Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 143: Finally Exposing Rafael Cruz

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10
Corrik 10/27/17 11:23:17 AM #51:	lordloki12 posted... Corrik posted... Not_an_Owl posted... https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923730831637610496 Hey, I thought Trump was a master negotiator. Why did the government agree to this god-awful contract? Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Yeah 2 person company from the hometown of the interior secretary gets 300 million dollars to restore a country's energy grid and nobody is allowed to question the costs, the timetable to finish, or file a claim if the work is never finished. Totally standard stuff I'm sure. Only part i find troubling. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889248402] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>lordloki12 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Not_an_Owl posted...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923730831637610496 Hey, I thought Trump was a master negotiator. Why did the government agree to this god-awful contract?</quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Yeah 2 person company from the hometown of the interior secretary gets 300 million dollars to restore a country's energy grid and nobody is allowed to question the costs, the timetable to finish, or file a claim if the work is never finished. Totally standard stuff I'm sure.</quote> Only part i find troubling.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 10/27/17 11:33:54 AM #52:	Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish. Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system. Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway. --- GameFlux: Unofficial GameFAQs board browser <cite>Shaduln posted [p:889248997] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish.</quote> Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system.</quote> Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 11:58:28 AM #53:	Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish. Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system. Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway. Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it) --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889250401] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish.</quote> Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system.</quote> Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway.</quote> Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 10/27/17 12:01:44 PM #54:	Corrik posted... Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish. Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system. Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway. Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it) But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project. --- Posted using GameFlux <cite>Shaduln posted [p:889250581] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish.</quote> Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system.</quote> Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway.</quote> Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it)</quote> But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LapisLazuli 10/27/17 12:03:09 PM #55:	Did Corrik just claim somebody was lying about their job again? --- H E Y W A S S H I L E T S E N J O Y K A G A W A L I F E <cite>LapisLazuli posted [p:889250656] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Did Corrik just claim somebody was lying about their job again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 12:04:31 PM #56:	Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish. Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system. Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway. Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it) But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project. Depends. There are times when a company comes back and says the job cannot be done for the money and requests more funds. That is when shit usually hits the fan. That said companies are generally trying to win bids. Not as much worried about hitting deadlines. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889250746] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish.</quote> Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system.</quote> Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway.</quote> Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it)</quote> But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project.</quote> Depends. There are times when a company comes back and says the job cannot be done for the money and requests more funds. That is when shit usually hits the fan. That said companies are generally trying to win bids. Not as much worried about hitting deadlines.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 10/27/17 12:09:25 PM #57:	Corrik posted... Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Shaduln posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion. Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish. Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system. Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway. Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it) But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project. Depends. There are times when a company comes back and says the job cannot be done for the money and requests more funds. That is when shit usually hits the fan. That said companies are generally trying to win bids. Not as much worried about hitting deadlines. In which case they lied on their bid and will not be chosen again by this government. Winning a bid and then saying "oh that's actually not enough" is a good way to make sure your bids aren't considered in the future. --- GameFlux: Unofficial GameFAQs board browser <cite>Shaduln posted [p:889251018] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> Though I am sure the contract is probably standard. I am curious to know how many government contracts Trump personally negotiates in your opinion.