Current Events > Live: President Trump meets with Kim Jong-un.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Rodman having a break down on CNN.
---

Hannity just Rekt the whole opposition
---

southcoast09 posted...

Hannity just Rekt the whole opposition

tl;dr version?
---

Skurvy_1 posted...

southcoast09 posted...

Hannity just Rekt the whole opposition

tl;dr version?

He had this entire videoclip of these whiny, angry anchors on cnn and msnbc saying that Trump would fail and was unprepared and called them out on being overpaid, under qualified, and overly emotional.

Winning feels nice
---

southcoast09 posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

southcoast09 posted...

Kim Jong Un is smiling like a kid in a candy store.

No shit, he finally got what he's wanted forever

Dude, I can tell youre angry that President Trump is making you naysayers look like angry little children. As I said before: if obama did it, youd have been on your knees

If Obama did this you would act like he sold out America to North Korea and we were on our way to being enslaved by satan.
---

Actually, no. Though I loathe to admit it, I voted for obama. Keeping John McCain out of office was a priority, and Romney was no better. We just had a bunch of losers to choose from until President Trump.
---

muchdran posted...

Trump haters are the worst

Close obsessed Trump fanboys are worse. Both groups are delusional.
---

southcoast09 posted...

Actually, no. Though I loathe to admit it, I voted for obama. Keeping John McCain out of office was a priority, and Romney was no better. We just had a bunch of losers to choose from until President Trump.

Whose the biggest loser of all. Every President is a loser.
---

Meeting has been in session for over 30 minutes so far.
---

do we actually know anything, or was the last hour just bland formalities before the very secret substance?

Live footage of them now sitting at table
---

treewojima posted...

do we actually know anything, or was the last hour just bland formalities before the very secret substance?

They spent about 5 mins in front of cameras for photos, then went into a 1-on-1 meeting. Nobody knows anything at this point.

I cant understand what they are saying. Cameras are too loud and the room is too echoy.

CiIantro posted...

treewojima posted...

do we actually know anything, or was the last hour just bland formalities before the very secret substance?

They spent about 5 mins in front of cameras for photos, then went into a 1-on-1 meeting. Nobody knows anything at this point.

so the blandest of the bland formalities

CiIantro posted...

treewojima posted...

do we actually know anything, or was the last hour just bland formalities before the very secret substance?

They spent about 5 mins in front of cameras for photos, then went into a 1-on-1 meeting. Nobody knows anything at this point.

But don't let that stop anyone from claiming this is the most successful thing that's ever happened.

gp1829 posted...

But don't let that stop anyone from claiming this is the most successful thing that's ever happened.

Or that WW3 is imminent. Hot takes have ruined sports and politics.
---

Its a pretty safe thing to say that President Trump has already won the re election.
---

Just finished watching the Trainwreck that was Sony's conference. What's going on here?
---

southcoast09 posted...

they can no longer say that President Trump is doing better than obama.

---

Trump and Kim walking together:
https://twitter.com/ABCWorldNews/status/1006357579461746688

trump is such a joke being played by kim so easily
---

andel posted...

trump is such a joke being played by kim so easily

Haha, so this is the narrative the sjws are going to go with
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

Eh...I don't see it as surefire.

If the democrats fuck up like they did last time and end up pumping out even more SJW and politically correct nonsense along with a terrible candidate, I would certainly say he's very likely). I still think he is better than Clinton, though I preferred Obama.

If the left doubles down and gets behind Kamala Harris I could see them losing the general to him, assuming Trump runs again, something I'm not entirely convinced will happen. Biden and especially Bernie would beat him, though age matters. And Gillibrand probably stands a good chance if she could avoid the Hillary pitfalls and real basic comparisons(having Soros come out against her recently will likely help her tremendously there).

We'll see, 2020 is still ages away in the present election climate. Plenty of shit could change
---

The Great Muta 22 posted...

-Gavirulax- posted...

Eh...I don't see it as surefire.

If the democrats fuck up like they did last time and end up pumping out even more SJW and politically correct nonsense along with a terrible candidate, I would certainly say he's very likely). I still think he is better than Clinton, though I preferred Obama.

If the left doubles down and gets behind Kamala Harris I could see them losing the general to him, assuming Trump runs again, something I'm not entirely convinced will happen. Biden and especially Bernie would beat him, though age matters. And Gillibrand probably stands a good chance if she could avoid the Hillary pitfalls and real basic comparisons(having Soros come out against her recently will likely help her tremendously there).

We'll see, 2020 is still ages away in the present election climate. Plenty of shit could change

Uhhh no. That is literally what you WANT to believe. This is completely insane, as a matter of fact. Biden OR comerade bernie would easily lose to him, and so would Harris.

He is literally going to bring peace to Korea and win a nobel peace prize. He is a hero in Israel because he finally gave them what they wanted. Hes lowered taxes and we all have more money. Hes going to legalize marijuana.

Hes built SO much momentum that even the craziest and most idealistic liberal could never hope to beat him. The majority of the country supports President Trump and he keeps getting more and more support. This is ALL in less than two years time.

