Probable' based on what?</quote> Evidence</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:21:13 PM #157:	Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909685150] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#158	Post #158 was unavailable or deleted.
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:22:02 PM #159:	Coffeebeanz posted... Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward. Yeah he has no business on the SC. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685187] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward.</quote> Yeah he has no business on the SC.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 09/29/18 9:23:15 PM #160:	ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. <cite>nemu posted [p:909685253] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:23:55 PM #161:	In before "evidence" --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909685285] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>In before "evidence"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 09/29/18 9:25:27 PM #162:	Conflict posted... KingCrabCake posted... shockthemonkey posted... YourDrunkFather posted... Clearly the intelligent thing to do is to take unsubstantiated accusations at face value. Nothing bad could ever come from that. Ford has absolutely nothing to gain from this Except $700,000 Which she's using towards security. But keep thinking rape victims are just out for the money, it's a pretty good look for you Aside from the gofundme page that claims it what makes you think she is gonna use it for security. Furthermore it was not created by her. --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:909685358] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YourDrunkFather posted...</cite> <quote>Clearly the intelligent thing to do is to take unsubstantiated accusations at face value. Nothing bad could ever come from that.</quote> Ford has absolutely nothing to gain from this</quote> Except $700,000</quote> Which she's using towards security. But keep thinking rape victims are just out for the money, it's a pretty good look for you</quote> Aside from the gofundme page that claims it what makes you think she is gonna use it for security. Furthermore it was not created by her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:27:31 PM #163:	nemu posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685446] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:27:46 PM #164:	ledbowman posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Coffeebeanz posted... Dr. Ford gains absolutely nothing from doing this. She gave a credible testimony under oath. Fuck outta here thinking that believing her is politics. And I'm asking you what makes her testimony "credible" . And "X has nothing to gain from this" is a logical fallacy when used as an argument that subjective statements must be true. Youre using credible to mean whatever I say wont count. She explained the trauma and explained under oath why she remembered what she remembered. She gains nothing from reliving any of that and being put in this fucking terrible spotlight, so I believe her over the drunk dude who didnt want to answer anything. Watching those testimonies and pretending that siding with her is purely political is absolute bullshit. I'm super confused why "having nothing to gain" lends any credence to why she should be believed. Her mental state is irrelevant in terms of proving things. Explaining away gaps in her memory still does not provide pertinent information needed to believe her statements. I feel like people are stuck on the emotions and not the actual facts needed to prove her accusations to a degree reasonable enough to declare this man guilty in the court of public opinion. Oh yeah youre right she was definitely lying for no reason I don't know for certain if she's lying, but I do know she has not proven her case. It's entirely possible she was never touched and has just developed a delusion. It is entirely possible she was assaulted by another person. I cannot say for sure, but what I can say is that no person should be believed with a flimsy story and no pertinent evidence. I don't understand why that is so hard for people to understand. No evidence = no crime, even if the crime happened. It's how our entire system works. There is evidence. There literally is not. She has offered no proof to her claims. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909685458] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Dr. Ford gains absolutely nothing from doing this. She gave a credible testimony under oath. Fuck outta here thinking that believing her is politics. And I'm asking you what makes her testimony "credible" . And "X has nothing to gain from this" is a logical fallacy when used as an argument that subjective statements must be true.</quote> Youre using credible to mean whatever I say wont count. She explained the trauma and explained under oath why she remembered what she remembered. She gains nothing from reliving any of that and being put in this fucking terrible spotlight, so I believe her over the drunk dude who didnt want to answer anything. Watching those testimonies and pretending that siding with her is purely political is absolute bullshit.</quote> I'm super confused why "having nothing to gain" lends any credence to why she should be believed. Her mental state is irrelevant in terms of proving things. Explaining away gaps in her memory still does not provide pertinent information needed to believe her statements. I feel like people are stuck on the emotions and not the actual facts needed to prove her accusations to a degree reasonable enough to declare this man guilty in the court of public opinion.</quote> Oh yeah youre right she was definitely lying for no reason</quote> I don't know for certain if she's lying, but I do know she has not proven her case. It's entirely possible she was never touched and has just developed a delusion. It is entirely possible she was assaulted by another person. I cannot say for sure, but what I can say is that no person should be believed with a flimsy story and no pertinent evidence. I don't understand why that is so hard for people to understand. No evidence = no crime, even if the crime happened. It's how our entire system works.