Board 8 > Millions of people are marching to take away your natural right of self defense

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
trdl23 03/24/18 10:31:21 PM #52:	This is relying entirely on the slippery-slope fallacy. Stop buying what the NRA is literally selling to keep their revenues up and recognize we have a fucking problem in our country. The Onion headline is, "''No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." Topics like this show that the Onion isn't even being satirical. People shit themselves because a bunch of kids don't want to get shot in their fucking classrooms because it's easier to get a weapon designed for nothing but killing than it is to get a car. Or at least to lower the damn odds. Other industrialized nations don't have this problem. They just don't. "Criminals will find a way to get guns anyway" doesn't mean we should just make it easy for them. And very rarely does the "good guy with a gun" pull anything off. "People will kill each other anyway?" That's like saying people will just run to work that's 10 miles away if we took away all cars. It's physically possible, and a few people will try, but removing the ease of use also deters a majority of people from actually doing it. There's a reason crime spikes in summer -- it's more inconvenient to do as much stupid shit when it's cold. Now, do I support a blanket ban on all guns? Fuck no. First, with how many guns are already out there, it's impossible. Also, the second amendment does exist (you've just forgotten the first half of it). Plus, guns have a lot of practical uses. Hunting, actual defense (handguns), and hell, shooting at a range is tons of fun. And I get that the term "assault weapon" is tough to define, even though I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 unless you need to cull the boar population in Texas and Louisiana. But is it really so hard to admit that maybe background checks should be universal without any gun-show loopholes, and a waiting period will help deter not just murder but also suicide? Is your high horse worth all the subsequent blood on your hands? Not to mention that almost all illegal guns that people like to cite as a reason "gun control will never work" were, at one point, legal guns. It isn't like Smith and Wesson sort their manufacturing lots into "legal" and "illegal." We're awash in illegal guns because it's so damn easy to acquire them legally. We need to stem the tide. This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it. --- E come vivo? Vivo! <cite>trdl23 posted [p:898436502] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote>This is relying entirely on the slippery-slope fallacy. Stop buying what the NRA is literally selling to keep their revenues up and recognize we have a fucking problem in our country. The Onion headline is, "''No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." Topics like this show that the Onion isn't even being satirical. People shit themselves because a bunch of kids don't want to get shot in their fucking classrooms because it's easier to get a weapon designed for nothing but killing than it is to get a car. Or at least to lower the damn odds. Other industrialized nations don't have this problem. They just don't. "Criminals will find a way to get guns anyway" doesn't mean we should just make it easy for them. And very rarely does the "good guy with a gun" pull anything off. "People will kill each other anyway?" That's like saying people will just run to work that's 10 miles away if we took away all cars. It's physically possible, and a few people will try, but removing the ease of use also deters a majority of people from actually doing it. There's a reason crime spikes in summer -- it's more inconvenient to do as much stupid shit when it's cold. Now, do I support a blanket ban on all guns? Fuck no. First, with how many guns are already out there, it's impossible. Also, the second amendment does exist (you've just forgotten the first half of it). Plus, guns have a lot of practical uses. Hunting, actual defense (handguns), and hell, shooting at a range is tons of fun. And I get that the term "assault weapon" is tough to define, even though I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 unless you need to cull the boar population in Texas and Louisiana. But is it really so hard to admit that maybe background checks should be universal without any gun-show loopholes, and a waiting period will help deter not just murder but also suicide? Is your high horse worth all the subsequent blood on your hands? Not to mention that almost all illegal guns that people like to cite as a reason "gun control will never work" were, at one point, legal guns. It isn't like Smith and Wesson sort their manufacturing lots into "legal" and "illegal." We're awash in illegal guns because it's so damn easy to acquire them legally. We need to stem the tide. This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CelesMyUserName 03/24/18 10:31:41 PM #53:	it's objectively a good name --- http://i.imgur.com/U7qSWmn.jpg something something hung something horse something <cite>CelesMyUserName posted [p:898436522] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote>it's objectively a good name</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Johnbobb 03/24/18 10:32:11 PM #54:	UInstinctGogeta posted... Jakyl25 posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... Humans are not animals. Thats kind of the point. This topic is making me wish we taught more philosophy in high school. I'd be okay with federally funding those programs as a matter of national security. Humans are in fact animals. This topic is making me wish we taught more biology in high school Thats a no chief. Modern humans (Homo sapiens, ssp. Homo sapiens sapiens) are the only extant members of the subtribe Hominina, a branch of the tribe Hominini belonging to the family of great apes. They are characterized by erect posture and bipedal locomotion; high manual dexterity and heavy tool use compared to other animals; open-ended and complex language use compared to other animal communications; and a general trend toward larger, more complex brains and societies --- Khal Kirby, warlord of the Super Star Khalasar PSN/Steam: CheddarBBQ https://goo.gl/Diw2hs <cite>Johnbobb posted [p:898436555] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>UInstinctGogeta posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>Humans are not animals. Thats kind of the point. This topic is making me wish we taught more philosophy in high school. I'd be okay with federally funding those programs as a matter of national security.