The globalist movement is finished. Notice how Kim is meeting with trump and not them? He doesnt want to be a globalist nations.
---

two fatties discussing diplomacy over lunch with dennis rodman being the matchmaker

what a world
---

Lmao, @southcoast09 do you really believe that Trump will legalize weed when all weve heard from the AGs office is doubling-down on anti-pot rhetoric?
---

Metro2 posted...

Trump and Kim walking together:
https://twitter.com/ABCWorldNews/status/1006357579461746688

Kim's belly looks bigger than Trump's, but I'm sure they could both have some good bonding over some food.
---

And to think, all that proclaimed "success" and half the country still hates his guts.
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

southcoast09 posted...

Uhhh no. That is literally what you WANT to believe. This is completely insane, as a matter of fact. Biden OR comerade bernie would easily lose to him, and so would Harris.

I dunno about Bernie losing tbh.

Biden I'm not so confident in for similar reasons to Clinton, but Bernie I think would have a legit chance assuming he doesn't die.

I think Bernie kind of fizzled out. People started to realize that his entire platform was strictly idealistic and that he made promises without any knowledge of how or whether they would work.

Bernie had a large following, but it was extremely loud. The major factor that would do Bernie in is the fact that many of his supporters went to Trumps side after the DNC committed treason to secure the vote for Hillary. Trump has a lot of reluctant support and many people will vote for him without openly supporting him, whether for fear of social ostricization, being fired, or because they dislike his personality.

Bernie Sanders basically was the kid who ran for class president under the, no homework, free candy, two recesses, platform, knowing full well hed never win.

Even if Sanders built up the same amount of momentum he had in 2016, then it may indeed be close, but we arent going to abandon this real progress to try dismantling democracy just to see if it works (this time).
---

Gotta give credit to trump although I despise him as a man and even more so as a leader he has done something no other president has ever been able to do.

Looks like that Twitter beef from last year between the 2 of them was 5D chess boys.
---

southcoast09 posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

-Gavirulax- posted...

Eh...I don't see it as surefire.

If the democrats fuck up like they did last time and end up pumping out even more SJW and politically correct nonsense along with a terrible candidate, I would certainly say he's very likely). I still think he is better than Clinton, though I preferred Obama.

If the left doubles down and gets behind Kamala Harris I could see them losing the general to him, assuming Trump runs again, something I'm not entirely convinced will happen. Biden and especially Bernie would beat him, though age matters. And Gillibrand probably stands a good chance if she could avoid the Hillary pitfalls and real basic comparisons(having Soros come out against her recently will likely help her tremendously there).

We'll see, 2020 is still ages away in the present election climate. Plenty of shit could change

Uhhh no. That is literally what you WANT to believe. This is completely insane, as a matter of fact. Biden OR comerade bernie would easily lose to him, and so would Harris.

He is literally going to bring peace to Korea and win a nobel peace prize. He is a hero in Israel because he finally gave them what they wanted. Hes lowered taxes and we all have more money. Hes going to legalize marijuana.

Hes built SO much momentum that even the craziest and most idealistic liberal could never hope to beat him. The majority of the country supports President Trump and he keeps getting more and more support. This is ALL in less than two years time.

The globalist movement is finished. Notice how Kim is meeting with trump and not them? He doesnt want to be a globalist nations.

congrats, almost 100% of this is demonstrably false.
---

southcoast09 posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

-Gavirulax- posted...

Eh...I don't see it as surefire.

If the democrats fuck up like they did last time and end up pumping out even more SJW and politically correct nonsense along with a terrible candidate, I would certainly say he's very likely). I still think he is better than Clinton, though I preferred Obama.

If the left doubles down and gets behind Kamala Harris I could see them losing the general to him, assuming Trump runs again, something I'm not entirely convinced will happen. Biden and especially Bernie would beat him, though age matters. And Gillibrand probably stands a good chance if she could avoid the Hillary pitfalls and real basic comparisons(having Soros come out against her recently will likely help her tremendously there).

We'll see, 2020 is still ages away in the present election climate. Plenty of shit could change

Uhhh no. That is literally what you WANT to believe. This is completely insane, as a matter of fact. Biden OR comerade bernie would easily lose to him, and so would Harris.

He is literally going to bring peace to Korea and win a nobel peace prize. He is a hero in Israel because he finally gave them what they wanted. Hes lowered taxes and we all have more money. Hes going to legalize marijuana.

Hes built SO much momentum that even the craziest and most idealistic liberal could never hope to beat him. The majority of the country supports President Trump and he keeps getting more and more support. This is ALL in less than two years time.

The globalist movement is finished. Notice how Kim is meeting with trump and not them? He doesnt want to be a globalist nations.

Holy shit, how high are you right now?
---

So, andel, you dislike what I said, but youre not capable of intelligently refuting it??
---

southcoast09 posted...

So, andel, you dislike what I said, but youre not capable of intelligently refuting it??

you claimed the majority of the country supports trump, that is a lie. his approval is in the toilet. the entire post was nothing but blatant lies anyway lol if you want to be taken seriously you should probably try and substantiate your claims tbh
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

southcoast09 posted...

Its a pretty safe thing to say that President Trump has already won the re election.

