Current Events > South Africa to sieze land from white people

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Questionmarktarius 08/02/18 5:11:13 PM #51:	darkphoenix181 posted... Milkman5 posted... imagine being white and not leaving a country that wants to kill all white people Where would they go? Ironically, Zimbabwe. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:906160136] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Milkman5 posted...</cite> <quote>imagine being white and not leaving a country that wants to kill all white people</quote> Where would they go?</quote> Ironically, Zimbabwe.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:12:07 PM #52:	Still waiting for you guy to quote me verbatim where I said being white in America is hard. Gave up since you lied and twisted words? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906160189] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for you guy to quote me verbatim where I said being white in America is hard. Gave up since you lied and twisted words?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 08/02/18 5:12:16 PM #53:	2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:906160203] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperpowder 08/02/18 5:12:50 PM #54:	Broseph_Stalin posted... hyperpowder posted... You either can't read, or grasping to twist my words to fit your agenda. Your argument is yes to whites no to Syrians, I don't have to twist anything. Think before you post next time, most people aren't aware of their bias. My argument is yes to South African refugees(regardless of race) and no to Syrian refugees. Jesus stop twisting my words to fit your agenda. You sound like you work for Fox news --- Whoever beats my score I will give them a $10 PSN or Live card: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpiorAx40GY <cite>hyperpowder posted [p:906160238] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hyperpowder posted...</cite> <quote>You either can't read, or grasping to twist my words to fit your agenda.</quote> Your argument is yes to whites no to Syrians, I don't have to twist anything. Think before you post next time, most people aren't aware of their bias.</quote> My argument is yes to South African refugees(regardless of race) and no to Syrian refugees. Jesus stop twisting my words to fit your agenda. You sound like you work for Fox news</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:13:03 PM #55:	HiddenRoar posted... 2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid. That is what these farmers are saying will happen. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906160254] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenRoar posted...</cite> <quote>2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid.</quote> That is what these farmers are saying will happen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 08/02/18 5:14:19 PM #56:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Thats fucked up. People ITT are defending it though --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://imgur.com/r9xK2NR <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:906160337] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote>Thats fucked up.</quote> People ITT are defending it though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ving_Rhames 08/02/18 5:14:31 PM #57:	Thats fucked up. --- the real Irving Rameses https://imgur.com/A7f6F9h <cite>Ving_Rhames posted [p:906160348] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>Thats fucked up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 08/02/18 5:14:35 PM #58:	They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:906160355] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 5:15:50 PM #59:	hyperpowder posted... My argument is yes to South African refugees(regardless of race) and no to Syrian refugees. Why would we take anyone from South Africa? They're literally taking land from people, doesn't sound very civilized to me. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906160434] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>hyperpowder posted...</cite> <quote>My argument is yes to South African refugees(regardless of race) and no to Syrian refugees. </quote> Why would we take anyone from South Africa? They're literally taking land from people, doesn't sound very civilized to me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 08/02/18 5:17:37 PM #60:	Because they are being persecuted by the government on the basis of race which are qualifying factors for asylum. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:906160539] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>Because they are being persecuted by the government on the basis of race which are qualifying factors for asylum.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:18:33 PM #61:	gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906160578] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 5:18:45 PM #62:	Nomadic View posted... Because they are being persecuted by the government on the basis of race which is a qualifying factor for asylum. Syrians also qualify. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906160590] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Because they are being persecuted by the government on the basis of race which is a qualifying factor for asylum. </quote> Syrians also qualify.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LethalAffinity 08/02/18 5:19:23 PM #63:	So this is becoming reverse-Apartheid at this point. Mandela is rolling in his grave. --- https://imgur.com/Sv19SP4 https://imgur.com/esZpDkI https://imgur.com/tdtzIvW https://imgur.com/E0O1koZ <cite>LethalAffinity posted [p:906160626] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>So this is becoming reverse-Apartheid at this point. Mandela is rolling in his grave.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 08/02/18 5:19:42 PM #64:	so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away <cite>Zikten posted [p:906160651] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Firewerx 08/02/18 5:19:46 PM #65:	nemu posted... Firewerx posted... Milkman5 posted... imagine being white and not leaving an imaginary country that wants to kill all white people FTFY They want to take all the white owned farmlands and will get violent over it if they resist. They're not yet in a state of "kill every white person", but they're not that far off at that rate. So after nearly a quarter of a century of foot-dragging by the ANC government over the land issue, whites still own almost all farmland in South Africa? Yet there've been klaxons screaming about an "imminent white genocide" ever since 1994... However you might view the prospect of heavy-handed evictions, it's still pretty fucking far off "kill every white person", and idiots who claim it shows the government's on a knife-edge of mass genocide are actually doing white landowners no favours, because principled opposition to the stupidity, cynicism and injustice of the farm seizures policy gets buried beneath all the bullshit hyperbole. For Chrissake, even anti-apartheid activists who attacked the (far bigger) forced removals of black South Africans under the National Party regime never made the stupid claim that it was the first step on the road to "killing all black people". <cite>Firewerx posted [p:906160653] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Firewerx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Milkman5 posted...