</quote> Humans are in fact animals. This topic is making me wish we taught more biology in high school</quote> Thats a no chief.</quote> Modern humans (Homo sapiens, ssp. Homo sapiens sapiens) are the only extant members of the subtribe Hominina, a branch of the tribe Hominini belonging to the family of great apes. They are characterized by erect posture and bipedal locomotion; high manual dexterity and heavy tool use compared to other animals; open-ended and complex language use compared to other animal communications; and a general trend toward larger, more complex brains and societies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmartMuffin 03/24/18 10:33:27 PM #55:	I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it. Come and take it, man. --- SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://i.imgur.com/W66HUUy.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/ <cite>SmartMuffin posted [p:898436624] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><quote>I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 </quote> http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg <quote>This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it.</quote> Come and take it, man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UInstinctGogeta 03/24/18 10:35:17 PM #56:	trdl23 posted... This is relying entirely on the slippery-slope fallacy. Stop buying what the NRA is literally selling to keep their revenues up and recognize we have a fucking problem in our country. The Onion headline is, "''No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." Topics like this show that the Onion isn't even being satirical. People shit themselves because a bunch of kids don't want to get shot in their fucking classrooms because it's easier to get a weapon designed for nothing but killing than it is to get a car. Or at least to lower the damn odds. Other industrialized nations don't have this problem. They just don't. "Criminals will find a way to get guns anyway" doesn't mean we should just make it easy for them. And very rarely does the "good guy with a gun" pull anything off. "People will kill each other anyway?" That's like saying people will just run to work that's 10 miles away if we took away all cars. It's physically possible, and a few people will try, but removing the ease of use also deters a majority of people from actually doing it. There's a reason crime spikes in summer -- it's more inconvenient to do as much stupid shit when it's cold. Now, do I support a blanket ban on all guns? Fuck no. First, with how many guns are already out there, it's impossible. Also, the second amendment does exist (you've just forgotten the first half of it). Plus, guns have a lot of practical uses. Hunting, actual defense (handguns), and hell, shooting at a range is tons of fun. And I get that the term "assault weapon" is tough to define, even though I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 unless you need to cull the boar population in Texas and Louisiana. But is it really so hard to admit that maybe background checks should be universal without any gun-show loopholes, and a waiting period will help deter not just murder but also suicide? Is your high horse worth all the subsequent blood on your hands? Not to mention that almost all illegal guns that people like to cite as a reason "gun control will never work" were, at one point, legal guns. It isn't like Smith and Wesson sort their manufacturing lots into "legal" and "illegal." We're awash in illegal guns because it's so damn easy to acquire them legally. We need to stem the tide. This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it. While your hate for America is admirable.... I would point out that good guys with guns actually stop many many crimes.... it just doesn't make national news because it doesn't fit the MSM's agenda. Arm ALL teachers. That's the way to stop it. Has been for a decade. Anyone against it is complicit in every shooting. <cite>UInstinctGogeta posted [p:898436731] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>trdl23 posted...</cite> <quote>This is relying entirely on the slippery-slope fallacy. Stop buying what the NRA is literally selling to keep their revenues up and recognize we have a fucking problem in our country. The Onion headline is, "''No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." Topics like this show that the Onion isn't even being satirical. People shit themselves because a bunch of kids don't want to get shot in their fucking classrooms because it's easier to get a weapon designed for nothing but killing than it is to get a car. Or at least to lower the damn odds. Other industrialized nations don't have this problem. They just don't. "Criminals will find a way to get guns anyway" doesn't mean we should just make it easy for them. And very rarely does the "good guy with a gun" pull anything off. "People will kill each other anyway?" That's like saying people will just run to work that's 10 miles away if we took away all cars. It's physically possible, and a few people will try, but removing the ease of use also deters a majority of people from actually doing it. There's a reason crime