Current Events > Kavanaugh hearing anyone else sense this is all an act on both sides

(+) Yeah! (+)

I think everyone is acting look in the back ground look in their eyes anyone who has been through some shit knows when someone is lieing and this whole thing seems like a show.

I don't think Dr Ford was acting, no.
---

This hearing is representative of the whole Trump administration.

Random accusations, people fighting back, everyone watching at home getting upset and taking side, theatrics, the media getting too excited. How else could this have happened, you know?

Let's hope he's a one term president.

---

I think that there are people who want us to tear eatch other apart and all of the people in that hearing are part of it. Or controlled by it think of the last ten thoughts you have had then think where they came from was it you or ws it a tweet an intagram. I just implore you to think for yourselves.

Unmitigated thought is the rulers most feared weapon

It was never going to change anyone's minds. How can it. It's he said she said. Whatever you think of her or him at the end of the day there's no evidence either way. You already made up your mind before even watching it. And either you believe in innocent until proven guilty or that all accusations made by women can't be questioned and the accused is guilty until proven innocent. One or the other. The rule of law or group think angry mob mentality. Period.
You can't support the guilty until proven innocent mentality while claiming it's a sad day for the rule of law to not do so like dumbass Joe Scarborough is this morning. I'm against the rule of law in the name of the rule of law. Jackass. But that's a semi different subject.

And no investigation by anyone is going to uncover what really did or did not happen between two people at a high school party that happened 36 years ago to which there are no witnesses. So investigate what? Who? We already have all the info that's possible to have. And may I add that her supposed witnesses have already said they know nothing beyond what she claimed happened. 30 years after the fact.
It's he said she said and there's an obvious political motive behind getting him confirmed and blocking him.

Which seemed more believable yesterday? That's up to you. She came off as Bob's from Bob's Burgers crazy sister in law to me. He seemed pissed that she's being taken seriously with no evidence and he's not.
---

I don't think he should be convicted of anything, but it's definitely a bad look for being a SC justice

They are using the most basic of divisive tactics on us race and sex we are better than this bullshit

Hulkasaurusrex posted...

They are using the most basic of divisive tactics on us race and sex we are better than this bullshit

I felt like absolute shit at the end of today, and I think this whole business is messing with my contentment and happiness

Are you following me basic kat meow

you know what I think? this kind of shit would not be happening if it weren't for Trump

Gimme some more

I'm kinda worn out had an eventful day that's just the core basics of how I feel about it

Aw shit you make me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izGwDsrQ1eQ" data-time="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-_s8c_URQU" data-time="

scar the 1 posted...

I don't think Dr Ford was acting, no.

---

I think they were all acting i am trying to tell you young fools everyone is acting

The world is a stage. Everyone plays it up because it garners interest, whereas being real and true is boring apparently.

True that i am tired of this shit man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt1Pwfnh5pc" data-time="

@EternalDivide posted...

Which seemed more believable yesterday? That's up to you. She came off as Bob's from Bob's Burgers crazy sister in law to me. He seemed pissed that she's being taken seriously with no evidence and he's not.

Kavanaugh vented about how his named was smeared to the ground by the allegations, yet when asked if he wanted an FBI investigation to clear his name, he never gave a straight answer. In fact, it got to the point where he was given a option to look at a single official's face to request an investigation and he was a deer stuck in headlights. He knows Ford took a polygraph test but he hasn't and not once did he propose taking a polygraph test. Devil's Triangle's wikipedia page was edited to his explanation the moment after it was addressed in court. He talks about how he has several witnesses who state it never happened yet their wording is "they don't recall", and worse yet, one refuses to testify under oath. That one also has TWO (2) books covering his adventures as a teen alcoholic and Kavanaugh refuses to confirm if the specified character in the book is indeed Brett Kavanaugh, in which the books are indeed the perfect evidence to corroborate with Ford's allegations.

Tell me, why should anyone trust him over that "crazy sister in law"?
---

So booker runs and i say he touched me in 2000 game over?

Hulkasaurusrex posted...

So booker runs and i say he touched me in 2000 game over?

You have no credibility and fairly strong documented evidence of where you were in 2000 and it would have been hundreds of miles away.
---

Hulkasaurusrex posted...

So booker runs and i say he touched me in 2000 game over?

Look what they've been reduced to lol.
---

Of course it's an act on both sides, at least as far as the parties go. And the GOP in particular are being massive hypocrites, though that's nothing new.

As for Ford and Kavanaugh go, though, it's impossible to say what happened and who is acting because we have no evidence.

But the burden of proof is on the accuser. End of story.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

But the burden of proof is on the accuser. End of story.