</quote> Why would you just assume that? And even if you?re right, isn?t that deeply troubling? And yeah we know Trump didn?t negotiate this one, because there WAS no negotiation. There was no bidding process allowed for this project. It was just handed to Whitefish.</quote> Are you surprised? My cousins company works on bridges. They get almost double their rate to work on federal jobs than regular jobs. They also almost always do the job as slow as possible to extend it to keep working longer. (They are 12 months over schedule on their current job) Why I somewhat doubt shad's comment on reviewing government contracts thing. . The government has been over paying for work since forever. I don't know how to fix the system.</quote> Yes I'm lying about being an auditor. Davis Bacon Act (prevailing wages) is a requirement for any federal work, that is true. However, contracts are provided on a schedule and a specific amount of money. If they go over, they better have a damn good reason, otherwise they are still on the hook for finishing the job and aren't getting more money. Though most jobs are paid on a basis of how much is done vs hourly rates anyway.</quote> Went over schedule. "Took longer than expected". A lot of the problem with jobs is that people generally bid best case scenarios mostly because if every other company is you have to to compete. However, there really is not a good job vetting those bids either. War Dogs is a great example of it. (If you have seen it)</quote> But the thing is, that isn't a valid reason to get more money. They sign a contract for a certain amount of money. They get money based on percentage of project complete. "Taking longer than expected" is the contractor's error and not adding to the overall project.</quote> Depends. There are times when a company comes back and says the job cannot be done for the money and requests more funds. That is when shit usually hits the fan. That said companies are generally trying to win bids. Not as much worried about hitting deadlines.</quote> In which case they lied on their bid and will not be chosen again by this government. Winning a bid and then saying "oh that's actually not enough" is a good way to make sure your bids aren't considered in the future.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 12:12:24 PM #58:	Isn't that what you are claiming here? You doubt they can finish on time for the money? So, if they cannot do that then they will not get another contract then. What's the issue? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889251186] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Isn't that what you are claiming here? You doubt they can finish on time for the money? So, if they cannot do that then they will not get another contract then. What's the issue?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 10/27/17 12:15:04 PM #59:	No I'm saying not being tied to a schedule or audit requirements is not a normal contract. --- Posted using GameFlux Get it now for Android from Google Play! <cite>Shaduln posted [p:889251343] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>No I'm saying not being tied to a schedule or audit requirements is not a normal contract.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 12:32:59 PM #60:	Shaduln posted... No I'm saying not being tied to a schedule or audit requirements is not a normal contract. It is a disaster zone. It is impossible to foresee all delays possible. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889252360] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote>No I'm saying not being tied to a schedule or audit requirements is not a normal contract.</quote> It is a disaster zone. It is impossible to foresee all delays possible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 10/27/17 12:35:48 PM #61:	I agree that this shouldn't be a normal contract necessarily, but claiming it is normal is false. The audit part is what bugs me the most to be honest. --- GameFlux: Unofficial GameFAQs board browser <cite>Shaduln posted [p:889252516] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>I agree that this shouldn't be a normal contract necessarily, but claiming it is normal is false. The audit part is what bugs me the most to be honest.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peace___Frog 10/27/17 12:38:02 PM #62:	Lol In other news, trump's fbi has released annual crime information... that is missing 70% of datasets. Crazy that a "law and order" administration is holding back information on crime --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:889252643] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Lol In other news, trump's fbi has released annual crime information... that is missing 70% of datasets. Crazy that a "law and order" administration is holding back information on crime</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheRock1525 10/27/17 12:46:55 PM #63:	Peace___Frog posted... Lol In other news, trump's fbi has released annual crime information... that is missing 70% of datasets. Crazy that a "law and order" administration is holding back information on crime I don't know if its holding back so much as the entire government is understaffed right now and they can't get shit done. Not sure if that extends to the FBI, though. --- TheRock ~ I had a name, my father called me Blues. <cite>TheRock1525 posted [p:889253142] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Peace___Frog posted...</cite> <quote>Lol In other news, trump's fbi has released annual crime information... that is missing 70% of datasets. Crazy that a "law and order" administration is holding back information on crime</quote> I don't know if its holding back so much as the entire government is understaffed right now and they can't get shit done. Not sure if that extends to the FBI, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 1:42:39 PM #64:	Shaduln posted... I agree that this shouldn't be a normal contract necessarily, but claiming it is normal is false. The audit part is what bugs me the most to be honest. I am saying I am sure this contract is standard for disaster relief bids. I can't see them just magically making up a contract out of nowhere for one specific company. But who knows. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889256384] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shaduln posted...</cite> <quote>I agree that this shouldn't be a normal contract necessarily, but claiming it is normal is false. The audit part is what bugs me the most to be honest.</quote> I am saying I am sure this contract is standard for disaster relief bids. I can't see them just magically making up a contract out of nowhere for one specific company. But who knows.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Eddv 10/27/17 2:17:54 PM #65:	Yeah youre right corrik I have never seen millions of dollars motivate people to engage in shady behavior OR extra work. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason http://i.imgur.com/chXIw06.jpg <cite>Eddv posted [p:889258574] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Yeah youre right corrik I have never seen millions of dollars motivate people to engage in shady behavior OR extra work.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Not_an_Owl 10/27/17 2:26:38 PM #66:	Even if you want to argue that the lack of oversight or auditing is somehow "normal", take a look at this shit: https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923738930662510592 $332.41 per person for accommodations each day $79.82 per person for food each day That's a reasonable budget if you're planning a luxury vacation. If you're on a taxpayer-funded work trip? That's straight-up graft and waste. --- Besides, marijuana is far more harmful than steroids. - BlitzBomb I headbang to Bruckner. <cite>Not_an_Owl posted [p:889259081] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Even if you want to argue that the lack of oversight or auditing is somehow "normal", take a look at this shit: https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923738930662510592 $332.41 per person for accommodations each day $79.82 per person for food each day That's a reasonable budget if you're planning a luxury vacation. If you're on a taxpayer-funded work trip? That's straight-up graft and waste.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 2:39:51 PM #67:	Eddv posted... Yeah youre right corrik I have never seen millions of dollars motivate people to engage in shady behavior OR extra work. Well, you are right on that. Shady shit does happen when money is involved. I think the shadiest thing is if there is a conflict of interest with who won the bid in reference to the person who awarded the bid. That would be an ethics violation. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889259870] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah youre right corrik I have never seen millions of dollars motivate people to engage in shady behavior OR extra work.</quote> Well, you are right on that. Shady shit does happen when money is involved. I think the shadiest thing is if there is a conflict of interest with who won the bid in reference to the person who awarded the bid. That would be an ethics violation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SgtSphynx 10/27/17 3:02:42 PM #68:	Not_an_Owl posted... Even if you want to argue that the lack of oversight or auditing is somehow "normal", take a look at this shit: https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923738930662510592 $332.41 per person for accommodations each day $79.82 per person for food each day That's a reasonable budget if you're planning a luxury vacation. If you're on a taxpayer-funded work trip? That's straight-up graft and waste. For comparison, the federal government per diem rate for Puerto Rico is $91/night for lodging and $51/day for meals. That lodging price is exceptionally high regardless of where in the states/territories you are, and that meals per diem sounds like the south Florida rate. --- Congrats to the BYIG Guru Winner, BKSheikah slurps yakisoba nods nods <cite>SgtSphynx posted [p:889261259] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Not_an_Owl posted...</cite> <quote>Even if you want to argue that the lack of oversight or auditing is somehow "normal", take a look at this shit: https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/923738930662510592 $332.41 per person for accommodations each day $79.82 per person for food each day That's a reasonable budget if you're planning a luxury vacation. If you're on a taxpayer-funded work trip? That's straight-up graft and waste.</quote> For comparison, the federal government per diem rate for Puerto Rico is $91/night for lodging and $51/day for meals. That lodging price is exceptionally high regardless of where in the states/territories you are, and that meals per diem sounds like the south Florida rate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 3:44:55 PM #69:	http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889263868] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 3:47:41 PM #70:	Corrik posted... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html Once he recuses himself he needs to be arrested. Sadly we can't do that if we fire him. So I hope they keep pounding that pressure on him... <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889264037] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html</quote> Once he recuses himself he needs to be arrested. Sadly we can't do that if we fire him. So I hope they keep pounding that pressure on him...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LapisLazuli 10/27/17 4:30:17 PM #71:	https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC/status/924005963874660354 I uhhhhh....sooooooooo.... --- H E Y W A S S H I L E T S E N J O Y K A G A W A L I F E <cite>LapisLazuli posted [p:889266658] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC/status/924005963874660354 I uhhhhh....sooooooooo....