Current Events > Fantasy football QB advice needed.

Topic List	Page List: 1
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 6:12:22 PM #1:	Stafford @ MIN, Wentz @ LAC, or Siemian at home vs OAK? I currently have Stafford and Luck, trying to hold Luck til he gets back but it's becoming increasingly difficult with some of the bad matchups Stafford has early on this season. I guess I could drop Luck, but I'm considering dropping Stafford for one of these guys and just streaming QBs until Luck returns. Thoughts? Pretty standard QB scoring in our league btw. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887406914] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Stafford @ MIN, Wentz @ LAC, or Siemian at home vs OAK? I currently have Stafford and Luck, trying to hold Luck til he gets back but it's becoming increasingly difficult with some of the bad matchups Stafford has early on this season. I guess I could drop Luck, but I'm considering dropping Stafford for one of these guys and just streaming QBs until Luck returns. Thoughts? Pretty standard QB scoring in our league btw.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 8:05:30 PM #2:	CE being no help as usual --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887412612] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>CE being no help as usual</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Compsognathus 09/27/17 8:18:07 PM #3:	Wentz @ LAC would be my call. Chargers D is nothing special. That said, Stafford has a tendency to put up points even on decent defenses like the Vikings. Semen should never be considered a QB1 option. He can have good games, but that's in spite of his mediocrity. --- raptorsclaw37: March 10, 2004-May 28, 2006 <cite>Compsognathus posted [p:887413257] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Wentz @ LAC would be my call. Chargers D is nothing special. That said, Stafford has a tendency to put up points even on decent defenses like the Vikings. Semen should never be considered a QB1 option. He can have good games, but that's in spite of his mediocrity.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/27/17 8:21:38 PM #4:	I'd go Wentz. Wtf happened to your draft that these are your options? --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:887413439] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>I'd go Wentz. Wtf happened to your draft that these are your options?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/27/17 8:24:03 PM #5:	N1NJAREB0RN posted... dropping Stafford Literally living up to your tag of sports clown --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:887413547] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted...</cite> <quote>dropping Stafford</quote> Literally living up to your tag of sports clown</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CountrySlicker3 09/27/17 8:24:19 PM #6:	I agree with above. Wentz is a good choice, as is Stafford. Lists I've seen mostly have those two ranked near each other so it's really a toss up. Siemian is a lower tier QB by every measure I've seen, but he still has his weeks. I think any choice is justifiable and making the absolute best one is impossible to predict. <cite>CountrySlicker3 posted [p:887413562] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>I agree with above. Wentz is a good choice, as is Stafford. Lists I've seen mostly have those two ranked near each other so it's really a toss up. Siemian is a lower tier QB by every measure I've seen, but he still has his weeks. I think any choice is justifiable and making the absolute best one is impossible to predict.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 8:24:31 PM #7:	MabusIncarnate posted... I'd go Wentz. Wtf happened to your draft that these are your options? I was the last person to take a QB. I always try to be the last to take one, but I did fuck up taking Luck. Also nearly everyone in our league is a moron and has 2-3 QBs on their roster at all times even when they have Rodgers / Brees / Brady. So that didn't help. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887413568] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>I'd go Wentz. Wtf happened to your draft that these are your options?</quote> I was the last person to take a QB. I always try to be the last to take one, but I did fuck up taking Luck. Also nearly everyone in our league is a moron and has 2-3 QBs on their roster at all times even when they have Rodgers / Brees / Brady. So that didn't help.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GODTIER 09/27/17 8:25:17 PM #8:	Stafford --- #freesquader <cite>GODTIER posted [p:887413603] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Stafford</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/27/17 8:26:13 PM #9:	RB QB RB should always be your first 3 picks. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:887413652] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>RB QB RB should always be your first 3 picks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GODTIER 09/27/17 8:26:50 PM #10:	MabusIncarnate posted... RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks. Or WR RB RB --- #freesquader <cite>GODTIER posted [p:887413682] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks.</quote> Or WR RB RB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Old NoiseTank 09/27/17 8:28:46 PM #11:	keep streaming baby. i'd go siemian this week. --- "You ought to take the cash cab. You'll actually make money by riding in it as long as you don't screw up three times." - mitchells2003 <cite>Old NoiseTank posted [p:887413775] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>keep streaming baby. i'd go siemian this week.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/27/17 8:30:06 PM #12:	GODTIER posted... MabusIncarnate posted... RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks. Or WR RB RB Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:887413847] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks.</quote> Or WR RB RB</quote> Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pancake 09/27/17 8:31:10 PM #13:	stafford all the way --- https://i.imgtc.com/xSHXlNj.gif <cite>Pancake posted [p:887413898] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>stafford all the way</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 9:50:28 PM #14:	MabusIncarnate posted... GODTIER posted... MabusIncarnate posted... RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks. Or WR RB RB Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR. Our league is full point PPR. I went WR WR WR TE WR my first 5 rounds. I regret that 4th WR at this point since it was Allen Robinson and he didn't even make it one game without getting injured but a WR / TE heavy team dominates our league every year. The winner isn't ever the one to draft Leveon Bell or Demarco Murray or whatever the top backs are. It's the one to get 3 WRs and a TE who get 10+ targets per game and a couple PPR backs like Woodhead or Sproles. And I disagree with taking a QB early. Even top QBs have clunker games and the difference between the 1st and 12th QB is never big enough to justify sacrificing real depth at more injury prone positions. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887418014] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks.</quote> Or WR RB RB</quote> Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR.</quote> Our league is full point PPR. I went WR WR WR TE WR my first 5 rounds. I regret that 4th WR at this point since it was Allen Robinson and he didn't even make it one game without getting injured but a WR / TE heavy team dominates our league every year. The winner isn't ever the one to draft Leveon Bell or Demarco Murray or whatever the top backs are. It's the one to get 3 WRs and a TE who get 10+ targets per game and a couple PPR backs like Woodhead or Sproles. And I disagree with taking a QB early. Even top QBs have clunker games and the difference between the 1st and 12th QB is never big enough to justify sacrificing real depth at more injury prone positions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/27/17 9:53:47 PM #15:	Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887418209] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 9:55:44 PM #16:	Kineth posted... Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made. Damn dude did you not read any of my post? I have Luck and Stafford. I haven't dropped anyone yet either. Just considering my options this week since I don't like Stafford @MIN. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887418322] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made.</quote> Damn dude did you not read any of my post? I have Luck and Stafford. I haven't dropped anyone yet either. Just considering my options this week since I don't like Stafford @MIN.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 09/27/17 9:56:28 PM #17:	We use a messed up system, but Stafford is like...top 5 so I can't imagine he's too low in standard scoring, and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind, which usually leads to high scores (even if they aren't wins). --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:887418369] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>We use a messed up system, but Stafford is like...top 5 so I can't imagine he's too low in standard scoring, and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind, which usually leads to high scores (even if they aren't wins).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/27/17 9:57:20 PM #18:	Anteaterking posted... and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind, bwhahahahahahahahahahaha --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:887418409] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote>and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind,</quote> bwhahahahahahahahahahaha</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/27/17 9:57:31 PM #19:	N1NJAREB0RN posted... Kineth posted... Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made. Damn dude did you not read any of my post? No, I didn't read the update. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887418420] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made.</quote> Damn dude did you not read any of my post?</quote> No, I didn't read the update.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 9:58:26 PM #20:	Anteaterking posted... We use a messed up system, but Stafford is like...top 5 so I can't imagine he's too low in standard scoring, and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind, which usually leads to high scores (even if they aren't wins). Stafford is 8th in our league. Wentz is 4th. Siemian is 9th. I'm thinking of dropping either Stafford or Luck for Wentz. Is it really worth holding onto Luck? --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887418461] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote>We use a messed up system, but Stafford is like...top 5 so I can't imagine he's too low in standard scoring, and Sunday is likely going to be a game where he's playing from behind, which usually leads to high scores (even if they aren't wins).</quote> Stafford is 8th in our league. Wentz is 4th. Siemian is 9th. I'm thinking of dropping either Stafford or Luck for Wentz. Is it really worth holding onto Luck?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 9:59:16 PM #21:	Kineth posted... N1NJAREB0RN posted... Kineth posted... Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made. Damn dude did you not read any of my post? No, I didn't read the update. I mean I literally said all that in my opening post and it hasn't been edited so it sounds more like you didn't read anything. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887418500] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Why do you have 3 QBs. Also dropping Stafford was probably the worst move to have made.</quote> Damn dude did you not read any of my post?</quote> No, I didn't read the update.</quote> I mean I literally said all that in my opening post and it hasn't been edited so it sounds more like you didn't read anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/27/17 10:07:19 PM #22:	Yeah, well you're the one having a hard time figuring out that you should start Stafford instead of 2 bums and an injured QB. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887418937] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, well you're the one having a hard time figuring out that you should start Stafford instead of 2 bums and an injured QB.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