</quote> There is evidence.</quote> There literally is not. She has offered no proof to her claims.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:28:50 PM #165:	shockthemonkey posted... Coffeebeanz posted... Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward. Yeah real awful to not want a likely attempted rapist on the Supreme Court 'Likely' based on what? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909685509] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Man, our justice system is well and truly fucked if this is the kind of mentaility we're allowing going forward.</quote> Yeah real awful to not want a likely attempted rapist on the Supreme Court</quote> 'Likely' based on what?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:29:14 PM #166:	darkjedilink posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Coffeebeanz posted... Dr. Ford gains absolutely nothing from doing this. She gave a credible testimony under oath. Fuck outta here thinking that believing her is politics. And I'm asking you what makes her testimony "credible" . And "X has nothing to gain from this" is a logical fallacy when used as an argument that subjective statements must be true. Youre using credible to mean whatever I say wont count. She explained the trauma and explained under oath why she remembered what she remembered. She gains nothing from reliving any of that and being put in this fucking terrible spotlight, so I believe her over the drunk dude who didnt want to answer anything. Watching those testimonies and pretending that siding with her is purely political is absolute bullshit. I'm super confused why "having nothing to gain" lends any credence to why she should be believed. Her mental state is irrelevant in terms of proving things. Explaining away gaps in her memory still does not provide pertinent information needed to believe her statements. I feel like people are stuck on the emotions and not the actual facts needed to prove her accusations to a degree reasonable enough to declare this man guilty in the court of public opinion. Oh yeah youre right she was definitely lying for no reason I don't know for certain if she's lying, but I do know she has not proven her case. It's entirely possible she was never touched and has just developed a delusion. It is entirely possible she was assaulted by another person. I cannot say for sure, but what I can say is that no person should be believed with a flimsy story and no pertinent evidence. I don't understand why that is so hard for people to understand. No evidence = no crime, even if the crime happened. It's how our entire system works. There is evidence. There literally is not. She has offered no proof to her claims. Ok, so you don't know what evidence is. Noted. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685523] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Dr. Ford gains absolutely nothing from doing this. She gave a credible testimony under oath. Fuck outta here thinking that believing her is politics. And I'm asking you what makes her testimony "credible" . And "X has nothing to gain from this" is a logical fallacy when used as an argument that subjective statements must be true.</quote> Youre using credible to mean whatever I say wont count. She explained the trauma and explained under oath why she remembered what she remembered. She gains nothing from reliving any of that and being put in this fucking terrible spotlight, so I believe her over the drunk dude who didnt want to answer anything. Watching those testimonies and pretending that siding with her is purely political is absolute bullshit.</quote> I'm super confused why "having nothing to gain" lends any credence to why she should be believed. Her mental state is irrelevant in terms of proving things. Explaining away gaps in her memory still does not provide pertinent information needed to believe her statements. I feel like people are stuck on the emotions and not the actual facts needed to prove her accusations to a degree reasonable enough to declare this man guilty in the court of public opinion.</quote> Oh yeah youre right she was definitely lying for no reason</quote> I don't know for certain if she's lying, but I do know she has not proven her case. It's entirely possible she was never touched and has just developed a delusion. It is entirely possible she was assaulted by another person. I cannot say for sure, but what I can say is that no person should be believed with a flimsy story and no pertinent evidence. I don't understand why that is so hard for people to understand. No evidence = no crime, even if the crime happened. It's how our entire system works.</quote> There is evidence.</quote> There literally is not. She has offered no proof to her claims.</quote> Ok, so you don't know what evidence is. Noted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:29:27 PM #167:	ledbowman posted... darkjedilink posted... shockthemonkey posted... nemu posted... shockthemonkey posted... Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma? And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists. Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not 'Probable' based on what? Evidence Too bad there is none. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909685535] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>Did you listen to her testimony when she explained how memory is linked to trauma?</quote> And again, that is not proof. Her explaining away why her story is flimsy does not make it less flimsy. Even if the accusations are 100% true, I am against him being prosecuted in the court of public opinion or legally if she cannot prove them. If they are true, I'm very sorry for her, and hopefully he'll get brought down by another victim who can recall enough details and provide enough evidence if one exists.