Current Events > So Mal_Fet, he for real?

(+) Yeah! (+)

I know he's been here for a long time. I know I've seen his username around here for years. I don't remember how he used to be before around last year or so. I remember he used to make topics about his hair.

But what's going on with him? I can't tell if he's for real or not. With such increasing frequency, he's like...owning himself in debates. Like he'll argue something for half a topic, then get tripped up, then completely contradict what he was arguing before. He defends a lot of questionable stuff and he doesn't always read the links he posts. Oh, and he always thinks he's right and his posts smack of condescension even when he's arguing with professionals in their own field.

@Mal_Fet just out of respect. Don't want anyone to feel like people are talking about them behind their back.

Yeah he's for real. I think for the most part he tries to be logical and use facts, he's just extremely misguided and clearly has biases he'll let through when trying to argue his points. The issue is he doesn't realize his biased or that he's not always being so logic as he thinks he is and that can lead to him saying stupid shit.
---

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet
---

FrenchCrunch posted...

I remember he used to make topics about his hair.

What

FrenchCrunch posted...

But what's going on with him? I can't tell if he's for real or not. With such increasing frequency, he's like...owning himself in debates. Like he'll argue something for half a topic, then get tripped up, then completely contradict what he was arguing before.

Example?
---

Mal_Fet posted...

What

Yep, on your Sephiroth1288 account

Mal_Fet posted...

Example?

i really don't see a point at all man

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

---

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

FrenchCrunch posted...

Yep, on your Sephiroth1288 account

I repeat, what

FrenchCrunch posted...

i really don't see a point at all man

I think we figured out why you think I lose arguments. You don't care about evidence.
---

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

---

Mal_Fet posted...

I think we figured out why you think I lose arguments. You don't care about evidence.

alright man

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

FrenchCrunch posted...

But what's going on with him? I can't tell if he's for real or not. With such increasing frequency, he's like...owning himself in debates. Like he'll argue something for half a topic, then get tripped up, then completely contradict what he was arguing before.

Example?

Mal_Fet posted...

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.

Here you go
---

FrenchCrunch posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

What

Yep, on your Sephiroth1288 account

Mal_Fet posted...

Example?

i really don't see a point at all man

There isn't one. He's a "dig your heels in" kinda dude.

He's alright on anything that's not subjective or abstract. If it's either of those it's pathetic to watch.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.

---

literal_garbage posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.

https://imgur.com/a/RSsGf

And boom goes the dynamite
---

Spooking posted...

Mal_Fet is a good man with a good heart. That's all I know. Man of the Year for CE 2017? Who knows.

The best CEmen of 2017 contest already happened, it wasn't him.
---

Spooking posted...

Mal_Fet is a good man with a good heart. That's all I know. Man of the Year for CE 2017? Who knows.

We're well aware how big a fan you are.
---

best librarian on CE
---

Having seen him post for awhile..I think he is real but over-does it to play the "ha, im a good troll getting the liberals!" card...but the reality is he really believes the dumb shit he says to some extent.
---

I can only hope to be noteworthy enough on CE one day for people to make heartfelt threads expressing concern for my well being...
---

He defended Nazis. He's a gimmick
---

Spooking posted...

RockRapDubstep posted...

The best CEmen of 2017 contest already happened, it wasn't him.

We need a redo, me thinks. Was the original contest rigged?

I don't even think he got enough nominations in the week or two long nomination topic to get in to the bracket so he probably wouldn't have made it far if he did get in.
---

literal_garbage posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.

Thank you for proving that I didn't say what he said I said!
---

Mal_Fet posted...

FrenchCrunch posted...

Yep, on your Sephiroth1288 account

I repeat, what

FrenchCrunch posted...

i really don't see a point at all man

I think we figured out why you think I lose arguments. You don't care about evidence.

No, it's pointless because we all post here and we know how you are.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

I think we figured out why you think I lose arguments. You don't care about evidence.

Coming from you? HAHAHA

You gotta realize man that when EVERYONE says something is wrong with the way you post, it's not just us at that point.
---

Terra-enforcer posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

I think we figured out why you think I lose arguments. You don't care about evidence.