</cite> <quote>imagine being white and not leaving an imaginary country that wants to kill all white people</quote> FTFY</quote> They want to take all the white owned farmlands and will get violent over it if they resist. They're not yet in a state of "kill every white person", but they're not that far off at that rate.</quote> So after nearly a quarter of a century of foot-dragging by the ANC government over the land issue, whites still own almost all farmland in South Africa? Yet there've been klaxons screaming about an "imminent white genocide" ever since 1994... However you might view the prospect of heavy-handed evictions, it's still pretty fucking far off "kill every white person", and idiots who claim it shows the government's on a knife-edge of mass genocide are actually doing white landowners no favours, because principled opposition to the stupidity, cynicism and injustice of the farm seizures policy gets buried beneath all the bullshit hyperbole. For Chrissake, even anti-apartheid activists who attacked the (far bigger) forced removals of black South Africans under the National Party regime never made the stupid claim that it was the first step on the road to "killing all black people".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/02/18 5:20:03 PM #66:	good --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:906160672] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>good</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 5:20:33 PM #67:	darkphoenix181 posted... as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire That's not what happened fyi <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906160706] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire</quote> That's not what happened fyi</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:21:16 PM #68:	Broseph_Stalin posted... darkphoenix181 posted... as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire That's not what happened fyi Ok explain how they got it then. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906160754] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire</quote> That's not what happened fyi</quote> Ok explain how they got it then.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 5:22:04 PM #69:	darkphoenix181 posted... Ok explain how they got it then. Conquest. The area wasn't even under British control at the time. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906160805] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Ok explain how they got it then.</quote> Conquest. The area wasn't even under British control at the time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#70	Post #70 was unavailable or deleted.
Wetterdew 08/02/18 5:22:38 PM #71:	I'm a white person who moved to America from South Africa. My mom grew up on a farm there. We came to America when I was five; my uncle and cousins still live there, but I'm glad I'm in Texas now --- Touch fuzzy get dizzy. <cite>Wetterdew posted [p:906160841] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>I'm a white person who moved to America from South Africa. My mom grew up on a farm there. We came to America when I was five; my uncle and cousins still live there, but I'm glad I'm in Texas now</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 08/02/18 5:23:07 PM #72:	Conflict posted... Zikten posted... so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away Some people actually have more to their lives than gamefaqs buddy well that's his loss. <cite>Zikten posted [p:906160855] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away</quote> Some people actually have more to their lives than gamefaqs buddy</quote> well that's his loss.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:23:09 PM #73:	Broseph_Stalin posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ok explain how they got it then. Conquest. The area wasn't even under British control at the time. Who conquered it? Random british farmers just took over South Africa without aid of the empire? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906160857] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Ok explain how they got it then.</quote> Conquest. The area wasn't even under British control at the time.</quote> Who conquered it? Random british farmers just took over South Africa without aid of the empire?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 08/02/18 5:24:04 PM #74:	darkphoenix181 posted... gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:906160908] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 08/02/18 5:24:35 PM #75:	darkphoenix181 posted... HiddenRoar posted... 2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid. That is what these farmers are saying will happen. That's what historically always happens, as seen with Venezuela, Zimbabwe, China, Russia, Haiti, etc., etc.. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:906160939] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenRoar posted...</cite> <quote>2019: South Africa experiences unprecedented food shortage, mass starvation, hyperinflation; begs for immediate international aid.</quote> That is what these farmers are saying will happen.</quote> That's what historically always happens, as seen with Venezuela, Zimbabwe, China, Russia, Haiti, etc., etc..</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 5:26:25 PM #76:	darkphoenix181 posted... Who conquested it? Random british farmers just took over South Africa without aid of the empire? Holy shit dude you really need to read up on South African history. First of all, they weren't British. They were Dutch settlers who were very hostile to British colonial rule. They migrated out of the Cape Colony and forcefully took the land from African tribes. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906161045] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Who conquested it? Random british farmers just took over South Africa without aid of the empire? </quote> Holy shit dude you really need to read up on South African history. First of all, they weren't British. They were Dutch settlers who were very hostile to British colonial rule. They migrated out of the Cape Colony and forcefully took the land from African tribes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 5:33:40 PM #77:	gunplagirl posted... darkphoenix181 posted... gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable. Do you own a house or a car gunplgirl? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906161461] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable.</quote> Do you own a house or a car gunplgirl?