spikes in summer -- it's more inconvenient to do as much stupid shit when it's cold. Now, do I support a blanket ban on all guns? Fuck no. First, with how many guns are already out there, it's impossible. Also, the second amendment does exist (you've just forgotten the first half of it). Plus, guns have a lot of practical uses. Hunting, actual defense (handguns), and hell, shooting at a range is tons of fun. And I get that the term "assault weapon" is tough to define, even though I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 unless you need to cull the boar population in Texas and Louisiana. But is it really so hard to admit that maybe background checks should be universal without any gun-show loopholes, and a waiting period will help deter not just murder but also suicide? Is your high horse worth all the subsequent blood on your hands? Not to mention that almost all illegal guns that people like to cite as a reason "gun control will never work" were, at one point, legal guns. It isn't like Smith and Wesson sort their manufacturing lots into "legal" and "illegal." We're awash in illegal guns because it's so damn easy to acquire them legally. We need to stem the tide. This is where it starts. Man the fuck up about it.</quote> While your hate for America is admirable.... I would point out that good guys with guns actually stop many many crimes.... it just doesn't make national news because it doesn't fit the MSM's agenda. Arm ALL teachers. That's the way to stop it. Has been for a decade. Anyone against it is complicit in every shooting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UInstinctGogeta 03/24/18 10:36:30 PM #57:	Johnbobb posted... UInstinctGogeta posted... Jakyl25 posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... Humans are not animals. Thats kind of the point. This topic is making me wish we taught more philosophy in high school. I'd be okay with federally funding those programs as a matter of national security. Humans are in fact animals. This topic is making me wish we taught more biology in high school Thats a no chief. Modern humans (Homo sapiens, ssp. Homo sapiens sapiens) are the only extant members of the subtribe Hominina, a branch of the tribe Hominini belonging to the family of great apes. They are characterized by erect posture and bipedal locomotion; high manual dexterity and heavy tool use compared to other animals; open-ended and complex language use compared to other animal communications; and a general trend toward larger, more complex brains and societies Again, no. You want to be an ape have at it. <cite>UInstinctGogeta posted [p:898436804] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Johnbobb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UInstinctGogeta posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>Humans are not animals. Thats kind of the point. This topic is making me wish we taught more philosophy in high school. I'd be okay with federally funding those programs as a matter of national security.</quote> Humans are in fact animals. This topic is making me wish we taught more biology in high school</quote> Thats a no chief.</quote> Modern humans (Homo sapiens, ssp. Homo sapiens sapiens) are the only extant members of the subtribe Hominina, a branch of the tribe Hominini belonging to the family of great apes. They are characterized by erect posture and bipedal locomotion; high manual dexterity and heavy tool use compared to other animals; open-ended and complex language use compared to other animal communications; and a general trend toward larger, more complex brains and societies</quote> Again, no. You want to be an ape have at it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
trdl23 03/24/18 10:37:03 PM #58:	SmartMuffin posted... http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg I get the historical aspect of it. We are a country founded on armed revolution, the only really successful one in the world. That was 240 years ago. Slavery was legal then, too. Let's reevaluate how reality looks. Can someone really be so delusional that, in the case of the US becoming Hitler's Germany, small arms are going to do shit to air strikes, drones, and tanks? People need to get over themselves and realize Rambo movies are fiction. --- E come vivo? Vivo! <cite>trdl23 posted [p:898436837] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>SmartMuffin posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg </quote> I get the historical aspect of it. We are a country founded on armed revolution, the only really successful one in the world. That was 240 years ago. Slavery was legal then, too. Let's reevaluate how reality looks. Can someone really be so delusional that, in the case of the US becoming Hitler's Germany, small arms are going to do shit to air strikes, drones, and tanks? People need to get over themselves and realize Rambo movies are fiction.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmartMuffin 03/24/18 10:38:23 PM #59:	Can someone really be so delusional that, in the case of the US becoming Hitler's Germany, small arms are going to do shit to air strikes, drones, and tanks? It worked in Vietnam. How are Iraq and Afghanistan going, again. A bunch of goat farmers hiding in caves in the poorest countries on Earth with nothing more than small arms can hold the US military to a stalemate. You think you're going to forcibly pacify Texas? --- SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://i.imgur.com/W66HUUy.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/ <cite>SmartMuffin posted [p:898436918] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><quote>Can someone really be so delusional that, in the case of the US becoming Hitler's Germany, small arms are going to do shit to air strikes, drones, and tanks?