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FFDragon 10/27/17 4:33:23 PM #72:	'yikes' --- If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? #theresafreakingghostafterus <cite>FFDragon posted [p:889266823] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>'yikes'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peace___Frog 10/27/17 4:40:00 PM #73:	I imagine that aliens who pretend to be human speak like trump when they're first learning how to be a human. --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:889267195] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>I imagine that aliens who pretend to be human speak like trump when they're first learning how to be a human.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 4:51:00 PM #74:	LapisLazuli posted... https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC/status/924005963874660354 I uhhhhh....sooooooooo.... Lololol --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889267804] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>LapisLazuli posted...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC/status/924005963874660354 I uhhhhh....sooooooooo....</quote> Lololol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Not_an_Owl 10/27/17 8:58:58 PM #75:	Mueller has filed charges, but they're under seal: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html --- Besides, marijuana is far more harmful than steroids. - BlitzBomb I headbang to Bruckner. <cite>Not_an_Owl posted [p:889281474] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Mueller has filed charges, but they're under seal: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 9:04:15 PM #76:	Not_an_Owl posted... Mueller has filed charges, but they're under seal: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html He sure rushed this once it came out he was part of this investigation as he did illicit things, Huh? <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889281751] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Not_an_Owl posted...</cite> <quote>Mueller has filed charges, but they're under seal: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html</quote> He sure rushed this once it came out he was part of this investigation as he did illicit things, Huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dowolf 10/27/17 9:22:53 PM #77:	yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements. --- Nonsense. "Testing" is for when you're still guessing--and now, I have no need to guess. -- Agatha, Girl Genius <cite>dowolf posted [p:889282704] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 9:26:21 PM #78:	dowolf posted... yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements. I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime. <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889282848] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements.</quote> I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dowolf 10/27/17 9:55:33 PM #79:	protip: a propagandist shouldn't insult the person they're trying to brainwash. --- Nonsense. "Testing" is for when you're still guessing--and now, I have no need to guess. -- Agatha, Girl Genius <cite>dowolf posted [p:889284278] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>protip: a propagandist shouldn't insult the person they're trying to brainwash.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 9:59:21 PM #80:	dowolf posted... protip: a propagandist shouldn't insult the person they're trying to brainwash. You don't get to talk about propaganda. Your entire party and news source is World War II Italy levels of it.... <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889284458] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>protip: a propagandist shouldn't insult the person they're trying to brainwash.</quote> You don't get to talk about propaganda. Your entire party and news source is World War II Italy levels of it....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:07:20 PM #81:	SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements. I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime. Whats Trump gonna do about it? --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889284879] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements.</quote> I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime.</quote> Whats Trump gonna do about it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 10:10:54 PM #82:	Jakyl25 posted... SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements. I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime. Whats Trump gonna do about it? Well. He was an asshole that didn't recuse himself. So Trump can't arrest him now as it would look awful. If I were him I would just pardon everyone before they are even officially indicted, and sign an EO immediately and with no impunity dissolving the FBI and any currently ongoing and future investigations. After that. I don't know. You have to get Mueller, but I really don't know how since you dissolved the FBI. Give the CIA additional duties since you got rid of the FBI and appoint someone to investigate Mueller and his dealings with the DNC. Maybe. I don't know. How to get him is really hard now... <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889285081] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements.</quote> I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime.</quote> Whats Trump gonna do about it?</quote> Well. He was an asshole that didn't recuse himself. So Trump can't arrest him now as it would look awful. If I were him I would just pardon everyone before they are even officially indicted, and sign an EO immediately and with no impunity dissolving the FBI and any currently ongoing and future investigations. After that. I don't know. You have to get Mueller, but I really don't know how since you dissolved the FBI. Give the CIA additional duties since you got rid of the FBI and appoint someone to investigate Mueller and his dealings with the DNC. Maybe. I don't know. How to get him is really hard now...