Current Events > If you have 30 people in a room, there is a 100% chance of two of them sharing a

Topic List	Page List: 1
EpicMickeyDrew 03/14/18 10:57:22 PM #1:	birthday. Maths is crazy --- Just how, pray tell, does your dick "take life"? How could a dick take a life? - XciteMe <cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted [p:897823736] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 03/14/18 10:58:40 PM #2:	No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) --- http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAfJB3KYYDg <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:897823804] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_cajun88 03/14/18 10:58:50 PM #3:	Stay in school. --- http://i.imgur.com/OkvDFD3.jpg http://i.imgur.com/owvpCYR.jpg <cite>the_cajun88 posted [p:897823812] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>Stay in school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duwstai 03/14/18 11:50:42 PM #4:	EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. --- balls <cite>Duwstai posted [p:897826321] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CensorErik 03/14/18 11:51:55 PM #6:	Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. --- Kindness is never wasted. Friend Code: SW-5769-2111-0614 <cite>CensorErik posted [p:897826370] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/14/18 11:53:55 PM #7:	CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. What? @DarkTransient is correct. --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897826458] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> What? @DarkTransient is correct.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
clyde_frog 03/14/18 11:55:59 PM #8:	CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? There could be 366 people with all different birthdays in a room. The 367th person has to share one with another person. --- http://i.imgur.com/UFOAF.gif https://i.imgur.com/aPQ00PI.gif http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m71fpsIYJA1qf1116o1_500.jpg <cite>clyde_frog posted [p:897826548] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? There could be 366 people with all different birthdays in a room. The 367th person has to share one with another person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlephZero 03/14/18 11:57:07 PM #9:	i fucking love science --- "There is value in segregation." - qwertyman2002 01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010 <cite>AlephZero posted [p:897826604] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>i fucking love science</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CensorErik 03/14/18 11:57:23 PM #10:	clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. --- Kindness is never wasted. Friend Code: SW-5769-2111-0614 <cite>CensorErik posted [p:897826620] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
clyde_frog 03/14/18 11:58:46 PM #11:	CensorErik posted... clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. I edited my post. On a leap year there are 366 days, meaning 366 possible birthdays. --- http://i.imgur.com/UFOAF.gif https://i.imgur.com/aPQ00PI.gif http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m71fpsIYJA1qf1116o1_500.jpg <cite>clyde_frog posted [p:897826683] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> I edited my post. On a leap year there are 366 days, meaning 366 possible birthdays.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/14/18 11:58:50 PM #12:	CensorErik posted... clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. Depends on if you count Feb 29 as a separate day. I can see both answers being correct tbh. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:897826690] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> Depends on if you count Feb 29 as a separate day. I can see both answers being correct tbh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlabamaLove 03/14/18 11:58:52 PM #13:	CensorErik posted... clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. Nah 367 is right --- http://i.imgur.com/nAjIv.gif http://i.imgur.com/Gqlg3.gif <cite>AlabamaLove posted [p:897826693] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> Nah 367 is right</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/14/18 11:58:54 PM #14:	CensorErik posted... clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897826694] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70%</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Butterfiles 03/14/18 11:59:21 PM #15:	you need 365.999~ people --- http://www.last.fm/user/PigBun 56k warning <cite>Butterfiles posted [p:897826709] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>you need 365.999~ people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CensorErik 03/15/18 12:01:03 AM #16:	Ok. Leap year. Lol. Pile on guys. --- Kindness is never wasted. Friend Code: SW-5769-2111-0614 <cite>CensorErik posted [p:897826788] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>Ok. Leap year. Lol. Pile on guys.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CensorErik 03/15/18 12:02:07 AM #17:	LordFarquad1312 posted... CensorErik posted... clyde_frog posted... CensorErik posted... Duwstai posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... birthday. Maths is crazy DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) You both need to go back to school. This. Jfc guys. Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people? Yes. Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless. --- Kindness is never wasted. Friend Code: SW-5769-2111-0614 <cite>CensorErik posted [p:897826849] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clyde_frog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duwstai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote>birthday. Maths is crazy</quote> <cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> You both need to go back to school.</quote> This. Jfc guys.</quote> Why is the second poster wrong? Would it need to only be 366 people?</quote> Yes.</quote> Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70%</quote> Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#18	Post #18 was unavailable or deleted.
