No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant
Nope. To you, humans are factually more important. It is not a scientific fact. ---
No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant
Nope. To you, humans are factually more important. It is not a scientific fact.
Now your talking about something unrelated to those other topics
You're wrong and thats really all there is to it. You're to sad to admit that though ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant
Nope. To you, humans are factually more important. It is not a scientific fact.
Now your talking about something unrelated to those other topics
You're wrong and thats really all there is to it. You're to sad to admit that though
No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant
Nope. To you, humans are factually more important. It is not a scientific fact.
This is why I think you'd like Singer.
Published in 1975, Animal Liberation[22] has been cited as a formative influence on leaders of the modern animal liberation movement.[23] The central argument of the book is an expansion of the utilitarian concept that "the greatest good of the greatest number" is the only measure of good or ethical behaviour, and Singer believes that there is no reason not to apply this principle to other animals, arguing that the boundary between human and "animal" is completely arbitrary. There are far more differences, for instance, between a great ape and an oyster, for example, than between a human and a great ape, and yet the former two are lumped together as "animals", whereas we are considered "human" in a way that supposedly differentiates us from all other "animals."
He popularised the term "speciesism", which had been coined by English writer Richard D. Ryder to describe the practice of privileging humans over other animals, and therefore argues in favour of the equal consideration of interests of all sentient beings.[24]
No. You don't get it lol. I don't care about humans. I AM a bit of a psychopath. My literal belief is that humans are no more important than other species, especially those we've endangered.
I completley understand that you're not right in the head. Thats obvious
That doesn't mean you're right about trophy hunting, the native americans, the defenition of murder or any of the other topics already mentioned
What you literally believe about these subjects is wrong from a factual standpoint, and what you think of humans is irrelevant
Nope. To you, humans are factually more important. It is not a scientific fact.
Now your talking about something unrelated to those other topics
You're wrong and thats really all there is to it. You're to sad to admit that though
No, I'm not wrong. You are.
Then post sources about one of the topics I mentioned earlier ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
That literally has nothing to do with my stance on getting 7 year olds to hunt. Nice try though.
So basically you're still incapable of posting a source for these "facts"?
lol
Well its a fact that all serial killers had to eat. Thus making us all serial killers
I mean its just bizzare that not one single person can back up any of these claims that are supposedly factual.
Wheres the source correlating teaching a kid to hunt to them becoming a psychopath?
Where's the source saying native american children were not excited with their first kill?
Where's the source saying trophy hunting is just shooting an animal and leaving the meat?
Where's the source saying you can "murder" an animal?
Where's the source stating that nine years old is too young to learn about hunting/gun safety?
I mean making up random things and screaming to justify them is the sign of someone who is mentally not all there.
Because they just make shit up to either troll or to be ignorant
Yea, I do get it. I know some of these responses have to be done for trolling reasons because they're literally too dumb to be taken seriously, but still. Dedicating you're time to do stuff like that shows you're atleast a little mentally unstable ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
Nothing there correlates hunting to becoming a psychopath. We both know comparing torturing animals to hunting was about some of the dumbest shit you could of said as they're not even on the same spectrum
So are you going to actually post some proof or keep sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming?
He says while American crime rates continue to skyrocket above every other developed country lmao. There really is no reasoning with your ignorance. You'll happily encourage violence and bloodshed at a young age even as your children are getting shot in their schools on the regular. There was just another shooting the other day. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/76233550 Absolutely disgusting.
Also, it's "could have" not "could of". Why isn't it surprising that you're unable to even get your native language right?
gnome from nome posted...
With your so called correlation with a hysterically provided source, handling guns and killing animals (we call it legal hunting btw), the stats per state listed does show it takes a stable mindset for hunting, and not a huge influx of psychopaths, as you try to state as fact
Yes it fucking does. You claimed you can't murder an animal. You're wrong.
See, just saying I'm wrong doesn't make it true.
The literal definition of murder is to kill a human. I can kill an animal, but not murder them
Feel free to prove me wrong, but try to do it by saying more than "NO"
No, it is not the definition. Human is not the defining factor.
So you are just going to go with "No" as an answer.
If you're not intellectually capable of backing up your claim then maybe your shouldn't make it?
Why? You're espousing your opinion as fact with no proof. Why should I not do the same?
