Current Events > So north korea are not going to give up their nukes

Topic List	Page List: 1
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:04:57 PM #1:	https://twitter.com/AP/status/996579621595475973 BREAKING: North Korea official says country has no interest in summit with US if it's based on 'one-sided' demands to give up nuclear weapons https://twitter.com/joshjonsmith/status/996576704054181888 BREAKING: KCNA says North Korea will "reconsider" summit with Trump if U.S. insists on it giving up nuclear program, says it will never give up its nuclear program in exchange for economic trade with the United States now watch the same republicans who bragged about how Trump would receive a nobel peace prize go back to talking about how Trump should nuke nk. you know. their original stance. --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901417165] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/AP/status/996579621595475973 BREAKING: North Korea official says country has no interest in summit with US if it's based on 'one-sided' demands to give up nuclear weapons https://twitter.com/joshjonsmith/status/996576704054181888 BREAKING: KCNA says North Korea will "reconsider" summit with Trump if U.S. insists on it giving up nuclear program, says it will never give up its nuclear program in exchange for economic trade with the United States now watch the same republicans who bragged about how Trump would receive a nobel peace prize go back to talking about how Trump should nuke nk. you know. their original stance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 05/15/18 11:06:44 PM #2:	lol obviously they wouldn't lose the nukes <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:901417268] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>lol obviously they wouldn't lose the nukes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 05/15/18 11:06:53 PM #3:	This is basically what was going to happen from the start. Trolling is really the only thing NK does. --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. http://i.imgtc.com/tHc3mIo.png http://i.imgtc.com/PYxw8Lm.png <cite>Irony posted [p:901417278] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>This is basically what was going to happen from the start. Trolling is really the only thing NK does.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 05/15/18 11:07:04 PM #4:	They're looney. We got some prisoners back. They'll reconsider --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:901417286] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>They're looney. We got some prisoners back. They'll reconsider</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
008Zulu 05/15/18 11:08:02 PM #5:	It's good Trump isn't getting the Peace prize, he is tired of winning. This will be a reief to him. --- Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer. <cite>008Zulu posted [p:901417339] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>It's good Trump isn't getting the Peace prize, he is tired of winning. This will be a reief to him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Garioshi 05/15/18 11:09:35 PM #6:	Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway. --- <cite>Garioshi posted [p:901417418] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#7	Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
Antifar 05/15/18 11:12:01 PM #8:	Garioshi posted... Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway. That's correct --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:901417536] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Garioshi posted...</cite> <quote>Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway.</quote> That's correct</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:13:58 PM #9:	Antifar posted... Garioshi posted... Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway. That's correct I'm still split on this. Relatively speaking the gap in power between NK and the US was at its peak in the 90s. Clinton chose not to attack because of potential casualties in SK. The USSR was dead by that point. Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s? --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901417639] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Garioshi posted...</cite> <quote>Of course not. Kim Jong-Un saw what happened to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. They gave up their weapons and the US toppled them anyway.</quote> That's correct</quote> I'm still split on this. Relatively speaking the gap in power between NK and the US was at its peak in the 90s. Clinton chose not to attack because of potential casualties in SK. The USSR was dead by that point. Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 05/15/18 11:15:14 PM #10:	Kim really upped his trolling game this time, to be fair. I actually thought there was like a 5% chance that this time could be different. Normally it's a big fat zero. So I don't blame some people for falling for it this time. --- BKSheikah owned me so thoroughly in the 2017 guru contest, I'd swear he used the Lens of Truth to pick his bracket. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:901417706] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>Kim really upped his trolling game this time, to be fair. I actually thought there was like a 5% chance that this time could be different. Normally it's a big fat zero. So I don't blame some people for falling for it this time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:15:57 PM #11:	Polycosm posted... Kim really upped his trolling game this time, to be fair. I actually thought there was like a 5% chance that this time could be different. Normally it's a big fat zero. So I don't blame some people for falling for it this time. i think he might have overplayed it this time --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901417738] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Polycosm posted...</cite> <quote>Kim really upped his trolling game this time, to be fair. I actually thought there was like a 5% chance that this time could be different. Normally it's a big fat zero. So I don't blame some people for falling for it this time.</quote> i think he might have overplayed it this time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Minute 05/15/18 11:16:17 PM #12:	foreveraIone posted... Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s? Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo. --- Ryzen 7 1800x \|\| MSI X370 Gaming Carbon Pro \|\| Cooler Master Masterbox Pro 5 G.Skill Trident Z 16GB 3200MHz C14 \|\| GIGABYTE GTX 1060 6GB \|\| Kraken x62 <cite>Minute posted [p:901417757] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>foreveraIone posted...</cite> <quote>Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s?</quote> Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:17:08 PM #13:	Minute posted... foreveraIone posted... Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s? Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo. I'm sorry. if they didn't have a nuclear program. --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901417799] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Minute posted...</cite> <quote><cite>foreveraIone posted...</cite> <quote>Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s?</quote> Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo.</quote> I'm sorry. if they didn't have a nuclear program.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#14	Post #14 was unavailable or deleted.
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:19:31 PM #15:	Cpt_Pineapple posted... so much winning! Trump supporters don't care. When Trump launches a war and Tokyo and Seoul are a crater the same trumpists will act like Trump was justified. Do you know how I know? because these same people also favored war with NK from the beginning. --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901417919] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cpt_Pineapple posted...</cite> <quote>so much winning!</quote> Trump supporters don't care. When Trump launches a war and Tokyo and Seoul are a crater the same trumpists will act like Trump was justified. Do you know how I know? because these same people also favored war with NK from the beginning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 05/15/18 11:19:39 PM #16:	Minute posted... foreveraIone posted... Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s? Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo. And the national security advisor is John "Preemptive Strikes" Bolton --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:901417929] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>Minute posted...</cite> <quote><cite>foreveraIone posted...</cite> <quote>Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s?</quote> Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo.</quote> And the national security advisor is John "Preemptive Strikes" Bolton</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 05/15/18 11:20:58 PM #17:	UnholyMudcrab posted... Minute posted... foreveraIone posted... Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s? Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo. And John "wipe out the browns" Bolton ftfy --- https://imgur.com/aVTScxQ Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:901418001] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Minute posted...</cite> <quote><cite>foreveraIone posted...</cite> <quote>Why would the US ever attack NK if they didn't in the 90s?</quote> Because the American head of state is Cheeto Benito, and the secretary of state is Mike "Chickenhawk" Pompeo.</quote> And John "wipe out the browns" Bolton</quote> ftfy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chetmanly 05/15/18 11:21:46 PM #18:	nuke em --- Incel stands for involuntarily celibate, I believed the ancients called them creeps. ~Me <cite>chetmanly posted [p:901418048] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>nuke em</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlecSkorpio 05/15/18 11:22:06 PM #19:	At least we got prisoners back --- https://imgur.com/vQLlUd0 https://i.imgtc.com/tWy9NTL.png <cite>AlecSkorpio posted [p:901418058] in So north k... [t:76611485]...</cite> <quote>At least we got prisoners back</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > So north korea are not going to give up their nukes (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > So north korea are not going to give up their nukes