Coming from you? HAHAHA

You gotta realize man that when EVERYONE says something is wrong with the way you post, it's not just us at that point.

Nah, he's got Spooky, Bevan, Caution, Capn, and a few others who are so far up his ass he has no reason to realize the vast majority think he's a fool. He only needs a solid base of like 10 to be content with his "superiority".
---

lol, Mal takes pride in being the "Superior Leader" in a group consisting of Capn and Caution...that makes it that much sadder...
---

"I'm a Libertarian"

E: Also I liked one time he said I had been here 7 years longer than he had except he conveniently forgot his Sephiroth1288 account is older than mine.
---

TheVipaGTS posted...

lol, Mal takes pride in being the "Superior Leader" in a group consisting of Capn and Caution...that makes it that much sadder...

THIS!!!!!!!
---

Bishop9800 posted...

TheVipaGTS posted...

lol, Mal takes pride in being the "Superior Leader" in a group consisting of Capn and Caution...that makes it that much sadder...

THIS!!!!!!!

You guys need to seek some help
---

Mal_Fet posted...

literal_garbage posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Axiom posted...

davyheinz posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

"NATO didn't exist before 9/11" - Mal_Fet

"Nazis didn't care about the gays" - Mal_Fet

And fake news and fake news

First quote was up probably a grand total of 20 seconds before I realized I mistook NATO for something else and I deleted it

Second thing I never said.

Thank you for proving that I didn't say what he said I said!

It is true that his claim is not backed up by the picture and what you said does not fit the narrative of the claim, so you are right here. I am curious to know what you mistook NATO for and what caused that mental hiccup, if you remember. .However, You did type "Nazi's" with an apostrophe in an attempt to make Nazi plural.

I am curious though, in the girl scout hugging controversy topic, why were you responding only to single sentences of my posts instead of addressing their entire content, including when I was specifically pointing out that on some points, I agree with you? Additionally, at the end of the conversation, I outlined exactly which points we agreed upon and on which points we disagree, clarifying my opinion on the entire scope of the argument, addressing perspective of the child, the parent and the relatives. The post was called, by another user, "too reasonable for you to respond to" and sure enough, you neglected to respond. I'm curious as to why you would leave the conversation at that point, when I was giving you credit for the aspects of the subject on which we were in agreement, after appearing to be more interested in trying to call me out on cherry-picked things when the vast majority of the content of my posts outlined my own stances on the issue and in many instances were admissions of agreement, .which I must assume you just simply were not interested in acknowledging. Was it that you were interested only in painting me in a certain light and therefore could only respond to things I said that were consistent with me being paintable in said light?

Edit: .sorry, forgot I was on this account and on phone. I'm ImTheMacheteGuy (this is my main alt. The other account is warned). I do have this in my sig, but not my phone sig, so apologies if you read this whole thing but saw my username and thought "who the fuck is this guy?"
---

I can only assume Mal has that Orwell quote to seem fair in his opinions. God knows anyone who's spent more than 5 minutes talking with him can gather that he's against everything Orwell believed and would be mocked relentlessly by Orwell for all Mals pseudo-intellectual "arguments".
---

Mal_Fet posted...

You guys need to seek some help

Hello Kettle, this is Pot. You're black.
---

There's no way he's serious. If he is, he's a pretty awful human.
---

Mal "I scour the net for stories constantly to add to my multi-gig SJW folders but you're the one that needs help" Fet

Axiom posted...

Mal "I scour the net for stories constantly to add to my multi-gig SJW folders but you're the one that needs help" Fet

Yes, concocting some dramatic fiction that I'm somehow the leader of a cabal of right-wingers on a video game website is quite a bit more worrying than compiling lulzy screenshots for fun and humor.

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I am curious though, in the girl scout hugging controversy topic, why were you responding only to single sentences of my posts instead of addressing their entire content, including when I was specifically pointing out that on some points, I agree with you?

Obviously I was only responding to the parts I disagreed with. What's the problem?

FigureOfSpeech posted...