8-bit_Biceps 03/15/18 12:03:35 AM #19:	Usually the main quip here is that if you're in a room with 23 including yourself, there's over a 50% chance that any two people have the same birthday. <cite>8-bit_Biceps posted [p:897826945] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>Usually the main quip here is that if you're in a room with 23 including yourself, there's over a 50% chance that any two people have the same birthday.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/15/18 12:03:42 AM #20:	CensorErik posted... Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless. Yeah, I just wanted a number. --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897826955] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote>Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless.</quote> Yeah, I just wanted a number.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 03/15/18 12:04:44 AM #21:	DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:897826986] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/15/18 12:05:35 AM #22:	Dash_Harber posted... DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays. --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897827022] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 03/15/18 12:06:40 AM #23:	LordFarquad1312 posted... Dash_Harber posted... DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays. Wait, yes, you are right. My bad, misread the post. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:897827072] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays.</quote> Wait, yes, you are right. My bad, misread the post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 03/15/18 12:09:44 AM #24:	LordFarquad1312 posted... Dash_Harber posted... DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays. You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:897827230] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays.</quote> You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
8-bit_Biceps 03/15/18 12:10:45 AM #25:	"However, 99.9% probability is reached with just 70 people, and 50% probability with 23 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem <cite>8-bit_Biceps posted [p:897827271] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote>"However, 99.9% probability is reached with just 70 people, and 50% probability with 23 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/15/18 12:10:51 AM #26:	Unsugarized_Foo posted... LordFarquad1312 posted... Dash_Harber posted... DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays. You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh Then they share a birthday.... --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897827276] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays.</quote> You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh</quote> Then they share a birthday....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 03/15/18 12:11:45 AM #27:	LordFarquad1312 posted... Unsugarized_Foo posted... LordFarquad1312 posted... Dash_Harber posted... DarkTransient posted... No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.) That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group. Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays. You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh Then they share a birthday.... But do they? --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:897827321] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>No, there isn't. There's a very, VERY high chance, but not 100%. You need 367 people to have a 100% chance of that. (And that's assuming we only care about the day and month, not the year. If you care about the year too, it gets even trickier.)</quote> That's still not a 100% chance. You can't have a 100% chance with a random group.</quote> Literally no way 367 people can have different birthdays.</quote> You have two people born at the same moment on opposite coasts at 12am EST. Everyone argues, then the two decide to be time twins and leave a day open Duh</quote> Then they share a birthday....</quote> But do they?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/15/18 12:14:40 AM #28:	8-bit_Biceps posted... "However, 99.9% probability is reached with just 70 people, and 50% probability with 23 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem Just did the math, it checks out! :D --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897827475] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>8-bit_Biceps posted...</cite> <quote>"However, 99.9% probability is reached with just 70 people, and 50% probability with 23 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem</quote> Just did the math, it checks out! :D</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EpicMickeyDrew 03/15/18 12:20:00 AM #29:	CensorErik posted... Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless. Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though. --- Just how, pray tell, does your dick "take life"? How could a dick take a life? - XciteMe <cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted [p:897827744] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote>Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless.</quote> Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 03/15/18 12:24:56 AM #30:	EpicMickeyDrew posted... CensorErik posted... Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless. Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though. Yeah, 70% of the time, it happens 100% of the times >.> --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:897827989] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote>Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless.</quote> Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though.</quote> Yeah, 70% of the time, it happens 100% of the times >.></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CensorErik 03/15/18 12:31:29 AM #31:	LordFarquad1312 posted... EpicMickeyDrew posted... CensorErik posted... Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless. Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though. Yeah, 70% of the time, it happens 100% of the times >.> This sounds like a Maddenism. 95% of the game is half mental. Or, Usually the team with the most points wins. --- Kindness is never wasted. Friend Code: SW-5769-2111-0614 <cite>CensorErik posted [p:897828280] in If you hav... [t:76416768]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordFarquad1312 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EpicMickeyDrew posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote>Leap year. Also, I just did the math, and with 30 people, the probability of 2 people sharing a birthday is about 70% Ok, but 70 is not 100, so TC is still wrong regardless.</quote> Most of the time there is a 100% chance of them sharing though.</quote> Yeah, 70% of the time, it happens 100% of the times >.></quote> This sounds like a Maddenism. 95% of the game is half mental. Or, Usually the team with the most points wins.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > If you have 30 people in a room, there is a 100% chance of two of them sharing a (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > If you have 30 people in a room, there is a 100% chance of two of them sharing a