| Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
|---|---|
|
Squall28 12/31/17 1:19:22 PM #1: |
Person A: I think some more welfare programs will be good for the country.
Person B: Socialism is terrible. People who work less shouldn't be paid equal. --- If you're going through hell, keep going. -Winston Churchill ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
DK9292 12/31/17 1:20:26 PM #2: |
Strawman fallacy.
--- "If the heroes run and hide, who'll stay and fight?" ~Saitama ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Antifar 12/31/17 1:20:33 PM #3: |
Strawmanning
--- kin to all that throbs ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
ManSpread 12/31/17 1:20:54 PM #4: |
proudclading
--- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Nostradumbass 12/31/17 1:21:08 PM #5: |
Being on CE
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Axiom 12/31/17 1:21:48 PM #6: |
DK9292 posted...
Strawman fallacy. ManSpread posted... proudclading Nostradumbass posted... Being on CE All correct answers ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
COVxy 12/31/17 1:22:32 PM #7: |
That doesn't seem to be the most demonstrative example...
Anyway, arguing from the extreme isn't fallacious in and of itself, as it ensures people assert boundary conditions. The issue is when the exaggerated form seemingly replaces the core argument. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Nostradumbass 12/31/17 1:23:35 PM #8: |
COVxy posted...
That doesn't seem to be the most demonstrative example... which is always what happens. just look at any topic Admiral jumps into ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
|
Squall28 12/31/17 1:27:46 PM #9: |
COVxy posted...
That doesn't seem to be the most demonstrative example... Yeah I couldn't think of a good example off the top of my head. I wanted to say strawmanning, but I like your phrase better. Arguing from the extreme matches the mark more. --- If you're going through hell, keep going. -Winston Churchill ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
| Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
