Current Events > the moon landings were hoaxed???

Topic List	Page List: 1
Vegy 11/18/17 6:35:07 PM #1:	https://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/stagehand-spotted-in-apollo-photo/ --- http://i.imgur.com/gt58G1y.gif http://i.imgur.com/Kdvuckz.png http://i.imgur.com/SYqReLE.gif <cite>Vegy posted [p:890643125] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>https://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/stagehand-spotted-in-apollo-photo/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fire810 11/18/17 6:35:37 PM #2:	nope --- "This weapon, I am." - Paul Atreides <cite>fire810 posted [p:890643152] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>nope</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrOnionHead 11/18/17 6:37:32 PM #3:	fire810 posted... nope --- 'being tolerant of someone doesn't instantly make them the chancellor of germany' - Fatso666 <cite>MrOnionHead posted [p:890643249] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>fire810 posted...</cite> <quote>nope</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vol2tex 11/18/17 6:37:33 PM #4:	It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go. --- https://imgtc.com/i/x4XUFSS.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/YFpt0kk.jpg <cite>Vol2tex posted [p:890643251] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sonicblack35 11/18/17 6:37:44 PM #5:	"While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing? --- "you're a worthless coward and a total f*** up and probably very unattractive" <cite>Sonicblack35 posted [p:890643264] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>"While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 11/18/17 6:39:53 PM #6:	Of course they were --- https://i.imgtc.com/hQ5SuG6.gif https://i.imgtc.com/QrhAq36.gif https://i.imgtc.com/Yjov9DU.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:890643349] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>Of course they were</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fire810 11/18/17 6:42:55 PM #7:	Vol2tex posted... It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go. how do these skeptic even rationalize a massive rocketship that had people on it and take off beyond the atmosphere. That was witnessed by entire nations. Is it really that hard to then believe that they accomplished their mission? There are people that think there's an invisible shield surrounding earth and it's impossible to cross it. --- "This weapon, I am." - Paul Atreides <cite>fire810 posted [p:890643503] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vol2tex posted...</cite> <quote>It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go.</quote> how do these skeptic even rationalize a massive rocketship that had people on it and take off beyond the atmosphere. That was witnessed by entire nations. Is it really that hard to then believe that they accomplished their mission? There are people that think there's an invisible shield surrounding earth and it's impossible to cross it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Doge 11/18/17 6:43:50 PM #8:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhp-FTYSGe8 --- Wow such signature join Dogefaqs today http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1341-dogefaqs <cite>The_Doge posted [p:890643566] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhp-FTYSGe8</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 11/18/17 6:45:08 PM #9:	Vol2tex posted... It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go. This. I also love that time when the obnoxious nerd was yelling in Buzz Aldrin's face about the moon landing being fake and was summarily punched in the face. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:890643634] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vol2tex posted...</cite> <quote>It would have been more impossible with 1960s technology to fake the moon landing than to actually go.</quote> This. I also love that time when the obnoxious nerd was yelling in Buzz Aldrin's face about the moon landing being fake and was summarily punched in the face.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 11/18/17 6:45:26 PM #10:	Sonicblack35 posted... "While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing? Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon. --- https://i.imgtc.com/hQ5SuG6.gif https://i.imgtc.com/QrhAq36.gif https://i.imgtc.com/Yjov9DU.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:890643654] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sonicblack35 posted...</cite> <quote>"While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing?</quote> Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
omega cookie 11/18/17 6:46:44 PM #11:	Anybody that thinks the moon landings were faked should be sterilized for the good of the human race. --- FFRK: BRKB - Eiko - Guardian Mog FFBE: 885,063,087 - Orlandeau - 931 ATK <cite>omega cookie posted [p:890643742] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>Anybody that thinks the moon landings were faked should be sterilized for the good of the human race.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 11/18/17 6:47:28 PM #12:	omega cookie posted... Anybody that thinks the moon landings were faked should be sterilized for the good of the human race. No one believed MK Ultra either --- https://i.imgtc.com/hQ5SuG6.gif https://i.imgtc.com/QrhAq36.gif https://i.imgtc.com/Yjov9DU.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:890643785] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>omega cookie posted...</cite> <quote>Anybody that thinks the moon landings were faked should be sterilized for the good of the human race.</quote> No one believed MK Ultra either</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sonicblack35 11/18/17 6:47:49 PM #13:	Bad_Mojo posted... Sonicblack35 posted... "While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing? Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon. Except it clearly looks like a spacesuit. It even has the black part where the visor would be. --- "you're a worthless coward and a total f*** up and probably very unattractive" <cite>Sonicblack35 posted [p:890643810] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bad_Mojo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sonicblack35 posted...</cite> <quote>"While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing?</quote> Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon.</quote> Except it clearly looks like a spacesuit. It even has the black part where the visor would be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fire810 11/18/17 6:47:58 PM #14:	Bad_Mojo posted... Sonicblack35 posted... "While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing? Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon. well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right. --- "This weapon, I am." - Paul Atreides <cite>fire810 posted [p:890643820] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bad_Mojo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sonicblack35 posted...</cite> <quote>"While the image is quite compelling, skeptics suggest that, beyond the 'person' being a product of light and shadow, that there is an even more obvious explanation: that it is simply another astronaut" Seriously, why is this even a thing?</quote> Although the blurry appearance of this 'mystery person' makes discerning features rather difficult, the conspiracy theorist who found the photo argues that the interloper is not wearing a spacesuit and, thus, the setting is not on the moon.</quote> well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 11/18/17 6:50:12 PM #15:	fire810 posted... well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right. That's a fair point. No way Kubrick would fuck up like that. So I guess that just confirms it wasn't Kubrick that shot it. So who did? --- https://i.imgtc.com/hQ5SuG6.gif https://i.imgtc.com/QrhAq36.gif https://i.imgtc.com/Yjov9DU.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:890643931] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>fire810 posted...</cite> <quote>well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right.</quote> That's a fair point. No way Kubrick would fuck up like that. So I guess that just confirms it wasn't Kubrick that shot it. So who did?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sonicblack35 11/18/17 6:51:08 PM #16:	Bad_Mojo posted... fire810 posted... well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right. That's a fair point. No way Kubrick would fuck up like that. So I guess that just confirms it wasn't Kubrick that shot it. So who did? Probably the astronauts --- "you're a worthless coward and a total f*** up and probably very unattractive" <cite>Sonicblack35 posted [p:890643987] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bad_Mojo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fire810 posted...</cite> <quote>well even film crews dress in period wear during filming so that when they are accidentally seen it wouldn't look weird. You'd think a super secret, government funded hoax to trick the planet would be at least have the basics of making a movie down right.</quote> That's a fair point. No way Kubrick would fuck up like that. So I guess that just confirms it wasn't Kubrick that shot it. So who did?</quote> Probably the astronauts</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathVelvien 11/18/17 6:53:41 PM #17:	I seriously wonder how someone can look at that reflection, see what is apparently a very ambiguous figure dressed in white with what could well be a visor over his/her face, and definitively conclude "this is not a person in a spacesuit." --- Under Night: Phonon/Orie/Enkidu/Waldstein \| BB Cross Tag Battle: Weiss/Waldstein Arizona Diamondbacks: 93-69 \| Arizona Cardinals: 4-5 <cite>DeathVelvien posted [p:890644120] in the moon l... [t:76006186]...</cite> <quote>I seriously wonder how someone can look at that reflection, see what is apparently a very ambiguous figure dressed in white with what could well be a visor over his/her face, and definitively conclude "this is not a person in a spacesuit."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > the moon landings were hoaxed??? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > the moon landings were hoaxed???