</quote> Ok while youre fine with a dude who probably tried to rape someone being on the Supreme Court Im not</quote> 'Probable' based on what?</quote> Evidence</quote> Too bad there is none.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 09/29/18 9:29:52 PM #168:	ledbowman posted... nemu posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted. I bet you're the kind of person who will stick to the strictest definition of a word you like, but if someone uses a definition for a word you don't like you'll say the dictionary doesn't matter. <cite>nemu posted [p:909685552] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted.</quote> I bet you're the kind of person who will stick to the strictest definition of a word you like, but if someone uses a definition for a word you don't like you'll say the dictionary doesn't matter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:30:01 PM #169:	The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909685559] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 09/29/18 9:30:53 PM #170:	ledbowman posted... nemu posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted. Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent. --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:909685600] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted.</quote> Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:31:54 PM #171:	He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent. Her friend* believes her doesn't even remember if party existed --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909685646] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote> He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent. Her friend believes her *doesn't even remember if party existed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:35:15 PM #172:	ledbowman posted... Ok, so you don't know what evidence is. Noted. Your own definition in this thread proves my point. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909685817] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>Ok, so you don't know what evidence is. Noted.</quote> Your own definition in this thread proves my point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:36:09 PM #173:	Coffeebeanz posted... The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685856] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there</quote> Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:38:22 PM #174:	HiddenLurker posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted. Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent. Yes, this too is evidence, used to determine facts. Good job. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909685965] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted.</quote> Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent.</quote> Yes, this too is evidence, used to determine facts. Good job.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chrono625 09/29/18 9:38:54 PM #175:	The only thing I got from this topic is ledbowman thinks he/she can decide what determines something being evidence or not. --- https://imgur.com/Rqk1DYV - Super Bowl XXI/XXV/XLII/XLVI Champions - NY Giants Eli Manning SB tracker: 2/2 Superbowls 2/2 SBMVP's <cite>chrono625 posted [p:909685998] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>The only thing I got from this topic is ledbowman thinks he/she can decide what determines something being evidence or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/29/18 9:39:17 PM #176:	The question of his guilt is still inconclusive. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:909686015] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>The question of his guilt is still inconclusive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 09/29/18 9:40:02 PM #177:	ledbowman posted... Coffeebeanz posted... The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them. <cite>nemu posted [p:909686054] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there</quote> Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing</quote> Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:40:36 PM #178:	Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686090] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 09/29/18 9:41:23 PM #179:	ledbowman posted... HiddenLurker posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... ledbowman posted... nemu posted... you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far. Um no. She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life. Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted. Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent. Yes, this too is evidence, used to determine facts. Good job. The point Pluto Moon Your head --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:909686122] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote>you should at least be able admit this woman has no actual case with what is presented so far.</quote> Um no.</quote> She remembers nothing important about the event that can actually help determine anything. She has nobody who has been able to corroborate at very minimum that such a party with such people even took place. The only thing she has presented is the assault itself, despite remembering nearly no other details, and some stuff that happened in 2012 that proves nothing at all besides the fact that she didn't think of this story yesterday. Maybe the event happened and the trauma has left her unable to recall those details, but if so, then unfortunately that just means she will forever be unable to make him face justice. Words alone cannot and should not affect a person's life.</quote> Ok, so the evidence doesn't convince you. Noted.</quote> Dude if testimony = evidence. He testified he did not do it. Therefore by your own logic he is innocent.</quote> Yes, this too is evidence, used to determine facts. Good job.</quote> The point Pluto Moon Your head</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:42:56 PM #180:	Coffeebeanz posted... Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox Where's the wrong part? --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686192] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox</quote> Where's the wrong part?