In a criminal trial, yes
The burden of proof in this situation is on Kavanaugh. Not to prove his innocence, to prove he's a suitable candidate for the SCOTUS.
---

scar the 1 posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

But the burden of proof is on the accuser. End of story.

In a criminal trial, yes
The burden of proof in this situation is on Kavanaugh. Not to prove his innocence, to prove he's a suitable candidate for the SCOTUS.

It doesn't fucking matter. We don't treat all accusations as "suitability" metrics. The only credibility she has is that she is politically advantageous to the Democrats.

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

So stop moving the fucking goalposts and stop making up your bullshit justifications for why this is "different".
---

I think it's all a show and Kavanaugh is the unwilling participant of it all.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.
---

EternalDivide posted...

It was never going to change anyone's minds. How can it. It's he said she said.

No it's not. It's he said she said, and HER friends side with HIM, and he has a diary that he kept. All of the actual evidence, outside of these 2 speaking for themselves, suggests Kavanaugh is innocent.
---

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

A polygraph of a story that doesn't match what she's telling now. And even if it did, it literally means jack shit. The fact that it doesn't match up is even less than jack shit.

And holy crap it's almost like the judge was in high school when was in high school! Guilt!
---

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

And therapist notes from 2012 and she wants the FBI.
---

ledbowman posted...

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

And therapist notes from 2012 and she wants the FBI.

Therapist notes that never mention anyone by name. And I want the FBI to investigate Pelosi.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

ledbowman posted...

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

And therapist notes from 2012 and she wants the FBI.

Therapist notes that never mention anyone by name. And I want the FBI to investigate Pelosi.

No you wouldn't because then you would have lied to the FBI.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

scar the 1 posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

But the burden of proof is on the accuser. End of story.

In a criminal trial, yes
The burden of proof in this situation is on Kavanaugh. Not to prove his innocence, to prove he's a suitable candidate for the SCOTUS.

It doesn't fucking matter. We don't treat all accusations as "suitability" metrics. The only credibility she has is that she is politically advantageous to the Democrats.

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

So stop moving the fucking goalposts and stop making up your bullshit justifications for why this is "different".

It matters a lot. But you're right in that we don't treat all accusations as suitability metrics. This isn't just any accusation. This is a very credible accusation, with evidence. Of course it's politically convenient for the Democrats, but that doesn't keep it from being a relevant and credible allegation.

You making up an accusation is not comparable, because you don't have any corroborating evidence. Dr. Ford does. Saying that there's no evidence is a flat out lie.
---

Also, sworn testimony is evidence.
---

ledbowman posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

ledbowman posted...

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

And therapist notes from 2012 and she wants the FBI.

Therapist notes that never mention anyone by name. And I want the FBI to investigate Pelosi.

No you wouldn't because then you would have lied to the FBI.

And I believe it's a felony to start a false FBI investigation. Do you really want to play this game, Coffee?
---

I want feinstein hooked up to a lie detector to make sure she is still alive otherwise i got another life to tell you about. She looks like a vampire that raped me two lives ago.

Sad_Face posted...

ledbowman posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

ledbowman posted...

Sad_Face posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

I could say Nancy Pelosi fingered my butthole two years ago, and I won't be called up to Washington to testify. I have exactly as much evidence as Ford does.

She has a polygraph test on her side and Judge's book to corroborate with her timeline of when it occurred.

And therapist notes from 2012 and she wants the FBI.

Therapist notes that never mention anyone by name. And I want the FBI to investigate Pelosi.

No you wouldn't because then you would have lied to the FBI.

And I believe it's a felony to start a false FBI investigation. Do you really want to play this game, Coffee?

Only if they can prove it's false. For an event that happened 36 years ago that literally nobody can verify.
---

I got bad news hillary touched me dog i will go in front of right wing news i will be a hero to all these heroes you can look with tears in your eyes and think look a brave hero he destroyed a womans life that hero.

Coffeebeanz posted...

Only if they can prove it's false. For an event that happened 36 years ago that literally nobody can verify.

I'm talking about Pelosi's alleged assault on you, you sure can prove your allegation isn't a waste of time? The absence of evidence will turn to evidence of absence in this case.
---

Oh btw if you want proof talk to my lawyer

Some of you people on this site are fucked up.
---

ledbowman posted...

Some of you people on this site are fucked up.

I get that a lot maybe i need meds or society does maybe you are the crazy ones and good luck.

I love how pissy this has made Trump toadies over the last few days
---

But seriously nobody looks at those hearings and does not think they are not trying to start a civil war? Dont be so fuckin dense that you dont think nobody will ever hate us and are salivateing at the chance to take america they are waiting for a weakness and bitch ass trophy children are it. You gonna fight, what your mom not paying your allowance.

https://goo.gl/images/4rTTpB