N1NJAREB0RN 09/27/17 10:09:21 PM #23:	Kineth posted... Yeah, well you're the one having a hard time figuring out that you should start Stafford instead of 2 bums and an injured QB. Several analysts have both those guys above Stafford this week, hence the question. So shut the hell up and get out of my topic. --- PSN: N1NJAREB0RN <cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted [p:887419040] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, well you're the one having a hard time figuring out that you should start Stafford instead of 2 bums and an injured QB.</quote> Several analysts have both those guys above Stafford this week, hence the question. So shut the hell up and get out of my topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/27/17 10:15:45 PM #24:	Hey, you're the one that's continually responding to me after I admitted that I fucked up. Maybe don't be an overbearing douche. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887419353] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Hey, you're the one that's continually responding to me after I admitted that I fucked up. Maybe don't be an overbearing douche.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/27/17 10:22:17 PM #25:	"guys i dont think qbs are worth it, but i literally drafted luck and am now wondering if it's worth keeping him' ~ some clown --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:887419698] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>"guys i dont think qbs are worth it, but i literally drafted luck and am now wondering if it's worth keeping him' ~ some clown</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/27/17 10:24:35 PM #26:	N1NJAREB0RN posted... MabusIncarnate posted... GODTIER posted... MabusIncarnate posted... RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks. Or WR RB RB Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR. Our league is full point PPR. I went WR WR WR TE WR my first 5 rounds. I regret that 4th WR at this point since it was Allen Robinson and he didn't even make it one game without getting injured but a WR / TE heavy team dominates our league every year. The winner isn't ever the one to draft Leveon Bell or Demarco Murray or whatever the top backs are. It's the one to get 3 WRs and a TE who get 10+ targets per game and a couple PPR backs like Woodhead or Sproles. And I disagree with taking a QB early. Even top QBs have clunker games and the difference between the 1st and 12th QB is never big enough to justify sacrificing real depth at more injury prone positions. So is mine, I didn't take a WR til the 4th round. I'm the only undefeated team in the league right now of 12 teams. Brady has basically single handedly won me week 2 and 3 also, having a strong QB is extremely important, plus i'm not faced with who to start against who except for the one bye week. I've also been in this league for 14 seasons. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:887419820] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote><cite>N1NJAREB0RN posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>RB WB RB should always be your first 3 picks.</quote> Or WR RB RB</quote> Meant RB QB RB The way I see it, there are at best 10 quality starting QB and the rest are mediocre to decent. Closer to 20 RB but the same difference. There are 90 starting WR on each team total, and typically 2 are worth starting, so there's 60 of those right off the bat. A lot of WR emerge and can be plucked off of waivers if you pay attention, much more commonly than a QB or a RB. There are many more viable options at WR opposed to QB and RB, which is why I never spend any of my first 3 picks on a WR.</quote> Our league is full point PPR. I went WR WR WR TE WR my first 5 rounds. I regret that 4th WR at this point since it was Allen Robinson and he didn't even make it one game without getting injured but a WR / TE heavy team dominates our league every year. The winner isn't ever the one to draft Leveon Bell or Demarco Murray or whatever the top backs are. It's the one to get 3 WRs and a TE who get 10+ targets per game and a couple PPR backs like Woodhead or Sproles. And I disagree with taking a QB early. Even top QBs have clunker games and the difference between the 1st and 12th QB is never big enough to justify sacrificing real depth at more injury prone positions.</quote> So is mine, I didn't take a WR til the 4th round. I'm the only undefeated team in the league right now of 12 teams. Brady has basically single handedly won me week 2 and 3 also, having a strong QB is extremely important, plus i'm not faced with who to start against who except for the one bye week. I've also been in this league for 14 seasons.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Compsognathus 09/27/17 11:50:22 PM #27:	Do not drop Stafford. He is a reliable, high-scoring fantasy QB. Ride him out until Luck comes back and then play it game by game. Never trust Semen. --- raptorsclaw37: March 10, 2004-May 28, 2006 <cite>Compsognathus posted [p:887424368] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Do not drop Stafford. He is a reliable, high-scoring fantasy QB. Ride him out until Luck comes back and then play it game by game. Never trust Semen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperExcitebike 09/27/17 11:56:27 PM #28:	Stream Siemian. Oakland secondary is trash --- SMU Mustangs/Jayhawks/Texans/Rockets/Astros http://followmy.tv/u/Excitebike <cite>SuperExcitebike posted [p:887424667] in Fantasy fo... [t:75820869]...</cite> <quote>Stream Siemian. Oakland secondary is trash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Fantasy football QB advice needed. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Fantasy football QB advice needed.