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:43:42 PM #181:	ledbowman posted... Coffeebeanz posted... Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox Where's the wrong part? Aside from the fact that the people who signed that document all stated that she never mentioned Kavanaugh to them? You're throwing so many fucking foul balls I'm not even sure the game can proceed. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686229] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>Do you seriously get your news from fucking Vox</quote> Where's the wrong part?</quote> Aside from the fact that the people who signed that document all stated that she never mentioned Kavanaugh to them? You're throwing so many fucking foul balls I'm not even sure the game can proceed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:44:32 PM #182:	nemu posted... ledbowman posted... Coffeebeanz posted... The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them. It is evidence. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686276] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there</quote> Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing</quote> Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them.</quote> It is evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:45:58 PM #183:	It is evidence Evidence that she told people that someone in the past assaulted her. You're not even on first base. Hell you're not even in the stadium. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686348] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>It is evidence Evidence that she told people that someone in the past assaulted her. You're not even on first base. Hell you're not even in the stadium.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 09/29/18 9:46:26 PM #184:	ledbowman posted... nemu posted... ledbowman posted... Coffeebeanz posted... The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them. It is evidence. It's like you think you're proving a point, but you don't actually understand the words you'e using. <cite>nemu posted [p:909686370] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>The closest things she has to "evidence" are: A friend who doesn't remember the party, and was never told about it until now, but believes her. Therapist notes about an assault with no names, locations or even time. A polygraph test that does not mention Kavanaugh at all. A husband who believes her. And three named witnesses who all say they dont remember anything. Boy, that's a hell of a case you built there</quote> Yes. This is evidence, even as hard as you try to skew it against her. Also: Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault while they were both in high school, have released sworn statements from four people supporting Fords story about the alleged assault. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/26/17905538/christine-blasey-ford-witnesses-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing</quote> Who cares if she told people decades later? It only proves she didn't concoct this story just recently. She didn't tell them anything relevant enough to actually provide details. They can at best prove that her current recollection is consistent with what she told them.</quote> It is evidence.</quote> It's like you think you're proving a point, but you don't actually understand the words you'e using.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:47:10 PM #185:	You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686409] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:48:17 PM #186:	ledbowman posted... You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though. If she didn't say it was Kavanaugh, it cannot be evidence that Kavanaugh did anything. You do understand that, right? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909686482] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though.</quote> If she didn't say it was Kavanaugh, it cannot be evidence that Kavanaugh did anything. You do understand that, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:48:50 PM #187:	darkjedilink posted... ledbowman posted... You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though. If she didn't say it was Kavanaugh, it cannot be evidence that Kavanaugh did anything. You do understand that, right? Lol no. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686517] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though.</quote> If she didn't say it was Kavanaugh, it cannot be evidence that Kavanaugh did anything. You do understand that, right?</quote> Lol no.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:48:52 PM #188:	ledbowman posted... You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though. It's because that's exactly what it means. She told a vague story with no details to a bunch of people a long time ago. Suddenly now she has razor sharp details. Except they don't retroactively make those stories specific. That's why literally no one has come forward and said "I remember this" --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686519] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though.</quote> It's because that's exactly what it means. She told a vague story with no details to a bunch of people a long time ago. Suddenly now she has razor sharp details. Except they don't retroactively make those stories specific. That's why literally no one has come forward and said "I remember this"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:49:08 PM #189:	Dragonblade01 posted... The question of his guilt is still inconclusive. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909686536] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>The question of his guilt is still inconclusive.