</quote> It worked in Vietnam. How are Iraq and Afghanistan going, again. A bunch of goat farmers hiding in caves in the poorest countries on Earth with nothing more than small arms can hold the US military to a stalemate. You think you're going to forcibly pacify Texas?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nelson_Mandela 03/24/18 10:40:40 PM #60:	Jakyl25 posted... Seph, what level of gun control in addition to current laws do you support? Wheres the line where, if Republicans crosses it in reaction to the protests, youd stay home? Restrictions based on violent behavior (with due process), banning methods to turn semiautomatic weapons into automatics are fine. Enforce the current laws. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:898437053] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Seph, what level of gun control in addition to current laws do you support? Wheres the line where, if Republicans crosses it in reaction to the protests, youd stay home?</quote> Restrictions based on violent behavior (with due process), banning methods to turn semiautomatic weapons into automatics are fine. Enforce the current laws.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 03/24/18 10:42:26 PM #61:	Nelson_Mandela posted... Jakyl25 posted... Seph, what level of gun control in addition to current laws do you support? Wheres the line where, if Republicans crosses it in reaction to the protests, youd stay home? Restrictions based on violent behavior (with due process), banning methods to turn semiautomatic weapons into automatics are fine. Enforce the current laws. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:898437153] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Seph, what level of gun control in addition to current laws do you support? Wheres the line where, if Republicans crosses it in reaction to the protests, youd stay home?</quote> Restrictions based on violent behavior (with due process), banning methods to turn semiautomatic weapons into automatics are fine. Enforce the current laws.</quote> SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nelson_Mandela 03/24/18 10:43:09 PM #62:	The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:898437196] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote>The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
trdl23 03/24/18 10:44:20 PM #63:	UInstinctGogeta posted... While your hate for America is admirable.... I would point out that good guys with guns actually stop many many crimes.... it just doesn't make national news because it doesn't fit the MSM's agenda. Stop acting like you have a monopoly on patriotism. I love my damn country. I love our ideals. I love what we can be. I love that my Chinese friend wants to find a way, any way, to become American through hard work and dedication. My grandmother and her sisters were in an orphanage during the depression. One to two generations later, we have multiple millionaires, research scientists, and doctors in the family. Nowhere else would that be possible. And that's why I would like to see less of my countrymen die from preventable violence within our country. You may question my methods, but don't you EVER question my intentions. UInstinctGogeta posted... Arm ALL teachers. That's the way to stop it. Has been for a decade. Anyone against it is complicit in every shooting. Right, take away funding for schools, but put a bunch of guns around hundreds of hormonal teenagers and a lot of overworked, overstressed, underpaid teachers who might absentmindedly leave it somewhere? Even if you prevent a mass shooting, how many smaller shootings will replace it? How could it easily cause a mass shooting to occur more easily? Even cops have tough aim in stressful situations, and they're literally trained for it; you expect a teacher to have the same amount of discipline when there's also tons of potential collateral damage if they miss? Please, analyze a solution before just asserting it. Keep your pistol money and use it so kids don't have to share textbooks in class and not bring them home to study. --- E come vivo? Vivo! <cite>trdl23 posted [p:898437249] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>UInstinctGogeta posted...</cite> <quote>While your hate for America is admirable.... I would point out that good guys with guns actually stop many many crimes.... it just doesn't make national news because it doesn't fit the MSM's agenda. </quote> Stop acting like you have a monopoly on patriotism. I love my damn country. I love our ideals. I love what we can be. I love that my Chinese friend wants to find a way, any way, to become American through hard work and dedication. My grandmother and her sisters were in an orphanage during the depression. One to two generations later, we have multiple millionaires, research scientists, and doctors in the family. Nowhere else would that be possible. And that's why I would like to see less of my countrymen die from preventable violence within our country. You may question my methods, but don't you EVER question my intentions. <cite>UInstinctGogeta posted...</cite> <quote>Arm ALL teachers. That's the way to stop it. Has been for a decade. Anyone against it is complicit in every shooting. </quote> Right, take away funding for schools, but put a bunch of guns around hundreds of hormonal teenagers and a lot of overworked, overstressed, underpaid teachers who might absentmindedly leave it somewhere? Even if you prevent a mass shooting, how many smaller shootings will replace it? How could it easily cause a mass shooting to occur more easily? Even cops have tough aim in stressful situations, and they're literally trained for it; you expect a teacher to have the same amount of discipline when there's also tons of potential collateral damage if they miss? Please, analyze a solution before just asserting it. Keep your pistol money and use it so kids don't have to share textbooks in class and not bring them home to study.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 03/24/18 10:47:02 PM #64:	SmartMuffin posted... I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg . he said practical --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:898437384] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>SmartMuffin posted...</cite> <quote><quote>I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 </quote> http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg .</quote> he said practical</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