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/02/18 6:13:14 PM #78:	@Zikten posted... so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away You spend way too much time on the internet dude. I post on breaks at my job, I'm not here 24/7 like you dude. If you're really that interested it was the way you said it I was commenting on, not the fact that you have a subjective opinion on the subject. Edit: Zikten posted... Conflict posted... Zikten posted... so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away Some people actually have more to their lives than gamefaqs buddy well that's his loss. Brrrroooooo.... --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:906163701] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>@Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away</quote> You spend way too much time on the internet dude. I post on breaks at my job, I'm not here 24/7 like you dude. If you're really that interested it was the way you said it I was commenting on, not the fact that you have a subjective opinion on the subject. Edit: <cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>so in the fight between me and Zeak, I win apparently since he ran away</quote> Some people actually have more to their lives than gamefaqs buddy</quote> well that's his loss.</quote> Brrrroooooo....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/02/18 6:19:14 PM #79:	gunplagirl posted... darkphoenix181 posted... gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable. eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:906164050] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable.</quote> eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 08/02/18 6:20:30 PM #80:	When the South African state starts killing white people, the same usual suspects will be trying hard to find some moral justification for why that is okay. This is absolutely abhorrent. Seizing land from people who owned it for a long time just because they're white is evil. Even if a long time ago they had ancestors who were warlords or forcibly conquered land, that was how war and conquest were back then. Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it. Their hard work went into purchasing it from someone else, and now their labor is going to be stolen from them. Absolutely awful. I'd salt my land and raze it all down if this happened to me. Zimbabwe 2.0 --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:906164119] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>When the South African state starts killing white people, the same usual suspects will be trying hard to find some moral justification for why that is okay. This is absolutely abhorrent. Seizing land from people who owned it for a long time just because they're white is evil. Even if a long time ago they had ancestors who were warlords or forcibly conquered land, that was how war and conquest were back then. Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it. Their hard work went into purchasing it from someone else, and now their labor is going to be stolen from them. Absolutely awful. I'd salt my land and raze it all down if this happened to me. Zimbabwe 2.0</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 08/02/18 6:21:05 PM #81:	ThyCorndog posted... gunplagirl posted... darkphoenix181 posted... gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable. eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well do they even exist anymore? i thought that tribe vanished some decades ago --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:906164148] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable.</quote> eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well</quote> do they even exist anymore? i thought that tribe vanished some decades ago</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rimmer_Dall 08/02/18 6:25:58 PM #82:	FLUFFYGERM posted... . Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it. Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people. --- "The cheese it yours turtles." ~ William Shakespeare <cite>Rimmer_Dall posted [p:906164408] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote>. Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it.</quote> Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/02/18 6:26:13 PM #83:	FLUFFYGERM posted... ThyCorndog posted... gunplagirl posted... darkphoenix181 posted... gunplagirl posted... They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with. Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them. So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable. eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well do they even exist anymore? i thought that tribe vanished some decades ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan not many of them left and they basically mostly live spread out throughout the desert in the southern africa --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:906164421] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>They're reclaiming stolen land. It's not "seizing" as that would entail a certain degree of violence more in line with the colonialist platforms through which the land was procured by white invaders to begin with.</quote> Taking it without compensation from the people who likely didn't steal it either as they would have purchsed it from the British Empire; well, their grandparents that is, not them.</quote> So if somebody stole your car, then sold it, the person who bought it should be allowed to keep it? Ultimately somebody stole the land from the native citizens and enforced the premise of buying land and ownership of it. Just because it was legal by the invader's policies doesn't make it acceptable.</quote> eh it comes down to race and politics because the zulus and other bantu groups (which make up the majority of south africa) aren't natives to the region either. the natives are khoi-san peoples and they're somewhat of an oppressed minority as well</quote> do they even exist anymore? i thought that tribe vanished some decades ago</quote> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan not many of them left and they basically mostly live spread out throughout the desert in the southern africa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 08/02/18 6:27:30 PM #84:	Rimmer_Dall posted... Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people. Winner take all, that's reality. If you want to take it back, use force. Otherwise the Bantu should've been legally recognized as the owners once they won their invasion. What the Bantu does with the land after wards is their business. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:906164478] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people.</quote>Winner take all, that's reality. If you want to take it back, use force. Otherwise the Bantu should've been legally recognized as the owners once they won their invasion. What the Bantu does with the land after wards is their business.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/02/18 6:29:58 PM #85:	Antifar posted... How did they get the land? They bought it from the tribes that posessed it centuries ago. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906164627] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>How did they get the land?</quote> They bought it from the tribes that posessed it centuries ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alphamon 08/02/18 6:30:37 PM #86:	if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke. <cite>Alphamon posted [p:906164672] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/02/18 6:31:00 PM #87:	darkjedilink posted... They bought it from the tribes that posessed it centuries ago. Are you an admiral alt? You have the same weird fixation on being wrong. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:906164689] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>They bought it from the tribes that posessed it centuries ago. </quote> Are you an admiral alt? You have the same weird fixation on being wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 08/02/18 6:33:50 PM #88:	LethalAffinity posted... So this is becoming reverse-Apartheid at this point. Mandela is rolling in his grave. This --- Seriously. I don't care what side of the fence someone is on, if they are a piece of crap, they are a piece of crap. <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:906164838] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>LethalAffinity posted...</cite> <quote>So this is becoming reverse-Apartheid at this point. Mandela is rolling in his grave.</quote> This</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/02/18 6:42:28 PM #89:	Alphamon posted... if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke. Letting in successful farmers is okay, only if we let in possible terrorists? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906165280] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Alphamon posted...</cite> <quote>if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke.</quote> Letting in successful farmers is okay, only if we let in possible terrorists?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alphamon 08/02/18 6:44:30 PM #90:	darkjedilink posted... Alphamon posted... if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke. Letting in successful farmers is okay, only if we let in possible terrorists? oh my god you are so gross its ridiculous <cite>Alphamon posted [p:906165412] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alphamon posted...</cite> <quote>if south africans whites are so civilized, why did they support apartheid? yes they should be allowed asylum. but the idea that we should let these people in and not syrians is a joke.</quote> Letting in successful farmers is okay, only if we let in possible terrorists?</quote> oh my god you are so gross its ridiculous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/02/18 6:46:58 PM #91:	Rimmer_Dall posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... . Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it. Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people. @gunplagirl what do you make of this? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906165538] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote>. Everyone stole land, including the tribes that "owned" it before the colonizers moved in. None of that tribe is even around anymore AFAIK, and a shit ton of people who are gonna lose their land worked and paid for it.</quote> Yeah, this "their land was stolen from them by the Boers" argument is kinda funny, considering the Bantu people got said land to begin with by invading and eradicating the local Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San people.</quote> @gunplagirl what do you make of this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/02/18 7:08:29 PM #92:	I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:906166595] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 08/02/18 7:21:28 PM #93:	White people should move out of South Africa and let them have at it. Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day. --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:906167320] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>White people should move out of South Africa and let them have at it. Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 08/02/18 7:23:01 PM #94:	Capn Circus posted... Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day. It already had. --- Seriously. I don't care what side of the fence someone is on, if they are a piece of crap, they are a piece of crap. <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:906167384] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day.</quote> It already had.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 08/02/18 7:25:39 PM #95:	ThyCorndog posted... I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk sounds like youre just trying to reach real hard to keep that anti white sentiment goin tbqh --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:906167517] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote>I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk</quote> sounds like youre just trying to reach real hard to keep that anti white sentiment goin tbqh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
-Bungle- 08/02/18 7:27:08 PM #96:	DarkTransient posted... That's nothing, in the US, the government lets people say mean things about minorities. --- In the morning I will see - What you were trying to say to me. As I respond into the sink - Need not again hear myself think! <cite>-Bungle- posted [p:906167597] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>That's nothing, in the US, the government lets people say mean things about minorities.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alphamon 08/02/18 7:32:25 PM #97:	Capn Circus posted... Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day. the amount of paranoia needed to be a Republican in 2018 <cite>Alphamon posted [p:906167867] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>Anyway, it's important to look at examples like these and keep things in perspective. This can and will happen in places like the U.S. one day.</quote> the amount of paranoia needed to be a Republican in 2018</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/02/18 7:48:09 PM #98:	FLUFFYGERM posted... ThyCorndog posted... I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk sounds like youre just trying to reach real hard to keep that anti white sentiment goin tbqh I was just trying to reach the dead end in the logic but whatever --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:906168652] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote>I mean in the end, both the bantus and boers are invaders, but the boers invaded from more far away or cause the bantus are native to west africa which isn't south africa but it's still africa which means... something idk</quote> sounds like youre just trying to reach real hard to keep that anti white sentiment goin tbqh</quote> I was just trying to reach the dead end in the logic but whatever</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fluttershy462 08/02/18 7:50:55 PM #99:	Hope the innocent can get out --- Now hyped for: Pokemon Pikachu and Eevee Let's Go https://a4r91n.deviantart.com/art/Tovarischa-Fluttershy-477656032 <cite>Fluttershy462 posted [p:906168814] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>Hope the innocent can get out</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 08/02/18 7:57:06 PM #100:	Evacuate the white people out of that country. Leave it to its doom --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:906169138] in South Afri... [t:76865007]...</cite> <quote>Evacuate the white people out of that country. Leave it to its doom</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > South Africa to sieze land from white people (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > South Africa to sieze land from white people