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:49:58 PM #190:	Coffeebeanz posted... ledbowman posted... You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though. It's because that's exactly what it means. She told a vague story with no details to a bunch of people a long time ago. Suddenly now she has razor sharp details. Except they don't retroactivity make those stories specific. That's why literally no one has come forward and said "I remember this" Research what evidence is. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686574] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>You all sure like to think because she didn't say his name it isn't evidence. I understand stand you're short on material though.</quote> It's because that's exactly what it means. She told a vague story with no details to a bunch of people a long time ago. Suddenly now she has razor sharp details. Except they don't retroactivity make those stories specific. That's why literally no one has come forward and said "I remember this"</quote> Research what evidence is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:50:37 PM #191:	Research what evidence is. Buddy, you'd make Dunning-Kruger proud. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686612] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote> Research what evidence is. Buddy, you'd make Dunning-Kruger proud.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:51:21 PM #192:	I can repost the definition it if will help. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686644] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>I can repost the definition it if will help.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/29/18 9:51:50 PM #193:	ledbowman posted... I can repost the definition it if will help. The definition you already posted proves us right. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909686664] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>I can repost the definition it if will help.</quote> The definition you already posted proves us right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:51:58 PM #194:	No thanks, I can't even see the goalposts at this point. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686671] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>No thanks, I can't even see the goalposts at this point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 09/29/18 9:54:55 PM #195:	darkjedilink posted... ledbowman posted... I can repost the definition it if will help. The definition you already posted proves us right. It doesn't, but do your worst. This should be good. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:909686829] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>I can repost the definition it if will help.</quote> The definition you already posted proves us right.</quote> It doesn't, but do your worst. This should be good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bevan306 09/29/18 9:55:26 PM #196:	her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan https://imgur.com/5Ta28 <cite>bevan306 posted [p:909686851] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/29/18 9:56:31 PM #197:	bevan306 posted... her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him Did you seriously think this was a logical statement --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909686926] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>bevan306 posted...</cite> <quote>her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him</quote> Did you seriously think this was a logical statement</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 09/29/18 9:57:52 PM #198:	Kavanaugh perjured himself again on Thursday. He was plainly dishonest about the vocabulary he used in his yearbook, his claims about never passing out have been refuted by several classmates and contradict the written record, and his avoidant attitude towards the FBI investigation is simply not the way that an innocent person would act. I don't know that he's a rapist but I know that he's not credible and he's hiding something. --- BKSheikah owned me so thoroughly in the 2017 guru contest, I'd swear he used the Lens of Truth to pick his bracket. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:909686992] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>Kavanaugh perjured himself again on Thursday. He was plainly dishonest about the vocabulary he used in his yearbook, his claims about never passing out have been refuted by several classmates and contradict the written record, and his avoidant attitude towards the FBI investigation is simply not the way that an innocent person would act. I don't know that he's a rapist but I know that he's not credible and he's hiding something.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bevan306 09/29/18 10:02:11 PM #199:	Coffeebeanz posted... bevan306 posted... her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him Did you seriously think this was a logical statement https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77048253/909604560 --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan https://imgur.com/5Ta28 <cite>bevan306 posted [p:909687196] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bevan306 posted...</cite> <quote>her testimony was evidence, and she came off as intelligent and sincere. His testimony was also evidence, and he came off as an angry and petulant drunk, frothing at the mouth about democrats and hillary clinton. No one should be surprised that people believe her and not him</quote> Did you seriously think this was a logical statement</quote> https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77048253/909604560</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/29/18 10:03:45 PM #200:	Oh my god. Yes, testimony is a form of evidence. That doesn't make it conclusive. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:909687264] in If everyon... [t:77052218]...</cite> <quote>Oh my god. Yes, testimony is a form of evidence. That doesn't make it conclusive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current Events > If everyone could stop calling a credible rape victim a liar that'd be great (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > If everyone could stop calling a credible rape victim a liar that'd be great