....thats not an opinion
That is the literal definition of the word. Its a fact that what I'm saying is right. You can't just change the meaning of words to fit your narrative. Thats dumb ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
Yes it fucking does. You claimed you can't murder an animal. You're wrong.
See, just saying I'm wrong doesn't make it true.
The literal definition of murder is to kill a human. I can kill an animal, but not murder them
Feel free to prove me wrong, but try to do it by saying more than "NO"
No, it is not the definition. Human is not the defining factor.
So you are just going to go with "No" as an answer.
If you're not intellectually capable of backing up your claim then maybe your shouldn't make it?
Why? You're espousing your opinion as fact with no proof. Why should I not do the same?
....thats not an opinion
That is the literal definition of the word. Its a fact that what I'm saying is right. You can't just change the meaning of words to fit your narrative. Thats dumb
No, it's not. Drop the human part and you have a factual definition. ---
Yes it fucking does. You claimed you can't murder an animal. You're wrong.
See, just saying I'm wrong doesn't make it true.
The literal definition of murder is to kill a human. I can kill an animal, but not murder them
Feel free to prove me wrong, but try to do it by saying more than "NO"
No, it is not the definition. Human is not the defining factor.
So you are just going to go with "No" as an answer.
If you're not intellectually capable of backing up your claim then maybe your shouldn't make it?
Why? You're espousing your opinion as fact with no proof. Why should I not do the same?
....thats not an opinion
That is the literal definition of the word. Its a fact that what I'm saying is right. You can't just change the meaning of words to fit your narrative. Thats dumb
No, it's not. Drop the human part and you have a factual definition.
If you drop the human part then that isn't the definition anymore.
But since you're not going to try to prove anything to me and since I already factually proved that I was right on this topic I'm just going to assume I'm smarter that you're not fit for actual thought or discussion
Come back to me with some actual proof or try to provide sources from any of the other questions. Something I know you can't do, but still ---
Under a cold October sky, I wait I had ice cream with chill02!
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this video at all and it's depressing to have to defend liberal values in general when there are some fucking moronic liberals who do stupid shit like criticize this man's parenting skills or make such vicious attacks towards this man and his family that he actually had to disable comments on his page.
And my fellow liberals even here ITT actually attacked him for disabling comments when idiots we're threatening the lives of him and his family, let alone just being insanely inappropriate for something that was an incredibly positive event in his child's life. But its times like these that allow me to acknowledge my liberal perspective while still keeping an open mind and avoiding the pitfalls of tribalism.
But back on topic, anyone saying hunting is wrong or that its no different than murdering humans, or the worst one that there's no reason to think that humans are more important than animals, every single one of those people are dead wrong and shouldn't be taken seriously.
Lol trying to blame hunting for violent crimes or serial killers? C'mon guys... do you realize how difficult you make things for us rational liberals? Y'know, the ones that counteract your insanity so that we can avoid being discounted and ignored completely? Get your shit together!!! ---
Bitch you think you're rational? All you do here is fly into these long ass arguments that consist of an endless cycle of you putting your head up your ass and regurgitating it. Fuck all the way off you self righteous piece of shit. ---
I think what he means is that the term 'murder' is reserved for the unjustified killing of a human. The unjustified killing of an animal would be called something else.
But it's kind of silly to draw that distinction at this point.
Well he's wrong about the definition so he needs to shut up. ---
Bitch you think you're rational? All you do here is fly into these long ass arguments that consist of an endless cycle of you putting your head up your ass and regurgitating it. Fuck all the way off you self righteous piece of shit.
Yes I think I'm rational. Just look at my post being well thought out and logical and your hilariously immature hissy fit. You didn't even have an argument lmao. ---
I think what he means is that the term 'murder' is reserved for the unjustified killing of a human. The unjustified killing of an animal would be called something else.
But it's kind of silly to draw that distinction at this point.
Well he's wrong about the definition so he needs to shut up.
He actually isn't, but the distinction isn't really important at this point.
I think what he means is that the term 'murder' is reserved for the unjustified killing of a human. The unjustified killing of an animal would be called something else.
But it's kind of silly to draw that distinction at this point.
Well he's wrong about the definition so he needs to shut up.
He actually isn't, but the distinction isn't really important at this point.
I will not entertain that article's question. It is murder.
Gog, why are you being so abrasive right now?
I'm done arguing with evil people or tryimg to make them see the error of their ways through reason . My only goal now is their elimination from the planet. ---