Eh...I don't see it as surefire.

If the democrats fuck up like they did last time and end up pumping out even more SJW and politically correct nonsense along with a terrible candidate, I would certainly say he's very likely). I still think he is better than Clinton, though I preferred Obama.

They currently don't have much of a platform and are doing a lot of in-fighting. "Impeach Trump" and/or "Anything anti-Trump" is their only well known platform at the moment. I honestly have no idea where they stand and either do many level-headed Democrats. The blue wave is also starting to diminish, but I wouldn't make a solid bet on it at this point.

Another Democrat woman will not win. Another minority male Democrat will likely not win as well; Obama's charisma is hard to replicate---I will admit that is one thing he was good at.

As much as people think American voters absolutely hate Trump, it's simply not true and his approval has been on the rise for months. Next year when people are receiving their refunds they will realize it's because of Trump---standard deduction doubled---child tax credit doubled--- the latter will help poor(er) families out immensely.

People may not like his tweets. People may not like his brashness. But I believe people know they are in a better place and things are starting to change.
---

0AbsoluteZero0 posted...

Lmao, @southcoast09 do you really believe that Trump will legalize weed when all weve heard from the AGs office is doubling-down on anti-pot rhetoric?

Hes openly called sessions a punk (basically) and has stated we are going ahead with it. Think about this strategically. If he DOESNT do it, then a liberal challenger in the next election could very well run on that platform and use it as a deciding factor in a victory.

Legal marijuana will be in all 50 states before the next presidential election.
---

Hopefully the Democrats can run a competent campaign and not be blinded by their confidence.

I swear if they trot someone like John Kerry out there, I am going to lose it
---

Capn Circus posted...

They currently don't have much of a platform and are doing a lot of in-fighting. "Impeach Trump" and/or "Anything anti-Trump" is their only well known platform at the moment

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-october-surprise-midterms-hint-it-has-do-health-care-n881591
---

TheUsualSuspect posted...

Capn Circus posted...

They currently don't have much of a platform and are doing a lot of in-fighting. "Impeach Trump" and/or "Anything anti-Trump" is their only well known platform at the moment

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-october-surprise-midterms-hint-it-has-do-health-care-n881591

Dude, the democrats fucked up the healthcare system that already worked. You think ANYONE wants them messing with it again? Thats a perfect example of what happens when you ease socialism and globalism into a nation with democracy: *some* people pay $1 for all medical transactions, but if you actually work and buy insurance, then you wind up having to pay $30,000 for an X-ray and a bandaid. Youre paying for the other people who pay $1. The government doesnt pay for that; we do.
---

southcoast09 posted...

the healthcare system that already worked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lfiTebewnc" data-time="
---

It's also important to point out that mainstream media talking heads and others predicted absolute disaster if Trump was elected---The stock market would crash---wars would start---Trump can't be trusted with nuclear codes, etc. etc.

It's quite clear that is not the case, and, in fact, far from it.
---

southcoast09 posted...

0AbsoluteZero0 posted...

Lmao, @southcoast09 do you really believe that Trump will legalize weed when all weve heard from the AGs office is doubling-down on anti-pot rhetoric?

Hes openly called sessions a punk (basically) and has stated we are going ahead with it. Think about this strategically. If he DOESNT do it, then a liberal challenger in the next election could very well run on that platform and use it as a deciding factor in a victory.

Legal marijuana will be in all 50 states before the next presidential election.

I hope youre right, I could definitely get behind Trump leading pot legalization. Lord knows its long overdue.

However, I dont see it going over well with many of the Republican partys constituents, not to mention the deep-pocketed alcohol, pharmaceutical and private prison lobbyists and donors. Well see
---

Friends don't let friends associate with Hannity.
---

The only people who really oppose marijuana are the boomers, and half of them smoke it anyway. Simply put, there must be hundreds of millions (if not billions) of untaxed dollars in circulation that our nation could put into our economy. Half of the anti police sentiment comes from them arresting people and putting them in the criminal court system over marijuana.

They need federal mandates that make it a crime for any facility to include it on a drug panel. Basically, it should be a federal crime to fire an employee for having marijuana in his or her system. So many more Americans would begin to apply themselves more if they hadnt hit a glass ceiling that society placed there.

Theres only one reason that its ever been illegal and we all know what it is. The pharmaceutical industry knows it would destroy them, so they donate hundreds of millions of dollars to every presidential candidate. They all take it, every time, except for Donald Trump.

If we ever do federally end persecution against Cannabis users, it WILL be under Trumps administration. Of course, him not taking their money may have set a precedent for future elections. Youre not a transparent candidate if you owe massive corporations favors.
---

*clicks topic*
*Sees marijuana debate*
*Topic List*

CiIantro posted...

*clicks topic*
*Sees marijuana debate*
*Topic List*

*clicks topic*
*sees its not an anti Trump circlejerk*
*makes a post*
---

Everybody is saying Kim wants recognition and this is a publicity stunt, which is probably at least somewhat true, but shouldn't North Korea be acknowledged equally? Like it or not, it's a sovereign nation with nuclear weapons. Look at how much of an impact their little, secluded country has had on the planet. Fair.
---