Additionally, at the end of the conversation, I outlined exactly which points we agreed upon and on which points we disagree, clarifying my opinion on the entire scope of the argument, addressing perspective of the child, the parent and the relatives. The post was called, by another user, "too reasonable for you to respond to" and sure enough, you neglected to respond. I'm curious as to why you would leave the conversation at that point, when I was giving you credit for the aspects of the subject on which we were in agreement, after appearing to be more interested in trying to call me out on cherry-picked things when the vast majority of the content of my posts outlined my own stances on the issue and in many instances were admissions of agreement, .which I must assume you just simply were not interested in acknowledging. Was it that you were interested only in painting me in a certain light and therefore could only respond to things I said that were consistent with me being paintable in said light?

Serious question: do you have OCD? Genuinely not asking in a derogatory way

Anyway, if I responded to people non-stop in all my topics, every single one would reach 500.

I have a topic now that broke 300 because people won't accept that a Tucker Carlson quote is technically true, and I masochistically continue explaining every which way why they're wrong.
---

:/

So TC, did you get a answer to your question?
---

(Mal OCD question with quote blocks gone because on phone)

OCD is defined as having compulsions based on obsessions, such as "having to operate in repetitious numbers, such as 5, due to a related numerical obsession, such as 'fell down 5 stairs' to compensate, as everyday situations are reminders."

The short answer is no, I do not suffer from that. I just have a superb memory. Others, including people who have worked with trump (see actress Marilu Henner, 2 time The Apprentice contestant) have memories so extraordinary that you could ask them what they wore or ate for dinner on a random day 15-20 years prior and they could answer. I can't do that. I filter out the mundane, but I save more than others do.

You were not expected to respond non-stop. When I was presenting what I presented, the topic was slowing down and I was actually at the time the only one actively engaging you. ,Everyone else was on the periphery. I too fail to reply at times, I must assume. I keep track of activity through my active posts, so much is lost in cracks, and I can't remember everything, but when something catches my eye, it is essentially photographed in my mind. I will either never forget the photograph or I will lose track of it only to be reminded the instant a relevant reference triggers it, which varies and in a way I don't fully understand.

Back to your initial question... I do not exhibit OCD behavior to my knowledge, and I have no diagnosis, as I haven't had cause to seek psychiatric/psychological evaluation. I do not take medications of any kind. I have not been referred to anyone. ,I do not have any obsessions and I do not tend to act out of compulsion, whether or not compulsion is present. At the same time, I am not medically/psychologically qualified to confirm on those grounds that I in fact do not have any form or any level of OCD, and if you suspect that I do have it, as you were respectful and polite in suggesting the notion, I am more than happy to continue the conversation, even publicly.
---

bump

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I am curious though, in the girl scout hugging controversy topic,

Ha! I remember that one. He lost his shit and claimed that children should be forced to hug their aunts and uncles even if they're uncomfortable with it, because "how else will they ever learn how to be affectionate?"
---

That_Happened posted...

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I am curious though, in the girl scout hugging controversy topic,

Ha! I remember that one. He lost his shit and claimed that children should be forced to hug their aunts and uncles even if they're uncomfortable with it, because "how else will they ever learn how to be affectionate?"

Also a lie. All I took issue with was their insistence that having your kid hug grandma sets them up to be on with sexual harrassment in the future.

Isn't it funny how the only problems anyone has with me are all just false claims made up by the leftist crowd?
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Also a lie. All I took issue with was their insistence that having your kid hug grandma sets them up to be on with sexual harrassment in the future.

you literally said that people are taught to hug their relatives because otherwise they grow up to be entitled and self-centered
---

Balrog0 posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Also a lie. All I took issue with was their insistence that having your kid hug grandma sets them up to be on with sexual harrassment in the future.

you literally said that people are taught to hug their relatives because otherwise they grow up to be entitled and self-centered

What you're talking about is an answer I have to someone's question. Multiple people asked what benefit there is to telling kids to hug their family. I said, naturally, to teach kids to be more social, which is a good thing of a kid is naturally shy.

What's the problem
---

Balrog0 posted...

you literally said that people are taught to hug their relatives because otherwise they grow up to be entitled and self-centered

Yup.

Mal_Fet posted...

Also a lie. All I took issue with was

What you took issue with was that it was a suggestion coming from a dirty liberal. That's usually the reason you lose your mind and start flipping out over the smallest things.
---