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 10:11:36 PM #83:	SSJBGenkiDama posted... Jakyl25 posted... SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements. I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime. Whats Trump gonna do about it? Well. He was an asshole that didn't recuse himself. So Trump can't arrest him now as it would look awful. If I were him I would just pardon everyone before they are even officially indicted, and sign an EO immediately and with no impunity dissolving the FBI and any currently ongoing and future investigations. After that. I don't know. You have to get Mueller, but I really don't know how since you dissolved the FBI. lmfao --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889285114] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>yes. "huh" is the correct response to clearly BS statements.</quote> I guess you don't pay attention to news (makes sense... liberal sheep and all). Might want to check the past couple days. Multiple reports have come out showing that Mueller is absolutely implicated. And therefore he has now committed a federal crime.</quote> Whats Trump gonna do about it?</quote> Well. He was an asshole that didn't recuse himself. So Trump can't arrest him now as it would look awful. If I were him I would just pardon everyone before they are even officially indicted, and sign an EO immediately and with no impunity dissolving the FBI and any currently ongoing and future investigations. After that. I don't know. You have to get Mueller, but I really don't know how since you dissolved the FBI.</quote> lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kevwaffles 10/27/17 10:13:06 PM #84:	The desperation is palpable. --- "One toot on this whistle will take you to a far away land." -Toad, SMB3 <cite>kevwaffles posted [p:889285186] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>The desperation is palpable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 10/27/17 10:16:18 PM #85:	I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:889285327] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:19:39 PM #86:	Inviso posted... I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan. Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest? --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889285481] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan.</quote> Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 10/27/17 10:21:19 PM #87:	Jakyl25 posted... Inviso posted... I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan. Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest? The conflict of interest. You know, the one that's bullshit and not being covered by anyone reputable. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:889285558] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan.</quote> Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest?</quote> The conflict of interest. You know, the one that's bullshit and not being covered by anyone reputable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dowolf 10/27/17 10:22:49 PM #88:	The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source. --- Nonsense. "Testing" is for when you're still guessing--and now, I have no need to guess. -- Agatha, Girl Genius <cite>dowolf posted [p:889285615] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 10:25:20 PM #89:	Inviso posted... Jakyl25 posted... Inviso posted... I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan. Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest? The conflict of interest. You know, the one that's bullshit and not being covered by anyone reputable. It's been covered by WSJ. Which is easily the most ruputable news organization in a sea of fake news who have been proven to doctor footage and misrepresent. <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889285744] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>I can't find anything about this Mueller thing aside from a multitude of whiny conservative snowflakes' blogs talking shit about him and Hillary and Obama and Comey and every other Democrat that doesn't bend over and take it up the ass from Trump and his clan.</quote> Which thing, the charges hes presented or the potential conflict of interest?</quote> The conflict of interest. You know, the one that's bullshit and not being covered by anyone reputable.</quote> It's been covered by WSJ. Which is easily the most ruputable news organization in a sea of fake news who have been proven to doctor footage and misrepresent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 10/27/17 10:25:38 PM #90:	Wait wait, I found a Newsweek article. Are you fucking KIDDING ME? We're bringing back a "scandal" from before the fucking election that we ALREADY FUCKING COVERED?! Between this, the six month later Seth Rich non-story, and the one football season later story bitching about Colin Kaepernick...do NONE of the conservatrolls find it ODD that they keep getting mad about the SAME stories being dredged up MONTHS after they stopped carrying any weight the first time? Do they not find it odd that, in the middle of a fucking trainwreck of a presidency, there is this concerted effort, specifically from the right wing, to push unrelated scandals? --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:889285756] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Wait wait, I found a Newsweek article. Are you fucking KIDDING ME? We're bringing back a "scandal" from before the fucking election that we ALREADY FUCKING COVERED?! Between this, the six month later Seth Rich non-story, and the one football season later story bitching about Colin Kaepernick...do NONE of the conservatrolls find it ODD that they keep getting mad about the SAME stories being dredged up MONTHS after they stopped carrying any weight the first time? Do they not find it odd that, in the middle of a fucking trainwreck of a presidency, there is this concerted effort, specifically from the right wing, to push unrelated scandals?