trdl23 03/24/18 10:47:17 PM #65:	Nelson_Mandela posted... The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted. Okay, even if I don't agree with this, I can understand where it's coming from. However, isn't it ironic that the same right that allows one to protect oneself is also the cause of the most immediate personal threat to oneself? And again, I agree that people saying "ban all gunz pls" are dumb and out of touch with reality. But let's make it so it's harder for a bad guy to get a gun. If the good guy wants a gun, he can probably afford to wait a couple days and get a background check, right? --- E come vivo? Vivo! <cite>trdl23 posted [p:898437391] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted.</quote> Okay, even if I don't agree with this, I can understand where it's coming from. However, isn't it ironic that the same right that allows one to protect oneself is also the cause of the most immediate personal threat to oneself? And again, I agree that people saying "ban all gunz pls" are dumb and out of touch with reality. But let's make it so it's harder for a bad guy to get a gun. If the good guy wants a gun, he can probably afford to wait a couple days and get a background check, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmartMuffin 03/24/18 10:48:53 PM #66:	If the good guy wants a gun, he can probably afford to wait a couple days and get a background check, right? How many mass shootings are carried out by people who had just purchased their gun and who would have failed a background check? --- SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://i.imgur.com/W66HUUy.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/ <cite>SmartMuffin posted [p:898437487] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><quote>If the good guy wants a gun, he can probably afford to wait a couple days and get a background check, right?</quote> How many mass shootings are carried out by people who had just purchased their gun and who would have failed a background check?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 03/24/18 10:50:11 PM #67:	Nelson_Mandela posted... The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted. obviously anthrax and wmds are silly, but why don't I have the agency to choose a machine gun? If I'm serious about protecting myself from the government I would want some serious firepower. --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:898437542] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>The second amendment isn't just to defend against tyranny. It's designed to give everyone the right of agency in their own defense, so we do not have to rely exclusively on government protection. That is a fundamental freedom people take for granted.</quote> obviously anthrax and wmds are silly, but why don't I have the agency to choose a machine gun? If I'm serious about protecting myself from the government I would want some serious firepower.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr Lasastryke 03/24/18 10:54:00 PM #68:	MoogleKupo141 posted... obviously anthrax and wmds are silly, but why don't I have the agency to choose a machine gun? he ignored this question earlier because there's no substance to anything he says --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:898437754] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>MoogleKupo141 posted...</cite> <quote>obviously anthrax and wmds are silly, but why don't I have the agency to choose a machine gun?</quote> he ignored this question earlier because there's no substance to anything he says</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LapisLazuli 03/24/18 10:54:31 PM #69:	Why give him the satisfaction of arguing then? --- "I think Cuphead should be higher." - Abby from Brooklyn <cite>LapisLazuli posted [p:898437778] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote>Why give him the satisfaction of arguing then?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr Lasastryke 03/24/18 10:57:39 PM #70:	LapisLazuli posted... Why give him the satisfaction of arguing then? it kills the time --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:898437959] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>LapisLazuli posted...</cite> <quote>Why give him the satisfaction of arguing then?</quote> it kills the time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeepsPraw 03/24/18 10:58:18 PM #71:	MoogleKupo141 posted... SmartMuffin posted... I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg . he said practical Modern day police forces literally use military tanks on civilians. An AR-15 probably isn't protection enough --- pepsi for tv-game <cite>DeepsPraw posted [p:898437994] in Millions o... [t:76449771]...</cite> <quote><cite>MoogleKupo141 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SmartMuffin posted...</cite> <quote><quote>I really don't see a practical use to an AR-15 </quote> http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1212/the-2nd-amendment-vik-battaile-moti-politics-1356751499.jpg .</quote> he said practical</quote> Modern day police forces literally use military tanks on civilians. An AR-15 probably isn't protection enough</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Board 8 > Millions of people are marching to take away your natural right of self defense (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Millions of people are marching to take away your natural right of self defense