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:25:58 PM #91:	https://twitter.com/davidbegnaud/status/923968661538275329 The Maria death toll is getting catastrophic. Not all of these deaths are due to post-Hurricane conditions, surely, but I bet most were. --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889285774] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/davidbegnaud/status/923968661538275329 The Maria death toll is getting catastrophic. Not all of these deaths are due to post-Hurricane conditions, surely, but I bet most were.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 10:26:29 PM #92:	dowolf posted... The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source. Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit. <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889285800] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source.</quote> Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:32:04 PM #93:	SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source. Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit. I read that Trump was elected President on CNN... --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889286071] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source.</quote> Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit.</quote> I read that Trump was elected President on CNN...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reg 10/27/17 10:33:12 PM #94:	Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now... --- Congratulations to BKSheikah, winner of the BYIG Guru Contest <cite>Reg posted [p:889286128] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJBGenkiDama 10/27/17 10:35:23 PM #95:	Jakyl25 posted... SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source. Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit. I read that Trump was elected President on CNN... Fair enough. Fake till corroborated by an actual legit news source. Obviously CNN spoke of the eclipse in August. But the story should have been viewed as bullshit till WSJ said yes it's a thing. <cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted [p:889286234] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source.</quote> Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit.</quote> I read that Trump was elected President on CNN...</quote> Fair enough. Fake till corroborated by an actual legit news source. Obviously CNN spoke of the eclipse in August. But the story should have been viewed as bullshit till WSJ said yes it's a thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:35:42 PM #96:	Reg posted... Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now... But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889286251] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now...</quote> But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 10/27/17 10:36:56 PM #97:	SSJBGenkiDama posted... Jakyl25 posted... SSJBGenkiDama posted... dowolf posted... The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source. Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit. I read that Trump was elected President on CNN... Fair enough. Fake till corroborated by an actual legit news source. Obviously CNN spoke of the eclipse in August. But the story should have been viewed as bullshit till WSJ said yes it's a thing. lmfao --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:889286320] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJBGenkiDama posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dowolf posted...</cite> <quote>The implication that I am a Democrat is almost as insulting as the implication I only read one news source.</quote> Everything you libs read is fake. From CNN to huff post. It's literally all bullshit.</quote> I read that Trump was elected President on CNN...</quote> Fair enough. Fake till corroborated by an actual legit news source. Obviously CNN spoke of the eclipse in August. But the story should have been viewed as bullshit till WSJ said yes it's a thing.</quote> lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 10/27/17 10:37:10 PM #98:	I wonder if MWC realizes that the Mueller "news" the Wall Street Journal published was actually an editorial. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:889286330] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote>I wonder if MWC realizes that the Mueller "news" the Wall Street Journal published was actually an editorial.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Not_an_Owl 10/27/17 10:38:22 PM #99:	Jakyl25 posted... Reg posted... Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now... But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI Are you suggesting that inane bullshit like that is worth reading? --- Besides, marijuana is far more harmful than steroids. - BlitzBomb I headbang to Bruckner. <cite>Not_an_Owl posted [p:889286390] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now...</quote> But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI</quote> Are you suggesting that inane bullshit like that is worth reading?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 10/27/17 10:39:49 PM #100:	Not_an_Owl posted... Jakyl25 posted... Reg posted... Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now... But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI Are you suggesting that inane bullshit like that is worth reading? Moreso than a debate about blacks on TV in the 90s. --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:889286469] in Politics C... [t:75918724]...</cite> <quote><cite>Not_an_Owl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Can you guys not quote mwc posts? I mean really now...</quote> But how else will we get stuff like Trump needs to immediately dissolve the FBI</quote> Are you suggesting that inane bullshit like that is worth reading?</quote> Moreso than a debate about blacks on TV in the 90s.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 143: Finally Exposing Rafael Cruz (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 143: Finally Exposing Rafael Cruz